external image

Betfair Bonus Fiasco

Please find below the response from our casino team. Should you have any further complaints the addresses and phone numbers below should be used.

On the weekend of the 13/14th November Betfair ran a promotion for its casino product. It subsequently came to our attention that certain customers exploited the spirit of this promotion. The accounts of all customers that took part have been reviewed by Betfair, and corrective action has been taken where appropriate for those who acted in contravention of our terms and conditions.

Betfair has corresponded directly with all customers who were affected by this. If any customer would like to discuss the matter further, they may contact the LGA in Malta by e-mailing [email protected] or telephoning +356 21316590.

Betfair Casino Team

So same reply here from the rep as well, I originally emailed the casino asking why my bonuses were removed for no reason. Got no response whatsover so decided to PM the rep.

Looks like he is working off a script. Says a lot for Betfair really, they have litterally no customer care ethics whatsoever. No apology, nothing. They won't even admit they 'made a mistake' publicly. They are apportioning blame to customers.

People who have lost money on this promotion, by which I mean claiming the bonus and actually getting less back than your original deposit during play. I would advise to contact your bank and perform a chargeback for the funds lost as you were actually decieved into depositing for an offer that they haven't honoured.

It is quite clear Betfair encouraged customers to deposit into the casino under false pretences by offering an incentive they had no intention of honouring. It is really dirty play, the right thing to do would be to admit they made a mistake and offer some kind of incentive as an apology.

This is the worst case of fraud by a casino I have ever witnessed.
 
I too, have had exactly the same response. I even said in my message to the rep that all I'd had in the past was standard messages, that were obviously copied to many hundreds or thousands of people. If I couldn't have my winnings back, all I wanted was a specific answer as to what I'd done wrong, not just some crap about "spirit of the promotion".

If I really have done something wrong, please just tell me what I've done. I played slots and casino holdem.

It was bad enough having my winnings stolen, but it's even worse when you're accused of wrongdoing when you believe you're innocent - and not even getting a chance to respond.
 
And same old response for me too.

Note how it is now from 'The BetFair Team' rather than 'Richard', which is who I have been conversing with via PM.

BetFair rep - If you have any shred of decency or honesty then tell us (publically or PM) exactly what we have done wrong.

If you are unable to give a clear, explicit and justifiable reason why our money was taken then we can assume that BetFair is Rogue and that you, on behalf of BetFair wish to be known as Rogue.

Please respond with 24 hours.
 
ROGUE CASINO!

Hi all, I signed up here in order to discuss this with the Betfair rep but have just had the same cut 'n' paste email as everyone else.
:mad:
ROGUE CASINO!
 
I would advice everyone affected to PAB.(Pitch a bitch)
Pulver, havent you read all of the posts of this thread?
maxd said that betfair ignores the PABs:


I see this one Jetset, which other one were you thinking of?:
BETFAIR ONLINE SCANDAL BREWING

FWIW, Betfair is not responding to the PABs we have submitted to them, including those related to this specific issue. The only active representative here, Alex C Betfair, has simply told us that all issues must be submitted to [email protected] which get bounced back as undeliverable (email sent to [email protected] gets an auto-response). Rep says he is unable to respond to or become involved with player compliants.
therefore Bryan removed them from the list of accredited casinos:
Betfair has been removed from the Accredited section.

I am extremely dismayed on how Betfair has handled this situation. Actually, it's rather shameful and disrespects all casinos listed in the Accredited section.

This is the fourth casino removed in the past couple of weeks due to being non-communicative.
then betfair assigned a new casino rep to this forum promising he would review each complaint and Bryan decided that betfair remains accredited because of this:
Looks like we've made quite a bit of progress in a short period of time.

I was contacted by Betfair who will be assigning another casino rep to the forum. He has expressed that they should have been more communicative over this entire mess. I have been assured that each complaint will be reviewed and that those accounts that have been locked so far are being audited at the moment.

Sort of reminds me of the Fortune Lounge bonus fiasco some years ago.

As long as they maintain their communicativeness and they take care of each player issue individually and fairly, they will remain accredited.



Bwin, Villento, Rich Reels Casino.
Bryan hoped that betfair changes their policy and pays the players who didnt breach any terms:
The main thing is that Betfair is auditing each and every account. If terms and conditions haven't been broken, then the player should be paid. I believe that the massive lock-down and form letter email was a knee-jerk reaction to the results of a badly written promo. I anticipate that all players will be dealt with in a fair manner. It may take some time - but the ball is rolling.
but several players have posted that betfairs new rep is not helpful as they get useless replies and betfair obviously still doesnt want to pay players even if they didnt breach any terms. betfair says the players "exploited the spirit of the promotion" but that is too vague. in the standards for accredited casinos (https://www.casinomeister.com/accredited-casinos/) it says:

"Must not confiscate winnings for vague & unclear reasons, such as "irregular playing patterns" or "bonus abuse", without specific T&C violations."

but this is exactly what betfair is doing. they confiscate winnings by using their FU clause and they refuse to explain what the players have exactly done wrong. they can confiscate the winnings of players who used the roulette trick (betting on all of the numbers in order to make a guaranteed profit) but they confiscated the winnings of players who played different games like slots and casino holdem which means these players didnt play in a risk free way. what is really strange about it is that they paid some players who played these games (not roulette) and they didnt pay some who played in the same way.

when Bryan removed betfair from the accredited list they wanted to prevent this of course as this could cost them a lot of money in the long run. so they promised him to review all the confiscations but actually it looks like this was just a trick and they fooled Bryan. so shouldnt they be removed from the accredited list or maybe even be thrown into the rogue pit now?

and it doesnt make sense to PAB now I think. or have I misunderstood something?
 
I've had a reply from the Betfair rep, i've copied it here as there is no personal information (and like all correpsondance i've had with Betfair over this, I assume it's a "round robin" message)



Bolding added by myself. If this isn't grounds for throwing them in the rogue pit I don't know what is.

Fine, the rep ADMITS IN WRITING that they have INTENTIONALLY violated the standards for accreditation, and have NO INTENTION of changing their minds.

Player and Responsible Gaming Focused

Must forbid underage play.
Must have a clean history of fairness towards their customers.
Must be able to take care of any player issue swiftly and professionally.
Must display information about responsible gambling, with links to relevant organizations.
Must offer and enforce spending limits in addition to both temporary and permanent self exclusion options.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marketing Standards

Must not use false, misleading or deceptive advertising.
Must not spam, and must take appropriate actions against any affiliates or any third parties who do spam.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operational Standards

Must pay winnings in a timely manner.
Must not disqualify any player from a payout if terms & conditions are met, except for situations of fraud (multiple-accounts, bogus ID documents, chargebacks, etc.,).
Must not confiscate winnings for vague & unclear reasons, such as "irregular playing patterns" or "bonus abuse", without specific T&C violations.
Must not implement terms that can be construed as "unfair" towards the player.
No player shall be involuntarily placed into a situation which breaches the terms and conditions during the course of play.
Must pay out progressive jackpot wins in full or in reasonable chunks, regardless of any terms and conditions limiting payouts.*
Must remove any bonus and associated playthrough requirements at the request of the player if play has not commenced.
Will not entice players to reverse cash withdrawals with bonuses or other incentives.
Will not use outsourced support. Player support must be in-house.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry and Player Assurances

RNG and/or software must be audited by a third party.
Must have a representative (who can walk and chew gum at the same time) listed in Casinomeister's forum.
They must be licensed in a jurisdiction that offers gambling licenses.**

I have bolded the standards I believe they have failed to meet during their dealings with this fiasco.

Must be able to take care of any player issue swiftly and professionally.

FAIL

The way this has been dealt with is anything BUT professional. There is no consistent standard, and customers are being LIED TO. thelawnet was told that he was "cleared", and EVERYTHING was returned to his account. This was not just a lie, it was BLEEDIN' OBVIOUS from his account history that a considerable amount had actually been CONFISCATED.

Must not use false, misleading or deceptive advertising.

FAIL

Simply taking the "unlimited" bonuses was itself enough to have confiscations from the account. The proof is that some players had the bonuses confiscated before they had placed a SINGLE BET! The advert was therefore deceptive, since you were not supposed to take what was offered.

Must not disqualify any player from a payout if terms & conditions are met
Must not confiscate winnings for vague & unclear reasons, such as "irregular playing patterns" or "bonus abuse", without specific T&C violations.

FAIL

The rep has used the "in the spirit of" argument, rather than pointing out any specific violations of the terms. If there WERE specific violations, they would have said, surely.

Must not implement terms that can be construed as "unfair" towards the player.

FAIL

The unfair, even NON EXISTENT "in the spirit of" terms, were IMPLEMENTED against large numbers of players.


No player shall be involuntarily placed into a situation which breaches the terms and conditions during the course of play.

FAIL

Players breached NO written terms in many cases, not even the vague ones. It was therefore impossible for them to have known what "the spirit" of the promotion was that they were violating as they played.

Must have a representative (who can walk and chew gum at the same time) listed in Casinomeister's forum.

FAIL

We don't have a "rep" as such, they have booted out the former rep, and replaced them with a "PR agent", who will ONLY offer management approved stilted replies to questions. There is NO evidence so far that a genuine attempt to treat grievances on an individual basis is taking place, and the rep will not even tell players what they have done wrong, even though this has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with fraud, and a desire not to "give out information that will tell fraudsters how they got caught so they can do it better next time".

This rep will ONLY "walk and chew gum at the same time" with written management approval for each piece of gum chewed, and each step taken.

It seems inconceivable that they should be given the benefit of the doubt by remaining accredited whilst they continue to make a dog's breakfast of this situation.
 
and it doesnt make sense to PAB now I think. or have I misunderstood something?

If you, or anyone else, files a PAB then it becomes part of our official record as we pursue this situation and those cases. If you do not PAB then you are not part of that effort. Your choice, as ever. :thumbsup:
 
I think my situation is the worst up to date. I withdrawn 32000€ saturday night after the promo. I received them on Tuesday in my bank account, no e-wallet, no paypal stuff, just my bank account where are all my life savings. Guess what, on thursday, 18 November betfair debited 32000€ from my bank account. That was shocking and my family stills trying to forget this. It has been difficult days here for us, I´m in very bad psychological situation after this. My comp points earned for long time ago weren´t returnet (around 2k), my deposit wasn´t returned, no replies to my e-maisl. I talkd with my bank account manager and he said this was impossible to chargeback 32000€ 2 days after the credit, They are investigating the case and there´s a possibility of the bank give me back my 32000€ and solve the case with betfair. Please note that we´re talking about a Portuguese bank, of course it has more money than betfair, it´s called "Millenium BCP" owned by some chinese guys with a lot of €...

Anyway, sad days here, I still try to recover from this. I thought bank account was the safest place to have the money. I was wrong. Betfair went too far with this one but they will have problems. Yes they will. They will pay for this, at least here in Portugal. I have no doubts some Portugal ministers knows about this situations that betfair participation in Portugal is at risk. We have severe laws here. You can´t just go and chargeback 32000€ as if it was nothing. We´re not talking about 100€ or even 500€, we´re talking about A LOT of money that has been PAID. If they didn´t want to pay then why they processed my withdrawal? This is robbery, I feel robbed and I´m completly angry about this as you can see. I just want to recover my psychological situation though. Sorry for my bad english, just wanted to share with you my story, it makes me feel better to explain it on forums.

And I just wish you never have the feeling and excitement of winning 30k and loose them some hours later. Believe me, it´s really bad...

Cheers from Portugal.

Also I´ve found this great website and I´ve made a complain using your PAB section (if I´m not allowed to say this please delete it mods)

Thank you very much for having such a "service" and sorry about my poor english.
 
I think my situation is the worst up to date. I withdrawn 32000€ saturday night after the promo. I received them on Tuesday in my bank account, no e-wallet, no paypal stuff, just my bank account where are all my life savings. Guess what, on thursday, 18 November betfair debited 32000€ from my bank account. That was shocking and my family stills trying to forget this. It has been difficult days here for us, I´m in very bad psychological situation after this. My comp points earned for long time ago weren´t returnet (around 2k), my deposit wasn´t returned, no replies to my e-maisl. I talkd with my bank account manager and he said this was impossible to chargeback 32000€ 2 days after the credit, They are investigating the case and there´s a possibility of the bank give me back my 32000€ and solve the case with betfair. Please note that we´re talking about a Portuguese bank, of course it has more money than betfair, it´s called "Millenium BCP" owned by some chinese guys with a lot of €...

Anyway, sad days here, I still try to recover from this. I thought bank account was the safest place to have the money. I was wrong. Betfair went too far with this one but they will have problems. Yes they will. They will pay for this, at least here in Portugal. I have no doubts some Portugal ministers knows about this situations that betfair participation in Portugal is at risk. We have severe laws here. You can´t just go and chargeback 32000€ as if it was nothing. We´re not talking about 100€ or even 500€, we´re talking about A LOT of money that has been PAID. If they didn´t want to pay then why they processed my withdrawal? This is robbery, I feel robbed and I´m completly angry about this as you can see. I just want to recover my psychological situation though. Sorry for my bad english, just wanted to share with you my story, it makes me feel better to explain it on forums.

And I just wish you never have the feeling and excitement of winning 30k and loose them some hours later. Believe me, it´s really bad...

Cheers from Portugal.

Also I´ve found this great website and I´ve made a complain using your PAB section (if I´m not allowed to say this please delete it mods)

Thank you very much for having such a "service" and sorry about my poor english.


Just wow!! I would have thought that Betfair would need some kind of Debit authorization to take money out of someones bank account? This would be the case in Australia without authorization no one can touch your bank account. Its bad enough they took money back out of e-wallets etc but this ones just BS.

I would also be questioning my bank, why have they allowed a debit without your authorization?

It's good that you pab'd this one should be very interesting.

It also seems by the amount of comp points you had accumulated before the promo says you where a loyal player at bet fair.

Cheers
Matt
 
I think my situation is the worst up to date. I withdrawn 32000€ saturday night after the promo. I received them on Tuesday in my bank account, no e-wallet, no paypal stuff, just my bank account where are all my life savings. Guess what, on thursday, 18 November betfair debited 32000€ from my bank account. That was shocking and my family stills trying to forget this. It has been difficult days here for us, I´m in very bad psychological situation after this. My comp points earned for long time ago weren´t returnet (around 2k), my deposit wasn´t returned, no replies to my e-maisl. I talkd with my bank account manager and he said this was impossible to chargeback 32000€ 2 days after the credit, They are investigating the case and there´s a possibility of the bank give me back my 32000€ and solve the case with betfair. Please note that we´re talking about a Portuguese bank, of course it has more money than betfair, it´s called "Millenium BCP" owned by some chinese guys with a lot of €...

Anyway, sad days here, I still try to recover from this. I thought bank account was the safest place to have the money. I was wrong. Betfair went too far with this one but they will have problems. Yes they will. They will pay for this, at least here in Portugal. I have no doubts some Portugal ministers knows about this situations that betfair participation in Portugal is at risk. We have severe laws here. You can´t just go and chargeback 32000€ as if it was nothing. We´re not talking about 100€ or even 500€, we´re talking about A LOT of money that has been PAID. If they didn´t want to pay then why they processed my withdrawal? This is robbery, I feel robbed and I´m completly angry about this as you can see. I just want to recover my psychological situation though. Sorry for my bad english, just wanted to share with you my story, it makes me feel better to explain it on forums.

And I just wish you never have the feeling and excitement of winning 30k and loose them some hours later. Believe me, it´s really bad...

Cheers from Portugal.

Also I´ve found this great website and I´ve made a complain using your PAB section (if I´m not allowed to say this please delete it mods)

Thank you very much for having such a "service" and sorry about my poor english.

If you can be honest to your bank about this being a gambling transaction, you have a good case to take this up through the banking system.

Strongly in your favour is that they have "charged back" not just the winnings, but your initial DEPOSITS too. Further, they seem to have broken banking rules by "doing the impossible" by charging back a credit. Perhaps they were SUPPOSED to get YOU to initiate the return of the money, and the way they got it back was by PRETENDING this was a transaction authorised by yourself from their website.

Make it clear to your bank that you did NOT authorise them to take back the money from your account, and that whatever they did was without your permission.

They DO of course have your bank details, and criminals can use these to get money from a victim's account. They do this by FRAUDULENTLY presenting the transaction to the banking system such that it appears to have been authorised by the account holder. It works because to some degree the banks have to work on trust, otherwise the system would grind to a crawl if every transaction was double checked to ensure it was authorised properly.

The correct procedure for Betfair would have been to ask the bank to hold the money because it was subject to a dispute, and give YOU a fair chance to present your side of the case. It would then be up to the authorities in your country to decide who rightfully owned the money, and the WORST outcome would have been loss of winnings, and only that part returned to Betfair.

Since they are relying on "not in the spirit of" arguments, it is unlikely Betfair would have won the case, since it would be decided on the CONTRACTURAL terms and conditions, as they are written, and as agreed to by both parties. This would also be subject to "unfair contract" laws, which would disqualify some of the vague and ill defined terms.

Betfair have made it quite clear they will NOT discuss these cases further once they have made their decision, and they are even keeping to this when players contact the rep here.

Your best solution at present IS to pursue this through your bank, and let THEM take care of Betfair and it's lawyers. You might even find that your case IS with your BANK, rather than Betfair, if your bank made a mistake in allowing the money to leave your account once it had been credited.

Your position is far stronger than it would have been with an eWallet, who would have routinely returned the money to the casino based on the casinos' word alone, and you would have had to pursue the casino directly to get it back.

This case, as presented, is Betfair not only confiscating bonuses and winnings because a player didn't "play within the spirit of" this promotion, but confiscating the DEPOSITS too!!!

This is NOT what Betfair have been saying, which is that only a "minority of players" have had their "bonus and winnings voided" for "breaches of the general terms and conditions".

This could get far worse for Betfair. What if players started "charging back" their DEPOSITS, even where their grievance has nothing to do with this promotion, but just one of being a "sore loser". Betfair are demonstrating that merely feeling the "game wasn't played fair" is enough to not only void all the play, but in some cases REVERSE the overall outcome by converting a player win into a player "bust out" of all their deposits.

Do they not see all the gripes from players who "swear the games are rigged" after a few bad sessions, yet who (generally) do NOT go on to charge back all their deposits in a fit of "sour grapes".

With operators lowering their morals to a lower common denominator, they should be worrying that PLAYERS will increasingly start to respond in kind, and problems they once had with a very small minority of players will extend to problems with a significant minority of players who will no longer feel morally bound to treat the casinos with the respect they once enjoyed.

