Mr Bet - They Do Not Permit Bonus Round Storing On Slots

[Playford7]

What is there to say other than that he, quite rightly, corrected himself.

Nothing at all mate.
i rest my case.
All the best for your new year, hope you get a skull repeat on danger. Fine hit

 

[Steviedoo]

stupid question...
what’s a bonus hunt?

 

[Playford7]

stupid question...
what’s a bonus hunt?

Getting a bonus mate. Then saving the bonus or multiples of them until you want to play them at the end where funds are at zero.
interlogs mates encouraged this as normal behaviour, but as the thread and almost every single casino terms states ‘in the spirit of the bonus’ it’s against terms.

 

[Playford7]

What is there to say other than that he, quite rightly, corrected himself.

Only as his affiliate manger I spoken to (and still have emails) told him no!
he stopped lying mark.
ill not be brought into it again as certain people like me banned for ‘streamer’ talk...
all the best.

 

[Steviedoo]

Getting a bonus mate. Then saving the bonus or multiples of them until you want to play them at the end where funds are at zero.
interlogs mates encouraged this as normal behaviour, but as the thread and almost every single casino terms states ‘in the spirit of the bonus’ it’s against terms.

Thanks...
can you do this if you do not play with bonus money that needs wagering?

 

[Borgie]

Getting a bonus mate. Then saving the bonus or multiples of them until you want to play them at the end where funds are at zero.
interlogs mates encouraged this as normal behaviour, but as the thread and almost every single casino terms states ‘in the spirit of the bonus’ it’s against terms.

No its not againt the terms if you have made a raw deposit with no bonus attached. You need to let this streamer hatred go or avoid threads that trigger you. It won't end well and you are better than that.

 

[Mr_Slot5]

you mean not with bonus money?

I'm guessing he meant what he said originally

Billy has been quite open/clear on his stream that he has been told by some affy managers that they'd prefer him to play with casino funds rather than real cash.

 

[Kroffe]

Saving bonuses can be fun.
Not sure why he thought he would be allowed to save bonuses for when wagering was over tho.
Its a pretty common abuse.

There are a couple steps to it.

1. Take a nice depositbonus (atleast 100-200%).
2. Play higher stakes than what you usually do (like way higher)
3. Save all bonuses.
4. Bust out.
5. Come back next day with small raw-money deposit and open all saved bonuses.
6. Get plastic surgery and a fake id.
7. Buy an island and live there rest of your life, hiding from the casino hit-squad.

 

[Nicola]

Fuck you and your fucking stupid fucking site. You are all fucking idiots and you have no fucking clue how casino software even works. So shut your idiot mouths!

Wow

I can imagine the way he spoke to player support at Mr Bet!

 

[interlog]

Only as his affiliate manger I spoken to (and still have emails) told him no!
he stopped lying mark.
ill not be brought into it again as certain people like me banned for ‘streamer’ talk...
all the best.

Well, I let will let you into something that I arranged with a casino a few years ago. I used to get the occasional £250 no deposit bonus (usual wagering attached, no limit to cash out) and I could do a bonus hunt with it providing that I opened all of the bonuses with a balance left of at least £5 of that bonus money. I then carried on to attempt to try the wagering.

Maybe (and I don't know this), Nick had a similar agreement with the casino he, at the time, was streaming from.

That was years ago when cash and bonus money wasn't separated like it is now.

 

[L&L-Jan]

Same to you!

kylerowland81@gmail.com
IP 207.228.78.178

Thanks, banned the account(s) just to be sure

Kr. Jan

 

[irish-ranger]

So it is somehow my fault that the brutal online casino has some fine print clause that states you can't save your bonuses? Which does not change the result at all!! Does this seem right to you? I get f8cked cause I never had my lawyer review the ridiculous policy of the bonus itself? What an absolute scam and a joke!

You got fucked because your a cock and didnt read the T@Cs or you intentionally maluipited the bonus..

 

[goatwack]

That was spicy wordage

 

[Bloatgoat]

Whats the avg timespan you have to open your saved bonus game? I know it's accepting and then closing the window. The casino once said to me (not this one) that the bonus has to be accepted in a reasonable amount of time or otherwise it could be forfeited or some shit.

 

[stokes]

1. Take a nice deposit bonus (at least 100-200%).
2. Play higher stakes than what you usually do (like way higher)
3. Save all bonuses.
4. Bust out.
5. Come back next day with small raw-money deposit and open all saved bonuses.

I might be wrong, but I think you misunderstood him. I guess what he meant was the following: he completed the wagering, meaning all the needed wager was done (like all the X 30 or whatever) and more, then he had the saved bonuses. I would not consider this scenario as an abuse (being the wagering completed).

 

[Kroffe]

I might be wrong, but I think you misunderstood him. I guess what he meant was the following: he completed the wagering, meaning all the needed wager was done (like all the X 30 or whatever) and more, then he had the saved bonuses. I would not consider this scenario as an abuse (being the wagering completed).

Its still counted as abuse.
Completing wagering, or busting out makes no difference.
In both cases there is no wagering left to do, so why do you think its not abuse if wagering is completed, but is abuse if busting out?

Collecting coins (btg), vikings (yggdrasil) etc while on a bonus, only to come back later when there is no wagering to buy the bonuses (btg) or play them (yggdrasil) is also abuse.

 

[Mr_Slot5]

Its still counted as abuse.
Completing wagering, or busting out makes no difference.
In both cases there is no wagering left to do, so why do you think its not abuse if wagering is completed, but is abuse if busting out?

Collecting coins (btg), vikings (yggdrasil) etc while on a bonus, only to come back later when there is no wagering to buy the bonuses (btg) or play them (yggdrasil) is also abuse.

Because when you bust out, it often resets wagering to 0 at the casino end. That means the bonuses that were collected basically give you 'free money' free from wager stipulations.

On the other hand, if wager was completed before these bonuses were opened, it makes no odds at the casino end from a fairness point of view as the system won't have been cheated and anything he earned from bonus opening would be his fair and square.

The first scenario is bonus abuse, the second really is not (even though some casinos might try and pull that card).

 

[Borgie]

I might be wrong, but I think you misunderstood him. I guess what he meant was the following: he completed the wagering, meaning all the needed wager was done (like all the X 30 or whatever) and more, then he had the saved bonuses. I would not consider this scenario as an abuse (being the wagering completed).

Only as his affiliate manger I spoken to (and still have emails) told him no!
he stopped lying mark.
ill not be brought into it again as certain people like me banned for ‘streamer’ talk...
all the best.

Sorry you don't get banned for discussing streamers in a calm and reasonable way. You seem to be implying you get singled out while others can slander whoever they want. Just not true.

You are bringing up something that happened years ago. Nick is in his fourth year of streaming i believe so would have been early days. I'm not saying hes an angel by any means but all of us make mistakes. I'd like to think someone would not be hounding me for something i did wrong years ago. When I've watched him bonus hunt in the last year or so he uses a raw deposit and explains why.

Unfortunately you destroy your own arguments with your hatred as it clouds any truth.

I think you are a good guy really but this is your Achilles heel.

 

[Borgie]

Because when you bust out, it often resets wagering to 0 at the casino end. That means the bonuses that were collected basically give you 'free money' free from wager stipulations.

On the other hand, if wager was completed before these bonuses were opened, it makes no odds at the casino end from a fairness point of view as the system won't have been cheated and anything he earned from bonus opening would be his fair and square.

The first scenario is bonus abuse, the second really is not (even though some casinos might try and pull that card).

Agreed ... however numerous casinos have this rule so basically it needs to be adhered to or bye bye money. It's certainly not just this casino.

 

[Kroffe]

Because when you bust out, it often resets wagering to 0 at the casino end. That means the bonuses that were collected basically give you 'free money' free from wager stipulations.

On the other hand, if wager was completed before these bonuses were opened, it makes no odds at the casino end from a fairness point of view as the system won't have been cheated and anything he earned from bonus opening would be his fair and square.

The first scenario is bonus abuse, the second really is not (even though some casinos might try and pull that card).

I agree it makes no difference for the casino.
I guess the rules are there to prevent people thinking scenario 1 is ok.

Aw, i miss bonuses.

 

[Borgie]

I agree it makes no difference for the casino.
I guess the rules are there to prevent people thinking scenario 1 is ok.

Aw, i miss bonuses.

Look at the trouble they cause lol

 

[Kroffe]

Look at the trouble they cause lol

But i have a Phd in the T&C
So im fine as long as i stay away from the thc.
So the FCC won't let me be
Or let me be me, so let me see
They try to shut me down on MTV
But it feels so empty without me

-Kroffinem

 

[mack341]

Nick is in his fourth year of streaming

When's he due to retire? I'll chip in for a leaving present [oh no, that's a bit of a double pun ]

 

[Slottery]

Because when you bust out, it often resets wagering to 0 at the casino end. That means the bonuses that were collected basically give you 'free money' free from wager stipulations.

On the other hand, if wager was completed before these bonuses were opened, it makes no odds at the casino end from a fairness point of view as the system won't have been cheated and anything he earned from bonus opening would be his fair and square.

The first scenario is bonus abuse, the second really is not (even though some casinos might try and pull that card).

Kind of understand and agree casios approach in this. When you leave these bonuses to slot to be played later once wagering is completed or all funds busted which also remove wagering, you most probably can't know if you are able to complete wagering or you going to bust before.

Therefore you leave them there instead of playing them when wagering bonus to avoid winnings from these rounds having wagering requirements. What ever happening first, your aim was get all winnings from bonus rounds without wagering requirement to be able withdraw all winnings right away.

As long bonus terms mention that it's not allowed to build bonus features with bonus money and return after wagering is completed (by playing it through or all balance lost) that's clear for players as well. I don't find in unreasonable or unfair term, and even if it feels like that, it's mentioned in bonus terms (many think that most of bonus terms are unreasonable).

 

[goatwack]

I can see both sides of the argument. but really it makes perfect sense for casinos to abhor these shenanigans.

Given how the 'saved' bonus essentially only came about via bonus funds.

Why would they be deliriously happy at punters storing a batch of bonuses that get paid out as straight cash