ConnectoCasino gives Afilliate the High Hard One

Lurkio,

You have already made yourself heard and we know what you stand for. Since you are so outspoken,you must be man enough to tell us who the magnificent 7 are? Come on,what are you waiting for. Many of us really want to know.
 
Lurkio said:
..then you dont gamble by definition ,as the outcome for you, ( alone on the planet) is a foregone conclusion. :eek:
..

Lurkio

For a self confessed 'expert' on internet gambling you don't appear very clued in mate. :confused:

Very little in life is a "foregone conclusion", probability rules. Therefore everything is possible including me, amongst others on this forum, losing money overall at internet casinos, just unlikely thats all.

"( alone on the planet)"

Me, Vesuvio, Clayman, Cipher, KK and everybody in Denmark just for starters it appears! :)

Do you think casinos like Danes so much that they don't want to take their money off them? :p

Nope you will have to do better than this if you want to recover your credibilty on this forum. Just my opinion of course.

Mitch

"win don't gamble"

PS

"( alone on the planet)"


Unless you have really sussed me out mate in which case when I am gone nobody will be winning! :D
 
Last edited:
Ah, what a pleasant thread. A few bashings, a few tangents, a few derailments - oh well, life in the cyber-world of forum administration. :D

One point I should make before this thread dies and slithers into the past, is that I believe there is some unnecessary casino bashing going on. I know, I know, a lot of people don't like the way connect-to-casino is managed, but jumping to conclusions or having knee-jerk reactions only leads to a bash-fest which does no one any good.

I don't like it when the forum is used as means to publicly harass someone (read person(s) or casino). I'm not saying that this applies 100% here, but Im making a general comment.

Yet I'm bringing this up because it does apply to this thread maybe not 100% but it's a high percent.

Conroy, you brought up this problem of an affiliate payment not being issued to you, but you had only just signed up through them and according to their FAQ, payments are made on the 7th of each month. I don't know when you sent these two players to the casino, (one of which failed to qualify as a player - bad check), but you were paid on the 18th (according to the casino). But you continued to bash the casino after this date, and then thank me as if I had something to do with the payment. I didn't.

I don't mind people coming here and voicing their dissent over whatever ails them. But when it is unnecessary -- it's unnecessary. That's all I have to say.
 
Conroy, you brought up this problem of an affiliate payment not being issued to you, but you had only just signed up through them and according to their FAQ, payments are made on the 7th of each month.

Right, and I started trying to contact them the last week of December for their SOP's on an affiliate withdrawl.

I don't know when you sent these two players to the casino, (one of which failed to qualify as a player - bad check),

December 04 is when, which would make commission payable on 1/07/05.


but you were paid on the 18th (according to the casino).

The 20th is when they came through (see previous post).


But you continued to bash the casino after this date, and then thank me as if I had something to do with the payment. I didn't.

I did not try to bash the casino in anyway. If stating the facts clear as day is bashing, so be it. I thanked you because you did have something to do with it. This is your froum correct? I contacted them through here and they only started to reply after I went public, so I see your forum as what initiated their response. Not the fact that for 2 weeks prior I tried contacting them through e mail, phone and live chat with no resoultion to the issue at hand. It began as an inquiry, but turned into a hunt not long after. I was told on the 1/08 or 1/09 that payments for 12/04 (which I was owed) are processed on the 7th. Then told thriough PM's here that I need a casino account. Then finally my Neteller was credited on the 20th, after I cut and pasted the Live Chat transcript on this forum (see previous post). I got paid, issue resolved and I am done posting about this matter. I tried to bring my concern to this forum in order to reach a resolution, and tried to give only the facts without bashing. Huh, if I came right out bashing do you think I would ever see a dime? Once again, TY Casinomeister!


:notworthy
 
mitch said:
Lurkio

For a self confessed 'expert' on internet gambling you don't appear very clued in mate. :confused:

Very little in life is a "foregone conclusion", probability rules. Therefore everything is possible including me, amongst others on this forum, losing money overall at internet casinos, just unlikely thats all.

"( alone on the planet)"
mitch said:
LOL umm..I never said I was an expert did I but anyway..

..just to clear that up..you said and I quote..

"Well Lurkio, I "gamble" and dont lose."..

..so my point was ( which went straight over your head) that if you dont lose, you arent gambling are you ?..as its a foregone conclusion that you win..so actually you were just being a bit big headed and I called you on it..

..but as you climbed down off your high horse and quoted "Very little in life is a "foregone conclusion", probability rules. etc etc.." ..I forgive you!

and "alone on the planet" refers to your 100% success rate which you now admit isnt true..good boy!

Sorry if I annoy you Unicorn ..I dont think there was any need to call me jerk though was there?

btw re Narnia..heres a link to broaden your horizons..completely free of charge and any affilate links LOL ( small respectful hint..dont pull people on their typing errors before "google-ing " them ! )

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


Seruiously though..even Bryan has pointed this out right here in his own way, the vast majority of posts here are very negative..and it does the boards credibility no good at all..they are often very petty .

Conroy made one post and was called THIEF by regulars so if you can give it out and cant take it ..tough!..thats what boards and healthy debate are about.

If everyone agrees with one another and gangs up ...its not a board anymore, just a private club.

BTW Can I put my award in my avatar?
 
Lurkio said:
mitch said:
If everyone agrees with one another and gangs up ...its not a board anymore, just a private club.

Well here is a first for you Lurkio, someone on this forum agrees with an opinion of yours... me!

Your right about people making challenging statements on the forum. ( see my comments on 'The Meisters' thread for more information).

Of course you do talk bollocks for the majority of the time IMO but I quite like a bit of healthy debate.

I do think in debating issues the rapier works better than the sledgehammer you tend to employ, but each to his own however.

Mitch
 
connect-to-casino = bunch of scums!!!!

Ive been waiting for a $500 payment since last october , and here im watching paint dry...
 
mitch said:
Lurkio said:


Well here is a first for you Lurkio, someone on this forum agrees with an opinion of yours... me!

Your right about people making challenging statements on the forum. ( see my comments on 'The Meisters' thread for more information).

Of course you do talk bollocks for the majority of the time IMO but I quite like a bit of healthy debate.

I do think in debating issues the rapier works better than the sledgehammer you tend to employ, but each to his own however.

Mitch



LOL ...point taken Mitch

Its all a little one sided here..the regular whiners can vent unchallenged , whether they are wrong or right.

I think Bryan wants a credible board and doesnt mind a bit of stirring now and then..there are others who should enage their brains in gear before putting their "mouths" in motion..knee jerk reactions that damage the boards credibility....usually after a loss.

But that doesnt happen to you :rolleyes: ( just kidding!)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Click here for Red Cherry Casino

Meister Ratings

Back
Top