spybarbie said:You think that I may ask YOU for help although you can't even help yourself?!
Woohoohoo, keep your dreams, find a girl or any plastic puppet to express your sexuality but stop to bother any woman who makes you scared to death which really seems to include all the women in the world, HAHAHA!!!
Bye, Bye ... JPM Babe ***LOL***
gfkostas said:Based on the way she expresses herself and talk to the others my opinion is that she's wasting her and what is infinetely worse our time.However that's what she is so if we dont like something we change it or we change the way we think about it.
Jpm let's stop having communication with spybarbie since its obvious that she doesn't like the way we uneducated people talk.
What if she's a real spy?
At the end of the day she's a barbie girl in her own barbie world
Lets start drinking bro.How a Remy martyn sounds?
connectocasino said:I appreciate it Caruso & Jetset. This is why we disagree with other operators when they say responding directly on the forums is a thankless and pointless job.
Thank you for proving us right.
jetset said:This character Kane is imo making a grave misjudgement in backing out of a message board commitment so soon.
...we are immediately branded as thieves when the slightest doubt arises without even waiting for our response rogue players such as Marcolino are encouraged by moderators and players alike...
casinomeister said:...
Players are free to voice their discontent, but I request them to do this in a responsible manner by backing up their complaints with explicit proof of a wrong doing. Same goes for the operators.
...
caruso said:I agree that John should not take schoolyard insults at WOL as a reason to stop posting anywhere but there. He's received by and large, if not exactly 100%, respectful treatment here and should not be allow himself to be backed off because of discouraging experiences elsewhere.
Macgyver said:Whether Connecto still reads or responds to posts, I'll add just one ...
They paid me with no trouble, taking two days from the time I emailed them about the withdrawal. No, it wasn't a big payout ... it was only comps points which equalled roughly half my deposit.
For me, their payouts weren't a problem. For others, they may be. However, I thought it only fair to post that at least one person was paid by that casino without any trouble.
This person used to play with us on credit until last September. A privilege we extended him because he lives in Italy and we couldn't accept his Western Unions during what was daytime for him. He disappeared on us one fine day leaving $ 6000 in arrears. We had a policy on not giving him more than $ 2000 in credit but he hammered our staff every minute until the manager finally gave in and gave him $ 4000 more than the allowed amount. We made every attempt to contact him to receive our money but he did not respond. We wrote off the money and assumed we would never hear from him again.
Then all of a sudden he started playing again on 3/13/2004. We were unaware because he didn't call/email/chat like he used to. He had figured out how to use Neteller and he started depositing monies using that method. He played for a while using that method and had an account balance of $ 16033 by 4/2/2004 and called for a withdrawal.
He had a received a bonus of $ 1998 on his deposit and hence he qualified for a withdrawal of $ 3996 as per our policies as of February. Since he owed us $ 6000 before this win he STILL owes us $ 2004. We proceeded to remove the $ 16033 from his account. This is when he flew off the handle.
We have explained everything to him in Italian, Spanish and English SEVERAL times but he has insisted on continuing on this unnecessary path he has chosen. He has sent us no less than 10000 emails since 4/21 calling us names and using foul language I refuse to post. We have even offered to wipe the slate clean if he stops harassing us. But he won't quit.
I have to side with the casino on this one. I would subtract the $6000 debt AFTER the player cashes out. In other words, the player was due $3996, player owes casino $6000, so player still owes casino $2000. the full balance in the player's account wasnt fully cashable so i wouldn't equate it with real money and use it against the $6000 debt. If C2C's story is really true (I note the player does not deny it), then I don't think the casino owes the player the benefit of the doubt in this case. Just my .02
The matter of credits anticipated is a very confusing one here - I can't really get my head around it clearly. That aside, the casino CAN make a case for subtracting the debt from the cashable balance and leaving a negative residue. The major problem is that the player did not realize that the cashout cap had been reduced from five times to two times when he deposited. If it had still been at five times he would unquestionably be owed money - about $4000 after removing the $6000 "debt". As it is, the casino can make a plausible case for not owing any money, and although the rules do not take these remarkable circumstances into consideration I don't see that the casino is about to be persuaded to look at the wording of their rules in a rather fairer manner. This player was clearly a solid gold customer, dropping over 20K, and even if there were truth about the abrasive nature of his Emails, which are HIGHLY doubt after the educated and courteous PMs I've received from him, the casino could maybe nurture these types of customers better. 20K - 4K still leaves a 16K profit over less than a year from this ONE customer alone.
I can sure admit to send many mails to connectocasino... the reasons are two:
becouse they do not answer me NEVER !!!... and becouse they send me mail with virus.
Bottom line:
1) Casino claims $6000 in uncovered credits.
2) Player cannot prove otherwise, and has accepted that this claimed debt may be actually the case, ie. theose WU deposits did NOT go through.
3) Total withdrawable balance currently c.$4000, mainly because the player did NOT realize that the cashout cap had been reduced to twice the bonus when he played.
4) The casino can make a genuine case for not owing the player any money and the player does not have any redress on this unless he can prove that that 6000 credit "debt" is false. I believe that this will be next to impossible to achieve.
Marco - my advice to you in all sincerity is to let this matter go. There is absolutely no way you will ever see a resolution that you would consider satisfactory.
(Marco - lascialo perdere, in tutta sincerit. Non c' nessuna possibilit di poter risolvere questo in modo che sarebbe soddisfacente per te)