Yeah, right, and I am Napoleonwinning does not equate to fair gaming, maybe you should have won $55,277.69
Ive never known anyone live to win that much without betting heavily, in saying that live table limits dont accomodate for this, using betting limits.
And why should we believe you? Because you say so?No reason not to believe him.If you think winning equates to fair gaming that simply is not true. Winning is very possible in the short term,the issue is in a fair game over the short term should he have been up $73,455.69 or whatever amount.....now if he continues to gamble and reaches forever (the long term) and claims he is up forever,then that would not be fair gaming either in a negative expectation game as the software would have had some malfeasance in the player's favor and that would be flawed also of course for anyone claiming winning large amounts forever (for one's long term,life,etc). One could claim being an advantage player (not sure how online at large stakes) or have won a signifcant amount in the short term and then play for pennies til forever arrives. In all likelihood, one who claims winning over the long term is prolly streching the truth especially online at consistently high stakes.
I do not recollect saying that although some may argue that I may imply that (Unintentionally).....have you read all the posts...appears you have not.....furthermore only 3 parties that are members on this forum have seen practically all the the multiple SOF's and many other means of correspondence and documentation pursuant to the audit so how would you know whether I have proof or not. I am not sure what I have to be honest other than a bunch of paradoxical rhetoric but that rhetoric has got some sleeping dogs out of bed. If my comments are "very ignorant" then I can live with your flame.Yes in the long run you lose. I should have lost the amount according to the casino edge x my play. I accept that. But your persistent "casinos are rigged" comments is very ignorant without proof.
NASHVEGAS said:
Hope you are over your hangover and HNY!Understandable but I did not name the thread and the thread title does not correlate entirely with the posts throughout which I still do not believe you have read the entire thread. If so,my apologies.With a title as Oh my GOD! God d#mn cheaters! and all the things your implying in this thread, no it wasnt intentional.
I have offered and the number of documents exceed 100 so it will be very time consuming and as I previously posted I am ready,willing and able to spend the time taking up bandwith. However, Bryan is the one who will determine if I am allowed to post all in full. To date, I have not been granted permission and even when I posted the conclusion for the audit invoiced 12-10-07 labeled "all work complete" and payment remitted in full to the auditor on 12-11-07, thereafter Bryan deleted it pursuant to the auditor's request for whatever reason. This audit SOF was clearly considered FINAL,COMPLETE, and ACCURATE when I posted the conclusion and I owned the audit having remitted payment in full but I do not call all the shots. Maybe Bryan will allow all to be posted at a later date!If you have proof post it. We have nothing but rambling from someone that may or may not have lost alot of money and are grasping at straws to justify the loss.
I will PM you so you know what I meant....nothing bad.....just a weird coindence that I will c.c. the PM to CM and Dr.Jacobson!
I think the PM explained everything...nice run at 3D,Congrats Zman
