Casino Plex not paying my big win out

Safe, yes, but it's not that good IMO. The weekly cashout limit at Plex and .dk was a paltry 7500 a month (yep, seriously!)

Yeah, I remember we discussed this last year (or was it the year before). Casino Plex was offering some slots where you could bet €5000/ or something per spin, but at the same time their withdrawal limit was like 7500 a month as you said.

Hopefully they have improved.
 
I've been gambling online for over 8 years, and this is the first time I've seen anything like this. so take your useless troll comment and go elsewhere.

I never asked for a bonus and i never asked for anything special. I just deposited my money, and played.

If you don't read the terms of a bonus before taking it you deserve what you get.

Considering you've been gambling online for 8 years you should know this.

Rather than flaming other members, how about THANKING them for taking the time to HELP you. I'm annoyed I actually spent time researching on your behalf, especially since its obvious you couldn't be arsed doing it yourself.
 
Yeah, I remember we discussed this last year (or was it the year before). Casino Plex was offering some slots where you could bet €5000/ or something per spin, but at the same time their withdrawal limit was like 7500 a month as you said.

Hopefully they have improved.

They've definitely reduced some max bets since then. Great Blue came down to the standard 12.50 max from 25 for sure.
 
They could atleast give him the money back and let him have another shot at clearing the WR. Forfeitting that much money for a simple error is just silly. Especially if he if he weren't warned about it when cashing out. Thats no better than casinos that void your withdrawal if you missclick the max bet on a slot so that one bet goes over the max bet limit. If casinos want us to be forgiving when they screw up, they should be a bit forgiving aswell. Its human to make mistakes.

Sorry, but that's silly. It makes terms pointless to begin with.....and every scammer in town would be flocking over there and "accidentally" playing max bet or a banned game with their last few bucks and claim their deposit and bonus back.

He didn't even bother to take a cursory glance at the bonus terms, so this isn't even close to being a "forgive an honest mistake" situation. Its not a mistake....it is lazy and ignorant, and he is paying the price as he should.
 
That cuts both ways. We can't expect them to honour the terms and conditions of bonuses and promotions then turn around and say, er but can you make an exception here

Well yeah we can.. Most casinos have a clause that says they are to make the final deciscion and that no further correspondence will we answered etc, but we still expect them to answer a PAB, and not use that right without any explanation. In the same way most acredited casinos here will let you pass if you accidently click the max bet button and bet over the max bet stated in promotion terms.

Casinos do need to protect themselfes, and thats why they have terms one have to agree to, but having and applying a term like that is just like setting a trap if you ask me. But who knows, maybey they put x dollars taken from people who do different mistakes into the budget?
 
Its human to make mistakes.

....every scammer in town would be flocking over there and "accidentally" playing max bet or a banned game with their last few bucks and claim their deposit and bonus back.

You're both right. It does seem unfair on newbies: bonuses are sold as good things for players whereas they are mostly good things for the casinos. I have some sympathy with players and the bonus trap. But Nifty is right: rules is rules and the moment you start making exceptions, you invite problems.
 
Sorry, but that's silly. It makes terms pointless to begin with.....and every scammer in town would be flocking over there and "accidentally" playing max bet or a banned game with their last few bucks and claim their deposit and bonus back.

He didn't even bother to take a cursory glance at the bonus terms, so this isn't even close to being a "forgive an honest mistake" situation. Its not a mistake....it is lazy and ignorant, and he is paying the price as he should.

I hope i didnt misread the OP, but as i understood it he was up like 17 000, and not down to his last cent after having lost 1500 or 17 000? If he was down to his last cent i wouldnt have expected them to reinstate his original balance. Neither would i if some guy played an accidental max bet with his last cents. I agree that ignorance usually aint no excuse, but this guy didnt even do anything to get the bonus, the casino offered it to him after depositing, and if his unexperienced he might have thought that it werent that many terms coming with it.

Apart from some manhours going trough the play the casino doesent really loose anything from letting him have another go either. And nor does it make them a bigger target for scammers than any other casino.

Im 100% for looking at cases and treating them using common sense, and making some exceptions rather than doing everything after the book. Even the traffic police and and parking guards does it.
 
I hope i didnt misread the OP, but as i understood it he was up like 17 000, and not down to his last cent after having lost 1500 or 17 000? If he was down to his last cent i wouldnt have expected them to reinstate his original balance. Neither would i if some guy played an accidental max bet with his last cents. I agree that ignorance usually aint no excuse, but this guy didnt even do anything to get the bonus, the casino offered it to him after depositing, and if his unexperienced he might have thought that it werent that many terms coming with it.

Apart from some manhours going trough the play the casino doesent really loose anything from letting him have another go either. And nor does it make them a bigger target for scammers than any other casino.

Im 100% for looking at cases and treating them using common sense, and making some exceptions rather than doing everything after the book. Even the traffic police and and parking guards does it.

Well you did misread the OP.....he said he's been gambling online for 8 years. No allowances for being a noob there.

As Simmo! said it absolutely would make them a target more than the next operator.

Leeway is possible in VERY limited circumstances e.g player accidentally hits max bet, stops playing and contacts casino and they say no problem, or player accidentally plays banned game and does the same and is allowed to go on. Good operators do this as a matter of course.

However, leeway should NOT be applied to someone who clearly breached the terms because they couldn't be fagged reading them or even looking for them. Actually, to suggest someone like the OP should be let off the hook is laughable.

I reiterate...the OP is an experienced player.
 
... take your useless troll comment and go elsewhere.

Please be more respectfull toward your fellow forum members. Feel free to Report posts that you find inappropriate (see below) but beyond that please leave the forum moderation to the moderators.

Attach Removed (Old not found)
 
Last edited:
If you don't read the terms of a bonus before taking it you deserve what you get.

Considering you've been gambling online for 8 years you should know this.

Rather than flaming other members, how about THANKING them for taking the time to HELP you. I'm annoyed I actually spent time researching on your behalf, especially since its obvious you couldn't be arsed doing it yourself.


I wasn't flaming anybody. Try understand, i had just lost 15 500 Euros, even after looking for so called wagering requirements on their website i found nothing that explains it. Then i get i response like "some people really shouldn't be gambling online" i mean come on? that would annoy anybody that was already frustrated. I appreciate the comments and help that i have received here. Just why they take the money away on not leave it there to try reach wagering requirement is another story.
 
I wasn't flaming anybody. Try understand, i had just lost 15 500 Euros, even after looking for so called wagering requirements on their website i found nothing that explains it. Then i get i response like "some people really shouldn't be gambling online" i mean come on? that would annoy anybody that was already frustrated. I appreciate the comments and help that i have received here. Just why they take the money away on not leave it there to try reach wagering requirement is another story.

....so you contact the casino and ASK what the requirements are.

If you HAD, you would be a lot richer than you are today.

I still cannot believe I am explaining this to a "veteran" online casino player.

The casino terms state that they will NOT replace your balance if you withdraw early. Yes, it sucks, but you AGREED to those terms when you signed up. If you didn't bother to READ them, then it's tough cookies I'm afraid.

I have all the sympathy in the world for players who are unfairly ripped off and cheated out of winnings. I have NO sympathy for self-inflicted losses brought about by laziness and poor diligence i.e. not taking personal responsibility

Sorry, but I'm not sure what you were expecting to hear when you posted.
 
I agree it was a rookie mistake.

Should have at least contacted someone from the casino and asked. The worse i expected was that they leave the funds in for me to try reach the WR, its the first in about 7 online casinos that I have played in that took the funds. No excuse though, was a costly mistake on my part, i apologize for any rantings, was just frustrated.
 
I agree it was a rookie mistake.

Should have at least contacted someone from the casino and asked. The worse i expected was that they leave the funds in for me to try reach the WR, its the first in about 7 online casinos that I have played in that took the funds. No excuse though, was a costly mistake on my part, i apologize for any rantings, was just frustrated.

No probs.

Your apology to all concerned is appreciated. :)
 
I agree it was a rookie mistake.

Should have at least contacted someone from the casino and asked. The worse i expected was that they leave the funds in for me to try reach the WR, its the first in about 7 online casinos that I have played in that took the funds. No excuse though, was a costly mistake on my part, i apologize for any rantings, was just frustrated.

I can perfectly understand your frustrations. Been there. The thing is, while it might be the player's fault for not fully reading the T&C's, (speaking generally) most casinos don't make it easy or obvious. It feels like they are deliberately trying to make life hard when you win. This is why a casino like 32Red or 3Dice win so many awards - they recognize that frustrating and obstructing players is not the way to go if you want loyal custom.

However in Plex's defence, it sounds from the OP like they were prepared to pay 1500 of the winnings on a 500 deposit which personally, I think is a nice gesture considering the terms were broken.
 
