external image

North Korea and US politics

Status
Not open for further replies.
My only problem with internet based extreme liberals is that they are virtual beings devoid of physical content -- putting their resources and money where their mouth is(@ladyhawke lay down the banknote, this doesn't have the meaning you may think it have).

You are right...in a way...it doesn't have any meaning to me at all.

With this being said, I hope the first part of my last post here was not a mind bending experience. Am usually a man of reason and honest among other defects, I'm saying this not because I'm attempting to date you god forbid, but to justify the one time event of breaking my own rules and posting one more post after saying that I won't, because in the future we may engage again in different threads and hopefully, giving part of the response to Kroffe, you won't believe that I'm 'reformed' Lol. We do have something in common though by the immediate look of things namely... cat worship and unadulterated adoration. There is a seed of good in the depths of your inner self, I wish you have used it on the people surrounding you than complotting against them. Now consider me definetely out (and about).
 
for those of y'all want graphs, stats etc
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

title -
These numbers show that black and white people live in two different Americas

1593392932390.webp
 
[
Dear Steve, congrats, I'm afraid you'll take away the prize from me awarded by Harry earlier. This is getting clinically LMAO. I am asking these questions since I stepped in this thread, I don't know and I liked to know. Depending on the answers the discussion could have taken a route. From the whole lot not one had come with an answer so I had come to my own conclusions. I have compiled the multiple questions in a audio for better clarity just for you and your frivolous supporters. I can finally rest my case now, IF you are not both blind AND deaf. Much love, Mr. Dottie.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


To add:

A NAZZZIII proving his point time and time again by quoting an Israeli scientist. IMAGINE.


yawn...
 
With this being said, I hope the first part of my last post here was not a mind bending experience. Am usually a man of reason and honest among other defects, I'm saying this not because I'm attempting to date you god forbid, but to justify the one time event of breaking my own rules and posting one more post after saying that I won't, because in the future we may engage again in different threads and hopefully, giving part of the response to Kroffe, you won't believe that I'm 'reformed' Lol. We do have something in common though by the immediate look of things namely... cat worship and unadulterated adoration. There is a seed of good in the depths of your inner self, I wish you have used it on the people surrounding you than complotting against them. Now consider me definetely out (and about).

can we vote now and not wait till year end.....for the most pretentious poster of the year...
 
[...]I'm not attempting to date you god forbid...

You're not? Damn...I was so looking forward to a non-Date Night...

can we vote now and not wait till year end.....for the most pretentious poster of the year...

No! No! No! Not till I have had my non-Date Night! This is the only non-offer I am going to get this year. Please don't spoil it for me.
1593400584236.webp
 
This could turn into quite something for Mr T. The WH story has as usual changed already a few times.

- First, fake news, no such report
- Then Mr T sycophant DNI Ratcliffe: Mr T and VP not briefed, but does not say the story is fake or not credible intel.
- Aussie and UK intelligence people corroborate the story
- And then comes Mr T's Twitler creation. :rolleyes:

So they say, a story believed by two other Five-Eyes countries is not credible enough to be shown to the president of the country whose soldiers are the ones being targeted. On what planet are these people living? So, they are either lying through their teeth or simply incompetent to not take such a threat serious! :rolleyes:

The story came out over the weekend and it took "Intel" until Sunday evening to report to him about the info not being credible? :what:


1593403862609.png


And the clown show continues :D

200.gif
 
This could turn into quite something for Mr T. The WH story has as usual changed already a few times.

- First, fake news, no such report
- Then Mr T sycophant DNI Ratcliffe: Mr T and VP not briefed, but does not say the story is fake or not credible intel.
- Aussie and UK intelligence people corroborate the story
- And then comes Mr T's Twitler creation. :rolleyes:

So they say, a story believed by two other Five-Eyes countries is not credible enough to be shown to the president of the country whose soldiers are the ones being targeted. On what planet are these people living? So, they are either lying through their teeth or simply incompetent to not take such a threat serious! :rolleyes:

The story came out over the weekend and it took "Intel" until Sunday evening to report to him about the info not being credible? :what:


View attachment 135592

And the clown show continues :D

200.gif

To be fair: he was golfing over the weekend so probably had a DND sign on the door of his room.
 
To be fair: he was golfing over the weekend so probably had a DND sign on the door of his room.

The funny part is that Mr T always gives it away that he lies as it happened now too. :laugh: The story said that WH was briefed in March 2020. Mr T tweets that Meadows was among those "not briefed".

Problem is, Meadows officially started his job as Chief of Staff on 1st April 2020. :rolleyes:

And look at these sequences:

"so-called attacks"
"Everybody is denying it" (In Mr T speak that means nobody is actually denying it)
"there have not been many attacks on us"

First, implying so-called attacks as if there were none, then everyone is denying it but there were not many. :confused:

And of course, he's trying again his pathetic LOOK THERE CON with Where's Hunter? :rolleyes:

1593405987318.png
 
Last edited:
I found an Op Ed by Richard Galant for CNN very informative. Its purpose was to try to explain Trump's apparently diminishing influence in the USA. Two quotes that resonated most with me were by David Axelrod, the strategist for Barack Obama's presidential campaigns, and Michael D'Antonio, a shared winner of the 1984 Pulitzer Prize for local reporting.

