I respect how Chops hangs onto every counter argument.Sometimes by a single thread. Especially when the EU itself's future is so uncertain yet sovereignty of many member states of the EU and its diktats are making the unions future so questionable in itself.
Do you really think that the EU has a future Chops? If so then why do you think it has?
The thing is geordie, I can't overstate how little of a fan I am of the EU in many regards, I found this post post I made on some videogame forums back in 2012 (this isn't the whole thing but an excerpt from it).
It seems to me that the banking elite is making a real play for total societal domination in Europe at the moment, what was in the past achieved with soldiers and bombs, is now achieved through crushing financial repression and 'austerity measures'. Greece is no longer a democratic nation in the true sense of the word, it'll be interesting to see if there's some sort of attempt to derail/postpone the upcoming elections, as the political parties that have signed up to what is effectively a hostile EU invasion are sure to be wiped out at the polls.
And beyond that, even in this thread I've not exactly been banging the drum for how great the EU is an organisation, my point has always been that like it or not, it's a major economic and political force in the world, and it's better to be a big 'top table player' in that organisation with some real clout, than sitting on the sidelines moaning about stuff. (Which is the status the UK has relegated itself to.)
It's like, if you're a member of a local golf club and there are elements of the club that you really like and enjoy, and you can see the benefits of, but also stuff you think is crap and want to change, what's the best way to effect that change?
Let's also assume you're a powerful member of that golf club, you're on the executive committee, you help pay towards its costs but you also reap rewards from it in other ways, and if you're pissed off about something the club does, your voice gets listened to and sometimes the entire golf club has to bend to do what you want. (Which is absolutely what the EU used to do
all the bloody time for the UK.)
So in that scenario is it best to stay a member of the club and use the power and influence you have to steer the club in the direction you want it to go, or just cancel the whole lot and write the entire thing off as a bad deal? And the kicker is of course, with the latter choice, you realise you actually still want to play golf at the club and your business interests at the club are no longer considered because you're no longer a member and you gave up your spot on the committee.
The EU is deeply flawed in many ways, and yes, it's over-reached what it should be in some regards too, but the UK did at least have a seat at the top table of one of the most powerful economic and political forces in the world, what we said mattered, and even countries like Germany and France couldn't ignore what we said.
We gave it up for flags and fish, we didn't get the fish and our new blue passports are made in Poland.