Players are already waking up to the realisation that all this "I am your friend" BS they got from their "VIP account managers" has been nothing more than a sham designed to extract more money from them. TRUE friends do not stab you in the back & run off when the going gets tough, as many US players experienced from their "casino friends" when the casino ditched the US players en masse.
 
This is the problem when businesses have no effective regulation. They'll get away with more and more unethical practises, simply because they can.
Casinos closing or locking account, and confiscating winnings (and sometimes deposits as well) for very weak reasons is becoming more common, and it's simply because they're allowed to get away with it.
I believe that if things continue as they are, it's only going to be a matter of time before these scandals hit the mainstream media, which will cost ALL casinos money, due to the bad publicity - which would be a shame, as the good guys (if there are any left) would lose out as much as the rogues. This would hit the advantage players too, because if the casinos are making less money, they'll have less to spend on promotions.

We really need something similar to the rules for accreditation to be ENFORCED on casinos - that way, they have to play ball, or they lose their licenses. Ok, I know I'm dreaming........

I'd like to put a bet on casinos pulling more and more dodgy stunts in 2011, and although it won't be from me, eventually, someone will get the mainstream media involved with these scams.

I won't be placing that bet at betfair though......
 
So correct me if im wrong here:

An Accredited Casino is allowed to break multiple rules of accreditation and still stay accredited?

They have portrayed the ultimate dishonesty by removing funds from accounts (Ewallets, Banks, Casino Accounts) for a Promotion they introduced and are still given a chance to give players the run around all while remaining accredited?

They agree to communicate after being removed from the accredited section, but give the affected players generic responses and still stay accredited?

My personal opinion on the matter is they remain in the ROGUE pit until such time that all disputes are resolved. They BROKE every conceivable and ethical rule for a FAIR casino and are given the opportunity to remain an accredited Casino and rake in the business whilst players are STILL being shafted...... :notworthy

Hmmm?
 
No offense Nate but you're basically yelling "conspiracy!" before Bryan has even had a chance to react to the current situation (Betfair's blanket response to the PABs).

FYI we received notice of their position on the PABs barely more than 12 hours ago -- night, sleepy-time, yes? -- so the "generic responses and still stay accredited" accusations are a little pre-mature, no?

FWIW we now have a dozen PABs on this issue and they're still coming in. Obviously this is a developing situation and I'd hope that your comments would reflect that.
 
Max,

No offense taken.

It does not seem logical for any outfit who conducts business in this manner to be 'Recommended'. Do we have ANY proof that they will not do this again?

There are multiple players posting about the same issues (including seasoned members) who i believe are telling the truth. I do understand that Bryan is dealing with the issue, but to still 'Recommend' a Casino in the accredited list citing that they abide by ALL the values enstilled therein is misleading to say the least.

They have broken terms on a HUGE scale, dipped their fingers into other peoples bread and butter and it has not yet been resolved, but they are Accredited??:what:

I just do not see the reasoning for them remaining accredited. If there comes a time where issues are resolved and players are given assurances, then fair enough - Reinstate them. At this moment in time, it is no secret what they have done and remaining accredited is in the very least advocating this behaviour.

Well, its not my site, i cant make that decision, but the decision is disappointing to me.

Nate
 
I just do not see the reasoning for them remaining accredited ... but the decision is disappointing to me.

But that's my point: the "decision" hasn't been made yet, AFAIK. I'm not speaking for Bryan but if I were in his shoes I'd be on the phone talking to these guys, asking "WTF?" etc etc. In other words working on it while we're busy posting about it here.

I'm just saying give it a bit: let the decision be made before you start criticizing it.
 
I do understand that Bryan is dealing with the issue, but to still 'Recommend' a Casino in the accredited list citing that they abide by ALL the values enstilled therein is misleading to say the least.

The situation first reared its ugly head on the 17th of November 2010. It has remained a hot topic for 13 Days. As stated above and my point in the previous 2 posts were: They should be 'Not Reccomended' at the very least UNTIL Bryan gets clarity or they honour payments. Given the publicity and it being 13 days later, I feel its unethical for them to be listed as conforming to A Player Advocate Websites terms when in fact its far from the truth.

Its kind of like the Automobile Industry recommending a Car without brakes even if they know it has no brakes, but waiting for the manufacturer to respond and speak about the issues.

Nate
 
I would never piss-off hitler.

I think I learned a great deal from this video. Don't cheat the players one of them might be hitler.

Man he was so pissed off!

That video was so funny I was in a meeting when I saw it and I could not stop myself from laughing and then everyone at the meeting saw it and laughed. Ahh good times.
 
... I do understand that Bryan is dealing with the issue, but to still 'Recommend' a Casino in the accredited list citing that they abide by ALL the values enstilled therein is misleading to say the least.

They have broken terms on a HUGE scale, dipped their fingers into other peoples bread and butter and it has not yet been resolved, but they are Accredited??:what:

I just do not see the reasoning for them remaining accredited. If there comes a time where issues are resolved and players are given assurances, then fair enough - Reinstate them. At this moment in time, it is no secret what they have done and remaining accredited is in the very least advocating this behaviour.

Well, its not my site, i cant make that decision, but the decision is disappointing to me.

Nate
Points taken. Please understand that we take one step at a time. After reviewing how this is being handled, they've been removed. If they decide to take the "spirit of the bonus" route, they will find themselves in the rogue pit.
 
I think my situation is the worst up to date. I withdrawn 32000€ saturday night after the promo. I received them on Tuesday in my bank account, no e-wallet, no paypal stuff, just my bank account where are all my life savings. Guess what, on thursday, 18 November betfair debited 32000€ from my bank account. That was shocking and my family stills trying to forget this. It has been difficult days here for us, I´m in very bad psychological situation after this. My comp points earned for long time ago weren´t returnet (around 2k), my deposit wasn´t returned, no replies to my e-maisl. I talkd with my bank account manager and he said this was impossible to chargeback 32000€ 2 days after the credit, They are investigating the case and there´s a possibility of the bank give me back my 32000€ and solve the case with betfair. Please note that we´re talking about a Portuguese bank, of course it has more money than betfair, it´s called "Millenium BCP" owned by some chinese guys with a lot of €...

Anyway, sad days here, I still try to recover from this. I thought bank account was the safest place to have the money. I was wrong. Betfair went too far with this one but they will have problems. Yes they will. They will pay for this, at least here in Portugal. I have no doubts some Portugal ministers knows about this situations that betfair participation in Portugal is at risk. We have severe laws here. You can´t just go and chargeback 32000€ as if it was nothing. We´re not talking about 100€ or even 500€, we´re talking about A LOT of money that has been PAID. If they didn´t want to pay then why they processed my withdrawal? This is robbery, I feel robbed and I´m completly angry about this as you can see. I just want to recover my psychological situation though. Sorry for my bad english, just wanted to share with you my story, it makes me feel better to explain it on forums.

And I just wish you never have the feeling and excitement of winning 30k and loose them some hours later. Believe me, it´s really bad...

Cheers from Portugal.

Also I´ve found this great website and I´ve made a complain using your PAB section (if I´m not allowed to say this please delete it mods)

Thank you very much for having such a "service" and sorry about my poor english.


This case is imo one of the worse reported here so far, not only due to the size of the confiscation, but also to the fact that Betfair was apparently able to raid this player's personal bank account with impunity and little if any interference from the bank.

I find this absolutely incredible, and it begs the question "what the hell did the bank think they were doing?"

Joaopc56;398155 - surely you have by now demanded an explanation from your bank manager - can you share with us how he or she explained this?
 
This is the problem when businesses have no effective regulation. They'll get away with more and more unethical practises, simply because they can.
Casinos closing or locking account, and confiscating winnings (and sometimes deposits as well) for very weak reasons is becoming more common, and it's simply because they're allowed to get away with it.
I believe that if things continue as they are, it's only going to be a matter of time before these scandals hit the mainstream media, which will cost ALL casinos money, due to the bad publicity - which would be a shame, as the good guys (if there are any left) would lose out as much as the rogues. This would hit the advantage players too, because if the casinos are making less money, they'll have less to spend on promotions.

We really need something similar to the rules for accreditation to be ENFORCED on casinos - that way, they have to play ball, or they lose their licenses. Ok, I know I'm dreaming........

I'd like to put a bet on casinos pulling more and more dodgy stunts in 2011, and although it won't be from me, eventually, someone will get the mainstream media involved with these scams.

I won't be placing that bet at betfair though......


This could happen because they have been raiding BANK accounts. Whilst the media might not take much interest in the casino side of things, a story about a "merchant" taking €32,000 from someone's BANK account without authorisation, and possibly ILLEGALLY under the rules of the banking system, WILL make the media sit up and take an interest. The story will be about the BANK that allowed this, rather than the casino, which will probably only get a small mention.

The bank could then get investigated by the regulator, who might order it to repay the €32,000 back to it's customer, and resolve the dispute in a proper manner according to local banking rules.

€32,000 is a pretty large sum for a BANK to simply "confiscate" from someone, and if this does hit the mainstream media, it will be a BIG story, and may trigger other victims to come forward with similar stories. This poses a threat to the whole industry, since countries where this is still a legally undefined area may go down the prohibition route. We ALREADY have a ruling from the EU courts that countries CAN prohibit online casinos based elsewhere in the EU if it is deemed necessary in order to protect citizens from rogue business practices.

We have also established that, somehow, casinos CAN simply take back monies previously paid by them to a customer from a BANK, as well as an eWallet. If this was done LEGALLY, then bank customers in general will be concerned that ANY merchant can do this rather than use proper channels to recover disputed monies. When CUSTOMERS want to dispute a payment they have made, they CAN'T simply take it back, they have to initiate a formal "chargeback" procedure, where they have to put their case, and the merchant has a chance to put theirs.

Joaopc56 should seek advice as to whether this was legal under Portugese law, and if not, pursue the bank for allowing it to happen. Betfair can hide behind the inaction of the LGA, but the bank CANNOT. If the bank has to give back this money, it will go after Betfair, and the bank's lawyers will NOT be so easily put off by persistent non-replies and delays from Betfair and the LGA. The bank's lawyers will also know of any other ways to recover the money. It may turn out not to be a "casino matter" at all when it comes to the bank recovering it's losses, and it could pursue Betfair through the Portugese courts, or the UK courts, for recovery.

The bank may even end up being able to do what Betfair did, simply take the money back.
 
To submit a complaint to the LGA is equivilant to complaining to the mailman. I'm rather surprised that the Betfair casino team hadn't done a little research on whether or not that would be a good solution to this problem.

But what I find alarming is the "spirit of the bonus" defense. Only a rogue RTG casino would refer to that. This is covered in the Meister's Mission section:

"Spirit of the Bonus"
No such animal. If the casino offers a bonus, the casino should not assume on what grounds the bonus should be accepted. If the player wants to just play and watch the reels spin or is playing to make a profit, it is not up to the casino to enforce subjective terms like "spirit".
https://www.casinomeister.com/about-us/philosophy/

It's like the casino staff is oblivious to the pitfalls of online casino management. When you make mistakes, admit it, own up to it and move on. To argue that players need to play by some "spirit" is not the way to deal with this problem.
 
Points taken. Please understand that we take one step at a time. After reviewing how this is being handled, they've been removed. If they decide to take the "spirit of the bonus" route, they will find themselves in the rogue pit.

To submit a complaint to the LGA is equivilant to complaining to the mailman. I'm rather surprised that the Betfair casino team hadn't done a little research on whether or not that would be a good solution to this problem.

But what I find alarming is the "spirit of the bonus" defense. Only a rogue RTG casino would refer to that. This is covered in the Meister's Mission section:



It's like the casino staff is oblivious to the pitfalls of online casino management. When you make mistakes, admit it, own up to it and move on. To argue that players need to play by some "spirit" is not the way to deal with this problem.

Bryan,

Thank you for taking note of the points brought forward.

Where does Betfair currently lie? They are currently 'Not Accredited'. Are they 'Not Recommended' as well until resolution or are they just lying in limbo?

Nate
 
To submit a complaint to the LGA is equivilant to complaining to the mailman. I'm rather surprised that the Betfair casino team hadn't done a little research on whether or not that would be a good solution to this problem. But what I find alarming is the "spirit of the bonus" defense. Only a rogue RTG casino would refer to that. This is covered in the Meister's Mission section:



It's like the casino staff is oblivious to the pitfalls of online casino management. When you make mistakes, admit it, own up to it and move on. To argue that players need to play by some "spirit" is not the way to deal with this problem.