"Donald Trump is a cultural warrior. His politics depends on mining the fear and resentment of white, working class voters who feel they are on the losing end of economic and demographic change. Joe Biden is culturally inconvenient for Trump's re-election project. An older, white, Irish Catholic from a working class Pennsylvania family, Biden is just not frightening enough to the voters Trump needs to scare." (David Axelrod)

"Trump is responding by pushing all the buttons that worked for him as an outsider candidate in 2016. He indulges in stream-of-consciousness rants, he pastes ugly nicknames on his opponents. And he continues to rail against immigration. The trouble with Trump's rerun approach is that he's not an outsider anymore. He's the President -- which means he bears responsibility for the state our country is currently in. Things are so bad that he's even lost his chance to brag about the economy, which was once at the center of his claim to success." (Michael D'Antonio)

However, I am still not certain that Trump won't be re-elected, as the BLM riots appear to be re-invigorating the 'fear and resentment of white, working class voters....at the losing end of demographic change.'

In the end, I wonder whether all these protests and demands for change will just be relegated to the annals of history, rather than the chance for real reform that the USA - and the world - desperately needs.
 
I found an Op Ed by Richard Galant for CNN very informative. Its purpose was to try to explain Trump's apparently diminishing influence in the USA. Two quotes that resonated most with me were by David Axelrod, the strategist for Barack Obama's presidential campaigns, and Michael D'Antonio, a shared winner of the 1984 Pulitzer Prize for local reporting.

"Donald Trump is a cultural warrior. His politics depends on mining the fear and resentment of white, working class voters who feel they are on the losing end of economic and demographic change. Joe Biden is culturally inconvenient for Trump's re-election project. An older, white, Irish Catholic from a working class Pennsylvania family, Biden is just not frightening enough to the voters Trump needs to scare." (David Axelrod)

"Trump is responding by pushing all the buttons that worked for him as an outsider candidate in 2016. He indulges in stream-of-consciousness rants, he pastes ugly nicknames on his opponents. And he continues to rail against immigration. The trouble with Trump's rerun approach is that he's not an outsider anymore. He's the President -- which means he bears responsibility for the state our country is currently in. Things are so bad that he's even lost his chance to brag about the economy, which was once at the center of his claim to success." (Michael D'Antonio)

However, I am still not certain that Trump won't be re-elected, as the BLM riots appear to be re-invigorating the 'fear and resentment of white, working class voters....at the losing end of demographic change.'

In the end, I wonder whether all these protests and demands for change will just be relegated to the annals of history, rather than the chance for real reform that the USA - and the world - desperately needs.

Popular vote - no, not in a million years.
Electoral college - a different story.

He still has a chance to win, no doubt. Not because of his achievements but because of the electoral college.

I found it funny how he visited his medieval wall (which Mexico was supposed to pay) to celebrate the 200 miles mark. He of course omitted that of those 200 only 3 pathetic miles were completely new wall. That's how much the proclaimed "I built the best walls.....by far" master mustered in 3.5 years. :rolleyes:
 
Popular vote - no, not in a million years.
Electoral college - a different story.

He still has a chance to win, no doubt. Not because of his achievements but because of the electoral college.

I found it funny how he visited his medieval wall (which Mexico was supposed to pay) to celebrate the 200 miles mark. He of course omitted that of those 200 only 3 pathetic miles were completely new wall. That's how much the proclaimed "I built the best walls.....by far" master mustered in 3.5 years. :rolleyes:

that and he will cheat...
 
British intelligence confirming the intel on the Russian bounty on American soldiers is real.

GOP knew during impeachment trial that this was happening as some of the senators would have been briefed.

America has lost 20 service members in Afghanistan—that’s 5 Benghazis the way they count.

Covid is spreading like wildfire and the federal government is out golfing.


And don’t know what has to happen to get America to wake up.

Clinton called it. He is a Russian puppet.
 
Every document that goes to POTUS is literally stamped “The President Has Seen” and a record is kept.

maybe he didn’t see it cuz he does NO work...and doesn’t read the briefs he’s given....however this involves Russia, his favourite people...so I would imagine he knew...


wonder how all the servicemen and women feel this morning knowing the commander in chief allowed this to happen with no repercussions ....

and now that he knows...what’s he gonna do about it...
 
Every document that goes to POTUS is literally stamped “The President Has Seen” and a record is kept.

maybe he didn’t see it cuz he does NO work...and doesn’t read the briefs he’s given....however this involves Russia, his favourite people...so I would imagine he knew...


wonder how all the servicemen and women feel this morning knowing the commander in chief allowed this to happen with no repercussions ....

and now that he knows...what’s he gonna do about it...

