external image

300% bonus coupon...oh really?

Seriously people, if you have $50 burning a hole in your pocket, you could do so many better things than give it to the Virtual Group.

Throwing it down a drain would be more productive for instance. :D

Failing that, donate it to charity, or put it towards a holiday fund.

Or how about depositing it at a casino which is reputable and one that is not going to give you a whole can of problems.

Exactly Dave, why would anyone want to support a criminal enterprise in any way, shape or form?

What Virtual wanted to happen with this marketing campaign, is exactly what has happened.....players post that they've "recovered" winnings previously denied, then a few players figure what's the harm in taking up that 300% or 500% bonus offer just once....as Chuchu said, they more than likely will get paid, because the spotlight is still shining bright.

I posted this a week or so ago...I must be psychic. :rolleyes:

It's a domino effect. You get a few people posting how they have "recovered" previously denied winnings. Next thing you know previous players say "hey, let's give it a shot, just to see what happens". Then when that small experiment works out okay, you get some newbies who were previously smart enough to heed the advice given out here....decide that the 500% no max cashout bonus is just too good to resist.

Note the bolded part. Here we are a week, or ten days later....and we are talking about the EXACT thing that I said would happen. I just never dreamed the rep would have the balls to actually post a promo here on the forum, like it's some sleazy EZBoard, from the days of yore.

And then of course, the main objective, which is to get some of the big affies who have previously dropped them back on the bandwagon. Bryan's quote from a week ago:

The motivation of taking care of players is simply to be in a better light so that more affs will join Gambling Wages. It mainly has to do with marketing. That's all.

It has nothing to do with wanting to do the right thing, or turning over a new leaf, or all of a sudden deciding it's more profitable to run an honest business. It's marketing. I'm simply baffled that everyone can't see this.

Their notoriety for short-term thinking has left me pondering over why the heck are they paying out hundreds of thousands of dollars paying ripped-off customers and where the tally will increase by the day. If they are resorting to old tricks and falsely clearing their name they are playing a dangerous game as they will have to rip-off an enormous number of players just to break even as most players will tread very warily with them.

Again, the above is a quote from another thread...but I wanted to run some hypothetical numbers, so that we can see it won't really take that much for them to recoup whatever amount they have so far returned to previously screwed over players. I also doubt it's anywhere near in the hundreds of thousands. Acepedro, who's owed over 50K hasn't been paid, contrary to what Marty said. And the big million dollar winner hasn't been paid, that I know of. I haven't seen any big press release, have you? And I don't mean paid in dribs and drabs...where he signs some NDA, and gets paid over the next ten years...I mean, cha-ching...a big whopping roll of cash in his bank account.

At best, they have paid out 500 here, 1000 or a couple thousand there....sometimes even much smaller amounts ie. $100 or $200. I really don't think it's anywhere near hundreds of thousands.

I'm not sure if some people realize it...but there are some mega or super affiliates out there who easily make five figures a month or more. They don't have one or two websites....they have dozens, and hundreds. In the now closed "Forum Rule 4.4" thread, some of us tried to convince webmasters to remove all Virtual properties from their sites. Not a ton of success, but there was some....in particular a large affiliate network run by Topboss (Heather). The lady runs a network comprised of about (I think) 120 sites or so. And she pretty much had Virtual on all of them. Kudos to her...she actually did the right thing and removed all traces of them from all of her sites (no easy task apparently).

I'm not using her as a specific example below, but just as an overall idea of how big some of these affiliates can be...and how much reach and influence they have.

So, hypothetically...let's say we have an affiliate/webmaster who runs around 100 sites, all of them catering to different markets/parts of the world. And all with good search engine rankings. Let's say that this affiliate has Virtual banners placed prominently on their main pages on all 100 sites. And each of these banners offers some ridiculous 300-500% no restrictions signup bonus....minimum deposit $50.

Conservatively speaking, that webmaster gets ten new signups/depositors for each site they run (in a month). That's $500 gross...but 25% or $125 of it will go to the affiliate in question. Or if it's a CPA deal, then they might receive $50 to $100 (or more) per player/depositor.

Working on the revshare model..the casino has made $375 in the first month off just ONE of this affiliate's websites. Multiply that times 100 websites....$37,500. And that's just using the scenario of one big time affiliate. Do the math for a few more, and then add in the smaller ones...and the old players who are obviously fooled by this "new leaf" campaign. The numbers start to become truly staggering.

This has nothing to do with players, it has everything to do with getting the affiliates back on board, and getting the casinos some fresh meat to fuck over. They can't do that without affiliates....they need them. This is the ultimate exercise in PR, and spin doctoring. And they hired someone to spearhead it, whose previous rep in the industry was beyond repute.

What they have paid out in the last couple weeks, is a mere drop in the bucket to the POTENTIAL future earnings they can glean...dependent upon how many players and affiliates they can sucker in.

And it makes no difference if it is one 48 hr promo, or an ongoing promo, or whatever. Why would anyone even consider giving their money...$50, $100, $500..who cares the amount...to a criminal enterprise? I would rather set fire to it, and watch it burn, than let these assholes get one red cent from me.

They will go back to their old ways, as they have done half a dozen times in the last decade. This has all been played out before...I'm not psychic. But I could write the script for this with my eyes closed....cause I've seen the play before, more than once.
 
ksech: I don't see Chuchu or Silc running banners for these rogue casinos in their sig lines, and I most definitely have never seen either one endorse this group, quite the contrary.
Funny you should mention this becasue the only agenda I have ever had was to have a good time unlike many on here pushing one group over another. I have NEVER had a website, nor have I EVER been an affiliate, all I am is an online player that watches, learns the games and play and use my experiences to let others know just what I see going on.

The only people that will know about this one bonus and what was said are the people right here on this forum and unlike many others with an agenda that belong to multiple forums , are webmasters or affiliates...I belong to no other forum but this one right here...

So...say what you guys will.....because you will any way...and just as you are "predicting" things, I too had my "feelings" proven correct on many things....so...let's put it this way....we won't have to worry about these "crooks", "thieves" "wolves" in sheep clothing much longer now will we?

You can all lie in your beds and sleep quietly soon because with all the new laws bearing down on us in the USA...these operators good or bad will be made to conform to rules or close thier doors in the USA.

.
 
Last edited:
You can all lie in your beds and sleep quietly soon because with all the new laws bearing down on us in the USA...these operators good or bad will be made to conform to rules or close thier doors in the USA.

What in the world gives you that notion Silc? Even with new US regulation, that still does not mean a hill o'beans to these rogues. They will continue to operate just as they are now and have in the past.

Regulation don't mean jack shit to these crooks!

Who's going to make them conform....the US Government? That's a joke.
____
____
 
RobWin: What in the world gives you that notion Silc? Even with new US regulation, that still does not mean a hill o'beans to these rogues. They will continue to operate just as they are now and have in the past.

Regulation don't mean jack shit to these crooks!

Who's going to make them conform....the US Government? That's a joke.
The people Rob, the people. You do not have much faith in people if you think they are going to go against the laws of the land here in the USA. A small amount will but the masses will step back and wait IMO.

Even though online gambling per se is not illegal...we, the people will have been cut off from many avenues of funding. Who will go against the banks and the big boys just to deposit a few bucks?

The operators know this and know this will be hitting them big in the pockets..because I know I, for one, will just drive up the road to spend a few bucks LEGALLY without any financial hassells and instead of worrying if and how I will get my monies from the good or bad operators..


.
 
Some of you are really blowing the issue out of proportion.:confused: I was merely stating that I believed that it was unlikely that you would be screwed if you took and won on the bonus at this stage in time because it would jeopardise the exercise marty is embarking on. This was viewed as being shilling in nature and a lot of negative sentiments ensued.

I have been screwed by Inetbet and CWC and when I posted these experiences there was practically no feedback. What a laugh!

