As far as I know the Jackpot has been hit Three times and every time was with an unusual bonus.
If you don't see the problem or KK would like to trust Rival despite everything that has been revealed in this thread and the coincidence of this win then thats fine.
Four months, jackpot not hit once. Rival (notice I didn't say Irish Luck) runs a n/d promo to play ONLY this progressive, which is then hit twice on the same day, with a max cashout in place.
Three weeks later, Rival (notice I didn't say Vegas Sky) runs a n/d promo, but this time for a different slot....and what happens? A brand new player hits the progressive again, only this time there's no max cashout in place....so "apparently" this luckier than a four leaf clover player gets to keep it all.
I think Vegas Sky would have to be dumber than dirt to try some inside job right after the mess that just took place with IL. And I don't think they're dumb at all.
The only thing Vegas Sky stands to gain is some good publicity, a happy player, and knowing they paid out their progressive winner as progressive winners are intended to be paid. ALL OF IT.
I don't think it's fair to hold Vegas Sky in the shadow of another Rival operator (IL).
I think Vegas Sky and Irish Luck are Rival. And that's really what this comes down to for me. With the exception of Slotocash, I believe that each and every one of these Rivals are white label operations....with Rival themselves being the ones who make the decisions as to what promos are run, and when they are run.
17. Accordingly, all of the corporations are, in reality, alter egos of the Individual Defendants in order to disguise the Individual Defendants' ownership of the Casinos, and de facto operation and management thereof from the Ottawa premises.
19. The Corporate Structure (Exhibit P-1A), clearly indicates that, while Giesbrecht was represented to have some involvement in the marketing process, "all decisions with regards to marketing will be made by the principles (sic) at our Ottawa location."
Exhibit P-1A is a written explanation of the Corporate Structure of Rival
as provided by one of the defendants. It's not a corporate structure made up by T2 Marketing.....it was provided by Rival and is included as one of the exhibits, thus the quotes around the "all decisions with regards......" part above in #19.
I just don't understand how anyone still believes that these guys are on the up and up. With the exception of Slotocash, who had the professionalism and business acumen to actually make a public statement....not a word from any other Rival rep on this forum (besides John posting a link to a statement made by Rival on their own website, which basically told us nothing).
And as yet, still no statements on their max withdrawal limits...and exactly how long is it gonna take this Jeff (if he exists) to collect his cool 1/4 million? Maybe we should start a pool here and take bets as to when he'll receive his final payment? In reality, if he's genuine, he should receive the whole lump sum in one cha-ching payment into his bank account (or whatever payment method he uses).
There's a thread here that was split off from another thread, titled Issue with Max Withdrawal Limits at Rival. Nashvegas won 40K plus a bit, and finally got so frustrated at all the different answers and the runaround he was given, that he finally just played it all back (his fault for that part of it). So that was 40K, how long is it gonna take Jeff to collect his 1/4 million? And who's got this money in the interim? Where is it?
Just as KK stated, alot of this is speculation. No one has any definitive proof of anything. The people who choose to believe Rival, are going on the word of Rival, and affiliate managers who say it's all legit. I myself choose to believe legal documents filed in a court of law, with a mountain of evidence to back up the claim....regardless if the suit has been heard as yet or not. To each his own.
?
