Bonus Complaint Panekk vs MRRingo

More Israeli business practices I see.

This stinks, and just because YOU knew what you meant the customers certainly didn't.

Well, says a lot if you're too tight to pay out to 2 players a couple of thousand poxy Euros and risk your already questionable reputation on the web.

If sites like yours ever see accreditation that'll be the day I'm outta here.

Retrospective term changes are a HUGE no-no and are totally unlawful in any civilized country.

I say again as a native English-speaker your term change has dramatically changed their meaning. :mad:

So Mr Ringpiece has screwed more than one player over like this...
 
Sorry for the delay in writing. Was checking on a few things before giving an answer, to ensure that the answer was correct.

As previously stated, the terms and conditions were changed, but not to any extent where the meaning was changed. The original and the updated both have the same meaning, but the second is more clear.

I know that this answer will not be well received by some, there is little I can do than state the facts as they have been stated before. Think it is a case where we basically have to agree to disagree.

Wishing all a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.

Sorry but I find you a disgrace, do you think the player you have blatantly ripped off will have a good christmas? You casinos play with peoples lives when money like this is a large sum to most of us.

I hope your casino gets blacklisted and I will inform everyone I know possible what a rogue piece of crap your mrRingo is.

Have a sh*t christmas!
 
Sorry but I find you a disgrace, do you think the player you have blatantly ripped off will have a good christmas? You casinos play with peoples lives when money like this is a large sum to most of us.

I hope your casino gets blacklisted and I will inform everyone I know possible what a rogue piece of crap your mrRingo is.

Have a sh*t christmas!

I don't think they celebrate it in their neck of the woods. But I bet it won't be as shit as the players' Christmases....:(
 
Sorry for the delay in writing. Was checking on a few things before giving an answer, to ensure that the answer was correct.

As previously stated, the terms and conditions were changed, but not to any extent where the meaning was changed. The original and the updated both have the same meaning, but the second is more clear.

I know that this answer will not be well received by some, there is little I can do than state the facts as they have been stated before. Think it is a case where we basically have to agree to disagree.

Wishing all a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.

Absolute rubbish. You should payout this customer or at least acknowledge of your own mistake. This is a clear ROGUE move.

I have never heard any bookmaker to void or say winnings are void if a player has made multiple bets and the total was over the minimum.

If you state the meaning in this is different then you should clearly outline that ONLY single bet would be allowed then nothing would be misunderstood.

I am also happy to let you know that I will tell the affiliate manager who has been chasing me to close the account down i signed up for. I will not have anything to do with a company like yours its a disgrace and happy I have not spent so much time yet to look into your terms and other things before listing you.

If people want to do sports bets then there are plenty much better companies like Bet365 or Paddy Power to name a few. At least they operate with very clear terms and very fair bonus terms.

Above is not to try and tell where to make sports bets instead but just used as example. I feel so sorry for the OP in this and really hope he will take up a PAB. And stop posting in this thread. :mad:

I still wish you a Merry Christmas and happy New Year as clearly not your fault what decisions are made higher up...:rolleyes:

PS Casino is called Mr Ringo but im starting to think this was the guy who started it up and is behind this casino .... >

rango-online-slot-isoftbet.png
 
What a dumb ass rep and a dumb ass casino...
Will make sure no one I know will ever spend a dime in this place...

Are these guys in the rogue pit yet?

Time to get them high up in the Google ranks, of course to warn players not to play here and warn them what a crooked place this is!
 
Sorry for the delay in writing. Was checking on a few things before giving an answer, to ensure that the answer was correct.

As previously stated, the terms and conditions were changed, but not to any extent where the meaning was changed. The original and the updated both have the same meaning, but the second is more clear.

I know that this answer will not be well received by some, there is little I can do than state the facts as they have been stated before. Think it is a case where we basically have to agree to disagree.

Wishing all a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.

Were you born an idiot or just became this way?

You know this forum is frequented and lurked by many affiliates right? And tonnes of players?

Well done ruining a large portion of your casino with your idiotic posts and shadiness.

I hope you get hit with santas sled and it knocks some sense into you
 
I reported the matter to the PAB but thinks that it will not help if the casino is certain that I broke the rules but change terms after my bets..
 
I reported the matter to the PAB but thinks that it will not help if the casino is certain that I broke the rules but change terms after my bets..

OK, in that case remember not to post in this thread any further, unless just to say 'PAB still in progress' or other non-detailed stuff. You can no longer talk about the matter until it's resolved. :thumbsup:
 
Casino doesnt accept the math...

The chances of losing increase when betting more games.
1.6 is a quote given to a team that holds a half decent edge.
Its often a dangerous trick to lure betters in.
Its typically a big name team but out of form against a dangerous outsider.
Its by no means a safe bet.
3 times such a bet heavily decreases your chances of winning, since you only get payed if you have all 3 correct.

Its not like rolling a dice but there is a reason why multiples pay out more than singles.

Really nasty move on casinos part.
This should be widely reported and shuv'd in the rogue section
 
I reported the matter to the PAB but thinks that it will not help if the casino is certain that I broke the rules but change terms after my bets..

You should report them to the MGA. Everytime a licenced casino by the MGA changes their terms they need to send it in to MGA. So you can prove your case quite easy as you have the dates.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


MGA have starting to take player complaints more seriously than before. So might work. The bad part is that only their sportsbook is licenced in Malta, rest is licenced in Curacao.

To file a complaint with MGA go here:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


Good luck!
 
Oh and since the betting odds are multipied, the system acknowledges the risk one takes by betting on multiple matches in one bet. One stake placed on a bet slip, is one bet. If you bet on 1 match or 12 matches. If you didnt pick all winners correctly you lose the bet.

If i summarize this topic...:
The smuck representative should be banned from casinomeister.
"Sorry this that but the money we shuv elbow deep in our gaping **s*s and you can go f yourself."
"We see it like this and even though everybody else doesnt, we dont give a *nate diaz* f......
 
Just discovered the OP had posted two threads: now merged here. [later: thread title changed because "1240e stolen" is not conducive to a successful PAB resolution.]

@ Panekk : please reread the Posting Rules, with particular attention to item 1.2 (no cross-posting).
 
Last edited:
I reported the matter to the PAB but thinks that it will not help if the casino is certain that I broke the rules but change terms after my bets..

Casino's final statement to us was:
... that player dind't follow the rules, mentioned in terms and his winning is illegitimate.

FWIW I've since received and submitted three further PABs against Mr Ringo. They haven't responded to two of those. Not looking good.
 
Casino's final statement to us was:


FWIW I've since received and submitted three further PABs against Mr Ringo. They haven't responded to two of those. Not looking good.

I expected nothing less from a casino that so unashamedly changed their terms retrospectively and posted the fact proudly on here. My feelings lie with the OP. :(
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top