Here's the problem I have...Let's say members here do sign up at this rogue casino. The casino infact do pay the winners for a period of time. Everyone is happy and the casino is deemed trust worthy. Now more and more players decides to deposit there. Now the casino for ever reason. Decides, well we got their money. They can then return to their bread and meat. Of slow pay and no pay, and making up every excuse they choose. They have a history of this. If one doesn't learn from history. They are doomed to repeat it.
 
jod413, let's look at it this way...I have lost many thousands and I do not even want to think how many thousands it was...to accredited casinos because I believed. Time has moved on, and so have the accredited casinos IMO....it is a lousy bonus for goodness sake people, how many have taken a bonus from a KNOWN rogue casino before ? Even when you should not have? I know am guilty of it and I know everyone else here is too..so what makes this one any different? Do not throw stones unless you can live in that glass house.

For me, it is different because ,#1 it isn't much money ,#2 it probably be the one and only time depositing ....and #3 why not enjoy something without strings , unlike the accredited ones that are shaking us down for every penny they can get?

And here is a deep thought....this casino has been burned badly by many for doing the dirty against them and they "feel" it and are trying to make a difference and show some good faith....even if they fail, they get some credit for this...

Why are the rest of you not doing the same thing to other casinos that you have done to this one group? We have been saying walk with your money for a few years now and guess what...no one has and the good guys are sucking us dry...because they CAN....because you guys are allowing them to....I do not see them trying to go back to the way it was...all I see is greed rearing it's ugly head and the hurting it has put on the players...

So....playing one bonus makes me bad, then so be it...you keep feeding that beast you call accredited casinos and keep loving them until you end up broke ....just the way they like it...me, I probably won't play with the bonus, but at least it was OFFERED!

.

lost to accredited casinos because you believed what? that you would win? i dont post here much anymore but i still drop in to read. the same people pissin and moanin about losing while they continue to play EVERY SINGLE DAY. look at those two spin counters at the top of the page. look at the number of spins being recorded. that's only from 2 places! the more you spin the more your chances are of LOSING MONEY. that is how casinos are set up. i just dont understand how people cannot figure this out. 103 deposits? what did you really expect? if you went to a land based 103 days in a row guess what? you will lose. ive said it before and ill say it again when the casino is in your living room you will never come out ahead. as gamers we pay for our entertainment and we pay dearly. ENTERTAINMENT. slots are set with a house edge NOT a players edge. saying that you may as well try a rogue outfit because the accredited ones are taking your money is insane...
 
Cant_Get_Right: Let's say members here do sign up at this rogue casino
I know I was not talking about "signing up" to get the bonus, I was talking about players that already have an account there since it was such a limited time promotion. Remember, the casino already HAS your info, so it would make no difference for this LIMITED time of offer.

Cant_Get_Right: Of slow pay and no pay, and making up every excuse they choose.
Haven't you seen the NUMEROUS threads of no pay , slow pay from reputable casinos??? Again, there has been too much read into this. The offer will expire today so...it is done and gone pretty much. This was meant as a hit and run deal, not as a long term membership.

1819: if you went to a land based 103 days in a row guess what? you will lose
Absolutely agree with you there, but you would think at least a few times you would go home with a few bucks now, wouldn't you? Because I know I HAVE from experience come home with more than I went with at least 2 out of 5 times from a landbased casino. I do know where the withdraw/cashout button is.

1819: saying that you may as well try a rogue outfit because the accredited ones are taking your money is insane...
No it's not ...It was a one time offer, the casinos already have your info and if you come away with monies then how is this insane? Especially when you have the Rep right here for the time being.

I guess because I have never been ripped by them I feel ambivalent towards this ONE TIME OFFER. I have been ripped IMO by an accredited , very highly respected casino from here and after seeing them allow for a few what they did not for me with me being a long time player...so...yes, people get ripped...by both kinds of operators.


.
 
sil it's insane because now you are fighting a two headed monster. accredited or rogue you still have to overcome the house. now with the rogue, if you happpen to beat the odds and make a few bucks, you have to fight them AGAIN to get your money. just seems silly no?
 
I guess because I have never been ripped by them I feel ambivalent towards this ONE TIME OFFER.

