- Joined
- Sep 26, 2004
- Location
- SOMEWHERE IN ASIA
Bigjohn,
Now aint that the truth, the whole and nothing but the truth.
Now aint that the truth, the whole and nothing but the truth.
Inetbet - account has been closed.
- Thread starter IgoFyl
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2014
- Location
- USA
This is one good yet unanswered question in the thread. The other good question, not only unanswered but also unasked:
When will Inetbet casino offer a live chat support?
pobeda
account suspended
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2008
- Location
- San Diego, CA
Great post bigjohn!! That sums everything about that place
I also think Brian might want to revisit inetbet review page
It's simply not true. They do not process withdrawals during weekends
Limit for check 1per week $2000
Limit for paymycard 1per week $500
The page says they offer unlimited withdrawals and process during weekend
I made many withdrawals and none of them were processed on Friday, Saturday or Sunday
And I absolutely agree, unless you try to get help, email or just sign of life from their support, you will never understand frustration we are going trough.
I also think Brian might want to revisit inetbet review page
It's simply not true. They do not process withdrawals during weekends
Limit for check 1per week $2000
Limit for paymycard 1per week $500
The page says they offer unlimited withdrawals and process during weekend
I made many withdrawals and none of them were processed on Friday, Saturday or Sunday
And I absolutely agree, unless you try to get help, email or just sign of life from their support, you will never understand frustration we are going trough.
Last edited:
pobeda
account suspended
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2008
- Location
- San Diego, CA
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2004
- Location
- SOMEWHERE IN ASIA
They are cost-conscious and as live chat support involves more staff online its perfectly ok if they don't provide this service but can reply to emails in a timely manner. Take Guts and Betat as examples. They handle email requests speedily and everything is fixed within an hour or two and that is already a huge understatement. There have been far too many incidents of delays in email replies or even non-responses. Throw in their often cold and rude responses and you have a classic example of incompetent staff support from an organization. There comes a time when players wont merely be satisfied with prompt payouts and on this score they seem to be coming against a brick wall recently.
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2004
- Location
- United Kingdom
A bank lying to a customer?? say it isn't so
Looks like banks were lying. Clearly, there are many instances where banks have shown that they can reclaim payments made in error with or without the cooperation of the account holder who has wrongly received the funds.
It seems the rules are there for show, not to be obeyed. It's nothing like the recent big banking scandals, but if banks are flouting the rules for their own convenience (again), the FCA will end up slapping some wrists.
In the Metroplay case, this was not £4500 paid in error, but a payment made, and then later disputed by Metroplay. In such a case, it should have gone to court, yet the merchant was able to simply take back the disputed amount in much the same way that a customer can use "chargeback" when they are starting a dispute with a retailer. The initiator of the dispute can take the money back first, and then notify the other party that they are disputing. Casinos in particular HATE this system, yet it seems they will use it when it suits them.
If a member here, does a chargeback, they are tarred and feathered. And I believe their membership is cancelled.
Yet casinos (accredited or otherwise) have carte blanche to do as they please. Which is exactly what's happened in relation to iNetBet (accredited) and Metroplay (BBF)...just saying.
As I said, it seems there are two sets of rules here, one for players and the other for casinos...
Last edited:
The Neteller support office is located in Canada, though, Neteller (Optimal Payments Limited), I believe their corporate office is located in the UK or Isle of Man:
EcoCard - PSI-Pay Ltd registered office is at Afon Building, Worthing Road, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1TL, England.
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2010
- Location
- Turn around...
It's legal in NJ now, do you still play offshore?
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Location
- Northants
Theres a bit of info here about what banks can do, May give you adjust of things
www.adviceguide.org.uk/wales/debt_w...ccounts_work.htm#overpayments_to_your_account
www.adviceguide.org.uk/wales/debt_w...ccounts_work.htm#overpayments_to_your_account
That it is!
Although I'm not USA based, it seems, even with this legalised casino in NJ, they too need time to mature.
Be interesting to see when Navada gets the green light, how they intended to manage their online casinos.
bigjohn
Dormant account
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2012
- Location
- Northeast Coastal USA
No, I haven't played at an offshore site since the very first day NJ started their trial runs. There's no reason to.
When players do this, it's called chargeback, am I right?
I understand that the only way for iNetBet to handle this was to take those money back ASAP, especially when there were many players involved. As a casino manager I would have done the same thing, BUT I would have known that it was a breach of trust and I would have apologized to the customers involved.
iNetBet chose a different way.
I would ask this instead; iNetBet have chosen to not offer players live chat support, when will they then handle their email support in proper manner?
It can't be so many emails disappearing both to iNetBet and from iNetBet...it's impossible.
Did Emily Hanson receive that PM from OP?
PNEFOREVER2
Dormant account
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2011
- Location
- Preston,lancs
Wasn't there an excuse as to why they wouldn't install live chat? Wasn't it because they think they would be bombarded with comp requests or something? Surely they wouldn't be asked no more than any other casino, or any more than they already do on their facebook page.
It's all too convenient that emails regularly go missing, they closed my account after many emails and I got frustrated, I still kept my cool but was spoken to like sh!t by a certain member of their cs team, been a few years now so not sure if she still works there.
I'm willing to bet if CM received 10 PABS regarding them, and their accredited status depended on their outcome, they would receive every single email
It's all too convenient that emails regularly go missing, they closed my account after many emails and I got frustrated, I still kept my cool but was spoken to like sh!t by a certain member of their cs team, been a few years now so not sure if she still works there.
I'm willing to bet if CM received 10 PABS regarding them, and their accredited status depended on their outcome, they would receive every single email
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Location
- Northants
Wasn't there an excuse as to why they wouldn't install live chat? Wasn't it because they think they would be bombarded with comp requests or something? Surely they wouldn't be asked no more than any other casino, or any more than they already do on their facebook page.
It's all too convenient that emails regularly go missing, they closed my account after many emails and after I got frustrated, I still kept my cool but was spoken to like sh!t by a certain member of their cs team, been a few years now so not sure if she still works there.
I'm willing to bet if CM received 10 PABS regarding them, and their accredited status depended on their outcome, they would receive every single email
Yes or a live help will suddenly appear
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2004
- Location
- SOMEWHERE IN ASIA
Wasn't there an excuse as to why they wouldn't install live chat? Wasn't it because they think they would be bombarded with comp requests or something? Surely they wouldn't be asked no more than any other casino, or any more than they already do on their facebook page.
It's all too convenient that emails regularly go missing, they closed my account after many emails and I got frustrated, I still kept my cool but was spoken to like sh!t by a certain member of their cs team, been a few years now so not sure if she still works there.
I'm willing to bet if CM received 10 PABS regarding them, and their accredited status depended on their outcome, they would receive every single email
This may well prove to be their undoing as more and more people have these experiences. People have long memories after being treated in a disrespectful way and this has to come from staff engaged in a service industry.
I received a warning for saying it takes more than not stealing people's money to be a reputable casino and I've been basically ignoring this thread since then.
I will add though that there is nothing in the standards for accreditation that says casinos can't be totally unresponsive or accusatory toward players. So this isn't a question of whether or not the casino should be accredited.
The only thing I can suggest when you have an issue that doesn't involve non payment is to stop depositing until you receive a satisfactory response to your correspondence. If the issue is non payment just PAB.
I already answered that back here #post624501
I will add though that there is nothing in the standards for accreditation that says casinos can't be totally unresponsive or accusatory toward players. So this isn't a question of whether or not the casino should be accredited.
The only thing I can suggest when you have an issue that doesn't involve non payment is to stop depositing until you receive a satisfactory response to your correspondence. If the issue is non payment just PAB.
