New Casino Rep QueenVegas Representative

I only ask cause when searching for you I couldn't find you anywhere on first few pages yet there was a few posts about how you has Skillonnet software for games which was found out to not have a true random gamble on the games.
 
  1. While making bets to wager any deposit bonus/offer (free or deposit) or bonus credited for free spin winnings, the maximum bet permitted is 10% (min 0.10) of the bonus amount or 5 (eg, 5 EUR, 5 GBP) (the lower amount applies), however if your deposit was with Neteller or Skrill the max bet is 1 (eg, 1 EUR, 1 GBP). Failure to comply with this rule means you are in breach of the deposit bonus/offer terms and We reserve the right to void and remove any winnings. A bet includes any special bet feature, any gamble function or any other type of wagering activity (regardless of its name)
Don't like that rule, but just to clarify, if you have a £50 bonus you can bet £5 till its gone, or once you spin at £5, your balance is £45, max spin is £4.50 and so on?

We reserve the right to withhold any withdrawals and/or confiscate all winnings and bonuses for irregular play. The wording ‘Irregular play’ may include but is not wholly restricted to any one or more of the following types of play: Low margin betting, equal betting, zero risk bets or hedge betting are considered irregular gaming when done purposely to exploit bonuses. In addition to this, the following are considered irregular playing patterns:
  1. Increasing the balance then changing the gaming pattern significantly (bet, game type, bet structure, etc) in order to complete the wagering requirements for that bonus.
Another casino with that dodgy term in, which can be used to void winnings if anyone dares to change their stake.
 
It sounds like it was a mistake on their side to try and get customers from this forum.

Thanks for the warnings though and another place to stay away from:thumbsup:
 
If it's Skill-on-net, they'll most likely have the 'hidden' list of games, not playable with a bonus.
So let's hope they're not going for a BBF, since that was one of the reasons why Luck Niki (Skill-on-net) failed their BBF
 
Yeah, its Skill-On-Net, the same as Drueckglueck, Luckyniki, Slots Magic etc.

Wagering Requirements

Unless stated otherwise in the promotion offer, Bonuses (including winnings from Free Spins) given with a deposit offer carry a wagering requirement of thirty (30) times the total amount, e.g. If you deposit €10 and obtain a €10 bonus, you would have to wager 30 times the aggregate amount, in this case being €20 (deposit + bonus). If a Bonus (including winnings from Free Spins) is not awarded as a part of a deposit offer Or if the total bonus amount (from bonuses and Free Spins winnings) is greater than the deposit amount made to claim the offer, the offer will carry a wagering requirement of sixty (60) times on the bonus amount only.

So its bonus x60 and also freespins x60.

Make your first deposit & get one Mega Spin for every €1 you deposit.

100% up to 100 Mega Spins!

Its the same promotion 1 or more of their casinos have/had before also.
You get spins, not a match bonus...
 
If it's Skill-on-net, they'll most likely have the 'hidden' list of games, not playable with a bonus.
So let's hope they're not going for a BBF, since that was one of the reasons why Luck Niki (Skill-on-net) failed their BBF
Yes, and I have also pointed out many times before that the advertised and seemingly competitive low wagering in may cases only applied to their Green Valley in-house developed games, as they don't have provider fees liable unlike to Netent and the rest. To that end, given that GVG are only a tiny minority of the games available I think this is misleading advertising - a bit like B&G advertising "30% off everything in store today!" and then you finding it only applies to their own-brand paint and nails.
 
I only ask cause when searching for you I couldn't find you anywhere on first few pages yet there was a few posts about how you has Skillonnet software for games which was found out to not have a true random gamble on the games.
Netent and others. And in regards your previous question it's GVG (under SkillonNet).
 
It sounds like it was a mistake on their side to try and get customers from this forum.

Thanks for the warnings though and another place to stay away from:thumbsup:
Well if the Pogg is higher valued than 3 licenses I can only try to give a bit more of the history. Just to clarify the case was solved immediately and that was under old ownership (earlier than 2011 when this QV has been established). The Pogg refused to close it. Anyway no such cases have been raised since then.
 
Ok, given that there are several slots here with very high RTP's and cumulative features like Jack Hammer2 and Vikings Go Berzerk, all casinos tend to exclude them from bonus wagering. I cannot see a list of excluded or weighted slots here, anyone provide a link for me?
 
Well if the Pogg is higher valued than 3 licenses I can only try to give a bit more of the history. Just to clarify the case was solved immediately and that was under old ownership (earlier than 2011 when this QV has been established). The Pogg refused to close it. Anyway no such cases have been raised since then.

Have you missed my question?
 
Well if the Pogg is higher valued than 3 licenses I can only try to give a bit more of the history. Just to clarify the case was solved immediately and that was under old ownership (earlier than 2011 when this QV has been established). The Pogg refused to close it. Anyway no such cases have been raised since then.

It had nothing to do with his site, but the rules colinsunderland, and later also others posted. We can see through them pretty easy.
 
Well if the Pogg is higher valued than 3 licenses I can only try to give a bit more of the history. Just to clarify the case was solved immediately and that was under old ownership (earlier than 2011 when this QV has been established). The Pogg refused to close it. Anyway no such cases have been raised since then.
Knowing ThePogg and dealing with him for two years or so already, if he do not want to close complaint - it should not be closed.
And yes, my personal opinion - top third party mediators (like ThePogg and CM for example) in some cases much more stronger than any license.

I'm not saying anything about QV - it will be not good in terms of ethics, but since I'm player myself and played at most of skill-on-net brands - I have my own opinion.
 
Ok, given that there are several slots here with very high RTP's and cumulative features like Jack Hammer2 and Vikings Go Berzerk, all casinos tend to exclude them from bonus wagering. I cannot see a list of excluded or weighted slots here, anyone provide a link for me?
Sorry to say, but there is no such list. Clicking on the info button of each particular slot would provide the info.
 
Have you missed my question?
Apologies, wager is 10% of total bonus received, not current bonus balance while wagering. So in your words "with £50 you can bet £5 until it's gone".
and to add regarding the bottom part our bonus policy is in place to maintain fairness to every player. By agreeing to the terms and conditions when creating an account, players are confirming they agree with the terms of the casino. However, if a player does not agree with the terms, they are under no obligation to agree to them and create the account.
Our games offer players the flexibility to set their own stakes throughout their play; this is to accommodate for preferred habits of play, and respective individual account balances. QueenVegas players are welcome to change their stakes during Real Money Play, however the terms of the bonus policy are made clear in our terms and conditions section.
 
Last edited:
Sorry to say, but there is no such list. Clicking on the info button of each particular slot would provide the info.
Sorry, please clarify - are you saying NO slots are excluded or that there's no list and you can only find out by clicking the slot in question? If it's the latter then all kinds of disputes could arise...
 
Sorry, please clarify - are you saying NO slots are excluded or that there's no list and you can only find out by clicking the slot in question? If it's the latter then all kinds of disputes could arise...
In QV all bonuses have to be wagered, so no disputes in this case I assume :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top