As I thought, the whole point of my questions are missed.
Just a simple factual answer will do to an obviously important question, that should not be left for an idiot like me to ask.
I can't expect to see the source code of the casino software. I don't really want to see reams of data regarding every bet placed, every result passed through the RNG. I would'nt understand it.
The bottom line is with this whole ecogra thing is simply "trust".
# The more they dodge very very important player sensitive issues such as spyware with mere silence.
# The more they offer up badly worded press releases purporting to be "online gaming's regulatory body".
# The more they allow firms like Fortune to not stomp on spam by shutting down deals with the likes of Slickstreet, but stay sealed.
# The more they say nothing when affiliate webmasters have to put up with seriously questionable behaviour, without a word, in fact a wave of the hand to the likes of Spear. Such questionable behaviour in fact, the firms backed down.
# The more they refuse to answer simple questions to one, that they answer to another.
# The more they ask for trust on the back of PWC's good name, but then try to silently remove all mention of said firm from the site.
All means the less trust they gain. What do you supporters really expect one to think? Trust is earned - Ecogra even needed telling that "bonus abuse" by players who abide by "the letter of the promotion" should be paid what they are rightfully owed.
Then you get to wondering whether they are telling the truth about the number crunching process, that we just have to
trust their word on.
No need for a reply because there is nothing to say - the above #'s happened and some are still so.
Carry on.