I already answered that back here #post624501
Nothing will change with Inet, not their customer service (or lack there of) nor their accreditation, communication and attitude has been an outstanding issue for years vigorously defended by the forum leaders, yes they pay and generally without hassle but that's it, as for over payments, I personally think they have the right to claim that money back from any account providing a proper process of proof has been done.
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2005
- Location
- America
On April 27, you deposited $120.
On April 29, you withdrew $700.
Net profit: $580
On May 1, you deposited $100.
On May 3, you deposited additional $120.
On May 6, you withdrew $571.
Net profit: $351
On May 6, you deposited $100.
On May 7, you withdrew $148.
Net profit: $48
Total net profit: $979
Ah, I think you just pissed them off for winning so much!
Your "ignoring" their emails was just the thing (in their minds) to close your account. IMO.Agree it was their (iNetBet's money).
What I don't agree with is how it was handled by iNetbet. Especially the abrassive and disrespectful (unfounded) accusations leveled at the player. Albeit a casino can close accounts as they see fit; in accordence to their rules. But in this case, that's a moot point. Because iNetbet based the closure of this account on wrongful assumptions.
Though in a positive way, this thread has raises a few eyebrows.
For myself, this concern relates to what casinos can do; have carte blache to do. And, what players can't do (chargeback); even with proof a casino is knowingly holding money not belonging to them. It's these double standards; 1 rule from casinos another for players, which concerns me and maybe others too.
In keeping with the CM philosophy of, "Seek and you will find...", I've spent a hour or so putting good use to the forum search facility. I used the keyword of "chargeback" and narrowed it down from there. Found some interesting posts. One particular thread stood out. I followed a link from that to another thread and so on.
Here the tables are turned and it's iNetBet who is in possession of this ex-members money - essentially doing the exact same thing iNetBet did to the OP.
If it's perfectly ok for a casino to claw back its own money; whether it informs the player or not, why is it not ok for a player to take identical action?
Last edited:
pobeda
account suspended
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2008
- Location
- San Diego, CA
On April 27, you deposited $120.
On April 29, you withdrew $700.
Net profit: $580
On May 1, you deposited $100.
On May 3, you deposited additional $120.
On May 6, you withdrew $571.
Net profit: $351
On May 6, you deposited $100.
On May 7, you withdrew $148.
Net profit: $48
Total net profit: $979
Ah, I think you just pissed them off for winning so much!
Is this history if your play? Cuz it's not mine)
Some casinos either bonus-ban or ban totally entire countries due to their risk assessment calculations. Bonus-banning whole country does not mean that casino believes every the customers and potential customers in that country is bonus abuser, but it means that due to their risk assessment calculations, bonus-banning that whole country makes sense.
Risk assessment could go something like this
But the e-mail about the banning should have been more polite and less accusatory. Just like if customer inquires about why his or her country is bonus banned or has worse bonus terms, the customer service is not going to reply "all you people are bonus abusers" or anything like that, rather blather something about business strategy.
Also this kind of mess might cause players to make their own risk assessments of iNetbet.
Risk assessment could go something like this
Of course banning the whole group C is not fair, but neither is bonus-banning whole countries or having worse bonus terms for certain countries.
But the e-mail about the banning should have been more polite and less accusatory. Just like if customer inquires about why his or her country is bonus banned or has worse bonus terms, the customer service is not going to reply "all you people are bonus abusers" or anything like that, rather blather something about business strategy.
Also this kind of mess might cause players to make their own risk assessments of iNetbet.
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2005
- Location
- America
Oops. sorry, I meant it for the OP.
[strike]Not sure but I don't think the OP can comment (unless I read it wrong), is this currently under PAB?[/strike]
My mistake, continue...
Last edited:
Double standards seem to be pretty common? That doesn't sound fair.
bigjohn
Dormant account
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2012
- Location
- Northeast Coastal USA
Yikes, I was just about to make a first time deposit at Inetbet, but then I read all this shit. Sorry but if BigJohn hates you, then I'm out
Nah, hate is something I just don't have. It sure would be nice if they would recognize where they are headed, show a little humility and get their act together.
