- Joined
- Apr 27, 2009
- Location
- the land of snow and maple syrup
im more interested why the OP is sidestepping answering if hes reached out to the rep or is going to review a PAB
ok? what makes you think anyone else would, and it has absolutely no relevance to this thread. Why won't you answer my simple questions?sorry found in interesting that they kept the money and did not return it to players and got fined
what questionsok? what makes you think anyone else would, and it has absolutely no relevance to this thread. Why won't you answer my simple questions?
Royal Panda seized my depositwhat questions
i opened it in 2017 i probley didnt like the website. if i was going to do anything wrong i would of done it sooner self exckuded nearly 2 years ago and forgot.
You probably wouldn't.why would someone self exclude then wait 2 years it was a mistake
Seize any funds remaining in the player’s duplicate account(s), including deposited funds and winnings won by the player using said account(s).When a person takes something that belongs to somebody else without permission, that is stealing. The stolen object can be as small as a piece of candy or as big as a car. It can be taken from someone a person knows or from a stranger.
Blimey That is 15 minutes I will NEVER get back.
Yep, but watch out, Royal Panda is Holy Grail which is not allowed to be spoken bad about.Isn't the bone of contention the deposit being kept, not the winnings?
It seems to me that every man,women and their dog with a self exclusion issue are using CM as a platform of choice in order to get their gambling buzz via a second account at a casino as a fail safe method of limiting their loses should they lose or win and get found out.
For me they seem to be entertained in CM way too often which only perpetuates more new sign ups to CM in order to follow the same method of extracting their money back from very reputable Casino's.
Personally,I would like to see future self excluded complainants be limited to posting their basic details of complaint followed by being asked a few relevant questions alongside direction to the rules before having the thread frozen pending any investigation. This will prevent those with a gripe from manipulating events and google searches which can unfairly harm the casino.
I don't believe that new members signing up specifically for to post their self excluded depositing issues should be automatically be given a platform to post as much as they want when they are unwilling to even address crucial questions posed to them by experienced members.
Just my opinion.
I agree but that is another issue even though it is directly related.See if the UKGC made clear their position on this you wouldn't have any exclusion issues, no cat and mouse, no casino refunding whilst others don't, no players circumventing this knowing they wouldn't get winnings/losses back. It's not difficult. It's totally open to interpretation when there should be no dubiety over such a serious subject.
I agree but that is another issue even though it is directly related.
I just think that as a reputable gambling related forum reputable casino's need a little more support when being under endless attack in here when the complainant is unwilling to play ball
I thought this was a players forum? Yes, we can bash casinos or fellow players but at the end of the day it's open. People have differing views/arguments but that's what it's purpose is! It would be very boring if there weren't. Because of the dubiety I mentioned then these threads/issues will pop up numerous times over and over.
Yep, but watch out, Royal Panda is Holy Grail which is not allowed to be spoken bad about.