ROME Casino - Top Game Support disaster

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am a Topgame representative and have been watching the thread with some interest - I am not convinced that all the facts are real, looking at most of the evidence coming to me - the complaint seem oh so orchestrated to say the least and typical of a planned assault on online operations - I do agree that the way the issue was handled was somewhat unprofessional and should this so called high roller not have been allowed to even deposit in the first place.

I will continue to gather all the correspondence related and may respond if I believe it will benefit our industry as a whole.

so far I want to thank some of the posters that have seen through this issue and know something very wrong is going on here.

best

Jonathan
topgame

Trying to dismiss the complaints here by implying that there is something questionable and/or conspiratorial about their motivation is not going to cut it, IMO.

The complaint is well articulated and on the surface presents a case that should have been attended to earlier by a diligent casino representative.

I think in your shoes I would be anxious to present my side of the story rather than hint at unsubstantiated bad conduct before you have looked into the incident/s in full.

Leaving the issue dangling like this is not helping your cause in my view, and I hope you will soon return to further enlighten us.
 
Yes, like I could actually win a single poker hand this year....sigh.

I'm just bored and tilting off money on house edge. I'll get back into poker once I go through this dumb "phase", and hopefully I'll have a bankroll left to play with once the house edge phase is over.

Or I'll retire completely from poker - just don't know what I'd do to kill boredom if I take that road.

Throw your laptop out the window & find yourself a good partner to keep you busy? :D
 
Well, regardless of what the intentions of the OP were when he deposited at Rome Casino (which I would assume were the same as the rest of us - to win and/or be entertained), he did so on the basis of an offer from the Casino Rep which the casino subsequently reneged on after his deposit was made in good faith - that in itself is enough to turn me off ever depositing there and Im sure most others reading this thread feel the same.

As for the chat transcript....well that is the most disgraceful display of customer service Ive ever seen online or anywhere else for that matter, and whether the rep was authorized to offer bonuses is NOT the players' problem and its about time casinos realized that if they continue to employ meatheads for their frontline customer service their business will suffer. Ive seen many operations like this start up claiming they're the best and promising the world - and then just disappear like a fart in the breeze.

Remember that time when this kind of thing happened at 32Red??

NO OF COURSE YOU DONT - BECAUSE IT NEVER WOULD!!

Im disappointed with Jan's response. It looks like he is just trying to 'plant a seed' that the OP has some kind of vendetta or hidden agenda against Rome Casino. Im not meaning to be a smartass, but what 'other side' of this story COULD there be?? The OP is working for a competitor?? The OP had nothing better to do then spend several hours arguing with 'Cheech and Chong' in the hope that he might get one of them fired to appease his personal thirst for terminating the employment of random citizens of foreign countries?????? The OP may have been the 5th gunman on the grassy knoll?????

Just admit that Rome was 100% responsible for the whole thing and move on.

Someone pass ME the vicodin please....
 
Last edited:
My short lived experience with Rome casino was in the same vein as the OP, but I cut things off quite quickly. I don't have the chat transcripts, but the rep I was chatting with immediately tried to get me to increase my deposit amount and tempt me with a ridiculous bonus amount. I smelled something funny, the adage if it's too good to be true... still holds. The rep I chatted with was unprofessional in my opinion, but at least he didn't call me dear and say that he loves me. Maybe I cut it off before it got to that point. Then again, I'm not a whale.

Immediate warning signs with this TopGame operation was that they have all these various deposit methods listed, but only actually support a subset. When you get into the casino and ASK them where Click2pay is, they instead try to convince you to deposit with your credit card. Guaranteed that they just put up the various logos of deposit methods to attract people to sign up. And also guaranteed that this is against the rules with those payment processors.

TopGame, I will be avoiding your casinos from now on. I tried and played at Gold Vegas, but the fact is with this sort of nonsense happening at one of your licensees, I can't trust any of your operations.
 
I am a Topgame representative and have been watching the thread with some interest - I am not convinced that all the facts are real, looking at most of the evidence coming to me - the complaint seem oh so orchestrated to say the least and typical of a planned assault on online operations - I do agree that the way the issue was handled was somewhat unprofessional and should this so called high roller not have been allowed to even deposit in the first place.

I will continue to gather all the correspondence related and may respond if I believe it will benefit our industry as a whole.

so far I want to thank some of the posters that have seen through this issue and know something very wrong is going on here.

best

Jonathan
topgame

I am glad to have a representative for Topgame participating in this thread.

At no point did the OP actually PLAY your software, so I don't think this is really a software issue. As a Topgame representative, are you saying that you are more directly involved with Rome Casino than as a software provider? Certainly, in the case of Rival Casinos, it appears that the software provider is the owner/operator as well for some of the platforms for their software. I'm not attacking you in any way, just asking for clarification for your involvement in this thread.

If the OP's post of his chat transcripts is lacking anything other than the smilies, and Rome is providing you with copies of this, please feel free to post any discrepencies. I have not read Rome's privacy policy, but I suspect that sharing information with their software provider is allowed. I'm not sure how much information you are permitted to share with us.

That the manager (sic) responsible has since been dismissed is a good thing. The OP should be THANKED in my opinion for providing all the necessary documentation to dismiss such an employee without notice, or fear of reprisal in a wrongful dismissal suit...I doubt any court would uphold a suit by the employee for dismissal without cause. Sometimes an employee whose job rests on making a certain quota for deposits will go to lengths not authorized to avoid dismissal, or someone who knows they are out the door may not care how they damage their employer.

