qazwsx said:
Promo log entries for Playtech partners are not the responsibility of Playtech. I defy any of these "victims" to present one altered play log regarding actual wagering on games.
Why would the casino alter anything that reads
500-red
500-black
50-zero
This is their proof, not something that would be altered. Regardless, for the record, this site can't alter play logs. Why can't you people see you are being manipulated by greedy people that are BAD for online gaming and future online bonuses?
Correction, the people see it. Only those repeating themselves here are the ones arguing. That's because they are the sour grapes morons who got caught and can't understand why they are thieves to begin with.
Hahahahahaha.
500 Red
500 Black
50 Zero.
First off it's "Green" when refered to in this context, second off that's not a "Zero Sum Bet" as you previously refered to.
However, your tactics are again blatently obvious.
First you come into this thread and make all types of assertion beyond what a player would typically know in your position, then when someone mentions it, you shoot back with comments that plainly seem ignorant. The above mentioned quote, along with your general comment regarding altering of what you now seem to believe are game logs, whilst the whole time everyone has been saying it's the modification of transaction histories, and what is even more rediculous is your asertation of break even betting, which players on this thread (at least 1 in every 10,000 lol) have said they played video poker, one player must've even been playing $5 coins. I've busted out $5,000 balances before playing Video Poker with $5 coins, it's not exactly a break even kinda stratagy.
So my inclination is to say that you are either someone slanted for the casinos who has come on this thread trying to stir the pot, you said more than you should, and is now trying to backpeddel by slipping in inconsistancies and plainly wrong assertations. OR, you could be a player who thinks that posting anonymously is doing more good than hard by trying to misrepresent the casino side of things, which would be a highly misguided view.
Of course there is a possibility you are who you say you are, an affluent member of the BW community, but then why exactly would you be doing what you are doing. My only reason for mentioning that is the train of logic is simple.
If you are not who you say you are (which is highly likely the case,) then you found it nessisary to lie about who you are, so if you found it nessisary to lie about who you are, you are obviously someone who does not want their views tied to their identity.
The only question is ... why?
The Gunslinger
p.s. I saw the irrelivant shot you took at John Galt for being a member of BW. Obviously I've made no attempt to conceal my identity, as niether has he. I have no money whatsoever tied up in Joyland, and my only interest in this thread is to see that this precident doesn't get set that casinos can refuse payment in the event of essentially what turns out to be nothing more than the player winning. Anyway, I'd appreciate you not bringing BW into this regarding me as I do not in anyway represent BW, nor perticularly the same views as it's manager, infact Jek and I have found eachother at odds a couple of times. I just duely find it troublesome that you would launch an attack on John Galt based only on information you were able to ascertain because he's straightforward enough not to conceal himself as you have plainly done. The attack is as rediculous as it comes because you yourself say you're an active member of the community, posting there as recently as two hours ago. Well, perhaps you are, in which case, I'm sure you'll recognize me, so who exactly are you? I think you're a liar, and I believe you are a shill.