WARNING NineCasino : many no-pay complaints, casino ignores them all

[maxd]

Over the last 18 months or so we’ve seen about 10 complaints against NineCasino.com. This is a markedly higher complaint rate than we see from most casinos though, to be fair, it’s not astronomical. Small mercies.

Roughly 75-80% of the complaints we’re seeing regarding NineCasino are of the no-pay variety, as seen in this recent example. The casino usually doesn’t respond to complaints at all and if they do it is of the “you don’t send us players so we’re not interested” variety. This is, quite simply, gross negligence because it means that their interest in resolving player issues is predicated on profits first and player care … not at all, unless their palms are greased.

WARNING: Complaints against NineCasino for non-payment and related issues are much more frequent than they should be. Worse yet the casino has no interest in hearing those complaints from anyone who isn’t giving them profitable players. Be aware that NineCasino will very likely ignore your complaints if and when you have them. Players are advised to look elsewhere for their gambling services.

LATER: please note that I’m (now) aware that this Warning is somewhat at odds with the review we have on the main site. That gaff is on me: we’ve had this Warning in the queue for some time now and I pulled the trigger on it without consulting the Content guys first. My bad and we’re now looking into reconciling the two.

 

[dunover]

I think it might be a good idea to avoid sites with 'nine' in the name as it isn't the first:

WARNING Thread 'Ninewin owes players A LOT of money and most aren't getting paid'

Jul 18, 2024

Over the past several months we've seen a half dozen or so cases where players at Ninewin.com -- or a variety of highly dodgy pseudo URLs like 192-ninewin.com -- are owed money by the casino and either aren't getting paid or are being given a lot of excuses for very s-l-o-w payment. The thing is, if you're being paid slow enough that you never see the money then you aren't being paid, are you?

Often when a casino slips into this "money maybe" mode it's modest stuff that tends to be more an annoyance to players than anything else, $/£/€ 50 type of thing. But in the current rash of...

• maxd
• ninewin casino
• Replies: 5
• Forum: Casinomeister Warnings

• 
• 

 

[mulven]

Over the last 18 months or so we’ve seen about 10 complaints against NineCasino.com. This is a markedly higher complaint rate than we see from most casinos though, to be fair, it’s not astronomical. Small mercies.

Roughly 75-80% of the complaints we’re seeing regarding NineCasino are of the no-pay variety, as seen in this recent example. The casino usually doesn’t respond to complaints at all and if they do it is of the “you don’t send us players so we’re not interested” variety. This is, quite simply, gross negligence because it means that their interest in resolving player issues is predicated on profits first and player care … not at all, unless their palms are greased.

WARNING: Complaints against NineCasino for non-payment and related issues are much more frequent than they should be. Worse yet the casino has no interest in hearing those complaints from anyone who isn’t giving them profitable players. Be aware that NineCasino will very likely ignore your complaints if and when you have them. Players are advised to look elsewhere for their gambling services.

Should probably get the gentoo copy people to whip up a new review!

Might be worth extending this warning to all Extendy sites as I'm fairly confident the people behind the plug and play platform own most of the sites on it.

 

[lockinlove]

I think they are a money laundering scheme or idiots. Maybe both.

I played there once. Won $175 and cashed out. They paid me $600. I told them and they said dont worry about it all good have a great day.

I did not win a contest..nothing. They honestly did not care.

I stopped playing there though because they didnt seem invested in themselves and like it was meant for something other than gambling.

Although, if they give me money for free maybe I shoulda stayted lol

 

[maxd]

Should probably get the gentoo copy people to whip up a new review! ...

Quite so, and good call, my mistake for not consulting the Content team _before_ I posted the Warning to ensure that all was in synch as it should be. I’ve added a footnote to the Warning to make this clear.

- Max

 

[Hector]

I think it might be a good idea to avoid sites with 'nine' in the name as it isn't the first:

WARNING Thread 'Ninewin owes players A LOT of money and most aren't getting paid'

Jul 18, 2024

Over the past several months we've seen a half dozen or so cases where players at Ninewin.com -- or a variety of highly dodgy pseudo URLs like 192-ninewin.com -- are owed money by the casino and either aren't getting paid or are being given a lot of excuses for very s-l-o-w payment. The thing is, if you're being paid slow enough that you never see the money then you aren't being paid, are you?

Often when a casino slips into this "money maybe" mode it's modest stuff that tends to be more an annoyance to players than anything else, $/£/€ 50 type of thing. But in the current rash of...

• maxd
• ninewin casino
• Replies: 5
• Forum: Casinomeister Warnings

• 
• 

Oh, interesting… so it is allowed to talk openly about certain casinos here.
Just to clarify: some time ago I posted something about WizCasino, including a screenshot (nothing offensive), and not only was my post deleted — an entire thread full of replies got locked, apparently because it touched on some “sensitive” topics.
Now I see NineCasino can be openly criticized… well, I guess it’s because NineCasino doesn’t pay for advertising here, right?
Anyway, double standards officially confirmed.

 

[Hector]

I think it might be a good idea to avoid sites with 'nine' in the name as it isn't the first:

WARNING Thread 'Ninewin owes players A LOT of money and most aren't getting paid'

Jul 18, 2024

Over the past several months we've seen a half dozen or so cases where players at Ninewin.com -- or a variety of highly dodgy pseudo URLs like 192-ninewin.com -- are owed money by the casino and either aren't getting paid or are being given a lot of excuses for very s-l-o-w payment. The thing is, if you're being paid slow enough that you never see the money then you aren't being paid, are you?

Often when a casino slips into this "money maybe" mode it's modest stuff that tends to be more an annoyance to players than anything else, $/£/€ 50 type of thing. But in the current rash of...

• maxd
• ninewin casino
• Replies: 5
• Forum: Casinomeister Warnings

• 
• 

So let me get this straight, Dunover…
It’s okay to post public warnings about NineCasino now — and that’s fair — but when I posted a screenshot mentioning WizCasino, my post was deleted, and another thread with dozens of comments got locked?
Interesting how freedom of speech here seems to depend on whether a casino pays for exposure or not.
Thanks for the clarification.

Also, just a side note — your previous remarks about me using AI to communicate in English were honestly a bit despective and borderline racist.

Not everyone here is a native speaker, and many of us use tools just to participate in these discussions. Mocking that shows a lack of respect for international members of this forum.

But I guess that only matters when it’s convenient too, right?

 

[maxd]

First of all @Hector ease up with that conspiracy theory stuff. You’ve been here what, two weeks? You might want to get to know the place a little better before you start with the "freedom of speech” accusations. There are endless examples on CM of exactly the opposite of what you are claiming so … if you’re worried about looking foolish on that forums that might be a good thing to watch out for.

Secondly, I’m not clear on what your accusations here are specifically referring to but ask fair questions and you will get fair answers. If there are issues with some of your posts then by all means, let’s look into that. Do so calmly and all will be well. Expressing yourself by trying to torch the place will not be the path to happiness on the forums.

- Max

 

[dunover]

You're missing the point Hector - regarding AI, it tends to produce its output in English language and is immediately spotted by native English speakers as AI and therefore doesn't hold the respect of a genuine individual's work.

You don't even need to use AI, simply type in your own language and use Google translate - it's just as easy and it's your own work and would be recognized as such. It's also a rule of the forum to post in English.

If you check back in your posts you'll see that several people criticized your use of AI before I even mentioned it, quite rightly too.

Why you had fragments of Spanish in one of your chaotic posts I cannot know. We have numerous non-English speaking members none of whom seem to need AI and can communicate perfectly well without it.

'Borderline racist'?? That is invariably a hysterical arm-waving accusation used by those with no credible point or argument, not even worth a response.

Now the 'double standards' part:

Both casinos in question have a reviewed status on CM and neither pay for comments. As befits all partners, they are judged upon their behaviour and without censorship. NineCasino have been called out because they are bad for players and the PAB team considered a warning necessary. This is done regardless of any arrangement financial or otherwise they have with CM. Money is irrelevant. I suggest you check this thread out as a perfect example, a paid partner that didn't conduct themselves well and were kicked off the site:

WARNING Thread 'Del Oro is confiscating player balances without justification'

Jan 28, 2025

We’ve had a tough time with Del Oro Casino since they joined Casinomeister late last year. Their rep at the time — later disavowed as someone who didn’t know what they were doing — ignored the Forum Rules, solicited players from restricted countries, handed out bonuses without any reference to the applicable Terms or Conditions, ignored the Casinomeister staff, pretended to not understand “this forum” when it suited them and sucked up more of our time and attention than any rep or casino in living memory. That’s not even mentioning their use of shills within hours of joining the...