While making a chargeback was perhaps not the best way for the OP to handle the issue, can you truly blame him? This chat transcript (and I don't doubt the veracity of the transcript as being accurate, not commenting on the OP's statements during the chat) shows a level of gross negligence by Rome Casino's representative.

I would no more judge TopGame's software integrety by one casino's incompetence than I would judge RTG or Playtech by some of the Rogue operators, and would appreciate you clarifying your business relationship with Rome Casino.

Prior threads about player experiences at Rome Casino were not anything that tempted me to deposit there, but there are other Topgame casinos with representation on this board, and since the OP never got as far as playing with his deposit, I have formed no opinions as to your software from this thread, and I do not think a careful reader would either.

Rarely would the level of negligence on the part of an employee rise to this level without some kind of "head's up" unless senior management did not have enough involvement in day to day operations.

Again, thank you for your participation in this thread, and your response to my questions about your business relationship with Rome Casino.
 
Rome Casino Response

I apologize for not replying to this thread until now. You all certainly deserved a response much sooner but unfortunately, this event fell on what was supposed to be a relaxing weekend for me, and I've had to take a step back in order to take in the entire picture. First, to figure out what exactly occurred, where we went wrong, and finally, to determine the correct course of action.

My understanding of the situation is this and please correct me if I am mistaken:

The player came to our casino and was offered a bonus of 200% if he was to deposit $5,000. However, once the player began to deposit in $1,000 increments, our Risk department in Costa Rica flagged the transactions as potential Fraud, after he had deposited a total of $3,000.

Now, if you don't mind, I'd like to take a moment to explain this to you, just so you understand the process of how we managed risk in this particular case.

This player was playing from what appears to be somewhere in South East Asia, using a credit card from the United States, and is an Australian citizen. This raises not several but ALL the red flags for our Risk department. In addition to these red flags, once a more thorough check was done using iOvation and some other tools we have, it turns out that this player has charged back at other casinos as well and this was when Risk suspended his account. The way our system works, only once a transaction has gone through can we analyze the player and attempt to determine if we are dealing with a case of fraud (which is for the players' protection, as well as ours and our affiliates) or simply just irregular behavior. It's impossible to manage risk in real-time as if we did so, the player would be kept waiting for several minutes for their transaction to be approved. Most people lack the patience for this and would simply move on to another Casino. As such, it was only until he had deposited $3,000 (the third transaction) which is the pre-screen limit for $1,000 deposits, did risk determine they needed more information.

The next step was to ask the player for some documentation which he was more than happy to provide but our rep was very clear in stating that the process would take 24 hours due to the location discrepancies. He also did not have the authorization necessary to approve further transactions and was simply protecting himself.

It's important that everyone understands that due to the sheer volume of sign ups we are dealing with, it's impossible for any online casino to perform full due diligence on a player in the seconds it takes for the first few transactions to be processed. It is within the first few deposits that the player is sent to Risk and a fraud analysis is done. When our rep made his initial offer, he did so under the assumption that the player would clear Risk, which he must constantly assume in order to perform his job. There was no malicious intent here and any player that deposits in $1,000 increments is a player we'd very much like to have on board with us. Risk was afraid of this player charging back in large amounts (which he eventually did without giving us a chance to return his money).

The player was then contacted over the phone by a rep, and told that the account would be frozen for 24 hours, so that we could look into the situation and make an informed decision regarding the account. This was not up to the rep, who had the best of intentions, and fully intended to credit the player with the bonus. As this player has proven, and seems to be quite familiar with, chargebacks are a huge issue for any online operation (including all non-gambling e-businesses as well).

Before Risk even had the opportunity to perform an analysis, this player charged back the entire $3,000, despite our rep repeatedly promising a refund in full, using any payment method we offer, as we are obviously not interested in chargebacks. We also would have honored the deal offered by the rep once Risk had all the necessary information. Coming from three different locations, it is a huge risk for us entertain this kind of play. The player admits to having absolutely no sympathy for us in this case and wanted to intentionally damage relations between us and our merchant account. After reading the chat transcripts, I can see where this animosity stems from but we have been trying to make this right from the moment risk suspended his account. He simply never gave us the opportunity.

As I see it there are three main elements that lie at the crux of the matter:

1) The player was promised a $10K bonus on his $5K deposit.
2) Unbelievably unprofessional chat transcripts from our support rep.
3) That his high limit credit card is now unavailable for his trip to Vegas.

With regard to the first issue, the rep he was dealing with was in training, and made an offer he was unauthorized to make. Having said that, we were still prepared to honor it, until Risk flagged him as a coming from 3 different locations (US credit card, australian citizen, and an Asian IP address, (Asia being a red zone for credit card fraud). The bottom line is simple: had the player demonstrated the slightest amount of patience (more than the 3 hours he gave us), he would have saved himself, and us, considerable aggravation. He would still have his credit card available for Vegas, and either the amount plus the bonus credited to his account, or the entire amount returned to his credit card. We did not call his credit card company and chargeback and we did not cancel his credit card. These are things the player did all on his own accord.

With regard to the second issue, I take full responsibility as this chat transcript was admittedly disgraceful. We have suspended this rep for retraining and he has been seriously reprimanded, but he will not be fired.

With with regard to the third issue, all of this could have been avoided had the player demonstrated a little bit of patience. He openly admits that we tried frantically to return his money but he was unwilling or unable to do anything as he'd already set the ball in motion. We are assailed on an hourly basis by credit card fraudsters, unfortunately demonstrating similar characteristics this this player. (multiple points of origin) However, I want to publicly, personally, and profusely apologize to this player for putting him through all of this aggravation. However, the combination of the failure of our CS team, and the player's lack of patience has created this debacle, and as such we can only claim responsibility for things we have done wrong.