Inetbet doesn't just get complaints here, they get them on all the online gambling 3rd party sites that accept complains, as far as I've seen.
I don't know where CM got the idea "Players first approach" from when it comes to inetbet. I agree with most of you in this thread that Inetbet treats players like garbage.
I've read at least 20-30 complaints at inetbet in this forums (I've lurked for a while and read the PABs) as well as others, and my summary of Inetbet's overall attitude is this:
"Here at Inetbet we will maximize our profits whenever possible while still doing barly enough to stay within the rules. We will try to get approved and accredited at as many places as possible. When it comes to player issues, we know the industry well, we know what is allowed and not allowed and we will use our knowledge to squeeze every last bit out of every player that we possibly can, while there's nothing you can do about it because we will ensure it's allowed by the rules. We pride ourselves that we look like greedy lawyers from NYC. Do not expect mercy from us, you will nothing worthwhile as 'a sign of good will'"
I don't know where CM got the idea "Players first approach" from when it comes to inetbet. I agree with most of you in this thread that Inetbet treats players like garbage.
I've read at least 20-30 complaints at inetbet in this forums (I've lurked for a while and read the PABs) as well as others, and my summary of Inetbet's overall attitude is this:
"Here at Inetbet we will maximize our profits whenever possible while still doing barly enough to stay within the rules. We will try to get approved and accredited at as many places as possible. When it comes to player issues, we know the industry well, we know what is allowed and not allowed and we will use our knowledge to squeeze every last bit out of every player that we possibly can, while there's nothing you can do about it because we will ensure it's allowed by the rules. We pride ourselves that we look like greedy lawyers from NYC. Do not expect mercy from us, you will nothing worthwhile as 'a sign of good will'"
pobeda
account suspended
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2008
- Location
- San Diego, CA
wow, well said.
but I think NYC lawyers are much more loyal to their clients at least until they getting paid by the client. Those people at iNetBet getting paid and still treat their customers like garbage
- Joined
- May 24, 2008
- Location
- CO
I would say that
it is definetly within Inetbet "rights" to do what they did. The fact that they took the money out of the ewallet without the consent of the owner doesn't seem that different from most of the transactions that occur today. Remember, the casino put two transactions in of the same amount, so it is reasonable to say that the ewallet would concur with the vendors request.
I do remember this film we would watch in 2nd or 3rd grade and it was about people who were right. for example a guy walking through an intersection and another person was running a red light. The guy walking through the intersection saw the car coming, but he said, "I am right," and then blaam!!!!! He was dead right. I know kinda corny, but my point is that sometimes things can be handled differently.
If I were in Inetbet's shoes, I would have emailed requesting the money back, frozen the account until they contacted me through LIVE CHAT or a PHONE CALL, then if no response I would have taken the money back and sent an email that I did take the money back, keep their account frozen until they contact me through LIVE CHAT or a PHONE CALL, and finally explain to the forum that it wasn't the players fault, it was the processors fault and so what is everyone going on about? I would unfreeze the account once I was contacted by the player. This would ensure there were no misunderstandings and that I value the player as an asset.
it is definetly within Inetbet "rights" to do what they did. The fact that they took the money out of the ewallet without the consent of the owner doesn't seem that different from most of the transactions that occur today. Remember, the casino put two transactions in of the same amount, so it is reasonable to say that the ewallet would concur with the vendors request.
I do remember this film we would watch in 2nd or 3rd grade and it was about people who were right. for example a guy walking through an intersection and another person was running a red light. The guy walking through the intersection saw the car coming, but he said, "I am right," and then blaam!!!!! He was dead right. I know kinda corny, but my point is that sometimes things can be handled differently.