I can perfectly understand your frustrations. Been there. The thing is, while it might be the player's fault for not fully reading the T&C's, (speaking generally) most casinos don't make it easy or obvious. It feels like they are deliberately trying to make life hard when you win. This is why a casino like 32Red or 3Dice win so many awards - they recognize that frustrating and obstructing players is not the way to go if you want loyal custom.

However in Plex's defence, it sounds from the OP like they were prepared to pay 1500 of the winnings on a 500 deposit which personally, I think is a nice gesture considering the terms were broken.

Well the only reason they paid me that is because i had made previous deposits in the week of 1000 Euro, so they said it was because of those previous deposits that allowed me to cash out that amount. I am 100 percent certain they would not have paid that amount if the terms were broken even on the slightest :) the industry doesn't care much for its players when it comes to these things.
 
To disappoint Nifty, I am on the side of the player here.

The reason is that he was led to believe he was allowed to withdraw because the banking page told him so. It indicated that the bonus itself would be removed as per usual, but it allowed the withdrawal to proceed. In an industry that has been going twice as long as the OP has been playing, this situation should long ago have been addressed through the software, and the notice should not have merely said the bonus would be forfeit, but that the withdrawal itself was not permitted because further WR was due.

Having software give incorrect information to the player, and then penalising the player for acting on such information, is predatory.

This is yet another example of why I am so negative about Playtech software. They are a big company, and their programmers should have addressed this issue long ago.

The correct solution is for the OP to have had their withdrawal declined in the cashier, and told further WR was required. Oddly enough, years ago I DID find a withdrawal blocked by the Playtech cashier where the request was invalid, so it CAN be done now as the software catered for similar functionality years ago.

A truly "good operator" would have ensured the software gave correct guidance to players, blocked the withdrawal, or at worst give the CORRECT message that if they continued, only the deposit would be returned.
 
I agree with VWM though its not for the sake of disappointing Nifty who also seems correct in maintaining adherence to the rules. Take the RTG cashier for example, you cannot initiate a withdrawal till you have completed the WRs no matter how small the remaining WRs are. I cant see why they cannot reinstate the amount back for the OP to complete the WRs. Surely the balance he had would enable him to clear the WRs with a healthy profit. Instead, it does seem the casino is blaming the OP for withdrawing when he shouldn't.
 
I don't know if this term was recently added to CasinoPlex's terms. But its in black and white now: ◾Casino Plex customers requesting a withdrawal or a transfer out of their Casino Plex account, prior to the necessary wagering requirement being met, will forfeit all bonuses and winnings attributed to their account.
 
To disappoint Nifty, I am on the side of the player here.

The reason is that he was led to believe he was allowed to withdraw because the banking page told him so. It indicated that the bonus itself would be removed as per usual, but it allowed the withdrawal to proceed. In an industry that has been going twice as long as the OP has been playing, this situation should long ago have been addressed through the software, and the notice should not have merely said the bonus would be forfeit, but that the withdrawal itself was not permitted because further WR was due.

Having software give incorrect information to the player, and then penalising the player for acting on such information, is predatory.

This is yet another example of why I am so negative about Playtech software. They are a big company, and their programmers should have addressed this issue long ago.

The correct solution is for the OP to have had their withdrawal declined in the cashier, and told further WR was required. Oddly enough, years ago I DID find a withdrawal blocked by the Playtech cashier where the request was invalid, so it CAN be done now as the software catered for similar functionality years ago.

A truly "good operator" would have ensured the software gave correct guidance to players, blocked the withdrawal, or at worst give the CORRECT message that if they continued, only the deposit would be returned.

Another one that doesn't believe adults should be responsible for their own actions.

I don't believe operators should have to shell out to prevent ignorant players from losing their dough. If its ok for the vast majority of players to read and follow terms, its OK for the others.

Honestly, sometimes I think you just take the players side for the hell of it, because you'll always get more high fives when you do.
 
I don't know if this term was recently added to CasinoPlex's terms. But its in black and white now: ◾Casino Plex customers requesting a withdrawal or a transfer out of their Casino Plex account, prior to the necessary wagering requirement being met, will forfeit all bonuses and winnings attributed to their account.

Every major software that does this ie allow a w/d before WRs are made reminds players that they have not reached their wrs and clearly asks them whether they are willing to forfeit bonuses/winnings and that they will not be reinstated even if they change their mind later. I admit I haven't read all the OP's posts in detail so don't know whether the software permitted the w/d without reminding the player of his rights and obligations. If not, this term is predatory and its not simply a matter of a player being responsible for his actions.
 
Another one that doesn't believe adults should be responsible for their own actions.

I don't believe operators should have to shell out to prevent ignorant players from losing their dough. If its ok for the vast majority of players to read and follow terms, its OK for the others.

Honestly, sometimes I think you just take the players side for the hell of it, because you'll always get more high fives when you do.

I am not saying the player should be PAID, I am saying they should have the money bounced back to their account and told to wager some more before a withdrawal is allowed. The casino is not out of pocket at all.

It is no different to when a player asks CS and is told something is OK when it isn't. Where incorrect information is supplied by the casino through one of it's official channels, and the player acts upon it, it is not the players fault, adult or not, it is the casino's fault for not ensuring correct information was given.

In this case, this is a simple matter to unwind as bouncing the money back to the account does not disadvantage the casino. The term itself is predatory because it should be impossible to break.

This is a case of:-

•No player shall be involuntarily placed into a situation which breaches the terms and conditions during the course of play.

In this case triggered by incorrect information being given.

There is also no way for the player to obtain the CORRECT information with Playtech software, unlike the other major brands such as RTG and Microgaming where such information is presented in the cashier.

In this case, the operator is looking for reasons not to pay, rather than looking for reasons to help their customer get paid.

This situation came up before with an accredited casino (Fortune Lounge), and after a discussion here, they amended their practice so that if the player didn't get stopped by the cashier from making an invalid withdrawal, the funds would be placed back in the account and the player advised on what they needed to do. This was some time ago, and since then MGS have added functionality alongside their Clearplay system that ensures players see the CORRECT information when they enter the cashier, and can then make an INFORMED decision on whether to just get their deposit back where WR has not been completed, or return to the casino to make further play.

This is typical of the predatory nature of Playtech in general (with only a few exceptions). Another thread details a different predatory behaviour, live chat just won't leave you alone once logged in, constantly badgering you to deposit. It even happens when you visit the website, and makes it near impossible to be left in peace long enough to navigate around, and more importantly, find and read the terms. Oddly enough, despite being constantly there when not wanted, live chat just don't respond when the PLAYER tries to initiate contact to get help with a problem, unless the chat window is opened in the banking page when they respond like lightning. This only shows that this is a DELIBERATE predatory behaviour, as when launched from Banking, the player's problem is likely to be about making a deposit, so they get a quick response. It follows that there is plenty of availablilty in the live chat team, but they choose to ignore chat requests initiated from elsewhere in the software in order to ensure that they have plenty of capacity to badger players to make a deposit, or assist those who appear to have trouble making a deposit.

In this scenario, asking live chat whether a withdrawal is OK isn't going to get anywhere other than a dead chat window for many minutes, and may be why players don't generally think of asking live chat questions because it is made into such an ordeal.

An informed player like myself would avoid Playtech like the plague so as not to encounter this kind of issue. Exceptions to this would be rare, and it would have to be a Playtech casino that has not been involved with this kind of attitude in the past, and is not a "white label" run out of Manila by Paragon International Customer Care. My starting point would be the accredited list, but then I would look for any cases where they have tended to use a technicality to screw over a player, even if it is one where they have their ass covered in the terms as in this case.
 
I cant believe how anyone could side with the casino on this matter.
This is equivalent to casino having button in the cashier that reads "push here"
and you lose all your balance if you push it.

The only reason the casino has this term to confiscate winnings if withdraw is intitiated prior meeting wagering,
is in order to make more money out of the careless people.
The casino would not lose anything if they just removed the term. its win-win for them.
 
So i deposited about 500 Euros, and then they gave only about 100 Bonus, so played for a few hours, and finally made about 17 000 Euros, and decided to withdraw my money, next thing i know they say can only withdraw 1500 Euro, and after that my amount is showing 0 EURO, i am very upset about this! Is this normal? i had 17 000 EURO and now its not even showing after i asked to make the 1500 withdrawal?

Did you get a warning message before you tried to withdraw?
 
Casino should return money to players account and let him finish wagering requirements. The system should not rob your money just because you tried to withdraw too early..

How about this situation. Most casinos have a max 6.25$ bet when using a bonus, if you win and try to withdraw they will use this to only give you back your deposit. they use this excuse all the time. How about i deposits, and if i see im about to bust out i make a bigger bet then the $6.25 max, will they give me my deposits back?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top