That being said, I hope all reading this can put this issue in perspective and understand our position here as well. We're certainly at fault here to some degree but the player must also take some of the responsibility since at the end of the day, considerable damage was done to us and intentionally so by the player. Obviously, it was never our intent to sleight this player or any of you. Our only concern here was protecting our merchant accounts from being closed due to chargebacks and fraud. If we could, we would allow all transactions through the gate with no screening whatsoever but then we wouldn't be in business very long. I want to thank everyone for their thoughts and contributions here and as always, I'm available to answer any further questions you might have.

Thanks for reading,

JC.
 
Clarification

Though I considered firing this representative, I made the decision to keep him subject to two weeks of additional training and serious reprimand. Furthermore, Jan's relationship is with TopGame only. He neither speaks for RomeCasino or is involved in our business in any way, shape, or form. He is not on our payroll and simply serves in an advisory capacity and as a liaison between Rome and TopGame. His reason for posting here is to protect TopGame's interests as this thread is clearly not a very positive thing for them either, considering we are by far, their largest operator.

One final thing I should mention is that although Jan was once working with the Winward group, he is no longer and I will say as clearly as possible that RomeCasino is independently owned and operated. This means that TopGame holds absolutely zero interest in RomeCasino or vice versa and there is no ownership relationship or otherwise between us and the Winward group either. I'll go even further to say that none of the principals of TopGame or Winward hold any interest in Rome nor do any of their employees or anyone connected to them.

Kind Regards,

JC.

I am glad to have a representative for Topgame participating in this thread.

At no point did the OP actually PLAY your software, so I don't think this is really a software issue. As a Topgame representative, are you saying that you are more directly involved with Rome Casino than as a software provider? Certainly, in the case of Rival Casinos, it appears that the software provider is the owner/operator as well for some of the platforms for their software. I'm not attacking you in any way, just asking for clarification for your involvement in this thread.

If the OP's post of his chat transcripts is lacking anything other than the smilies, and Rome is providing you with copies of this, please feel free to post any discrepencies. I have not read Rome's privacy policy, but I suspect that sharing information with their software provider is allowed. I'm not sure how much information you are permitted to share with us.

That the manager (sic) responsible has since been dismissed is a good thing. The OP should be THANKED in my opinion for providing all the necessary documentation to dismiss such an employee without notice, or fear of reprisal in a wrongful dismissal suit...I doubt any court would uphold a suit by the employee for dismissal without cause. Sometimes an employee whose job rests on making a certain quota for deposits will go to lengths not authorized to avoid dismissal, or someone who knows they are out the door may not care how they damage their employer.

While making a chargeback was perhaps not the best way for the OP to handle the issue, can you truly blame him? This chat transcript (and I don't doubt the veracity of the transcript as being accurate, not commenting on the OP's statements during the chat) shows a level of gross negligence by Rome Casino's representative.

I would no more judge TopGame's software integrety by one casino's incompetence than I would judge RTG or Playtech by some of the Rogue operators, and would appreciate you clarifying your business relationship with Rome Casino.

Prior threads about player experiences at Rome Casino were not anything that tempted me to deposit there, but there are other Topgame casinos with representation on this board, and since the OP never got as far as playing with his deposit, I have formed no opinions as to your software from this thread, and I do not think a careful reader would either.

Rarely would the level of negligence on the part of an employee rise to this level without some kind of "head's up" unless senior management did not have enough involvement in day to day operations.

Again, thank you for your participation in this thread, and your response to my questions about your business relationship with Rome Casino.
 
Geeze, I am having trouble sleeping and so went to read this thread which is very interesting.

JC,

I know you have spent a lot of effort into putting together the reply but I cannot see why blame had to be apportioned to Scooter for his thin patience on the matter. Your staff continually requested him to play with the $3K when obviously not everything was in place yet. His play would first, not count as wagering requirements if he did receive a bonus later and second, there was nothing to ensure that there would actually be a bonus if the security department decides that there is something wrong with the deposit.

I might have viewed differently had your staff not insisted on persistently asking Scooter to commence playing without having the documents verified. Sounds fishy to me. Actually, these 'unbelievable bonuses' would certainly attract many players, including a fair share of 'bonus abusers'. However, if I were in the same situation, alarm bells would be ringing and I might just have done the same.

A slight derail but I would also like to see more details on Scooter's encounters at the other 3 casionos he mentioned in his first post.
 
This player was playing from what appears to be somewhere in South East Asia, using a credit card from the United States, and is an Australian citizen. This raises not several but ALL the red flags for our Risk department. In addition to these red flags, once a more thorough check was done using iOvation and some other tools we have, it turns out that this player has charged back at other casinos as well and this was when Risk suspended his account. The way our system works, only once a transaction has gone through can we analyze the player and attempt to determine if we are dealing with a case of fraud (which is for the players' protection, as well as ours and our affiliates) or simply just irregular behavior. It's impossible to manage risk in real-time as if we did so, the player would be kept waiting for several minutes for their transaction to be approved. Most people lack the patience for this and would simply move on to another Casino. As such, it was only until he had deposited $3,000 (the third transaction) which is the pre-screen limit for $1,000 deposits, did risk determine they needed more information.

The next step was to ask the player for some documentation which he was more than happy to provide but our rep was very clear in stating that the process would take 24 hours due to the location discrepancies. He also did not have the authorization necessary to approve further transactions and was simply protecting himself.

