Many remainers in this thread have often said the EU are the best negotiators, and will drive a hard bargain to get what's best in the EU's interests [which logically may not then coincide with ours in the long term] so any withdrawal deal is likely to contain drawbacks especially if the govt doing the negotiating didn't even have a working majority.
Let's have an election and then negotiate with brussels how you actually leave their club. No deal may be the most sensible option and to negotiate properly you have to be prepared to walk away otherwise you'd just accept anything, this is simple logic the lib dems etc.. seem unable to grasp, they'd rather live in airy-fairy land thinking the EU is wonderful.
One thing corbyn was right about a month ago or so, was asking what were the govt seeking in negotiations, boris replied it had to be kept all secret, but as we have a remain civil service at the top levels advising the govt in negotiations, I'd rather all the main details were on the table for the public to see, especially prior to this general election. So a quick snap election does have the disadvantage of leavers being hoodwinked without proper analysis of future policies, how many times has the british establishment/govt tricked or tried to trick the public?