The point is though, that the player can't really clear himself if he don't know what he's being accused of.
And I'm certainly not biased against the casinos, I can link you to multiple comments where I defend casinos. Here's one: Leovegas balance wiped. And I don't even play on LeoVegas. I might seem biased when compared to most users on this site for being 50/50 and not always believing the casino. I, for one, believe in innocent until proven guilty (and no, not letting the victim defend himself against accusations doesn't count as "proven").
I also keep repeating that I don't think they should give further details either. Letting him (not the forum, just him) know why his money was taken doesn't give him any information of know how he got caught. To people here, a site filled with affiliates who rely on these sites for their livelihood, this might seem fair. But as somebody neutral who hasn't been here very long, who's used to how it works in the real world (and who recently came out of a 7 month trial), the process appears extremely biased. If I wasn't allowed to hear and defend myself against the things my ex said about me, I wouldn't have my son today. And the excuse you repeat simply doesn't hold up. All criminals get to know what they're charged of, just the basic knowledge of what crime it is doesn't give them advantages IF they really did do it. Because if they did it, they'd already know what the crime was.
There are several warning about casinos from the same platform, where the casino hasn't been able to give Maxd the proof he needs in a PAB, to judge against a player. That tells me that he will be fair if this player do a PAB.
The fact that the OP is willing to let it go and just want to warn other players tells me what side to be on. Also offer to have the thread closed for information about what they have seen, is making me very suspicious.
I would love to see a PAB in this case.