Sil, you keep on bringing the aspect of this up as only being a one time offer, sure this particular one will expire today but why would you think that there will not be another one of the same issued tomorrow?

I have been ripped IMO by an accredited , very highly respected casino from here and after seeing them allow for a few what they did not for me with me being a long time player...so...yes, people get ripped...by both kinds of operators.

Do you mean 'ripped' as in not being paid or are you speaking of something else here?
____
____
 
Robwin: Sil, you keep on bringing the aspect of this up as only being a one time offer, sure this particular one will expire today but why would you think that there will not be another one of the same issued tomorrow?
Because I do not care about tomorrows or the next one....and becasue that is the only one that is offered and is on the table at THIS time with some kind of protection with a rep here. I didn't say for people to join this group, I do not condone any group or tell people where to play. I just know people love bonuses for some unknown reason and here is one that was offered with the rep on board, so why not take it if you can THIS TIME since many already have accounts there. And to be honest, I have no clue what casinos these operators run. I just know people LOVE bonuses for some unknown reason and this one seemed like a pretty good one.


And Rob, you and others keep trying to make it look like we are CONDONING this casinos previous actions and telling people to JOIN them, we aren't, we are saying USE the bonus if you have an account there already...and by saying what is the harm of this one offer...you keep trying to twist what was said..to fit your ideas of how to act towards a group.
Do you mean 'ripped' as in not being paid or are you speaking of something else here?
Not being paid. Old story and a lesson learned the hard way.

.
 
And Rob, you and others keep trying to make it look like we are CONDONING this casinos previous actions and telling people to JOIN them, we aren't, we are saying USE the bonus if you have an account there already

Maybe you aren't telling people to "Join Them" but you are in fact telling peeps... "hey it's ok to play there with this bonus because we have Marty here to pay us now" ....you can spin that anyway you want Sil but you are in fact promoting this bunch of rogues by saying that the bonus is ok to take and play there.

Jeeze, I feel like I am beating my damn head against a brick wall here trying to get some of you peeps to see the reasoning in this.

...and by saying what is the harm of this one offer...you keep trying to twist what was said..
I ain't twisting nothin girlfriend, you guys that are saying this offer is a-ok to take are the ones that are trying to re-twist the history of this group!
____
____
 
I just saw that Lucky134me nominated Marty Davis's SPAM POST as "Best Posting Award Of The Fortnight"... :eek:

You've got to be kidding... :barf: :eek:

IMO... THAT type of unbelievable stupidity... is something that "should" be grounds for being BANNED from this forum!! :mad:
Well - that "nomination" has just been removed.

Also, I'm closing Marty Davis's account here because this has been just too much. It seems as the forum is being used as another marketing arm of this casino group - and I don't like it.

I was speaking with RTG this past week and there is no problem whatsoever for players to submit claims via the Central Disputes Center:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


If you have an issue with any one of the Virtual Casinos, please feel free to submit those complaints there. If they are slow to respond, please PM me and I'll give the appropriate people a heads up. We will not be entertaining further complaints here at Casinomeister.
 
Rob: Jeeze, I feel like I am beating my damn head against a brick wall here trying to get some of you peeps to see the reasoning in this.
Me too...the day is done...
Casinomeister: Also, I'm closing Marty Davis's account here because this has been just too much. It seems as the forum is being used as another marketing arm of this casino group - and I don't like it.
The boss has spoken and has ruled...(thank goodness) and all is good in meister land again hopefully...


.

.
 
I am not a Virtual fan. I have never played at any of their properties, and I don't get any spam from them, at least not directly. I get enough unsolicited spam I don't look at, I'm not checking which Ca$$i)N O it is from.

Marty was getting some players paid, and that was a good thing IMO, whatever Virtual's motives was.

The RTG central dispute system has been complained about before here in this forum.

Do you think that the ban could be lifted long enough for Marty to post an email address he could be contacted at for players wishing to avail themselves of his intervention?

Bryan, you asked us to give Marty a chance, and he seemed to be sincerely trying, and with more success than any of the past Virtual reps this board has had to the best of my knowledge.

