Not paying a big winner full winnings should be the last last measure to treat a player when a clear fraud is being involved.
Warning about WPT without adding the same casino Party and Gamebookers are legitimate points to your taste can comment on that as well ?
Yes, I said I think Max is tired of this due to many cases of player fraud and that he looks not objective from his style, whats wrong with that ?
It is not only the style, the way Max decide is based on Terms and condition only, for this we don't need a human being, we can put a software to compare, not every term is there to apply it, when you add rogue behaviour by same Manager, when you add the circumstances here of extra play the player played, when you add the fact I see the attack the player gets by Max by saying of course he forgot that and obviously they judged against him in Ecogra, who also suffer from the same problem of looking in the terms and once you breach one in the general terms....
This kind of rule should be at the promotion terms, Max and Casinomeister agree with me on that, this was already discussed in Palace group thread.
You must agree with me that this is not the way complaints should be handle, it can't be right if you think Terms and condition are the only way to decide whether to pay or not , this can't be right, common sense should be used and when I see cases like that , that is very obvious to me the Casino just tried his best to find a reason not to pay I say that Max deicsion is not the right one in my stupid way but I am still right and you are wrong here, Player should be paid part of his winnings at this case.
The player wagered more than 60,000-80,000 in Roulette if I understand well which 40,000 was above wagering, whats the big deal to pay him half of his winnings and then the casino avoid the bad publicity and my stupid post, what is the big deal ?? what did he do bet some bets above what general terms mentioned, look how many cases of non pay they put there, it is impossible to win and get paid, even somebody who wager 60,000-even 100,000 wagering for couple of hundreds wgering cant be paid so where are we here ??????
The comments about Virtual group were just to show how unsatisfied I was with Palace at that time, to compare them to Virtual and say they are better make the job I think, in the points I mentioed they were better at that time of post.
you all attack me while the Casino Manager should be attack for his behaviour not paying, how would he feel if it was him, anybody of you here broke a term in general terms, give me your cashouts and how you all played and I will find for you the term you broke, I can assure you I will find for all of you here a term not to pay all your winnings ever with and without a bonus, I will find one trust me
Warning about WPT without adding the same casino Party and Gamebookers are legitimate points to your taste can comment on that as well ?
Yes, I said I think Max is tired of this due to many cases of player fraud and that he looks not objective from his style, whats wrong with that ?
It is not only the style, the way Max decide is based on Terms and condition only, for this we don't need a human being, we can put a software to compare, not every term is there to apply it, when you add rogue behaviour by same Manager, when you add the circumstances here of extra play the player played, when you add the fact I see the attack the player gets by Max by saying of course he forgot that and obviously they judged against him in Ecogra, who also suffer from the same problem of looking in the terms and once you breach one in the general terms....
This kind of rule should be at the promotion terms, Max and Casinomeister agree with me on that, this was already discussed in Palace group thread.
You must agree with me that this is not the way complaints should be handle, it can't be right if you think Terms and condition are the only way to decide whether to pay or not , this can't be right, common sense should be used and when I see cases like that , that is very obvious to me the Casino just tried his best to find a reason not to pay I say that Max deicsion is not the right one in my stupid way but I am still right and you are wrong here, Player should be paid part of his winnings at this case.
The player wagered more than 60,000-80,000 in Roulette if I understand well which 40,000 was above wagering, whats the big deal to pay him half of his winnings and then the casino avoid the bad publicity and my stupid post, what is the big deal ?? what did he do bet some bets above what general terms mentioned, look how many cases of non pay they put there, it is impossible to win and get paid, even somebody who wager 60,000-even 100,000 wagering for couple of hundreds wgering cant be paid so where are we here ??????
The comments about Virtual group were just to show how unsatisfied I was with Palace at that time, to compare them to Virtual and say they are better make the job I think, in the points I mentioed they were better at that time of post.
you all attack me while the Casino Manager should be attack for his behaviour not paying, how would he feel if it was him, anybody of you here broke a term in general terms, give me your cashouts and how you all played and I will find for you the term you broke, I can assure you I will find for all of you here a term not to pay all your winnings ever with and without a bonus, I will find one trust me
Last edited: