Palace group Flim Flammery
In response to the original post.
The problems come in when we look at trends and play and see definite signs that someone is betting a certain way after receiving bonus money which is not in the spirit of fair play and not the reason we give offers and bonuses to our players.
I played allowed games, under the betting cap you have imposed through the software and made sufficient wagers to clear your requirements. How can you even begin to suggest that I did not play fairly? When I gamble at a casino, I'm trying to win the casino's money, the casino is trying to win my money. That's how it is. I can't beleive that a big grown up casino is whinging that it's "not fair" that a player won from them. Where was your spirit of fair play when you decided to invoke this impossible to adhere to rule to deny my winnings?
Lets get this straight. You don't give bonuses to new players out of the kindness of your hearts. The ten pages of rules regarding bonuses (which are fatally flawed), game restrictions and bet capping make this perfectly clear. You give the bonuses to attract players so you can make money off them. Nearly all lose is my guess given the heavy restrictions. If I had lost you'd have made money off me. If you are a
fair casino, you would apply this rule in the same way for everyone who plays at your casino. That means you should either pay me or you should be sending everyone who ever played with a bonus and lost their deposits back as we speak. Are you on that yet? No? I think I could rest my case right here but I'll carry on.
Our terms do state what we do not allow and if players would like to clarify what they may or may not do prior to claiming and betting they are welcome to contact us.
Oh really? Are you suggesting that if I got in touch before playing I could have had this conversation:
Player: "Hey! If I deposit 10 do I get a 10 bonus from you?"
Support: "Yes sir"
Player: "Can I play slot machines with the money?"
Support: "Yes sir"
Player: "I can play slot machines at 1 a go? The whole 20? Without penalty?"
Support: "Apart from the last 1 sir, if you play it you will be breaking our rule which clearly(!) states that you cannot bet the majority of your balance. if you play with the last -=*magical*=- 1 we'd have to return your deposit."
Player: "So. If I lose the first 19 spins and then deliberately bet the last 1, I will be breaking your rules and you would return my deposit?"
Support: "Yes sir"
Player: "I think I just worked out how to play at your casino with absolutely no risk whatsoever! Please give me the bonus"
The 20% bonus offer on the reversal was an error and should not have been sent out. This does not detract that once the withdrawal was submitted and analysed the player did in fact break terms which they agreed to when registering with us.
That offer wasn't sent in error was it? It was a last ditch attempt at getting me to not withdraw by ofering me a bonus incentive. When that didn't work you invoked the impossible to abide by rule. I agreed to the spirit of the rules not the twisted version that you applied when you decided to deny me my winnings.
Players who play with us know we are a reputable group who does not need to revert to any underhand tactics. We do however strongly believe that a business needs to protect itself.
Sure a business needs to protect itself, that's why you have a wagering requirement and disallow most of your games while a bonus is in play oh, and you limit the maximum a player can bet too. I think it's fairly clear from this thread and your wishy washy reply that the Palace group are
not acting reputably and have in fact resorted to very underhand tactics indeed to deny my payout.
You can still turn this around Palace Group. Admit you made a mistake, change the rule so it is absolutely clear
and fair! and pay me.