Howdy folks,
After much discussion about this issue, I've been asked by senior management to post the following:
Hello Casinomeister Members
I thought it was time to address the forum, give you all some background as to who we are, and address this issue specifically.
As a Canadian that frequently travels to the US I'm not going to discuss any details about me nor will I speak of the new ownership behind Silver Oak. I hope for obvious reasons you can all appreciate this. However, I can say that I'm part of a new senior management team and I've been in the US facing gaming industry for many years with experience with several very successful operations, albeit, not exclusively casinos.
First of all, it is correct that Silver Oak Casino is a re-branded Crystal Palace. What does this mean? It means basically we took over the customer accounts. We are a completely new operation and no former staff, management or owners from the Crystal Group are involved in any way.
It is also true that from a business point of view, we have used the same bonus structure and operational procedures, at least the ones that make business sense. However, we are not in the business to stiff customers and our procedures are designed (and evolving) to provide a balance between business needs and customer expectations.
Anyone who has worked in the US facing gaming industry can certainly appreciate the challenges that we all face to provide US customers with a consistent level of service, let alone a quality one. How many of you have to now jump through hoops to get money in or out of the system? [I know from a personal experience that I'm having a hard time getting money in and out of one of the top US facing poker rooms and have been for quite some time.] I think if customers could actually see the challenges that every US facing gaming company goes through on a daily basis, they would be absolutely astonished.
As for the comment that we are treating non-depositing customers differently than depositing customers, being a veteran in this industry I can assure you that every operation have procedures in place to manage risk. The ones that don't, do not stay in business very long. This has little to do with cash flow and more to do with simple business.
While it is the intention of most operators to provide all customers with quality services regardless of player value, the reality is that some level of prioritization does take place in all operations, especially in today's US facing market. You get better service at your bank the more money you have in your account. Your bartender will pay extra attention to you the more you spend and tip. These are realities in life and not that one group of customers is intentionally being given poor service. If someone from payouts has two payout request to process at the same time, one from a customer that is spending money, and one from a customer who is not, which one would you process first?
I would like to be able to say that we won't ever have a month where payouts take longer than normal, however, given the nature of this business, it would be unrealistic for me to do. Some of the most well established operations get hit with unexpected challenges that temporarily affect the level of service given to customers [one of the biggest US facing gaming operators has gone public with the fact that the are taking 30 to 40 days to process payments]. The more volume that an operation does, the greater the challenges become, especially since UIGEA.
Now, as for the incident in question being discussed here, I understand that this customer has in fact been paid, albeit longer than the customer expected. It appears that there was some miscommunication to the customer and it was a simple thing to address that should have never become an issue. We'll learn from it, and make procedural changes.
However, I would like to add that the customer is question has claimed on this forum that there was no communication that payment was delivered. I can say without a doubt that I was in the room with the payout representative when she phoned to notify the customer, left a voice message detailing payment, then subsequently emailed the customer with the details of payment. I'm at a loose to explain why the customer claimed otherwise.
On a final note, if you all want to help US facing operators have payout times consistent with our European counterparts, please write to your congressman and senators and let them know that you support everyone's right to gamble online and just maybe they will back off putting pressure on the banks and the processing companies that take US business.
Thanks for reading,
Best Regards
---------------------
Please, if anybody has any questions, comments or just generally wants to know about anything in here feel free to email me!
Cheers everybody!