His one shilling post should not override all the good he has done for a number of forum members, IMHO.
 
Well - that "nomination" has just been removed.

Also, I'm closing Marty Davis's account here because this has been just too much. It seems as the forum is being used as another marketing arm of this casino group - and I don't like it.

I was speaking with RTG this past week and there is no problem whatsoever for players to submit claims via the Central Disputes Center:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


If you have an issue with any one of the Virtual Casinos, please feel free to submit those complaints there. If they are slow to respond, please PM me and I'll give the appropriate people a heads up. We will not be entertaining further complaints here at Casinomeister.


Wow, took a week longer than I had estimated, the old saying.....A leopard dont change its spots.
 
I try to be equally objective to all sides concerned. My thoughts on this whole thing from beginning to end was that it was commendable that Marty got some people paid, but if it weren't Marty, it would have been someone else as this group is struggling to get back into the good graces of the forums, affiliates and lastly the players.

But even those of us that may think it would be safe to play, our common sense will always tell us otherwise, so what we may think and do will be two entirely different things. Just as Chuchu and Silc had voiced a thought, it was only a thought and nothing more than that, there is no action involved, but it can be misinterpreted.

All of you long time posters, yes, we here you and yes, we do listen, a rogue is a rogue, is a rogue. But you get stressed out way more than necessary thinking we are all lemmings running to the cliff. I also understand your stress, but new players will always be playing at these casinos until they get burned, it is part of the learning process that no one will ever change, the individual will make the change for themselves when they finally have had enough. The best lesson learned is through experience for many. Having said that, the warnings do still need to be reinforced in many debates, but you don't have to use vomit and screaming to do it, your points are made just as well without all the visual images.

Anyways, I would hope though that they do get Acepedro paid. But was disheartened to see Marty post the bonus ad with code and all. This was the straw that broke the camels back and Marty only proved that yes he is doing as the upper management wants and marketing, is the main objective, not the wrongs done to past players that were owed by this group.

When a casino group finally realizes that the players, their backbone, is what makes them or breaks them and puts them number one, all other issues will seize to exist.
But unfortunately some will never understand this.

For Bryan and all Mods, you were more than tolerant and gave them a fair chance here, for this you are certainly to be commended as it proves that it doesn't matter if it is issues with accredited or non-accredited, you are not prejudiced when giving someone or a group a fair and equal chance to back up what they say or are claiming.
So for anyone that says Casinomeister is prejudiced and only backs the accredited casinos on his site, please come back to this and the other Marty thread and read the whole thing again. It serves to remind everyone, that if they claim to want to change, that those who operate this forum, did and will give all a fair chance at putting their money where their mouth is.
 
If Marty were smart, he would get everyone paid, then tell his employer there is nothing further he can do for them, lest he be labeled a criminal by working for them.
 
***


Seasoned member being sauteed. Excitement so thick, you can cut it with a knife, eat it with a pitchfork, and drink to it with some Kool-Aid.



That's my six cents (.02 cents at 300%).




Steed


***

A man of sometimes few words but your spot on with that post, it has become a feeding frenzy here within the last few months on this forum and it shouldnt be like this imho, like a Salem witch hunt.

As far as the Marty issue goes, i will state for the record, i have never been a shill for this group, played there when i was a newbie for a few years, yes im guilty as most of us have played there at one time or another.

I thought at first like everyone else, this man is up to no good, whats the catch, somethings up.

I was able to get some issues taken care of by him as well as others that got paid what was due them also and that was a good thing, i just wish all could have been resolved and everyone who is owed from the past paid.

After reading Maryt's post, i think he used very poor judgement on posting on the bonus coupon, he should have left it alone and continued paying past players.

I would hope that Marty sticks to his promise to get these folks paid and i dont feel he is a bad person, i also see casinomeisters point on this also, he has shown them more than enough trust in the past only for them to go back to their old ways

If a player has 50.00 there are so many other places to play at, you will get paid and it will be paid without fail and they have bonuses too.