• maxd
• Replies: 90
• Forum: Casinomeister Warnings

• 
• 
• 

Now contrast that with Winz who you irrationally decided to exemplify as a bad actor due to their weak license. Actually, one site there are seldom every any issues with and have earned their high rating by their performance. Therein lies the difference. And the reason Winz are treated differently to NineCasino. It really is simple.

And yes, your dodgy dealer accusation thread was locked because it was going round in circles and wasting people's time over what was, and still is, a load of unsubstantiated accusations from yourself. This was becoming tiresome for the members here. So rather than continuing to use the thread as your own bulletin board, you were invited to let the mods know when you had anything further to add regarding credible real evidence, at which point it will be reopened and you can add it and continue with the discussion.

If you doubt the integrity of the forum and resent the moderating decisions, then feel just as free to leave as you did to join. But you're not going to be allowed to trample all over it as if it's your personal fiefdom.

Thank-you.

 

[Hector]

You're missing the point Hector - regarding AI, it tends to produce its output in English language and is immediately spotted by native English speakers as AI and therefore doesn't hold the respect of a genuine individual's work.

You don't even need to use AI, simply type in your own language and use Google translate - it's just as easy and it's your own work and would be recognized as such. It's also a rule of the forum to post in English.

If you check back in your posts you'll see that several people criticized your use of AI before I even mentioned it, quite rightly too.

Why you had fragments of Spanish in one of your chaotic posts I cannot know. We have numerous non-English speaking members none of whom seem to need AI and can communicate perfectly well without it.

'Borderline racist'?? That is invariably a hysterical arm-waving accusation used by those with no credible point or argument, not even worth a response.

Now the 'double standards' part:

Both casinos in question have a reviewed status on CM and neither pay for comments. As befits all partners, they are judged upon their behaviour and without censorship. NineCasino have been called out because they are bad for players and the PAB team considered a warning necessary. This is done regardless of any arrangement financial or otherwise they have with CM. Money is irrelevant. I suggest you check this thread out as a perfect example, a paid partner that didn't conduct themselves well and were kicked off the site:

WARNING Thread 'Del Oro is confiscating player balances without justification'

Jan 28, 2025

We’ve had a tough time with Del Oro Casino since they joined Casinomeister late last year. Their rep at the time — later disavowed as someone who didn’t know what they were doing — ignored the Forum Rules, solicited players from restricted countries, handed out bonuses without any reference to the applicable Terms or Conditions, ignored the Casinomeister staff, pretended to not understand “this forum” when it suited them and sucked up more of our time and attention than any rep or casino in living memory. That’s not even mentioning their use of shills within hours of joining the...

• maxd
• Replies: 90
• Forum: Casinomeister Warnings

• 
• 
• 

Now contrast that with Winz who you irrationally decided to exemplify as a bad actor due to their weak license. Actually, one site there are seldom every any issues with and have earned their high rating by their performance. Therein lies the difference. And the reason Winz are treated differently to NineCasino. It really is simple.

And yes, your dodgy dealer accusation thread was locked because it was going round in circles and wasting people's time over what was, and still is, a load of unsubstantiated accusations from yourself. This was becoming tiresome for the members here. So rather than continuing to use the thread as your own bulletin board, you were invited to let the mods know when you had anything further to add regarding credible real evidence, at which point it will be reopened and you can add it and continue with the discussion.

If you doubt the integrity of the forum and resent the moderating decisions, then feel just as free to leave as you did to join. But you're not going to be allowed to trample all over it as if it's your personal fiefdom.

Thank-you.

Thanks for your response, Dunover.
Let me clarify something: I never intended to “trample” over the forum or make it my “personal fiefdom.” That kind of language is unnecessary. I simply shared evidence — not vague accusations — of a pattern I’ve documented over weeks, even months. To then see the thread closed with no clear dialogue or even attempt to verify the content felt dismissive.
You said it was “going in circles,” but perhaps that’s because no one from the moderation team actually addressed the specific issues being raised — such as the visual anomalies with the game mechanics, which are clearly documented on video.
About AI and language — if using tools to communicate more clearly in a non-native language is “unacceptable,” I find that incredibly disheartening. I was only trying to participate and be understood in a space dominated by native English speakers. It’s ironic that I’m criticized more for how I spoke than what I was saying.
And yes, it’s absolutely a double standard when other threads full of chaos and zero evidence remain open — but mine, backed with documentation and affecting real players, gets shut down. That inconsistency speaks louder than anything I could post.
If this forum wants to uphold credibility, it should welcome real concerns — even when they’re uncomfortable. That’s what transparency and accountability look like.
Thank you for reading. That’s all I have to say — for now.

