- Joined
- May 10, 2014
- Location
- UK
If we go back 10 years, I would have expected RTS 7C (likelihood of results occurring on "real devices") to have covered it - particularly given (current language) "including substituting losing events with near-miss losing events".
Somehow, that either hasn't been applied correctly or hasn't kept pace with the industry - and if the current understanding that you mentioned earlier is anything outside the game space is fair game (I assume because it's not a losing event), then the genie is out of the bottle and anything goes.
That probably explains the scenario where FOBT players (including video recordings) have observed non-selected pie gambles winning with surprisingly high frequency. It wasn't the one selected so it's not subject to fair play principles.
Somehow, that either hasn't been applied correctly or hasn't kept pace with the industry - and if the current understanding that you mentioned earlier is anything outside the game space is fair game (I assume because it's not a losing event), then the genie is out of the bottle and anything goes.
That probably explains the scenario where FOBT players (including video recordings) have observed non-selected pie gambles winning with surprisingly high frequency. It wasn't the one selected so it's not subject to fair play principles.