It's important that everyone understands that due to the sheer volume of sign ups we are dealing with, it's impossible for any online casino to perform full due diligence on a player in the seconds it takes for the first few transactions to be processed. It is within the first few deposits that the player is sent to Risk and a fraud analysis is done. When our rep made his initial offer, he did so under the assumption that the player would clear Risk, which he must constantly assume in order to perform his job. There was no malicious intent here and any player that deposits in $1,000 increments is a player we'd very much like to have on board with us. Risk was afraid of this player charging back in large amounts (which he eventually did without giving us a chance to return his money).

The point is that the player should be informed these checks will take place.
You have described how these triggers are automatic so surely the staff should be trained and given the same knowledge.
You can hardly be surprised by the players reaction as people do not enter a Casino in order to deposit funds there yet only be able to gamble at some time if the future depending on the whim or inner workings of your security department.

Since these deposits were large and as you have admitted yourself this situation was in fact predictable/waiting to happen makes it very unprofessional that a proper procedure was not in place - especially One informing the player of the inevitable security checks and training Reps that this information should be imparted to the player.

You suggest the player should have been more patient but that should read could have been.
He was totally vindicated IMO in making a charge back as Rome Casino reneged on the deal that was made. Namely that the player would receive 10k instantly upon depositing 5k and the player naturally assumed He would be able to play immediately.

The problem here is not necessarily with your security protocol but with staff training and a lack of professionalism.
Personally I do not believe there was any malicious intent by either party and my humble opinion is that this in itself is not a rogue offence but Bryan will be the judge of that.

Rome can argue the player cut off His nose to spite his face as far as not being able to use his credit card in Vegas goes but the facts are it was their mistakes which gave Him cause to activate a chargeback.
The argument of how patient He should or should not be Once caught up in this situation is not relevant in my view.

The player is not completely blameless though and acted foolishly IMO for not making proper enquiries about Rome Casino and for Him not to consider (this someone who apparently wagers fortunes at online Casino's) that a large deposit to a small operation may cause a problem certainly raises an eyebrow.

I am surprised that the Rep has not been fired - though that is an internal matter.

Hopefully lessons will be learned by Rome Casino and the player and this sorry mess can be put to bed.
 
Just curious JHV why you decided to pick Rome Casino to have a go at when you could play at at somewhere like 32red or another trusted casino.

I was pretty disgusted at the way I was treated by InterCasino. So I did a heap of gambling at Littlewoods, and was treated badly there over something was 100% my mistake but obviously innocent (on my first or 2nd spin, I had JJJxx on Jacks or Better but didn't hold as most other casinos have Auto-Hold and I'd just done something like 30,000 spins on Chili Video Poker / Eurolinx / Ladbrokes which all have Auto-Hold for hands > TT for Jacks or Better).

I just mentioned the obvious error to Littlewoods CS explaining I was used to Auto-Hold and was basically laughed at and dismissed. My mistake, but I'm getting pretty sick and tired of being treated in the manner in which these casinos are treating me, considering the ridiculous wagering volume I'm doing.

Then to add insult to injury, it turns out Littlewoods might actually be owned by InterCasino (?) - they're both promoted by PartnerLogic anyway. I wasn't that big a fan of Crypto software anyway but was busto on Ladbrokes and busto on Eurolinx - just had money on Chili which has max wager per spin of $50 which is a bit boring.

I used to edit a large casino affiliate site - but am no longer involved with it. I jumped on there to have a look at a casino that might grab my attention as I know they only (generally) deal with respectable casinos - at least, they only did when I was involved with the site.

The 2nd casino they had listed in the Top Ten was Rome, which I'd never heard of - so I downloaded the software to look at what kind of Video Poker games they had.

And the rest is covered in the OP and subsequent posts....
 
This player was playing from what appears to be somewhere in South East Asia, using a credit card from the United States, and is an Australian citizen. This raises not several but ALL the red flags for our Risk department.

<snip>
...Coming from three different locations, it is a huge risk for us entertain this kind of play.

<snip>

Having said that, we were still prepared to honor it, until Risk flagged him as a coming from 3 different locations (US credit card, australian citizen, and an Asian IP address, (Asia being a red zone for credit card fraud).

JHV said:
08/06/09 22:56:54 Scooter69 Michael i traveling and currently in bangkok - which sucks by the way don't ever bother lol
Scooter69 23:11:15
yep i'm in thailand on holiday

Scooter69 23:11:24
but i'm australian - should i put

Scooter69 23:11:28
my australia home address?

Scooter69 23:11:31
or my thai hotel

Michael 23:11:57
where is the card from

Michael 23:11:59
?

Scooter69 23:12:14
australian card

Scooter69 23:12:25
i think everything australian best

Michael 23:12:31
so write your austrelia address

Hmm...

JHV identified himself as being in Thailand THREE TIMES.

JHV identified his card as Australian.

Asia is not a red zone for credit card fraud, get real. Certain countries in Asia may be "red zones", but Thailand is not, and furthermore, I presume that the name on the credit card MATCHED the player's name?

Someone's telling little fibbies. The question is, who?
 
I am a Topgame representative and have been watching the thread with some interest - I am not convinced that all the facts are real, looking at most of the evidence coming to me - the complaint seem oh so orchestrated to say the least and typical of a planned assault on online operations - I do agree that the way the issue was handled was somewhat unprofessional and should this so called high roller not have been allowed to even deposit in the first place.

I will continue to gather all the correspondence related and may respond if I believe it will benefit our industry as a whole.

so far I want to thank some of the posters that have seen through this issue and know something very wrong is going on here.

best

Jonathan
topgame

Hi Jonathan,

Firstly, facts (by their very nature are...REAL). I'm assuming you mean to say that "there is more to this than meets the eye" (lol).

This, coincidentally, is the same default line the Rome representative apparently told another poster who informed them of this thread.