 

[Hector]

First of all @Hector ease up with that conspiracy theory stuff. You’ve been here what, two weeks? You might want to get to know the place a little better before you start with the "freedom of speech” accusations. There are endless examples on CM of exactly the opposite of what you are claiming so … if you’re worried about looking foolish on that forums that might be a good thing to watch out for.

Secondly, I’m not clear on what your accusations here are specifically referring to but ask fair questions and you will get fair answers. If there are issues with some of your posts then by all means, let’s look into that. Do so calmly and all will be well. Expressing yourself by trying to torch the place will not be the path to happiness on the forums.

- Max

Max,

Thank you for your reply. I understand your concern about forum structure and tone, but I’d like to clarify something important: what I’ve shared is not “conspiracy theory,” but a collection of documented patterns, supported by videos, screenshots, and observations that I’ve already submitted to national regulatory authorities — including the ESBK in Switzerland.
You mentioned “freedom of speech accusations” as if they were misplaced. But when a thread with detailed evidence and active discussion is shut down, while others with far less substance stay open indefinitely, it’s hard not to question the motives behind that moderation.
I may be new to the forum, but I’m not new to this issue — and if CasinoMeister is meant to be a platform where unfair treatment by operators and providers can be exposed, I’d expect my contributions to be treated with the same seriousness and respect as others.
I’m open to asking fair questions and presenting my findings calmly. But I also hope this forum is open to hearing from users who have legitimate concerns, especially when they involve one of the biggest gaming providers in the world.

Thank you.

 

[mulven]

Thanks for your response, Dunover.
Let me clarify something: I never intended to “trample” over the forum or make it my “personal fiefdom.” That kind of language is unnecessary. I simply shared evidence — not vague accusations — of a pattern I’ve documented over weeks, even months. To then see the thread closed with no clear dialogue or even attempt to verify the content felt dismissive.
You said it was “going in circles,” but perhaps that’s because no one from the moderation team actually addressed the specific issues being raised — such as the visual anomalies with the game mechanics, which are clearly documented on video.
About AI and language — if using tools to communicate more clearly in a non-native language is “unacceptable,” I find that incredibly disheartening. I was only trying to participate and be understood in a space dominated by native English speakers. It’s ironic that I’m criticized more for how I spoke than what I was saying.
And yes, it’s absolutely a double standard when other threads full of chaos and zero evidence remain open — but mine, backed with documentation and affecting real players, gets shut down. That inconsistency speaks louder than anything I could post.
If this forum wants to uphold credibility, it should welcome real concerns — even when they’re uncomfortable. That’s what transparency and accountability look like.
Thank you for reading. That’s all I have to say — for now.

The simple reason was that the crux of the post was private and you were being attacked my many members including myself. The moderation team don't want chaotic fighting and spats between members in threads so the best thing to do was to close the thread to replies for the time being.

The discussion couldn't move forward because it was stuck on you defending yourself, when attacked, by stating once you could share the full evidence, people would realise that you were speaking the truth etc. Without the evidence, people would just attack your views so it would go round in circles of attack your views, defend without the important evidence, attack your views, defend without the important evidence etc.

I'm curious when you posted about WizSlots (not wizcasino, unless that is a scam site trying to use a similar name), was that in the last 2 weeks?

 

[Hector]

The simple reason was that the crux of the post was private and you were being attacked my many members including myself. The moderation team don't want chaotic fighting and spats between members in threads so the best thing to do was to close the thread to replies for the time being.

The discussion couldn't move forward because it was stuck on you defending yourself, when attacked, by stating once you could share the full evidence, people would realise that you were speaking the truth etc. Without the evidence, people would just attack your views so it would go round in circles of attack your views, defend without the important evidence, attack your views, defend without the important evidence etc.

I'm curious when you posted about WizSlots (not wizcasino, unless that is a scam site trying to use a similar name), was that in the last 2 weeks?

