Sorry Max but i have to disagree with you here as you do not know me ....
Disagree as you like but you and I have some history here at CM and that is more than sufficient for me to draw conclusions and arrive at the decisions I need to. Do I know you personally? No, of course not, and that has exactly nothing to do with the subject at hand.
How many times have you PM'd me with "hey buddy Max, can you do this or that for me"? I'm guessing about a half-dozen times or more, give or take. We do for you and we do for you and still you complain about the help you get from us and then hit us with the "I'm deaf, can't make myself understood" stuff.
Suzy, no one is having any trouble understanding you. You are making yourself perfectly well understood. The problem isn't that we misunderstand you, the problem is that we disagree with your demands. Big, important, difference. It has nothing to do with deafness and everything to do with what is and is not reasonable.
I'm sorry to say this but anyone's benefit of the doubt only goes so far and yours ran out some time ago. After everything that's happened you use us to threaten a casino and expect to be pampered for it? No dice!
Your threads got merged because they were on the same topic and more or less saying the same thing. That's why threads _should_ be merged. You don't like it? Try posting on a new subject and voila!, no merging!
32Red gets treated well here? You're right, they do! They're a good shop, work hard for their reputation, are a top pick here at CM and they've earned our respect. Being rewarded for that is precisely what should happen. If you think otherwise you're entitled to your opinion, of course, but I think you'll find yourself in the small minority.
You say other casinos get slaughtered here. Yes, they do, and quite rightly so in many cases. If you look back over the history many casinos end up on the "Not Recommended" or "Rogue" lists exactly because people grumbled about them and raised the issues here on the forums. That's what the forums are (largely) for.
The bottom line is the good guys deserve credit, as you yourself say, where credit is due. And the bad guys deserve to be exposed. Sounds perfectly reasonable and very much in keeping with the CM tradition as I read it. How you can point to that as if it was a bad thing is beyond me.