All losses are put into and accredited by an international Investment Company. We earn our profit from the majority of the interest earned on those investments for the first 12 months. Once the investment matures the client has the option to leave the investment and then they will earn the majority of the interest (meaning they actually start making money from their losses) or they have the option to have their losses paid back to them. My entire concept is based on how does one convince a gambler to rather invest or save their money for a better future instead of losing it in casinos. We gamblers want to gamble, so I have put a casino in the middle to channel the losses into an Investment Company.
You cannot lose you money. Fair enough you will have to wait for the investment to mature but its better than the money being gone forever.
Thats the concept.
After reading the first numbers of assumed profit margins (90% / 12%) i just closed the thread. Notifications made me read a bit more and i caught above:
here's simple maths:
all the winners on a casino - (minus) all the losers on a casino will give you approximately 3-4% gross profit on all of their accumulated bets, translating to anywhere between 25-40% of all accumulated deposits. Assuming a fair business model.
that 25-40% of deposits are your "losses" which also pay for everything to do with your business, including 10-20% on game providers (depending on which), 2-10% on payment methods (again, depending on which), staff, salaries, marketing etc etc etc
This already leaves you with a small but reasonable net profit from all of the deposited funds at your casino, inclusive of the ones that came from winning players.
Your business model assumes that all your "earned" losses are given into an investment fund, meaning that you have no access to them, so here are my questions:
1. What pays your winners? (EDIT: + salaries, game providers, and all other costs needed to keep you operational) As in, what manages your cash flow if all your earnings are locked for a year? You have to have an immense, and i do mean immense, backing to completely eradicate the need to churn the money.
2. Taking the massive white elephant "IF" of number 1 aside, here is the next pickle: If your investment fund yields anything, then the guaranteed investments wont surpass more than 3-4% annual yield. Anything more than that and you are moving into the realm of non-guaranteed investments - meaning you can easily LOSE money. To reach 12%+ yield, you have to be investing into highly volatile, high-risk markets which begs the same question as number 1, extended. Where are you paying your winners from in year 1, and how are you mitigating the risk on lost investments in year 2+?
the maths are not adding up.
As my Financial Director would say to me on many of my "next big thing" propositions: "Igor, i can drive a truck through this. Do it again".
Good luck
