I would like to explicitly return to the issue of the thread, namely, casino behavior that foments an “anti-casino” bias
The statement of, and the enforcement of, "bat shit crazy terms," as Surasanji put it here
, along with a host of other examples that have nothing to do with T&C's, has a long and glorious history at Casinomeister.
Thread after thread, post after post, battle after battle, PAB after PAB, Rogue after Rogue, horrible experience after horrible experience; anyone spending some hours/days/weeks reading through the Casinomeister forum posts would have to exit that exercise with an "Anti-Casino” bias.
Many examples of these behaviors have been stated or implied, by myself and others, within this thread.
In addition, you don't need to look very hard to generate an even more impressive list of the continuance of this behavior into this week, this day - right now! It seems quite salient
: Regarding this "max cap" on free spins - the game says that you win 100 free spins, but on spin 37 you're informed that your free spins are over. I wish there was a less crude way of describing this, but it is the gambling equivalent of blue balls.
"No winning allowed"
: Link Outdated / Removed
And those evil bots
These complaints were genuine. These weren't people simply scamming or playing the legal game of T&C “interpretation.”
In the current Baptism by Fire and Probation threads, I found at least three instances of T&C "bat shit craziness". This also did not require digging very far. And these are the Baptism threads
! As ChuChu said here, the companies are going to be putting their best foots (feet?) forward during this kind of process.
Forced bonuses at Vernons
"Irregular" gaming, whatever the hell that is
Bonus “abuse” (and MIA rep)