Dutch said:Dear CM Community
About Security - bagofmaggots - jetset
Royal Dutch Casino value the relationship we have with our customers and web site visitors, and are committed to responsible information handling practices. We take the privacy of our customers very seriously and want you to feel comfortable whenever you visit our web sites, and use our online services. Although our web sites have unique services and offerings, they share a similar privacy philosophy.
IMPORTANT: Due to the sensitive nature of the information stored on our site, we cannot send any information to an email address that is not registered with the casino account. We take your privacy very seriously. Make sure to keep your email address current.
Thats why if you loose Your password it will be emailed to you -We only send this information to your registered email address.
About Payouts jetset
Our mission is to deliver safe, fair and legal entertainment to all gambling enthusiasts
by providing professional and personalized attention and of course fast payouts.
As you see there is several posters confirming that we are paying winners
We will continue processing fast payouts -Winners get paid al Royal Dutch Casino
Paul Giordano
Thanks for giving us another owners' name - we knew about Daniel Giordano before LOL.
A pity that you do not have the courage to sign the harrassing private messages I have been receiving since your shill appeared, which I contemptuously regard as further evidence of a weird management style.
Turning now to your professed concern for the client's privacy - why then did your manager post the email address of Bag of Maggots for all to see? And by the way that blunder resulted in him receiving some unwelcome email from another unethical clown.
And for the record, noone is requesting that you furnish gaming logs and processor details to anyone other than the player who you have been jerking around for going on seven months on a legit claim of $2 700. This is just another attempt on your part to kick up enough dust to confuse everyone imo.
But the fact remains that you have refused point blank to provide the player with information that he is entitled to at any reputable online casino. Added to the faux tax and legal threats from Danny and the *coincidental* bogus call to the player from a spurious "US Department of Home Security" official, this conduct from a Costa Rican casino is just about what we might expect, I guess.
Regarding this red herring diversion on the shill. Bagof Maggots whom you have tried rather ineptly to discredit here joined this board on 6 June last year and has 65 posts to his credit, addressing several threads. *Claire Phillips* on the other hand registered 12 Feb as BoM was posting in the negative, to make an otherwise unremarkable positive post that is out of character to the eye of experienced posters.
Vesuvius pointed out, "It's entirely normal behaviour to only decide to sign-up and post at a forum when you have something significant to say (e.g. if you've been cheated out of money), so a first-time poster criticising a casino is common. You might be better off dealing with the complaints rather than trying to hide them with a pointless discussion..."
I couldn't agree more - less time trying to (clumsily) mislead the players and silence critics, and more time paying at least one player who has been owed for far too long.
You need to review your marketing strategy, too - you are not doing too well in the CRM stakes at present!
Last edited: