Software error.
i'm not sure they could afford to take the hit on this one. it was an effup of monumental proportion. I saw one player at a forum that "won" over $100k from this. some players grabbed the reigns and freerolled like mofos with all these free bonus dollars.
I agree that Big Dollar has really dropped the ball in regards to providing a clearer explanation as to what went down. Once word of this promo hit the bonus-hustler forums, this thing surely took on a life of its own.
Had I known about this promo, I probably would have taken a shot as well, but I would have done so knowing that there was a good possiblility the water could get murky.
And I have seen things of this nature occur at a B&M casino and the player doesn't always necessarily get to keep the winnings.
Now, why could the casino not have expanded on this before. Clearly, redeeming points that were not eligible under the T & C, but that could be used due to a software bug, does give the casino more of a case. However, I suspect they have still gone too far in confiscating more than the excess due to the error.
In a B & M casino, while the casino could make a claim, the player would already have the money, and the onus would be on the CASINO to prove their case, whereas online it is the PLAYER who has to prove the casino is wrong. recent B & M cases have involved casinos taking action against players to RECOVER money believed to have been won against the terms of the game. Recent cases have involved the use of clandestine computer technology to beat games such as Blackjack, Roulette and 3 card poker. The casino had to prove their case in court. In the case of the 3 card poker, sloppy dealing was what enabled the scam to be successful. Had they not proved that players took advantage of this with technology, the casino would have had to take the hit, and reprimand the dealer.
Big Dollar should only remove the blocks of $50 that were awarded against the terms for the promotion. Even the promotion itself was mathematically flawed, as they used the standard $10 for 1 point, with $50 awarded for 100 points. Perhaps they meant it to be $50 for 1000 points, which would have been a 5% cashback on wagered amount with ridiculous playthrough. Someone on duty should have seen this going wrong while it was happening, rather than allowing play to continue under false pretences and confiscating winnings with a rather sketchy explanation later.
If indeed they could not pay such a hit, why do they have their multi-hand VP games set to allow such massively high wagers!
The norm at MG is 125 ($125) per deal at the 50 hand game. ALL FIVE Grand Prive casinos will allow coin to go up to 25. This is a massive 6250 per hand maximum. It is possible that a lucky (perhaps stupidly rich), player will play at that level, and hit the holy grail of a PAT RF, Grand Prive would then be liable for a payout of 800x6250, or some 5 MILLION on the hand!
Added to this, they once mailed out a bonus of 25% up to 25,000
Someone depositing 100,000 for this may very well be the kind of filthy rich player prepared to hit the VP at 6250 per hand in the hope of getting a more common big hit, such as pat 4 to a royal, pat 4OK etc.