Stop stalling for time and trying to think of ideas to get your way out of this carnage and mess - and present something tangible or I will continue to embarrass you in the manner in which stallers and time-wasters deserve to be embarrassed.

Have a good day now!

Scooter

-----

For what it's worth, I think your software is pretty tight and slick. Needs lots of small improvements but, once they're added, could be a better casino software platform than Playtech and Crypto and Microgaming and RTG.
 
So Josh... What about the affiliate? Are you going to compensate the aff for his/her loss, because of your unprofessional CS?

also JHV was told in chat that the incompetent and offensive CS was already fired... So is this another lie?

BTW - Don't blame the player in this, it makes your casino look even worse than it already does.

If a CS rep reneged on a deal, then laughed at me when I wanted a cash out (after not playing a single hand) and then froze my account... Then you don't even fire the offender... All I got to say is, You'll be damn lucky if all you end up getting out this is a chargeback and some negative feedback on a forum.
 
I treat with people with respect until they start lying through their teeth - at which point, I crush them. And I thank you for providing me with an entertaining task in my (embarassingly boring) life.

You are about to be crushed. Liars are scum. And I'm calling you out and, when finished, you will be shamed publicly.

However, once the player began to deposit in $1,000 increments, our Risk department in Costa Rica flagged the transactions as potential Fraud, after he had deposited a total of $3,000.

Firstly, your software limits max deposits to $1000. If you were competent, you would know this.

Secondly, I went out of my way to send you colour scans of my passport, utility bill and internet banking live screenshot showing all my CC details and some recent transactions to Moneybookers.

Thirdly, you list large payment processors like Moneybookers and Click2Pay on your site when you have no relationship with them. Explain why you do this, and have done this (I have since learned) for many, many months - when you have no relationship with Click2Pay or Moneybookers, why have you listed them as deposit options for 6 months or more?


This player was playing from what appears to be somewhere in South East Asia, using a credit card from the United States, and is an Australian citizen. This raises not several but ALL the red flags for our Risk department.

I'm a professional poker player - I travel all over the world. Not once, but TWICE before depositing I CLEARLY stated I was in Thailand on holiday.

I also clearly stated I am Australian.

My credit card is an Australian credit card from an Australian bank - and has nothing to do with the United States.

Your Risk department is a joke - your CS is a joke - and you are a joke.


In addition to these red flags, once a more thorough check was done using iOvation and some other tools we have, it turns out that this player has charged back at other casinos as well and this was when Risk suspended his account.

This is a disgusting lie and I will crush you for it. I have never, in my entire life, charged back a CC at any online casino in the entire world.

Present your iOvation "and some other tools we have" evidence, which you cannot do as we both know it does not exist - and then slink away to the Pit of Shame where liars like you belong.

Nice gamble - but massive fail. You will now look like a lying fool. I credit the play (which I realise it took you multiple days of frantic brainstorming to come up with) - but you gambled and lost. Now you'll accept the shameful consequences.

You were a desperate fool to gamble on this claim - which I'm sure you decided to gamble on based on my chat transcript where I tell your moron manager that I have charged back before. I've done chargebacks (when my bank mistakenly sent an active replacement CC I did not request via Philippines Post - which is lol and was charged out probably about half an hour after it landed in the country by a Philippines Post employee - VISA investigated it, my bank apologised profusely, and all charges were refunded to my card within days).

The only other time I have charged back on a CC in my entire life was when I lost my credit card in 2002 and a few hundred dollars of 7-11 purchases were charged to it before it was deactivated.

I'm not going to lie. I'm grinning from ear to ear at how stupid and angry you must be at yourself for gambling like this and failing so miserably. I would hate to be you right now as you read this. Oh, sweet sweet justice.

The way our system works, only once a transaction has gone through can we analyze the player and attempt to determine if we are dealing with a case of fraud (which is for the players' protection, as well as ours and our affiliates) or simply just irregular behavior. It's impossible to manage risk in real-time as if we did so, the player would be kept waiting for several minutes for their transaction to be approved. Most people lack the patience for this and would simply move on to another Casino. As such, it was only until he had deposited $3,000 (the third transaction) which is the pre-screen limit for $1,000 deposits, did risk determine they needed more information.

You either haven't read the chat transcripts as you claim you did or you are high on something a lot stronger than Vicodin.

You do NOT need to wait until a transaction goes through to determine potential fraud - how stupid are you, exactly? If fraud is suspected, you can request ID, utility bill and credit card scans before processing the transaction.

You manager told me to deposit $5000 for a 200% bonus. When his incompetence was no doubt flagged by your so-called "Risk Department" - and his lies became more and more obscure - I gave the option of returning my funds to the card.

This is AFTER I sent through high-resolution colour scans of my passport, utility bill showing proof of address and evidence (impossible to forge) showing the credit card in my name was actually mine and not belonging to another person of the same name.

but our rep was very clear in stating that the process would take 24 hours due to the location discrepancies.

Stop lying - it's getting embarassing for you. Read the transcripts. Your rep clearly stated that once I sent the scans, I could then deposit more.

He also clearly stated that he was "crediting the bonus now".

(OG using Michael's chat - seriously, get some half-decent chat software, you morons, with 'advanced' features like the ability to transfer chat to another operator)

Michael 00:05:07
AND im giving you bonus now


It's important that everyone understands that due to the sheer volume of sign ups we are dealing with, it's impossible for any online casino to perform full due diligence on a player in the seconds it takes for the first few transactions to be processed. It is within the first few deposits that the player is sent to Risk and a fraud analysis is done. When our rep made his initial offer, he did so under the assumption that the player would clear Risk, which he must constantly assume in order to perform his job. There was no malicious intent here and any player that deposits in $1,000 increments is a player we'd very much like to have on board with us. Risk was afraid of this player charging back in large amounts (which he eventually did without giving us a chance to return his money).

It is important that you stop treating the readers of this forum as if they were stupid. They are not. The chat transcripts speak for themselves. I was lied to over and over. I was screwed around, dealt with in a manner so unprofessional it was almost amusing, and then I calmly gave you 3 reasonable and logical options.

1. Fulfill your promise.
2. Renege on your promise and return my deposits - I had not played a single hand.
3. I would charge back.

At this, your drunk manager abused me and told me he loved me and insulted me over and over. I then went and had lunch and some wine, and slept for the afternoon.

Upon waking, I had an email from your Security saying all my documents had been certified. I emailed Rome in response and received no reply for 12-16 hours.

I then tried to login to my account to use Live Chat to find out what was going on - only to find my account had been locked. This is theft - you incompetent joke.

It was, AT THIS POINT, when my funds had well and truly been stolen - that I could be bothered actually charging back my card. Note this point was over 24 hours AFTER I'd warned I would charge back unless the lying and nonsense ended. 3k is not exactly an amount that motivates me to do much. Charging back, and punishing you for gross incompetence, unprofessional behaviour in EVERY aspect of your operations, and theft of my funds by locking my account and refusing to answer emails...was the motivation to make the call and charge back.

The player was then contacted over the phone by a rep, and told that the account would be frozen for 24 hours, so that we could look into the situation and make an informed decision regarding the account. This was not up to the rep, who had the best of intentions, and fully intended to credit the player with the bonus. As this player has proven, and seems to be quite familiar with, chargebacks are a huge issue for any online operation (including all non-gambling e-businesses as well).

This is a complete lie. Many hours, maybe even a day or more, after charging back my card and posting the OP of this thread, did Mark phone me begging me not to charge back, saying he had fired OG and apologising for the way I was treated. I told him there was nothing I could do.

I can only smile as you are either dropped by your processor or % vig raised to the point where CC deposits kill your margin - as it seems no major turnkey payment processor like Moneybookers, NETeller or Click2Pay will work with you.

1. Please explain why the above 3 companies will not work with you? They work with EVERYONE.

2. Please explain why you continue to list them as deposit options on your site and in your cashier for 6 months without actually being able to accept deposits from them.

3. Please explain why, after so many days of panicked brainstorming, that this joke of a post is the BEST damage control you could come up with.

Before Risk even had the opportunity to perform an analysis, this player charged back the entire $3,000, despite our rep repeatedly promising a refund in full, using any payment method we offer, as we are obviously not interested in chargebacks. We also would have honored the deal offered by the rep once Risk had all the necessary information.

Again, a complete lie. And the fact that I can so obviously prove you're lying by amounts of time so relatively huge in disparity makes me wonder if you're just a crackpot. You couldn't possibly be this stupid, could you?

Risk emailed me verification confirmation. I responded with an email asking what was going on.

I received NO REPLY for 12-16 hours.

I then tried to login to my account and it was locked.

Then I called my bank and charged back. They were horrified at your company's behaviour and insisted on canceling my card as your company held the CC number and all info. They then said they would initiate the charge back process the minute the transactions showed on their system.

Mark then called me many hours AFTER all of this - apologising first, then insulting my intelligence with idiotic threats. I calmly explained to him I had given him literally SO MUCH TIME to rectify the horrible mistakes made, and instead was ridiculed by his staff and my account was then locked with CS refusing to answer emails. When he continued his hysterical threats, I told him to shut up and hung up on him.

Later than day, or maybe the next day, I called my bank to confirm the charge backs were being processed - and was assured they were.

After reading the chat transcripts, I can see where this animosity stems from but we have been trying to make this right from the moment risk suspended his account. He simply never gave us the opportunity.

The moment Risk suspended my account, I was insulted and lied to endlessly by your manager.

I was ignored over a VERY long period of time by your CS Email Support.

When I eventually logged in to use Live Chat, you had locked my account.

THAT is what you call "trying to make this right from the moment risk suspended his account"?

I have encountered many types before in this industry, liars and thieves and unethical operators - but never before someone who will be as easy to crush and embarrass as you. Intelligence-wise, you're almost unworthy. But because you lied about me (and I take that VERY personally), I will enjoy the process of destroying what little reputation you have.

Let's play.


However, I want to publicly, personally, and profusely apologize to this player for putting him through all of this aggravation. However, the combination of the failure of our CS team, and the player's lack of patience has created this debacle, and as such we can only claim responsibility for things we have done wrong.

Apology not accepted. You lied over...and over...and over...again in this post, both about me personally and about the timing of my actions - and you're stupid enough to think that lies like this will be allowed to slide?

but the player must also take some of the responsibility since at the end of the day, considerable damage was done to us and intentionally so by the player.

Yes. My valuable time was wasted and I was lied to multiple times and insulted and offended by your manager - who Mark claimed he fired, but whom you now admit has not been fired.

You need to fire OG, Mark and yourself - for gross unprofessional misconduct and disgusting behaviour at every stage of this debacle.

If we could, we would allow all transactions through the gate with no screening whatsoever but then we wouldn't be in business very long.

I have a pretty strong feeling (call it a premonition) that you won't be in business very long - and it has nothing to do with CC fraud risk.

Josh, had you come on here and done the following, you would have acted in a manner worthy of respect:

1. Apologised for the disgusting way I was treated by your Manager in Chat.

2. Apologised for the waste of my time and offered compensation for that time wastage.

3. Provided evidence of OG's instant dismissal.

4. Provided evidence that you had taken steps to ensure no future players experience such disgusting, unethical and incompetent treatment at your casino ever again - this would involve a complete revamp of your entire operations and multiple staff firings and replacements.

5. Personally apologised and accepted your failure as a (what are you, exactly?) operator or manager or part-owner or whatever in setting up a casino in which such a situation could occur - and provided assurances you would replace your "relaxing weekends" with actual work at your place of business to ensure the business was operating smoothly as opposed to the shambles it is (assuming you are even capable of a leadership role in this industry, but which I believe this post proves beyond all existing doubt that you are not capable or competent or worthy of any kind of operational role, let alone a management role).

---------

I have ordered you to provide a number of things you cannot provide because you gambled and lost on the charge back claim. So you're pretty much screwed gameplay-wise.

But if you are brave enough to admit you gambled and lost, I will forgive your defamation against my character and credit you with the play under mitigation of the fact that you're desperate and panicked.

If you don't, we get to have a fun little game - which, like a casino game, is somewhat rigged in my favour (IQ points wise, and also because I have ethics and you, apparently, do not).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rome Casino

This thread is unbelievable...I didn't know who or what to believe until the Rome rep verified what had happened. The chat was so long that I didn't read all of it and should have.:mad:

I didn't even believe someone would throw that kinda money to online or B&M casinos but anyways I know you have a ton of PMs about this post.

I sincerely hope Rome casino doesn't blacklist you bc of the chargeback. I'm also pleasantly surprised that people didn't jump all over you for the chargeback but waited until everything was sorted out.
 
The player is not completely blameless though and acted foolishly IMO for not making proper enquiries about Rome Casino and for Him not to consider (this someone who apparently wagers fortunes at online Casino's) that a large deposit to a small operation may cause a problem certainly raises an eyebrow.

I am surprised that the Rep has not been fired - though that is an internal matter.

I have no problem with your comments, except to clarify my position.

I chose Rome because they were listed at Number 2 of a very large online casino review site - which I used to administrate. I am no longer involved with this site in any way, shape or form - but I know and trust the people that own and run it, so it was my first point of call when I felt like trying a new casino.

Secondly, I googled Rome before depositing when the CS chat behaviour was striking me as weird. As my Casinomeister account was dormant, I couldn't read any Rome threads or access the forum. I found nothing negative about Rome on Google apart from a link to Winward or something, which I mentioned in Chat.

Whilst I realise that I'm fortunate enough to be in a position to do so, and I apologise if I have given some posters the impression of arrogance in regards to wagering amounts - the simple fact is that a 5k deposit is a very small amount (for me). Had I known that a casino would treat a 3k deposit as "large", I would have ZERO interest in playing there (for what I hope are obvious reasons) - once it became apparent that they considered 3k a "large" amount, I made it clear I had no more interest in playing at their casino, bonus or no bonus.

I have actually been in contact with the Marketing Manager of the review site which has Rome at Number 2 on their Top 10 list - and yet Rome is still currently sitting there at Number 2. Which means that the Marketing Manager is snowed under with work at the moment, or something has gone VERY wrong with operations at that site since we parted ways last year.

Frankly, and I have to be careful with wording as I consider the owners and senior staff of the review site to be friends of mine, I'm shocked that they have not yet delisted Rome. But as it's WSOP time, they might just be too snowed under with work to deal with it at the moment.

When I was administrating the site, upon analysing the evidence and submission of a complaint like this, I would instantly delist Rome until they can prove the complainant was lying or omitting information. From a former editor of the site reporting such an experience, the fact that it remains listed at Number 2 shocks me, to be honest.
 
I sincerely hope Rome casino doesn't blacklist you bc of the chargeback. I'm also pleasantly surprised that people didn't jump all over you for the chargeback but waited until everything was sorted out.

Whilst I appreciate the sentiment, I don't think you understand this industry all that well - maybe?

Rome is the one in SERIOUS trouble here. I behaved in a manner which, frankly, surprises even myself at it's Zen level considering the way in which I was treated (the good people who make Vicodin might be credited for this).

That Zen is gone. Insulted and creeped out by a drunk manager is one thing.

Josh has now come on and lied through his teeth in a desperate gamble which has horribly back-fired for him - a gamble which probably took him the last x days of frantic brainstorming to come up with. And it's now Good Game for him - I just hope he doesn't run away as this has gotten pretty fun all of a sudden (for me).

I intentionally damaged Rome with the charge back to punish them after my patience had been pushed 10x past it's normal breaking point - and then, my laziness and nonchalance regarding the amount only resulted in me making the chargeback call once they'd locked my account and refused to answer emails after I received the Risk email saying my docs were all certified.

As I'm aware that I would be punishing them severely, I was in no hurry to do so (despite telling OG I had - purely to keep him chatting as I was actually bored and waiting for lunch and sensed some possible chat entertainment from the drunk creep).

I warned them so many times. They were stupid to even risk it. Even then, my laziness gave them a full day or two to contact me to correct the mistake - but NOT A SINGLE CONTACT WAS MADE DURING THAT TIME (apart from Risk saying my docs cleared certification) - and, instead, they ignored me and LOCKED MY ACCOUNT, stealing my money.

I then punished them. But now that Josh has defamed me and lied about almost everything, I will punish them further, if I can. And I will enjoy the process.
 
