brucake
Banned User - player fraud - flaming troll
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2011
- Location
- Kintston-upon-Thames
ahhhhhhhhhh, GreaseMOnkey. A popular poster, loved by many members detested by the mods.
Between this thread and the other that has spun off because of inet, Greasemonkey has made obvious and good points. He has been treated again very poorly as he usually seems to be regardless of the circumstances. Their is an obvious dislike of him by the mods. I happen to love his posts. I cringe everytime I see you people being "mean" to GM rather than embracing his thoughts and knowledge. Unless you have had past issues that I am unaware of then you have been grossly rude to gm for no apparent reason.
Why is he constantly told to be quiet or chill out or stop posting about a subject? Trying to silence him is not what many of us happen to desire. I happen to agree with him most often and would like him to post more often even as he is being shouted down by Bryan, nifty and a few others.
Why was he threatened with his membership for asking simple questions to inetbet that they have refused to answer in full?
Why was he warned to quit badgering when he simply asked for a direct and honest answer to finally determine who was and who was not being honest?
Why was this then squashed and lightly explained away?
Methinks THOU doth protesteth too much on inet's behalf. Those were good questions. inet is caught up in falsehoods. Shame on them. Don't protect them, shed the light on them.
What was meant by the bonus issue is moot?!!? It is surely not. They lied about it. Why do we accept their word for anything now? If the person was not using a bonus then she wasn't cheating the casino if her IDs are valid. This was a very poor way of handling that thread. Why in the world would anyone lock it if they are not trying to suppress information?
You warned gaydave for not being on topic then thanked inet for the same in the next thread. It is apparent that you are not being open minded or fair in your reactions.
It is apparent to level headed readers here, that something is wrong with the alicek situation and the handling of the thread. Also, that leads to questioning of the pab findings.
We all talk about multiple accounts when a fraudster is caught out. Or false ID or wrong age. Why is this being buried? Why arent basic questions answered?
this may very well be frustrating for bryan and max. it probably is. it is also very frustrating for readers trying to discern who is correct and who is wrong. it has become more difficult when threads are locked and questioners threatened. It is like an ancient tribunal. You are guilty and you just must believe, evidence be damned. yes, they lied but that is moot. ?
End Derail:
Between this thread and the other that has spun off because of inet, Greasemonkey has made obvious and good points. He has been treated again very poorly as he usually seems to be regardless of the circumstances. Their is an obvious dislike of him by the mods. I happen to love his posts. I cringe everytime I see you people being "mean" to GM rather than embracing his thoughts and knowledge. Unless you have had past issues that I am unaware of then you have been grossly rude to gm for no apparent reason.
Why is he constantly told to be quiet or chill out or stop posting about a subject? Trying to silence him is not what many of us happen to desire. I happen to agree with him most often and would like him to post more often even as he is being shouted down by Bryan, nifty and a few others.
Why was he threatened with his membership for asking simple questions to inetbet that they have refused to answer in full?
Why was he warned to quit badgering when he simply asked for a direct and honest answer to finally determine who was and who was not being honest?
Why was this then squashed and lightly explained away?
Methinks THOU doth protesteth too much on inet's behalf. Those were good questions. inet is caught up in falsehoods. Shame on them. Don't protect them, shed the light on them.
What was meant by the bonus issue is moot?!!? It is surely not. They lied about it. Why do we accept their word for anything now? If the person was not using a bonus then she wasn't cheating the casino if her IDs are valid. This was a very poor way of handling that thread. Why in the world would anyone lock it if they are not trying to suppress information?
You warned gaydave for not being on topic then thanked inet for the same in the next thread. It is apparent that you are not being open minded or fair in your reactions.
It is apparent to level headed readers here, that something is wrong with the alicek situation and the handling of the thread. Also, that leads to questioning of the pab findings.
We all talk about multiple accounts when a fraudster is caught out. Or false ID or wrong age. Why is this being buried? Why arent basic questions answered?
this may very well be frustrating for bryan and max. it probably is. it is also very frustrating for readers trying to discern who is correct and who is wrong. it has become more difficult when threads are locked and questioners threatened. It is like an ancient tribunal. You are guilty and you just must believe, evidence be damned. yes, they lied but that is moot. ?
End Derail: