That's completely fair to point out, but it misses the general point the other person was making. Their question was how can casinomeister portray them so positively when they operate like this?
So casinomeister does not accredit them for the reason you listed, but you personally still seem to hold them in very high personal regard as stated in the other thread ("At Casinomeister we know full well that such operators can actually be quite excellent, very experienced and proven trustworthy management. Such is the case with iNetBet.")
I believe in the past you've also stated you would trust inetbet management with your wallet or your firstborn child. Quite high praise.
They also have an extremely positive review here which lists them as both accredited and not accredited, I imagine it hasn't been updated in 10 years ("Inetbet casino review 2025"):
iNetBet Casino Review 2025 | Tested & Rated
Do you stand by these statements? If so, that seems to imply that you are at least personally fine with how they run their banking operations, their delays and communication issues, and rather dubious justifications for fees such as a 10% card to crypto withdrawal fee.
So either you've changed your mind, or your above answer was somewhat misleading towards the above poster's inquiry, as you are actually very positive towards inetbet.
I appreciate the arbitration service you offer here, but it's sad if it needs to be used just because of delays and exceptionally poor communication in regards to withdrawals. I still remember my own case where they wasted several months of my time ignoring all communications and withholding withdrawals without providing a single reason. I had to come back here to get it resolved, and still never received any explanation for their behavior. I'm convinced they would have never paid me without the PAB. Never played there again after.
I'm pretty sure a large amount is the smallest possible number they can pull out of a hat as a "large withdrawal" while still having people take them seriously. So probably $1,000 or higher. If you really pressure them, maybe $2,501. The idea that a longstanding player with a fixed address and many years of history needs a $5,000 check withdrawal split for "their own protection" is just silly. They could have at least used the standard "banking in the US is hard" excuse.
It's a similar thing with the max bet issue in the other thread. They're telling the truth when they say the software doesn't allow that, but they're the ones who spent 20 years not asking the software provider to add that feature. They're happy to have an excuse not to pay people if they don't feel like it. Inetbet is known to get out the magnifying glass on minor/potentially accidental bonus rule violations.