Laurie
 
Well - that "nomination" has just been removed.

Also, I'm closing Marty Davis's account here because this has been just too much. It seems as the forum is being used as another marketing arm of this casino group - and I don't like it.

I was speaking with RTG this past week and there is no problem whatsoever for players to submit claims via the Central Disputes Center:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


If you have an issue with any one of the Virtual Casinos, please feel free to submit those complaints there. If they are slow to respond, please PM me and I'll give the appropriate people a heads up. We will not be entertaining further complaints here at Casinomeister.

I'd like to say that I have no interest in the Virtual Casinos or Marty beyond the quest for fairness and common decency. I certaintly wouldn't deposit there again no matter what (although I have never been slow paid or cheated by them when I deposited with them many years ago).

I just think this is a very unfortunate decision (although I do respect it). Im sure no harm or ulterior motive was in mind in his one post here in this thread DEFENDING what other posters viewed as a too good to be true bonus. He even said if anyone had any further issues to PM him....and im sure if the original question/concern was brought forth in a PM, this would have never seen the light of day.

I don't know if some posters here realise it, but by putting pressure on the staff here to show Marty the exit, you could have very well hurt the chances of some of your fellow members recovering their funds. Im sure they thank you for that.

Im sure Marty is thinking well I came here to help but they obviously don't want it so screw em. Hope that Ace person still has a chance to get their funds.

As far as CDS.....we pretty much know that is useless. Have they ever favored the player?

Don't shoot me for my difference of opinion.
 
Marty was doing fine here until he shilled a promotion in this thread. That was bad judgement and something that can't be tolerated here. All that did is help confirm Bryan's suspicions that the sole purpose of Marty's presence here was promotion and to reel back in old players and hook some new ones, under the belief that everything is OK now. Apparently, he is not as reputable as people who were vouching for him thought he was.
 
I just think this is a very unfortunate decision (although I do respect it).

I have to disagree with you quite strongly on this point. Whilst Marty as an individual was probably commited to get all known issues resolved, he is I am afraid a pawn in this whole exercise. Which started with the PR sent out by Lyceum Media, lauding Gambling Wages and Virtual turning over a new leaf. As part of that PR was a promotion in association with Casino Affiliate Programs to entice new affiliate webmasters to sign up and start promoting the Virtual Casino Group.

This also got a lot of positive coverage and spin on sites such as Calvin Ayre and Gambling 911. In short, it showed Virtual ala Gambling Wages in an extremely good light and glossed over the real issues, which have been ongoing for a decade.

It is clear from this thread alone, that many long standing members of CasinoMeister had been taken in by the moves GW/Virtual had made. Yet clearly forgetting that there are many players that are owed considerable amounts of money still.

If Virtual/GW were of the mindset to do the right thing and truly change their business practices. They should have run a report on their player databases to ascertain exactly who was owed and paid said players promptly.

Instead, we have Marty promising to pay players that contact him here on the forum. Thus getting some positive feedback from individuals who do get paid out and in turn Virtual being lauded in parts by some on this forum. Forgetting the small fact that there are still many many players, owed countless amounts of money.

This is not right and looking at it objectively, Virtual/GW were using this forum for their own means. Not good IMO.

If 32Red can take over a casino such as Golden Lounge and pay off all players owed money, and not just a small percentage of them that contact them in the fora environment. Then Virtual should also do the same.

Once Virtual have cleaned up their mess then, and only then should they be treated as a casino business on the level.
 
I think it worth mentioning that Marty never once asked for the cold PAB cases related to Virtual. And his employers are most certainly aware of those because they bring them up every time we meet.

By contrast when 32Red took over Golden Lounge that was the first thing they did, even did it before the official announcement if I remember correctly. Same thing was done with their Nedplay purchase.

Virtual has long been trying to get Casinomeister to work for them or with them and have made several attempts at manipulation on the forums to those ends. Marty's recent appearance reeks of being the latest such attempt, IMHO.
 
Details of Bonus:

300% NO RESTRICTIONS SLOTS BONUS
No Playthrough Requirements
No Max Cash-Out
Redeem Bonus Coupon: MAYWEEKEND300
Deposit $50 or More
(Good for Play in Slots & Keno ONLY! Redeem Unlimited Times - Expires Sunday 16th, Midnight EST)
BONUS IS NON CASHABLE

In the furture please feel free to PM me if you guys have questions about T&C's of a bonus...remember this BONUS IS NON CASHABLE!!!

Have a great weekend!

Marty

I agree that it was bad judgement....but how can the above be considered shilling, and this post by INetBet not?:

https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/threads/inet.35248/

Marty was doing fine here until he shilled a promotion in this thread. That was bad judgement and something that can't be tolerated here. All that did is help confirm Bryan's suspicions that the sole purpose of Marty's presence here was promotion and to reel back in old players and hook some new ones, under the belief that everything is OK now. Apparently, he is not as reputable as people who were vouching for him thought he was.
 
Absolutely! It's one thing to have a track record of good and respectable service and do a screw up. It's quite another thing to be Lupo the Butcher and ask to be excused for a spare liver that dropped out of your pocket. Who you gonna trust?
 
Funeral I can't speak for CM but I would guess that it is the difference between being accredited one toe out of the rogue pit...

Absolutely! It's one thing to have a track record of good and respectable service and do a screw up. It's quite another thing to be Lupo the Butcher and ask to be excused for a spare liver that dropped out of your pocket. Who you gonna trust?

Of course! Im just saying though....it doesn't say "This no place for ads or cloaked promos. Shills and spammers be warned - unless you have accredition status" I guess I just don't like alot of grey area, especially when ones membership is in the balance.

@ Webzcas- Im fairly certain that 99.9% of this forum knows that Virtual will NEVER turn over a new leaf, and I agree. Just because they applaud his actions doesn't mean they are going to hop over there and deposit. I just think we could have seen a little more good done before having the plug pulled.
 
Of course! Im just saying though....it doesn't say "This no place for ads or cloaked promos. Shills and spammers be warned - unless you have accredition status" I guess I just don't like alot of grey area, especially when ones membership is in the balance.
Actually, I cringe when accredited casino reps do this, and I would have normally moved that to the promo section if I caught it in time. If someone had alerted me to that posting, that's what I would have done. Ad copy should not be posted in sections where informational conversations are taking place.

... I just think we could have seen a little more good done before having the plug pulled.
The plug should have never been plugged into our outlets to begin with. This announcement was only motivated by their marketing arm. Please note that this was not a casino manager, but their "affiliate" manager.

Their casino has every tool available to pay out whomever they want to pay. They have their database, and they have their payment records. If they were really determined to pay their players, they would not make a public stink about this and just send a mass mail to their players. Why use the pubic fora? Because it puts them back on the radar.

A handful of players were paid - and that's fine. If there are any more, well I've provided the links to their dispute channel. It's time to make that system work.
 
Marty came to the forum to assist players with unresolved payment issues. And for the most part we helped direct him to those players. So far so good. He began dodging IMO the acepedro situation amd instead decided to shill. Not cool and what did that do to assist unpaid players? Nada, nothing. Frankly CM was obliging as long as Marty's initial reason for being here was followed. When Marty took advantage of CM's good nature, well then he was shown the door.
 
...it doesn't say "This no place for ads or cloaked promos. Shills and spammers be warned - unless you have accredition status" I guess I just don't like alot of grey area, especially when ones membership is in the balance.

I think it's a "tip of the iceberg" situation. Marty's shilling comes with a very large body of miscreant behaviour behind it. Not him personally but the peeps he represents. It comes, as it were, after years of damage done.

The Inetbet thing, though somewhat inappropriate, comes with no such context: tip, no iceberg. Therefor the difference in reaction is pretty obviously reasonable.

As to not liking they greys ... life must really piss you off then, no? I mean, life is pretty much all one grey or another isn't it?

And the membership in Marty's case is a professional one: totally different thing that a private, personal membership. Bryan's move was about the business groups involved not Marty personally.

I just think we could have seen a little more good done before having the plug pulled.