Thank you for your message and for explaining your perspective more calmly. I understand that moderation may want to avoid chaos or personal attacks. However, I want to clarify that I never wanted to create conflict. I came here simply to share a serious case involving a licensed provider and a game that might be affecting thousands of players.
The reason I said the core evidence was private is because it’s currently under review by a national regulator, and I have to respect that process — but I also believe that the community has a right to know what is happening, even if some parts can’t be public yet.
Regarding WizSlots — yes, I posted something briefly around two weeks ago mentioning it as an example, and the post was immediately removed. That’s what made me feel censored, especially when other similar posts remain. If there was an issue with how I mentioned it, I would’ve appreciated a warning or a chance to edit it.
Anyway, I do appreciate your tone and willingness to explain, and I really do believe CasinoMeister has great potential when it supports users who bring uncomfortable truths to light.

 

[mulven]

You mentioned “freedom of speech accusations” as if they were misplaced. But when a thread with detailed evidence and active discussion is shut down, while others with far less substance stay open indefinitely, it’s hard not to question the motives behind that moderation.

You would not divulge the detailed evidence apart from to a few people privately.

The thread itself did not contain such evidence. And the "active discussion" was mostly a lot of discourse around the fact the we couldn't see the evidence.

I may be new to the forum, but I’m not new to this issue — and if CasinoMeister is meant to be a platform where unfair treatment by operators and providers can be exposed, I’d expect my contributions to be treated with the same seriousness and respect as others.

In this case, such warnings posts are only really made as a result of PAB developments or trends and are done my the staff/moderators. There is another discussion thread regarding if a lower level version of warnings (or something to that effect) should happen.

Additionally, as someone who hasn't seen your evidence, I would deem it as conjecture where as the PAB team have seen objective proof that many complainants have not been paid by the company. That is black and white, your proof is subjective and is dodgy looking roulette patterns/spins which have the potential to be explained a way by science. The human brain has a way of rationalising the things it sees and assigning patterns to them, whilst it might seem like its definitive objective proof, what you have sent off to the ESBK is not the same "black and white" concrete, objective proof, that has been used as the basis for this warning.

Once again, these warnings are derived from PABs (casinomeister complaints).

 

[Hector]

You would not divulge the detailed evidence apart from to a few people privately.

The thread itself did not contain such evidence. And the "active discussion" was mostly a lot of discourse around the fact the we couldn't see the evidence.

In this case, such warnings posts are only really made as a result of PAB developments or trends and are done my the staff/moderators. There is another discussion thread regarding if a lower level version of warnings (or something to that effect) should happen.

Additionally, as someone who hasn't seen your evidence, I would deem it as conjecture where as the PAB team have seen objective proof that many complainants have not been paid by the company. That is black and white, your proof is subjective and is dodgy looking roulette patterns/spins which have the potential to be explained a way by science. The human brain has a way of rationalising the things it sees and assigning patterns to them, whilst it might seem like its definitive objective proof, what you have sent off to the ESBK is not the same "black and white" concrete, objective proof, that has been used as the basis for this warning.

Once again, these warnings are derived from PABs (casinomeister complaints).

Thanks for clarifying your position. I understand your point regarding the lack of “public” evidence on the thread and your team’s threshold for issuing warnings based on PABs.
However, I’d like to make two things clear:

1. The decision to keep the strongest evidence private was not to make the thread chaotic — it was because the matter is under evaluation by a national gaming authority (the ESBK), and I’m cooperating fully with them. But I’ve already shared extensive video analysis, screenshots, and explained patterns that go far beyond subjective speculation. There is algorithmic behavior at play, and some of it was even indirectly acknowledged in a written response by the provider.
2. I totally agree that objective proof is essential. But I’d argue that relying only on “no payment” complaints is limiting. What if the root of the problem is how the game is functioning? What if the issue is so technical that it escapes most users’ understanding — until someone points it out clearly?

That’s what I’m doing. I’m not expecting automatic trust — but I do expect the same platform opportunity to explain what I’ve found, without being silenced or dismissed as conspiracy. If evidence is the missing piece, it’s on its way — because it’s already with the regulator.