It has not been 100% corroborated that he knew or didn't. Or if indeed it all happened as reported.

However, Mr T, the WH and all the other sycophants changed their story already a few times, so, one can rather safely assume that the story happened pretty much exactly as reported.

Options in my view:
- He was briefed but he didn't listen properly because he doesn't like negative things about Russia
- It was given to him in the PDB but he simply didn't bother to read
- The Intelligence people knew it but didn't dare to tell him as he reportedly does not react well to negative news about Russia
- Or worst of all, he knew it all and did nothing.

Either way, none make him look good. :rolleyes:

Time will tell. Let's see how many more times they will change their story. The more they do it, the more true the entire report is.
 
Last edited:
It has not been 100% corroborated that he knew or didn't. Or if indeed it all happened as reported.

However, Mr T, the WH and all the other sycophants changed their story already a few times, so, one can rather safely assume that the story happened pretty much exactly as reported.

Options in my view:
- He was briefed but he didn't listen properly because he doesn't like negative things about Russia
- It was given to him in the PDB but he simply didn't bother to read
- The Intelligence people knew it but didn't dare to tell him as he reportedly does not react well to negative news about Russia
- Or worst of all, he knew it all and did nothing.

he knows now...and still crickets On what the plan of action will be...


and funny no one except trump has commented about the reports...


also has anyone asked former chief of staff...Mick Mulvaney if he knew...
 
Playford7 update:

Bryan recommended I look into the "thread ban" feature for Playford7 as a possible alternative to me having disabled his account. That's now done. His account is reinstated to normal but he is banned from replying in this thread.

FYI I won't be monitoring replies here. If you feel I need to know your opinion of this, or whatever, feel free to PM me or email to [email protected].

- Max
 
Didn't know where to post this, so, I'll drop it here.

New Casino just opening its doors, Pay&Play in Trustly countries only at the moment (MGA licence).

Create a group and play together with a shared group wallet. Each member transfers an amount (whatever they want) to the group balance and any wins are divided based on the contribution. :)

1593603419532.png
 
Didn't know where to post this, so, I'll drop it here.

New Casino just opening its doors, Pay&Play in Trustly countries only at the moment (MGA licence).

Create a group and play together with a shared group wallet. Each member transfers an amount (whatever they want) to the group balance and any wins are divided based on the contribution. :)

View attachment 135760
So now i just need to find people willing to create the 9p Doa group with me.
:)
 
So now i just need to find people willing to create the 9p Doa group with me.
:)

no need, you can just contribute 10 bucks to the pot and should the session end with a win, then you get a share based on your contribution.

As far as I have seen it, let's say: you have 5 people 50-40-30-20-10 going into the shared wallet = 150. If the balance reaches 300 and you stop the session (there is a captain who will need to do it), it is shared back as in 100-80-60-40-20.

The advantage is, that you play for longer if you stay on reasonable bets. Some friends tried it out, and they really liked it.
 
no need, you can just contribute 10 bucks to the pot and should the session end with a win, then you get a share based on your contribution.

As far as I have seen it, let's say: you have 5 people 50-40-30-20-10 going into the shared wallet = 150. If the balance reaches 300 and you stop the session (there is a captain who will need to do it), it is shared back as in 100-80-60-40-20.

The advantage is, that you play for longer if you stay on reasonable bets. Some friends tried it out, and they really liked it.
So its only one playing at a time then?
It sounded like everyone taking part in the pot could use the shared pot to play with.
 
Got a mail from Unibet saying people that choose to have the limit higher than 5000sek/week will only be able to access the Sports betting part of their page.
So apparently betting on sports is not gambling then.
Who knew.

I bet Spelinspektionen will be thrilled with that loophole.
 
Didn't know where to post this, so, I'll drop it here.

New Casino just opening its doors, Pay&Play in Trustly countries only at the moment (MGA licence).

Create a group and play together with a shared group wallet. Each member transfers an amount (whatever they want) to the group balance and any wins are divided based on the contribution. :)

View attachment 135760

Casinobud is not yet available in your country.

Brilliant, thanks for the recommendation.

:rolleyes:
 
In a strange turn of events

Mexico closes US border in Arizona to stop July 4th visitors

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

tic-toc, tic-toc, Covid is circling closer to Mr T. :rolleyes:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


I saw parts of his speech at Mt Rushmore - as usual lies, lies and lies; this time garnered with fawning racists.
 
tic-toc, tic-toc, Covid is circling closer to Mr T. :rolleyes:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


I saw parts of his speech at Mt Rushmore - as usual lies, lies and lies; this time garnered with fawning racists.

At least they have all the remdesivir they need since US bought all of it. Leaving nothing for their "allies". With friends like these...etc. Not saying that US doesn't need a lot of medicine to fight Covid since they screwed up so badly dealing with it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top