I know this is an emotive topic, but it doesnt help the issue to bandy around personal insults, nor will it assist if/when it comes to reaching any potential resolutions. So can we keep to the facts in future posts please ;)
 
I know this is an emotive topic, but it doesnt help the issue to bandy around personal insults, nor will it assist if/when it comes to reaching any potential resolutions. So can we keep to the facts in future posts please ;)

I'm sorry Simmo. But when I'm publicly defamed in such a gross manner, I respond accordingly.

I struggle to be cordial to despicable human beings. Personality flaw? Perhaps. But gross lies which defame my character? That just really gets at my goat.

I backspaced over 80% of the words I would have preferred to label this guy with - I apologise that the 20% I thought were 'acceptable' were still over the line.

And to clarify, there is no resolution I am interested in. Except perhaps to expose these lying (------)'s and render them unemployable by sane operators, perhaps.

I want nothing from them. They can't resolve the situation or make amends. My buying off price would be too high for them to pay. And I probably couldn't even be bought off for 6 figures, now that this guy had the brazen stupidity to come on here and gamble on the desperate hope that I'd charged back against a casino based on days of panicked brainstorming and a flippant comment I made in chat - which I made to OG to let him know I was tired of being screwed around.

He gambled huge. He failed huge. He has to pay the consequences.

But I will try and cut out 80% of the remaining 20% of labels which passed my own self-censor :)
 
Not sure where you're going with this JHV... After your response to casino rep's post, you just continue making additional posts repeating yourself.

We or at least myself understand exactly what took place, and feel for your emotional stress.

At least you lost no money. Unfortunately the timing for you to have to cancel your cc and while waiting for a new one, your trip to Vegas will be hampered; I'm certain a man of your means will have no problem financing your trip one way or another.

I'm not a fan of Rome casino myself after my experiences their. I made a post expressing my opinion, and moved on.

Think we all here understand what took place, and although it should of came to a close in a much more professional manner, seems the matter regardless is closed.

The people reading this forum will certainly take this thread into consideration, if they ever think of depositing at Rome.

I thank you for sharing your experience with us, but lets move on.
 
I have no problem with your comments, except to clarify my position.

I chose Rome because they were listed at Number 2 of a very large online casino review site - which I used to administrate. I am no longer involved with this site in any way, shape or form - but I know and trust the people that own and run it, so it was my first point of call when I felt like trying a new casino.

Secondly, I googled Rome before depositing when the CS chat behaviour was striking me as weird. As my Casinomeister account was dormant, I couldn't read any Rome threads or access the forum. I found nothing negative about Rome on Google apart from a link to Winward or something, which I mentioned in Chat.

Whilst I realise that I'm fortunate enough to be in a position to do so, and I apologise if I have given some posters the impression of arrogance in regards to wagering amounts - the simple fact is that a 5k deposit is a very small amount (for me). Had I known that a casino would treat a 3k deposit as "large", I would have ZERO interest in playing there (for what I hope are obvious reasons) - once it became apparent that they considered 3k a "large" amount, I made it clear I had no more interest in playing at their casino, bonus or no bonus.

I have actually been in contact with the Marketing Manager of the review site which has Rome at Number 2 on their Top 10 list - and yet Rome is still currently sitting there at Number 2. Which means that the Marketing Manager is snowed under with work at the moment, or something has gone VERY wrong with operations at that site since we parted ways last year.

Frankly, and I have to be careful with wording as I consider the owners and senior staff of the review site to be friends of mine, I'm shocked that they have not yet delisted Rome. But as it's WSOP time, they might just be too snowed under with work to deal with it at the moment.

When I was administrating the site, upon analysing the evidence and submission of a complaint like this, I would instantly delist Rome until they can prove the complainant was lying or omitting information. From a former editor of the site reporting such an experience, the fact that it remains listed at Number 2 shocks me, to be honest.

Fair enough.
I was just surprised you hadn't checked out deposit limits before deciding to play as a means of checking the Casinos resources but I accept you put your faith in that review site and 5k obviously is not such an important sum of money to you as it is to others.

You do come across as arrogant but so what - I am judgemental and opinionated and many other things that get right up peoples noses.

Keep that meister account up to scratch ;)
 
Not sure where you're going with this JHV... After your response to casino rep's post, you just continue making additional posts repeating yourself.

We or at least myself understand exactly what took place, and feel for your emotional stress.

At least you lost no money. Unfortunately the timing for you to have to cancel your cc and while waiting for a new one, your trip to Vegas will be hampered; I'm certain a man of your means will have no problem financing your trip one way or another.

I'm not a fan of Rome casino myself after my experiences their. I made a post expressing my opinion, and moved on.

Think we all here understand what took place, and although it should of came to a close in a much more professional manner, seems the matter regardless is closed.

The people reading this forum will certainly take this thread into consideration, if they ever think of depositing at Rome.

I thank you for sharing your experience with us, but lets move on.

No lol! I'm sorry but did you miss a page or two of this thread?

Josh just gambled huge (a gamble I can almost respect from a desperate man in a desperate position) and defamed me by claiming I had previously made charge backs at other casinos - a blatant lie which I'm ecstatic about, frankly.

But when you gamble big, and lose big...you wear the consequences. That is the game of life - and this industry.

Things are JUST about to get really, really fun!

Why do you want it to end now? The awesomeness and public shaming of casino operators lying openly and boldly through their teeth - all lined up on the starting grid - the engines are revving up....! It's GOOOOOOOO at Monaco!!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why do you want it to end now? The awesomeness and public shaming of casino operators lying openly and boldly through their teeth - all lined up on the starting grid - the engines are revving up....! It's GOOOOOOOO at Monaco!!!


I think I am going to PUKE.......Pleeeeeease. I respect the fact that you feel you have been slighted, however this has become a personal vendetta and quite frankly your last posts are becoming laughable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top