Because it's a big step in the wrong direction from one of the biggest online casino.
I, for one, would like to hear the real reason behind it. I'd hate to believe that they do this because there's a high % of reversals on cards while ewallet users couldn't do it.
Don't forget that ewallet users are the only ones affected by this enhancement.
But you can flush a withdrawal whenever you like!?!
Other than the 'It's nice to be paid as quickly as possible" argument (which I agree with - I really do - I think it should ALWAYS be automated and immediate like it used to be @ Intercasino and Blue Square) - I still don't get the big issue.
Withdraw, Flush. Go shopping Monday morning.
You'll still get paid quickly in the week.
I dunno. Like I say, quicker is always better but, in the grand scheme of things - I can't get worked up about it.
Unless I'm missing something.
Cashout hits my moneybookers in ~5 seconds. I go outside my door and there is the ATM and I can cash it all out. Just like a real land based casino.
Casino is 99% about the fast money for me.
Wow - I didn't realise there was still outfits out there that did the IMMEDIATE Moneybookers thing. Fair play, your example makes perfect sense. I guess if you hit it big Saturday night you might want to go and blow the cash, which in your example @ William Hill - you could. Yep. Get it.
I guess it's one thing to take into consideration when viewing the overall experience at an online casino.
We have already had a player post that they were denied a loan because the bank found a transaction for 32Red on their statement in the recent past, and credit scored them negatively because of it. This is the kind of thing that is going to push players away from cards and towards eWallets. Another trend by banks is discouraging the use of credit cards for gambling by adding extra fees and charges beyond those that apply to normal "purchases".
It is a clear indication that as far as the industry are concerned, they dislike eWallets for some reason. It's not about preferential treatment, it's about a fear that even though it hasn't happened yet, a move by players from cards to eWallets is something to fear in industry circles.
Before I moved to Neteller I used a wide variety of cards to deposit with (before finally settling on a single gaming card, and then just using that card to fund my Neteller account), and there was a very clear correlation between the cards I was using regularly for gambling and getting letters from the companies telling me that as part of their responsible lending policy blah blah activity on your account etc etc 'we are increasing your APR' and/or 'we are reducing your credit limit'.
Online gambling is seen as a HIGH RISK ACTIVITY by both banks and credit card companies, we got a secured loan last year to get a load of work done on the house and the finance house went through EVERYTHING, bank statements, credit card statements, incomings and outogings, the whole works. Fortunately they only wanted the last three months worth and they didn't seem to notice and/or flag up the regular Neteller deposits from one of my credit cards (which I always maintain a zero balance on anyway so maybe that was the reason). I dread to think what would have happened if we'd have had a load of casino transactions on there.
Also, there was a cash deposit of ÂŁ500 into our current account and they specifically asked where that money had come from (I said it was from irregular self employment, which is sort of true ), which was actually a Neteller withdrawal that I had paid into the current account.
Personally I think you'd have to be nuts to have regular gambling activity on your mainstream credit and debit cards, it will be raising your risk profile and god help you if you need to get any sort of major credit facility with that sort of activity all over your cards and accounts - which is why I've gone 100% Neteller.
That "some reason" is usually the fact that E-wallets tend to charge twice as much for deposits than CC processors. Could be related
Before I moved to Neteller I used a wide variety of cards to deposit with (before finally settling on a single gaming card, and then just using that card to fund my Neteller account), and there was a very clear correlation between the cards I was using regularly for gambling and getting letters from the companies telling me that as part of their responsible lending policy blah blah activity on your account etc etc 'we are increasing your APR' and/or 'we are reducing your credit limit'.
Online gambling is seen as a HIGH RISK ACTIVITY by both banks and credit card companies, we got a secured loan last year to get a load of work done on the house and the finance house went through EVERYTHING, bank statements, credit card statements, incomings and outogings, the whole works. Fortunately they only wanted the last three months worth and they didn't seem to notice and/or flag up the regular Neteller deposits from one of my credit cards (which I always maintain a zero balance on anyway so maybe that was the reason). I dread to think what would have happened if we'd have had a load of casino transactions on there.
Also, there was a cash deposit of ÂŁ500 into our current account and they specifically asked where that money had come from (I said it was from irregular self employment, which is sort of true ), which was actually a Neteller withdrawal that I had paid into the current account.
Personally I think you'd have to be nuts to have regular gambling activity on your mainstream credit and debit cards, it will be raising your risk profile and god help you if you need to get any sort of major credit facility with that sort of activity all over your cards and accounts - which is why I've gone 100% Neteller.
That "some reason" is usually the fact that E-wallets tend to charge twice as much for deposits compared to CC processors. Could be related
I don't think I am being cynical when I say that it is most certainly a money-saving measure, and is absolutely NOT an improvement or enhancement of any kind. As Bryan often says to systems peddlers etc...."We ain't stupid here at CM".
Some of are most seasoned posters might be jumping to conclusions here?
Even the ones that sometimes critisize assumptions heavily?
Wink wink nudge nudge..
But in all seriousness:
I don't really think it's 32Red-like to come here disguising cutbacks as enhancement, i am pretty sure they don't underestimate our deductive capabilities..
But i also think they did not expect wild assumptions and a bit too heavy criticism for that matter.
I think we should wait with further such comments untill the good men from 32Red have replied with some elaboration?
That's just my opinion of course, but reflecting on how almost each and every one of us have been treated by them so far, it would seem common courtesy?
32Red would have garnered more respect (from me at least) if they just said it "as it is" and not dressed it up as something players want. I always thought they were beyond that, and that weekend payouts were a way for 32Red to "go the extra mile" for customers, even if there was a cost involved. Looks like the bean counters have finally had their way, and it is sad day...just like every other time the bean counters get their way.
Here you are assuming your take is a fact, but it is not yet proven to be so.
This is my take:
https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/threads/32red-payment-processing.57890/
I was saying it tongue in cheek, not as a disrespect of your or anyones opinion
The thought had crossed my mind too, as being one of the possible reasons.
But theres a fine line between opinions/seemingly easy deductions and facts.
(read assessments based on facts)
I never thought it would happen so soon. 32red suggesting that some players are unable to reverse their w/ds because the cashout is already in the system and the new initiative will benefit them. I though only those lowlife casinos resorted to these cheap excuses. What we can hope for is a big improvement in the global economy and that casinos wont need to resort to cheap stunts. Sigh.
The ONLY result of these changes is.:
1. No payouts on weekends
2. Less/No accounts staff on weekends = less costs to casino
Unless you can think of some others, then my take is looking a lot more solid than yours right now.
That might be, but it's still "a take on" and not yet a proven fact
And i can think of many reasons, but i posted my question before, as i'd rather have it answered by the only one who can really tell.
You know i respect your opinion Nifty, i assume you respect mine too.
That might be, but it's still "a take on" and not yet a proven fact
And i can think of many reasons, but i posted my question before, as i'd rather have it answered by the only one who can really tell.
You know i respect your opinion Nifty, i assume you respect mine too.