First, many people who operate gambling portals are affiliates in that they derive some revenue for referrals. Many casinos allow a sort of lateral tramsfer of funds, upon request, as credits in their casino. For certain people who have been affiliates a long time, this can amount to a subtantial sum.
but in order for the "IP Theory" to be feasible, you'd have to see not only the same IP's but the same casinos: primarily the ones the affiliate "promotes". This would be the only logic in doing it.
Second, almost all major gaming software providers maintain a central server, which means the casino operator simply does not have access to the codes (if they even exist) to juice up the machinery. It would be like you being able to gain access to your onw Internet Service Provider's central Admin Dept. The "casino" itself is merely a bank or network which can be located anywhere in the world, but the server is in only ONE location, and reputable casinos exercise very tight security measures; more than you would imagine!
Third, the use of the terms "program" and "random" do seen to negate each other. Software is "programmed" and predictable by nature, and thus cannot truly be "random". Random Number Generators, are "keyed" off a predetermined central point. Knowing what that central point is would then and only then, allow somone who DID have access to the main server to "predict" future results of the software. But even then, predicting a result is not the same as CAUSING the result anymore than it is when a siesmologist who predicts a major quake CAUSES the quake.
The Random Number Generator is "random" in that it is not sequential say, like when in a business, various operators who have access to a network can log on and get the "next" purchase order number generated by rotation.
Rather, in this scenario, the purchase order number can be made to be "random" as long as it obeys the program of not exceeding say 9 digits and not duplicating the same sequence.
I use 9 as an example of a 9 line slot, single coin. The RNG is able to produce any number of varying results as long as it remains within the parameters of the program. So in theory, it is possible to hit the top payout several times in a row, but the Law Of Averages dictates the probability of this is next to nil.
A truly random event would be tossing a coin. The only outcomes (the preset parameters) are that the coin will either land on heads or tails, thus giving a statistical odds of 50/50. BUT one cannot predict how many times out of say, 10,000 tosses, the coin will land on heads. When you translate this same "logic" to casino software, it isn't hard to understand that the software obeys the same paramenters, even if they are created by a IT geek.
Bottom line: "random" as the term is applied to typical casino software merely means that whatever "central point" the RNG keys off of dictates when and how much a payout will be. Even at this, a program can be created whereby there is still such unpredictability as to when this event will occur, that the integrity of the system is still maintained.
Yes, casino software can be manipulated, however the major software providers who own the license and "lease" the mainframe, are the ONLY persons who can do this, and simply speaking, their fee structure to the licensee does not include a profit motive for them to do so.
Since the brand mentioned is Real Time Gaming, let me say that in my very UNexpert opinion, RTG slots are about as "random" as they come, but in comparison, I do believe them to be programmed at a lower than average variance, meaning that the rate and increment of pay out vs. coins played reamins on the lower tier of percentages.
..............laurie
If the accredited software providers are rigged then it's the best kept secret I've ever seen and in a world where everything comes out. Rouge casinos and software is a whole new thread.
Good one...
can someone please translate that 
