- Joined
- Jun 5, 2006
- Location
- Edmonton Canada
I don't know how many we have here, but it would be good to get input from at least ONE of you! There was a recent thread where a player self-excluded for a gambling problem at one casino, then deposited at a different casino thinking they weren't related, and that account was closed because of the self-exclusion at the first one.
The question that I (and maybe others) have is this: Is this a blanket policy from EveryMatrix where a gambling problem self-exclusion keeps you from playing at any casino using this platform or is it a decision that's left up to each individual casino whether to allow the player or not?
I'm just curious, and I think it would be helpful for people to know.
The question that I (and maybe others) have is this: Is this a blanket policy from EveryMatrix where a gambling problem self-exclusion keeps you from playing at any casino using this platform or is it a decision that's left up to each individual casino whether to allow the player or not?
I'm just curious, and I think it would be helpful for people to know.