Perhaps they HAVE, and know DAMN WELL that players will get nowhere complaining to the LGA, which will allow Betfair to get away with anything they want.

It seems they are fobbing Max off after first telling you they will re-open communications in an effort to resolve this issue.

It seems that not only are they using this "spirit of the bonus" defence, they are engaging in mass "chargebacks" against players for withdrawals already paid. They also seem to be inept at maths, and even confiscating DEPOSITS along with bonus and winnings, leaving players who initially won as LOSERS, not even getting returned to the position they were in before they participated. This is WORSE than the actions of most of the rogues, who will at least return deposits in full when using the "spirit of the bonus" defense.

Players should forget the LGA, although they should "go through the motions" so that the LGA get flooded with complaints, and eventually have to make a decision, and be called to account.

Players should also PAB, even though it looks like Max is getting the brush off on these. Again, it's a matter of building a body of evidence, which will make it harder for Betfair to keep it's good reputation and at the same time "screw over" players because of Betfair's own poor maths and lack of expertise in the FIVE members of staff that supposedly "vetted" this promo before it went live. I don't believe there was any "mistake". These managers know EXACTLY what they were offering, and KNEW that although it posed a risk, it blew the competition out of the water, and would have created considerable interest among the player community, producing considerable deposits into Betfair over the weekend. The "mistake" was that they were too daring, and were blinded by the attraction of bringing in the deposits to the extent that they didn't fully appreciate the magnitude of the risks.

Betfair are experienced operators, and they must have known about "advantage play" at the time they constructed this promotion, and indeed ANY promotion.

They STILL haven't learned, and the new terms are STILL ALLOWING some of the actions that they said were "not in the spirit" of this offer, namely the "unlimited" nature of the bonus, and the fact that "stacking bonuses" by piling in multiple deposits during the 3 hour window is STILL not only allowed, but ENCOURAGED, by the ad copy for the amended promotion.
 
Players should also PAB, even though it looks like Max is getting the brush off on these. Again, it's a matter of building a body of evidence....

VERY important point! I tried to make this clear earlier but I guess I wasn't blunt enough.

Also, generally speaking an unresolved PAB stays on the books. So any overtures from the casino to "turn a new leaf" usually requires that old issues get dealt with first. This isn't always 100% but plenty of old business has eventually been sorted because of this.
 
Thank you very much for your words. Yes I sent e-mails to Portuguese media (magazines, tv channels, etc) and I talked immediatly with my bank. I talked already with 4 persons from my bank. None of them could explain how this was possible because the money was in my account for 2 days and I could spend it on a car, and betfair would have no chance of getting it that way. They´re investigating the case and I´ve tell them that if I don´t get my money back I will complain about them everywhere here in Portugal. I don´t think they want people to know you can´t trust the bank, and you can loose 32000€ that easily.

Waiting for news about this case and I will let you know what´s happening. About betfair I just can say I will never ever play again with them (my account is closed anyway). But I assure you they will pay for this. If it´s not today in the long run they will be paying for their actions.

Yesterday I made a complain to "banco de portugal" (bank of portugal) wich regulates all portuguese banks. I did it because the date I gave for my bank to refund my money has expired, and they know I made the complain. They´re not happy with my decision (because bank of portugal is very severe) but they understand mine and my family frustration about this. I would prefer to never receive the money in the past, the shocker was winning it, receiving it and loose it 2 days after without any explanation. If they debited 32000€ from moneybookers or neteller... it was sad anyway but I wouldn´t be shocked as I was after they debited 32k from my own bank account. Who can we trust these days?
 
Players should forget the LGA, although they should "go through the motions" so that the LGA get flooded with complaints, and eventually have to make a decision, and be called to account.

Do you really think this is a good idea?

I am considering going directly to court without contacting the LGA. I'm worried that the inevitable ruling in favour of Betfair will look bad in court. I'd rather bring the case straight to a truly impartial judge.

I know 100% that Betfair will laughed out of court, but I don't hold much faith in the LGA.
 
Whilst the media might not take much interest in the casino side of things

They would. The media love a bit of scandal, and I can say that from experience. I once (foolishly) appeared in a national newspaper in 1997 as they did a story about how I'd made £28k from fruit machines (in the UK) in a year (I hadn't, I'd only made £20k, but they said £28k sounded better). Once the story got printed, I had numerous phone calls asking me to write books or make videos. I had one TV company wanted me to go into an arcade, start emptying a JPM Money Talks (remember those, vinyl!?) and watch the owners throw me out. For this, they were offering to pay the princely sum of £75. I declined. Although I did go on Esther Rantzen's talk show in 2000 about gambling - only after I'd spent 6 hours in make-up so that no-one would recognise me! She asked, "so how do you do it?" I replied "I put a couple of pounds in a machine, and can tell if it's ready to pay out or not". Which translates as "I'll put £2 in this JPM fruit machine, and if it shows a 1 or a 12 on the number reel, it's going to pay out"



a story about a "merchant" taking €32,000 from someone's BANK account without authorisation, and possibly ILLEGALLY under the rules of the banking system, WILL make the media sit up and take an interest. The story will be about the BANK that allowed this, rather than the casino, which will probably only get a small mention.

Yes, the media would absolutely love that.

Advantage play wouldn't even have to be mentioned in the Betfair case. People just playing normally are having their winnings stolen. One guy has had 32 grand seized back from his bank account. It might not make TV just yet, but it's not going to be too long before it does......
 
To submit a complaint to the LGA is equivilant to complaining to the mailman. I'm rather surprised that the Betfair casino team hadn't done a little research on whether or not that would be a good solution to this problem.

I'm sure they know perfectly well how the LGA operate and that they will endorse whatever line Betfair chooses to take, and that is why they are adopting the 'We aren't answering any further emails, but you can contact the LGA if you wish'. They know the LGA will sit on the complaints for 9-12 months, then fail to take the player's side and finally come out with an identical 'this is the LGA's decision, no further correspondence will be enter into' outcome.

So it would indeed be a good solution to the problem from Betfair's side, as they fob people off for about a year and at the end of it probably get their point of view endorsed by the LGA.
 