It's not like the guy has been put down or anything, if he's set on doing good deeds it's hard to imagine that Casinomeister is his only venue for that. Again, Bryan pulled the plug on suspicious business activity based on years of experience with the parties involved. In the greater scheme of things Marty's PM box is pretty small potatoes.

Marty came to the forum to assist players with unresolved payment issues. ... Marty took advantage of CM's good nature, well then he was shown the door.

I don't mean to be contrary Suze but I think the way it ended has no small thing to do with the way it started. I personally don't believe that it's nearly as simple as "Marty came to the forum to assist players". I think, and I'm saying "I think", Marty came here as part of a planned, coordinated scheme to use Casinomeister to raise goodwill and profit for a group that Casinomeister has repeatedly refused to get down and dirty with. In short, they snookered us all, as least for a while.

Trust me, there is a river of history behind this and if the group's intentions were nearly as pure as Marty & Co. would have us believe they could have done this legit, properly and to much greater effect. That fact that things have stumbled and turned sour has a lot more to do with where this whole thing started than it has to do with Bryan's boot for Marty.
 
Last edited:
I have to disagree with you quite strongly on this point. Whilst Marty as an individual was probably commited to get all known issues resolved, he is I am afraid a pawn in this whole exercise. Which started with the PR sent out by Lyceum Media, lauding Gambling Wages and Virtual turning over a new leaf. As part of that PR was a promotion in association with Casino Affiliate Programs to entice new affiliate webmasters to sign up and start promoting the Virtual Casino Group.

This also got a lot of positive coverage and spin on sites such as Calvin Ayre and Gambling 911. In short, it showed Virtual ala Gambling Wages in an extremely good light and glossed over the real issues, which have been ongoing for a decade.

It is clear from this thread alone, that many long standing members of CasinoMeister had been taken in by the moves GW/Virtual had made. Yet clearly forgetting that there are many players that are owed considerable amounts of money still.

If Virtual/GW were of the mindset to do the right thing and truly change their business practices. They should have run a report on their player databases to ascertain exactly who was owed and paid said players promptly.

Instead, we have Marty promising to pay players that contact him here on the forum. Thus getting some positive feedback from individuals who do get paid out and in turn Virtual being lauded in parts by some on this forum. Forgetting the small fact that there are still many many players, owed countless amounts of money.

This is not right and looking at it objectively, Virtual/GW were using this forum for their own means. Not good IMO.

If 32Red can take over a casino such as Golden Lounge and pay off all players owed money, and not just a small percentage of them that contact them in the fora environment. Then Virtual should also do the same.

Once Virtual have cleaned up their mess then, and only then should they be treated as a casino business on the level.


Thanks to posts like this from Webzcas, Maxd and others, it certainly enlightens a forum member such as myself that finds it difficult to fully understand or see the whole picture.
I guess at times I may look at a picture through rose colored glasses and not notice the web that surrounds the entire picture.
Being plainly a player and nothing more, but willing to learn, it is easy to root for the guy that makes himself appear the hero and by trying to cloak oneself as the hero, many of us that didn't realize the full impact of what is involved here end up with mixed feelings on the subject.
I guess some of us want a hero in some situations, but the fact is that when the hero has strings to make him walk, talk and fly, then he is not really a hero afterall.
 
I don't mean to be contrary Suze but I think the way it ended has no small thing to do with the way it started. I personally don't believe that it's nearly as simple as "Marty came to the forum to assist players". I think, and I'm saying "I think", Marty came here as part of a planned, coordinated scheme to use Casinomeister to raise goodwill and profit for a group that Casinomeister has repeatedly refused to get down and dirty with. In short, they snookered us all, as least for a while.

Trust me, there is a river of history behind this and if the group's intentions were nearly as pure as Marty & Co. would have us believe they could have done this legit, properly and to much greater effect. That fact that things have stumbled and turned sour has a lot more to do with where this whole thing started than it has to do with Bryan's boot for Marty.

No doubt those words needed to be said:thumbsup: by someone who could voice it without repercussion.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top