- Joined
- Jun 17, 2004
- Location
- Haverhill
I'd like to distill my long winded arguments to a few brief points.
If I was a player who claimed a bonus with a cap, met the requirements, received a withdrawal, and had to wait a few weeks to get the remainder, my line of thinking would go thusly
1) Casinos like to make money
2) The casino will make money in the long term if I gamble with my remaining balance rather than wait for a withdrawal
3) Therefore, it's ok for me to gamble with my remaining balance
Shark doesn't agree with this line of thinking. Is it because
A) Shark doesn't like to make money
B) There is a way for the player to make positive expectation wagers on his balance.
c) Shark wants the player to gamble with his balance so they can freeroll off of him. If he wins, deny the winnings. If he loses, keep quiet and pay what's left (if anything)
D) ??????????????????????????//
I am 100% sure that A and B are false. I really want to believe that C isn't the case here. So can someone, anyone, please provide me with an answer D that makes sense?
If I was a player who claimed a bonus with a cap, met the requirements, received a withdrawal, and had to wait a few weeks to get the remainder, my line of thinking would go thusly
1) Casinos like to make money
2) The casino will make money in the long term if I gamble with my remaining balance rather than wait for a withdrawal
3) Therefore, it's ok for me to gamble with my remaining balance
Shark doesn't agree with this line of thinking. Is it because
A) Shark doesn't like to make money
B) There is a way for the player to make positive expectation wagers on his balance.
c) Shark wants the player to gamble with his balance so they can freeroll off of him. If he wins, deny the winnings. If he loses, keep quiet and pay what's left (if anything)
D) ??????????????????????????//
I am 100% sure that A and B are false. I really want to believe that C isn't the case here. So can someone, anyone, please provide me with an answer D that makes sense?