 

[mulven]

Thank you for your message and for explaining your perspective more calmly. I understand that moderation may want to avoid chaos or personal attacks. However, I want to clarify that I never wanted to create conflict. I came here simply to share a serious case involving a licensed provider and a game that might be affecting thousands of players.
The reason I said the core evidence was private is because it’s currently under review by a national regulator, and I have to respect that process — but I also believe that the community has a right to know what is happening, even if some parts can’t be public yet.
Regarding WizSlots — yes, I posted something briefly around two weeks ago mentioning it as an example, and the post was immediately removed. That’s what made me feel censored, especially when other similar posts remain. If there was an issue with how I mentioned it, I would’ve appreciated a warning or a chance to edit it.
Anyway, I do appreciate your tone and willingness to explain, and I really do believe CasinoMeister has great potential when it supports users who bring uncomfortable truths to light.

It's possible the structure/content of the post violated one of the rules. When complaining about a casino you have to do it a certain way for it to be "kosher" per se.

You are allowed to both praise and talk crap about casinos on here but if you praise too much its shilling and if you are making a post saying a casino is bad you have to do it a certain way so its not libel

It's likely some of your post violated one of these rules and that slight tweaks to wording, or omitting a few things might have made your posts complaint with the rules. I havent seen them but its the most likely reason.

1.6 - No "Libelous" Posts: Do not make posts that could be considered libelous, defamatory, or posting merely to cause harm to another's business. Opinions are expected, but do not attack others with accusations of criminal activity unless this has been proven in a court of law.

1.11 - Please do not exploit this board to promote your own personal agenda: If the moderators (and members) feel that you are harassing members with agenda laden posts, or consistently ragging on a casino that did you wrong, etc., you might be counseled by the admins of the site (like me) and/or your account may be suspended. If you have a crusade to lead, there are plenty of domain names out there that you can purchase and create your own personal whinge site. Casinomeister's forum is not the place to do this.

 

[mulven]

I totally agree that objective proof is essential. But I’d argue that relying only on “no payment” complaints is limiting. What if the root of the problem is how the game is functioning? What if the issue is so technical that it escapes most users’ understanding — until someone points it out clearly?

That is not the only reason for warnings, just the basis for this warning in particular.

Now I see NineCasino can be openly criticized… well, I guess it’s because NineCasino doesn’t pay for advertising here, right?

Also I forgot to speak to this comment...

Casinomeister/Gentoo literally has a business/affiliate relationship with NineCasino (or its affiliate management), my first post in this thread was joking how they should probably alter the review with an affiliate link they have hosted on the site.

If @L&L-Jan started zero-ing peoples balances just after they hit 10,000x+ wins for the shits and giggles, his brands would get a warning that peoples account balances are being maliciously reduced to zero. Doesn't matter if the brand is well loved on the forum or has any sort of financial relationship to them, if there is something dodgy going on that the staff can concur with, a warning will get posted, among other consequeneces.

 

[Hector]

That is not the only reason for warnings, just the basis for this warning in particular.

That’s exactly why this thread caught my attention — because my case also happened at NineCasino.
I opened a case here on CasinoMeister, and I have to say that the team was very helpful. They told me that NineCasino is known for not responding to complaints. They even did me the favor of forwarding my case to the game provider.
Unfortunately, the provider never replied.
That’s why I had no choice but to escalate the matter to the national gaming authority in my country.

 

[mulven]

That’s exactly why this thread caught my attention — because my case also happened at NineCasino.
I opened a case here on CasinoMeister, and I have to say that the team was very helpful. They told me that NineCasino is known for not responding to complaints. They even did me the favor of forwarding my case to the game provider.
Unfortunately, the provider never replied.
That’s why I had no choice but to escalate the matter to the national gaming authority in my country.

You made a complaint about a specific casino because a provider for the game you played "rigged" their roulette or had suspicious patterns? I probably am missing crucial information but I don't see what that has to do with the casino itself.

Anyways, We've had somewhat of a "DM" back and forth here and its not particularly on topic - apart from your last reply - so it's probably best to move the discussion to one of your other threads.

 

[Hector]

You made a complaint about a specific casino because a provider for the game you played "rigged" their roulette or had suspicious patterns? I probably am missing crucial information but I don't see what that has to do with the casino itself.

Anyways, We've had somewhat of a "DM" back and forth here and its not particularly on topic - apart from your last reply - so it's probably best to move the discussion to one of your other threads.

Yes, I understand your question. The issue is that a game provider is offering its products within the NineCasino platform.
When I noticed very suspicious patterns in one of their games, I first contacted the casino—but they didn’t respond at all. Then I contacted the provider directly, and they also ignored me.
So I submitted the case to CasinoMeister. The team confirmed that NineCasino is known for ignoring player complaints, and they even helped by forwarding my case to the provider—but again, no reply.
So while my main concern is about the game’s integrity, the casino’s refusal to take responsibility or even respond properly made them part of the problem. Any platform that hosts games must take accountability when something potentially serious is discovered.

 

[dunover]

Yes, I understand your question. The issue is that a game provider is offering its products within the NineCasino platform.
When I noticed very suspicious patterns in one of their games, I first contacted the casino—but they didn’t respond at all. Then I contacted the provider directly, and they also ignored me.
So I submitted the case to CasinoMeister. The team confirmed that NineCasino is known for ignoring player complaints, and they even helped by forwarding my case to the provider—but again, no reply.
So while my main concern is about the game’s integrity, the casino’s refusal to take responsibility or even respond properly made them part of the problem. Any platform that hosts games must take accountability when something potentially serious is discovered.

And now you've hijacked this NineCasino warning thread to carry on your pointless diatribe regarding unproven game allegations. This is what got your thread locked. Stop it please.

 

[Hector]

And now you've hijacked this NineCasino warning thread to carry on your pointless diatribe regarding unproven game allegations. This is what got your thread locked. Stop it please.

I understand your point, but I believe this topic still belongs in this thread — because what I experienced happened specifically on NineCasino’s platform. If a provider offers a possibly manipulated or malfunctioning game inside a casino that systematically ignores players and complaints, isn’t that something worth discussing in a warning thread?
I’m not trying to “hijack” anything — I’m trying to contribute useful information about a platform that may be unsafe for players. I’ve already submitted all the evidence to a national authority, and I trust they will determine whether my findings are valid or not.
I’ve always tried to keep my tone respectful, despite feeling dismissed. If you don’t believe me — that’s fine. But please don’t try to silence concerns that could potentially affect many other users.

 

[Hector]

And now you've hijacked this NineCasino warning thread to carry on your pointless diatribe regarding unproven game allegations. This is what got your thread locked. Stop it please.

 

[dunover]

If the issue is with the game provider as you stated, the fact that NineCasino is one of presumably tens that use the same software is incidental. You have simply used that to justify hijacking the thread.

We haven't got time to deal with you all day, nor the will.

So you have been suspended temporarily for 36 hours (or less) while the team decides how to proceed.

Thanks.

 

[maxd]

You mentioned “freedom of speech accusations” as if they were misplaced. But when a thread with detailed evidence and active discussion is shut down, while others with far less substance stay open indefinitely, it’s hard not to question the motives behind that moderation.

Under normal circumstances when a thread with evidence and ongoing respectful discussions is not being derailed by an agenda-driven blow-hard then yes. such discussions usually proceed without difficulty.

However when someone who is agenda-driven, routinely disrespectful and behaves like a troll derails those discussions their contributions — regardless of what claims they may make in them — are viewed with deep scepticism, not because of their content but because of the bad behaviour of the person concerned. We are not a platform for trolls with a drum to beat and if you behave like one then you will find yourself on the pointy end of the “get lost” stick.

if CasinoMeister is meant to be a platform where unfair treatment by operators and providers can be exposed, I’d expect my contributions to be treated with the same seriousness and respect as others.

You will be treated with seriousness and respect IF AND ONLY IF you respect the house rules. The more you violate those rules the more you will become a target for moderator actions being taken against you. You have been violating those rules quite freely and you now have a target painted on your forehead because of it, and rightly so.

I’m not expecting automatic trust — but I do expect the same platform opportunity to explain what I’ve found, without being silenced or dismissed as conspiracy

See above.

I’ve always tried to keep my tone respectful

That’s nice, and very easy to say, but statements like the following tell rather a different story:

Now I see NineCasino can be openly criticized… well, I guess it’s because NineCasino doesn’t pay for advertising here, right?

Interesting how freedom of speech here seems to depend on whether a casino pays for exposure or not.

Oh, interesting… so it is allowed to talk openly about certain casinos here.

an entire thread full of replies got locked, apparently because it touched on some “sensitive” topics.

Read the forum rules: dissing the site or the staff will get you booted; being a troll will get you booted; ignoring directions given to you by the moderators will get you booted; hijacking threads with your personal agenda will get you booted.

The truth is you are a PITA and a time-suck for the forum staff because of it. Whatever your issues are we now welcome you to take them elsewhere. Goodbye and good luck.

- Max