Last edited:
Removing bonuses and winnings without valid reason is one thing, but forcing manual deposits without authorisation is just asking for trouble. In theory they shouldn't be able to do this from a card since it's illegal to store CV2 numbers, but a wire transfer or e-wallet...they can certaintly make the request and hope it's processed.

Very poor practice for a listed company, I'm amazed they haven't just taken it on the chin and coughed up.
 
Yes they basically used my Card number to get the money back, everything without my bank permission. They´re in trouble, at least with this situation believe me. It´s not just a question of casino winnings and payement, it has more problems involved.

There is the shocker:

Expired Image

edit: my withdrawal when account was open

Expired Image

This is my bank website -> Link Removed ( Old/Invalid)
 
Joaopc56 I just read your incredibile post .. What can I say? I'm 100% sure you will receive bank your money from your bank.
Millennium Bank is a big bank..(in Romania is grow verry fast)...+ in this situation is Bank fault.
Please keep update this thread for casinomeister members :D

PS: About Betfair..Was my favourit sportbook and casino..but this scandal really changed everything. I really not understand Betfair position..they act in the most unprofesional way...
 
Think about this. Someone says to you if you put 200€ he gives you 100€ and you just have to play those 100€ x 10. When you play 1000€ you can withdrawal and deposit again the money you won, and He will give you another 100€. Just do this many times and with a bit of luck in the casino you win a lot. That was what happened, but I think the way the money was won isn´t the most important thing here. The terms were there, I just played according to the terms and conditions and had the luck to win large amount of money. I bet that if I lost money they wouldn´t refund me.

I just ask to betfair, why did they even process my withdrawal? Are withdrawals automatically processed? I don´t think so because they would lost a lot of money if it was automatic. So if they paid me and processed the payement why did they debited it 2 days after? It makes no sense. I want at least my psychological health back.

I thought betfair wasn´t in that bag we call "if you loose you´re welcome dear customer, if you win we will take your winnings back and you´re not welcome".

They just can´t be in the accredited casino list after this. I will never put a single €uro on betfair again.
 
If this BetFair is the same company that bought TVG here in the US, you might want to take a look at this post from another forum:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


It has a lot on information that could possibly help get in touch with someone plus if you really wanted to get attention, a little buzz to the media here in the US might get attention from them.

Couldn't hurt.
 
Thank you very much anniemac, I will look into that for sure. I´m amazed with this great forum, it has helped me a lot. Even If I don´t recover my money, my psychological situation will be much better after knowing this people here.

Thanks

I received an e-mail today from someone called Richard Bloch:

"Joao,



Thank you for your email which came via CasinoMeister.



I appreciate you may have seen a similar version of the email below, however I have included the details of how to contact the LGA who we are regulated by should you wish to take your complaint further.





On the weekend of the 13/14th November Betfair ran a promotion for its casino product. It subsequently came to our attention that certain customers exploited the spirit of this promotion. The accounts of all customers that took part have been reviewed by Betfair, and corrective action has been taken where appropriate for those who acted in contravention of our terms and conditions. Betfair has corresponded directly with all customers who were affected by this. If any customer would like to discuss the matter further, they may contact the LGA in Malta by e-mailing [email protected] or telephoning +356 21316590.



Kind Regards



Richard"

I don´t know why I received this e-mail but it sounds like a bot anyway.
 
I don´t know why I received this e-mail but it sounds like a bot anyway.

The same is happening with the PAB issues: one response for all, no individual attention to each case, no exceptions, period. In fact they haven't even bothered with the pre-fab respond to the latest batch I submitted, just getting dead air. :eek2:

This sounds very much like a corporate-style thing to me. Someone high up has sent down word about what their stand on this is -- whether that contradicts what the guys on the front line have already said or not -- and that's the orders they are now marching to, for better or worse. All we're getting now is defensive position behaviour: they're just hoping to ride this out, waiting for the storm to pass.
 
I got the above response from Richard to. For someone who has the title 'International PR Manager' this is a very lame message.

I agree with you Maxd, that this is now being driven from on high. Probibly board level.

Not sure the best way to proceed. (Not LGA though!)
 
This could happen because they have been raiding BANK accounts. Whilst the media might not take much interest in the casino side of things, a story about a "merchant" taking €32,000 from someone's BANK account without authorisation, and possibly ILLEGALLY under the rules of the banking system, WILL make the media sit up and take an interest. The story will be about the BANK that allowed this, rather than the casino, which will probably only get a small mention.

The bank could then get investigated by the regulator, who might order it to repay the €32,000 back to it's customer, and resolve the dispute in a proper manner according to local banking rules.

€32,000 is a pretty large sum for a BANK to simply "confiscate" from someone, and if this does hit the mainstream media, it will be a BIG story, and may trigger other victims to come forward with similar stories. This poses a threat to the whole industry, since countries where this is still a legally undefined area may go down the prohibition route. We ALREADY have a ruling from the EU courts that countries CAN prohibit online casinos based elsewhere in the EU if it is deemed necessary in order to protect citizens from rogue business practices.

We have also established that, somehow, casinos CAN simply take back monies previously paid by them to a customer from a BANK, as well as an eWallet. If this was done LEGALLY, then bank customers in general will be concerned that ANY merchant can do this rather than use proper channels to recover disputed monies. When CUSTOMERS want to dispute a payment they have made, they CAN'T simply take it back, they have to initiate a formal "chargeback" procedure, where they have to put their case, and the merchant has a chance to put theirs.

Joaopc56 should seek advice as to whether this was legal under Portugese law, and if not, pursue the bank for allowing it to happen. Betfair can hide behind the inaction of the LGA, but the bank CANNOT. If the bank has to give back this money, it will go after Betfair, and the bank's lawyers will NOT be so easily put off by persistent non-replies and delays from Betfair and the LGA. The bank's lawyers will also know of any other ways to recover the money. It may turn out not to be a "casino matter" at all when it comes to the bank recovering it's losses, and it could pursue Betfair through the Portugese courts, or the UK courts, for recovery.

The bank may even end up being able to do what Betfair did, simply take the money back.

VWM, goggle the name of the players bank and read what Wikipedia lists about it...:eek:
 
At the end of the day this is a decision about money . I think Betfair lost alot and in their opinion the damage from public discussions is lower then to pay players .

I heard some people talk about a sum of more then 10 Millions :eek:

This is probaly not a ehtical decision but its probaly cheaper for them . They wait until the dust has settled and until that happens they ignore every individual case .
 
I´m in very bad psychological situation after this. My comp points earned for long time ago weren´t returnet (around 2k), my deposit wasn´t returned, no replies to my e-maisl.

When I read this I thought you had been a long time dedicated player (as I mentioned in my other post), but going by your deposits this is not true so I'm guessing once you heard about the promotion you jumped on the band wagon. (or am I reading it wrong? and thats not your total deposit history?) Is so I apologize.

Anyways still not the point I guess,(assuming you followed t&c) a casino any casino should not be allowed to touch a players bank accounts, and your bank should not be giving away YOUR money like that

Keep us posted on what happens with the bank at least!

Cheers
Matt
 
Removing bonuses and winnings without valid reason is one thing, but forcing manual deposits without authorisation is just asking for trouble. In theory they shouldn't be able to do this from a card since it's illegal to store CV2 numbers, but a wire transfer or e-wallet...they can certaintly make the request and hope it's processed.

Very poor practice for a listed company, I'm amazed they haven't just taken it on the chin and coughed up.

Yes they basically used my Card number to get the money back, everything without my bank permission. They´re in trouble, at least with this situation believe me. It´s not just a question of casino winnings and payement, it has more problems involved.

There is the shocker:

Expired Image

edit: my withdrawal when account was open

Expired Image

This is my bank website -> Link Removed ( Old/Invalid)

Coupled with your bank saying this should have been impossible, and they can't figure out how it was done, they MUST have acted outside the rules to "force this through" the system. They may well have acted illegally, but from a regulatory point of view, you are a victim of your BANK's conduct in allowing this transaction to go through. It is CLEARLY a "chargeback", rather than you depositing again, because the transactions are the EXACT opposite of the credits.

It doesn't matter how good or bad the bank is, if it is regulated by the Bank of Portugal, it will have to do as it is told - same here in the UK. Our FSA can order a bank to pay back money that it allowed to leave a customer's account without due process.
The mere fact that your bank says this is "impossible" means that due process was NOT followed, else the bank would be able to tell you how this was able to happen.

The bank should also be able to find out just HOW this transaction was pushed through, and IF it finds that your card & CCV was used without your permission, the merchant could be charged with fraud. Use of the CCV will also prove that it had been stored illegally by the merchant, which would be a breach of data handling laws.

The same is happening with the PAB issues: one response for all, no individual attention to each case, no exceptions, period. In fact they haven't even bothered with the pre-fab respond to the latest batch I submitted, just getting dead air. :eek2:

This sounds very much like a corporate-style thing to me. Someone high up has sent down word about what their stand on this is -- whether that contradicts what the guys on the front line have already said or not -- and that's the orders they are now marching to, for better or worse. All we're getting now is defensive position behaviour: they're just hoping to ride this out, waiting for the storm to pass.

They may have realised how much trouble they are in, and with the possibility of court action, possibly even CRIMINAL proceedings, they are adopting the "no comment" attitude, and only responding with replies approved by their lawyers.

As for the LGA, whilst they need to feel the heat over this, a ruling from them in Betfair's favour COULD damage a court case, so players who ARE going to take them to court should perhaps hold off complaining to the LGA.

If the money was taken from the sportsbook wallet, they could argue that they didn't believe it was an LGA matter in the first place, since the confiscation was done by the SPORTS part of the organisation, not the CASINO side. Since they are regulated separately, the sports side may have acted illegally under UK regulations by processing a request for confiscation coming from a part NOT regulated by the UK.

If this €32,000 bank raid is NOT a "one off" the storm could get VERY bad for Betfair in the weeks to come.
 
I do wonder about your last point, whether or not they should come under UK rules since the confiscation was done from the sportsbook. It would make sense to me. I have already submitted a complain to IBAS and they referred me to the LGA, so it seems they don't agree.

IBAS is NOT the UK regulator, but an INDUSTRY "puppet" organisation. You should contact the UK Gambling Authority directly to ask whether money removed as a confiscation from the sportsbook comes under their remit. Let THEM decide, not IBAS.

Betfair are VERY keen to bury this in Malta, where they know they will probably get away with it, as well as being able to stall for many months.
 
So how is this one going to move forward?

MaxD/CasinoMeister, can you ask the BF rep to tell you exactly what terms and conditions have been broken.

They seem very reluctant to tell any of us what we have done!

For myself I am looking to take them to court (in the UK). IBAS/LGA/Gamming Commision are all a waste of space so this seems the best option.

Perhaps if there are enough people taking this route then they may see the light and do the right thing.
 
So how is this one going to move forward?

MaxD/CasinoMeister, can you ask the BF rep to tell you exactly what terms and conditions have been broken.

They seem very reluctant to tell any of us what we have done!

For myself I am looking to take them to court (in the UK). IBAS/LGA/Gamming Commision are all a waste of space so this seems the best option.

Perhaps if there are enough people taking this route then they may see the light and do the right thing.


It looks like there WERE no violations of the terms and conditions. They told one player they had not "played within the spirit of the offer". This will NOT work in court. The court will look at the terms as written, and agreed to. Betfair will have to demonstrate a breach of contract (in other words, the player broke the terms). It didn't work for the banks, nor the card companies. In fact, even where terms WERE written, and breached, the courts STILL sometimes decided in favour of customers, usually where advisors had lied to customers in order to make them believe the terms were different. These were the "mis-selling" cases.

If a UK court agrees to hear the case, Betfair will pull out all the stops to PREVENT a case going the distance, because they fear that a ruling against them will open the doors to EVERY player affected claiming, and using the case as a legal precedent to support their own.

The UK commission is also worth a try, since it is Betfair's UK license that could be at stake. This will mean they have to shut down or move their sport and games operations offshore, and this could impact their share price (as would a court ruling against them).

There is likely to be a compromise settlement in due course, but this could take some time. Betfair will have lawyers advising them what the risks are in these cases, and the execs will have to decide which is greater, stick it out and defend any court actions, or settle each out of court when they realise the player is NOT bluffing, and the papers land at their offices.
 
The only problem is the jurastiction issue. I'm still not convinced that Betfair will respond to a court case brought against them in the UK. They will probably send back the court papers saying you have the wrong company (Betfair Malta being the correct company).

It might take a court case to establish that Betfair UK is responsible, before you can even issue preceedings against them regarding the bonus fiasco!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top