mstrike1978 VS Club World Casino ($46,034.44)

[nitro]

The facts of this case have been put down, and you seem to be confusing many things into this, firstly saying I have multiple accounts, then saying that I am a seasoned bonus seeker. Where do you get that fact from?

It's the combination of the following: the date you register here, the numbers you post, your postings here, the membership in another forums and the postings there, your fanatical attitude in this thread, your lack of psychological knowledge... and the fact that you're the only person in this forum that still believes that mstrike can get the jackpot.

 

[uungy]

It's the combination of the following: the date you register here, the numbers you post, your postings here, the membership in another forums and the postings there, your fanatical attitude in this thread, your lack of psychological knowledge... and the fact that you're the only person in this forum that still believes that mstrike can get the jackpot.

I have been registered here since 2004, with 587 posts.
I have a membership in another forum
I am a fanatic that the OP should get his money - thats called opinion
lack of psychological knowledge (never claimed to be a psychiatrist)
and I am not the only person. Please read the thread, and then judge accordingly.

You have posted quite strong allegations here, which you seem to refuse to respond to, then you go on posting with mis-informed information.

Also please dont use the forum to constantly attack other members. It does nothing to this post, and completely out of order

 

[bb28]

I don't think I've ever expressed a wish for a thread to be closed here, so this is my first time.

This thread just drags on and on and has served it's purpose many pages back.

Max.....how about it?

 

[silcnlayc]

bb28:I don't think I've ever expressed a wish for a thread to be closed here, so this is my first time.

This thread just drags on and on and has served it's purpose many pages back.

Max.....how about it?
__________________

I STRONGLY agree!

.

 

[LaurieJim]

Yawnnnnn

Okay has the jury reached a verdict? Please read the verdict.

Yes, a couple of pages ago.

The OP lost on slots, took remaining balance and played BJ, took BJ winnings and played some more on slots @ $15/spin and won a lot of money. They're not going to see any of these winnings.

So the verdict is in favor of the casino. Case Closed.

Give this case a rest someone, put it out of its misery, i feel for the OP but rules are rules in gambling, a good gambler knows when he's licked and knows when to leave the table awaiting another day and play................laurie

 

[winbig]

where exactly was the verdict given? I don't recall any!

https://www.casinomeister.com/forum...orld-casino-46-034-44.35246/?highlight=winbig


Cliff notes:

Tom:

Hello, events did transpire as WinBig guessed:

While the hand count on Blackjack was relatively low, the winnings enabled mstrike to return to the slots and start hitting the bet max button.

By the way this win was not from a prize pool and so does not affect the jackpots available to our players.

From our terms and conditions:

6. All bonuses carry a wagering requirement that is to be completed on a specific selection of games. Any wagers made on games that are excluded from the wagering requirement before the wagering requirement is completed will result in the bonus and any winnings being void. The player must be aware of and accept these terms and conditions before playing the bonus.

I feel this is very clear and we would not take such extreme action without good reason.

Kind Regards
Tom

Max:

There's no question now: BJ winnings made in violation of the Terms were then used to win the Slots jackpot. As I read the Terms the casino has not applied them unfairly or unjustly. The player's Slots win should be forfeit due to Terms violations.

 

[nitro]

Amen.

 

[skiny]

I would like to add myself to the every growing list of people asking the question: Why are we still discussing this?

 

[maxd]

The stiff is froze, the thread is closed.

 

[Webzcas]

Only 20 pages of posts debating whether or not a guy gets to keep his winings after playing blackjack on a slots only bonus?

I honestly don't know what the hell people are thinking sometimes.

We spend years weeding out the casinos that won't pay us even when we win fair and square. Then we push to have all the vague terms and conditions removed by casinos that are deemed fair and honest so the rules aren't open to interpretation when we do win.

Then we just go ahead and break the rules anyway and expect to get paid?

At what point do we say the casino has done it's part and the player needs to take responsibility for his own actions?

Your post has also saved me from going through 20 odd pages.


Bottom line, if you are going to accept a bonus. Make sure you read the terms and conditions attached to said bonus.

Otherwise you could find yourself experiencing an expensive lesson such as this one.

* Edited to add: Didn't realise the thread was closed! ooopps!