If I were in Inetbet's shoes, I would have emailed requesting the money back, frozen the account until they contacted me through LIVE CHAT or a PHONE CALL, then if no response I would have taken the money back and sent an email that I did take the money back, keep their account frozen until they contact me through LIVE CHAT or a PHONE CALL, and finally explain to the forum that it wasn't the players fault, it was the processors fault and so what is everyone going on about? I would unfreeze the account once I was contacted by the player. This would ensure there were no misunderstandings and that I value the player as an asset.
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2011
- Location
- Belfast (Northern Ireland)
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2004
- Location
- Pacific NW
Not sure if you are being sarcastic, but sadly players have no way of contacting INB except through an email system that randomly decides what email comes in.
Here at Inetbet we even let you gamble with support emails! We will assign your email to a number on the roulette wheel and spin it. If it hits we will answer your email!
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2009
- Location
- UK
Ok well if you are right (and I am not saying you are wrong I am just presenting a statement) then its fair play if a player charge backs a casino deposit then? If they get double dipped?
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2001
If a casino double dips, it is a genuine error from the processor (in all cases I've seen anyway). The correct course is to ask the operator to reverse those charges or refund the amount some other way. I can't remember a case where a casino has refused to comply, so the need for chargebacks in this case just doesn't exist.
In any case, chargebacks hurt both parties. The casino is fined, and the player is subsequently blacklisted.
One is a genuine error. The other is a deliberate act.
Personally, I don't equate what the casino did with a chargeback. It was more of a rectified clerical error. Banks do this all the time. It's not exactly fraudulent activity.
I see no reason for a processor not to self correct a double payment. If your bank accidently puts money in your account they don't ask your permission to take it back out. It's not exactly the same thing but it's similar enough for me.
I just think the casino went overboard with the accusatory behaviour and the account closure. It wasn't a player friendly act.
I see no reason for a processor not to self correct a double payment. If your bank accidently puts money in your account they don't ask your permission to take it back out. It's not exactly the same thing but it's similar enough for me.
I just think the casino went overboard with the accusatory behaviour and the account closure. It wasn't a player friendly act.
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2004
- Location
- Europe
To Inetbet,
Please feel free to use this as an email template for future issues, I am sure we could provide more if required.
Dear (insert name),
Unfortunately we had an issue last week where payments were processed twice to certain players, you happened to be one of these, we have now rectified the situation by cancelling those transactions with your payment provider and all monies are now correct.
As a gesture of goodwill, and to apologise for any inconvenience, we have credited your account with $50 wager free.
If you would like any further information please don't hesitate to contact us.
Good Luck
Inetbet Support Team
I just don't understand why Inetbet have to be so confrontational instead of apologetic, it keeps players happy and continuing to deposit which is the aim of the business.
Please feel free to use this as an email template for future issues, I am sure we could provide more if required.
Dear (insert name),
Unfortunately we had an issue last week where payments were processed twice to certain players, you happened to be one of these, we have now rectified the situation by cancelling those transactions with your payment provider and all monies are now correct.
As a gesture of goodwill, and to apologise for any inconvenience, we have credited your account with $50 wager free.
If you would like any further information please don't hesitate to contact us.
Good Luck
Inetbet Support Team
I just don't understand why Inetbet have to be so confrontational instead of apologetic, it keeps players happy and continuing to deposit which is the aim of the business.
bigjohn
Dormant account
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2012
- Location
- Northeast Coastal USA
Brilliant!
This is what 99.99999999% of the accredited casinos here would send to one of their players, although the $50 might be a stretch and is not really necessary.
I am in a position where sometimes I must apologize for some real or perceived error my employer has committed and even a tiny amount of tact goes a long way.
Ummm you obviously haven't played at iNetBet. They don't have LIVE CHAT or PHONE SUPPORT. They only have email, which, given they have a long history of losing emails and ID docs. Grouping email & support together, when discussing customer support at iNetBet, is a farse.
As funny as this, in reality if you've ever dealt with iNetBet support and been stuffed about with them losing emails, then you'll wonder if this is how they run things over there.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Location
- Florida, USA
So realistically is there any process to re-evaluate an accredited casino? I find threads going back to 2011 complaining about poor CS and it appears that their T & C related to withdrawals have changed ( someone mentioned $500 limit per method).
They are the highest rated US facing casino at the moment. Seems like a slap in the face to others that are working hard to earn that mark and winning CM awards each year.
They are the highest rated US facing casino at the moment. Seems like a slap in the face to others that are working hard to earn that mark and winning CM awards each year.
- Joined
- Jun 30, 1998
- Location
- Bierland
Yes, I'll be getting the CAG members set up to do this. Because it's only fair to have an updated accreditation process - especially when some casinos change their terms and conditions without me being aware. I am not omniscient like many believe.
Unfortunately with threads like this one, you will have a number of members twist facts out of proportion to the point where you think the casino is a roguish clip shot joint that is confiscating winnings at a whim left and right; for instance, this thread. It's already been explained what happened - and as I mentioned in my last posting, there has not been much constructive criticism - only a bashfest, so it's really hard to take any of this in earnest. We even have members here opening up phoney accounts just so they can make the bashfest even more "bashing". So how is anyone to take this shit seriously?
They chose to close the player's account - so what? They had their reasons, and perhaps they didn't want to drag these reasons through the fora. It was a business decision that they made, and personally - I believe they made the call based on what they knew - and not based on some flippant whim. They have over a decade of experience running a casino, which is tougher than most of you think, and I respect that..
The CM ratings are based mostly on factual data that can be measured: licensing, payout times, withdrawal limits, flushing, etc. To say that their high score is a slap in the face of their peers is unrealistic. What most people are upset about in this thread is based on non-factual, emotive, guesswork being flamed on by those who think it's funny to hand out insults at the expense of others - giving each other high fives along the way. We can make allegations, accusations, and assumptions until the cows come home. And just because you feel that someone hasn't been treated fairly doesn't mean it's necessarily true.
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2004
- Location
- Pictland
(Bryan and I appear to have been typing simultaneously, apologies for any redundancy)
Clearly there is, as any experienced and passably observant forum member can tell you. Casinos are constantly being re-evaluated as demonstrated by the endless listing and de-listing of casinos on the Accred list.
That said you might want to start with Accredited Casinos Updates where you are free to bring up pretty much anything you like regarding Accred casinos.
I can tell you from experience that most Accred casinos have had their status evaluated over the course of the past several years (I mention that time frame in particular because I started my work on the PABs late 2007). iNetBet has been one of them, and for the most part our judgement has been that (a) they match or exceed most Accred casinos in a number of key areas and (b) a lot of the complaints about them don't stand up well under close examination. Sure some do but you can't just take them all at face value, there's a lot of bitching and moaning going on and no small amount of attempted witch-hunt attacks on them.
The reality is that iNetBet do things their own way which is not always to the pleasure and approval of the player community at large. If you don't like that you're free to play elsewhere, no one is being forced to play there.
That said, critisisms of iNetBet -- or any other Accred casino -- are, and will continue to be, considered for their individual merits. If it's just crabby belly-aching then that's pretty much the credit that will be given to it: not much. On the other hand issues presented seriously will be taken as such. Perhaps not instantaneously -- we are busy guys -- but there never has been, nor do I imagine there ever will be, an intentional choice to ignore real and substantiated problems.
Please remember that volume does not equal substance. It might mean something but it doesn't necessarily equate to truth.
Clearly there is, as any experienced and passably observant forum member can tell you. Casinos are constantly being re-evaluated as demonstrated by the endless listing and de-listing of casinos on the Accred list.
That said you might want to start with Accredited Casinos Updates where you are free to bring up pretty much anything you like regarding Accred casinos.
