Ah..ha..and people wonder why the floors are sticky
Ah..ha..and people wonder why the floors are sticky
Haha so true, older cinemas always had the sticky floors... same as older clubs and pubsand people wonder why the floors are sticky
AG alas is a different kettle of fish, have promoted many a rogue casino since being flogged to Catena Media. Never mind Barrymore pool party dodginess, you're well into Jim'll Fix It territory with AG. No foul.
But to suggest CM have been paid to give Bitstarz any rating will have @Casinomeister or @maxd spitting their beer out in fury. You couldn't be more wrong.
You're a troll. Fuck off and bye.
A few words about the Curacao license seem to be in order.
Curacao does not license casinos directly. They have 4 Master Licenses, each held by a different company (?), and those Master License holders then sell off sub-licenses to individual casinos.
In and of itself a Curacao license isn't worth spit because Curacao does nothing to police and regulate individual casinos. In other words it's all up to the Master License holder: if they are willing to police their sub-licensees then there is (at least) something in place to help ensure than the licensees behave themselves.
If however the Master License holder does nothing but sell sub-licenses then, as you can imagine, there is nothing to keep the sub-license holder from doing whatever they please. In other words players can get screwed en-mass and there is nothing anyone is going to do about it.
So the bottom line is that a Curacao license is only as good as the people who hold the sub-license. If they are douchebags then the players are going to get douched. If they are good people -- and yes, some certainly are, several of which we've worked closely with for many years -- then the players have nothing to worry about.
So is a casino shit if it holds a Curacao license? Not necessarily. Again refer to the nature of Curacao licensing: if the casino is run by good people then the casino is going to be a good place. If that is not the case ... run, don't walk, elsewhere. How can you know who is good and who isn't? Check the reviews, ask, do your research. There is no one-size fits all way to measure Curacao licensees.
FTR see this article on the four Curacao Master Licenses: Curaçao and Their Four Master License Holders
And last but not least I should say this: there has been a move VERY recently for some of the Curacao Master License holders to start cracking down on their sub-licensees. This is NOT a centralized effort by Curacao as much as the Master License holders would like people to believe it is. It is simply an effort by a couple of the Master License holders to extract their reputations from the bog hole they've been wallowing in for years. That said, any improvement is welcome so good on them for it.
So to recap, you don't use them, have avoided them for years but have decided they are crooks? That's like me saying I know the guy down the road sells dodgy motors although I have never bought one off of him, because I read it somewhere.So if I'm understanding correctly because the Russian ladies English is not so good Bitstarz coerced her into saying the bitcoin came from someone else in order to steal her winnings? Bitstarz are crooks here. She won the money fair and square but because its such a large sum they had to find a way to confiscate it. Typical Bitstarz... They've been finding ways for years to not pay players. I remember countless stories on bitcointalk years ago how they stole players money for any reason they could find. How they ever got accredited is beyond me. I've avoided them like the plague.
So until Bitstarz confiscates 40000$ from him he cannot have an opinion about them? It is much smarter and cheaper to use other people's experiences IMHO.So to recap, you don't use them, have avoided them for years but have decided they are crooks? That's like me saying I know the guy down the road sells dodgy motors although I have never bought one off of him, because I read it somewhere.
I am not defending Bitstarz if they are in the wrong, I am merely pointing out that your logic is flawed and based on assumptions rather than fact
if you choose to use slanderous terms, youd best have the means to back them upSo until Bitstarz confiscates 40000$ from him he cannot have an opinion about them? It is much smarter and cheaper to use other people's experiences IMHO.
I have heard the full story from the OP. She has also added the copies of the emails. At the same time, the casino rep preferred not to comment on the case in any way. So I base my opinion on the facts available at the moment.if you choose to use slanderous terms, youd best have the means to back them up
there's a very good reason we have PABs in place
that's rather the point; youve seen one sideI have heard the full story from the OP. She has also added the copies of the emails. At the same time, the casino rep preferred not to comment on the case in any way. So I base my opinion on the facts available at the moment.
P.S. I haven't used any slanderous terms.
So until Bitstarz confiscates 40000$ from him he cannot have an opinion about them? It is much smarter and cheaper to use other people's experiences IMHO.
I have heard the full story from the OP. ...
The way I see it... The casino's actions were explained quite well in their email to the player ...
So not only us, the public, will never be informed about the "real" reasons for the casino's action but it looks like the OP herself will never know why she got her 40k confiscated. And the reasons which the casino gave to the player in the explanatory email - those are just words without real meaning behind them. Hmm...That may be why you are posting in a forum rather than running an arbitration service.
The casino's case and the evidence they hold is not limited to, nor likely to be shared in full, in an email to the player.
You want simple answers, there usually are none. A significant majority of cases are judgement calls based on all the available evidence, whether that be given publicly or privately.
If you're offering to be the OP's arbitrator that's fine and between you two. Until I hear otherwise the OP has asked us to work on their behalf, and I am.
So not only us, the public, will never be informed about the "real" reasons for the casino's action ...
... it looks like the OP also will never know why she got her 40k confiscated. ...
And the reasons which the casino gave to the player - those are just words without any meaning. Hmm...
Let me predict how this thread and PAB will end. ...
Nice hopefully it will change ty for info✌thanks for taking the time to teach me that
I learned something today
Obviously casino will always win a PAB unless it's a small amount that they pay rather than fabricate proofs.
Because it is very easy for bitstarz say anything and they side will be trusted and the victim is always considered wrong before even any evidence. And all casinos proof provided to maxd is secret and automatically accepted as gospel
Good going - first post is a troll post.Obviously casino will always win a PAB unless it's a small amount that they pay rather than fabricate proofs.
Because it is very easy for bitstarz say anything and they side will be trusted and the victim is always considered wrong before even any evidence. And all casinos proof provided to maxd is secret and automatically accepted as gospel