I can tell you from experience that most Accred casinos have had their status evaluated over the course of the past several years (I mention that time frame in particular because I started my work on the PABs late 2007). iNetBet has been one of them, and for the most part our judgement has been that (a) they match or exceed most Accred casinos in a number of key areas and (b) a lot of the complaints about them don't stand up well under close examination. Sure some do but you can't just take them all at face value, there's a lot of bitching and moaning going on and no small amount of attempted witch-hunt attacks on them.
The reality is that iNetBet do things their own way which is not always to the pleasure and approval of the player community at large. If you don't like that you're free to play elsewhere, no one is being forced to play there.
That said, critisisms of iNetBet -- or any other Accred casino -- are, and will continue to be, considered for their individual merits. If it's just crabby belly-aching then that's pretty much the credit that will be given to it: not much. On the other hand issues presented seriously will be taken as such. Perhaps not instantaneously -- we are busy guys -- but there never has been, nor do I imagine there ever will be, an intentional choice to ignore real and substantiated problems.
Please remember that volume does not equal substance. It might mean something but it doesn't necessarily equate to truth.
Presumably by listening to the posts from the more respected and less bias members here. For me personally, it was largely the opinions of a couple posters that made me make up my mind, despite the quantity of posters.
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2008
- Location
- On the Beach
WHO am I to argue with the meister himself and Maxd who i think doeas a tremedous job here free of charge at that.
Now having said that , I know for a fact that I had ,in the pst, made several negative comments about inetbet and was embarassingly put down by either maxd or the meister.
My question really was not that they are an accredited casino but why for example are their numerical rating higher than Jackpot Capital . I think I asked twice and was told
to check the "formula" used or something like that.
I USED to play a lot at INET and to be honest , I think I was luckier there than at any other casino now available to US .I rarely ever play there anymore
I still would like to see a rationale as to how their rating is higher than Jackpot Capital
They are both RTG, JC has live chat and instant respose to email and there is always Yasmeen for complex problems
The payout period is no better or worse but there is always a problem about tracking number etc etc and processor did it wrong.
Last time I won at I net they asked for documentation at least 3 times saying cant read what i submitted which may be true I been tHERE for some time received several payouts but now documentation again BS!! I said screw it and blew off the 400 dollar request and that was it for me at INETBET
Now I expect the well miss congeniality from INET will reply in her usual childlike manner here but go ahead babes I am fine on my end!
NO MAS from me about INET
Now having said that , I know for a fact that I had ,in the pst, made several negative comments about inetbet and was embarassingly put down by either maxd or the meister.
My question really was not that they are an accredited casino but why for example are their numerical rating higher than Jackpot Capital . I think I asked twice and was told
to check the "formula" used or something like that.
I USED to play a lot at INET and to be honest , I think I was luckier there than at any other casino now available to US .I rarely ever play there anymore
I still would like to see a rationale as to how their rating is higher than Jackpot Capital
They are both RTG, JC has live chat and instant respose to email and there is always Yasmeen for complex problems
The payout period is no better or worse but there is always a problem about tracking number etc etc and processor did it wrong.
Last time I won at I net they asked for documentation at least 3 times saying cant read what i submitted which may be true I been tHERE for some time received several payouts but now documentation again BS!! I said screw it and blew off the 400 dollar request and that was it for me at INETBET
Now I expect the well miss congeniality from INET will reply in her usual childlike manner here but go ahead babes I am fine on my end!
NO MAS from me about INET
- Joined
- Jun 30, 1998
- Location
- Bierland
Seriously?
What a way to induce a bit of discourse between the players of the forum and the casino reps.You are a senior member, so I shouldn't have to explain the rating process as if I'm explaining it to a newbie. On nearly every page is a link to the review section that details how the ratings are calculated.
https://www.casinomeister.com/rating-system-explanation/
Thread upgraded to closed due to the number of thoughtless, childish comments made by a number of you. How disappointing.
- Status
