How to win at Roulette

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is the ONLY BASIS on any argument I have. PAST RESULTS do NOT dictate the future in a random game. Each spin is a NEW SPIN. A physical roulette wheel in a casino, and a RNG in software both DO NOT have a memory!

Every 'win' you get is based on the fact that probability smiled on you, you are not Nostradamus.

You have trotted out every usual 'roulette system' flaw possible, including now relating it to card games. This is again, ridiculous. Roulette has STATIC probabilities. They never change from one spin to the next. In card games, the probability is shifted every single time a card is used from the deck. They are TWO DIFFERENT animals. The only static probability in cards is selecting ONE card from a full deck. After that, the probabilities start changing. In roulette, numbers are NEVER expunged from the pool available, so the probabilities NEVER change, no matter how you wish they did.

As stated before, you are intoxicated with your luck. Every time you hit a winning spin, you are further convinced YOU predicted that.

And that's just :lolsign:

- Keith

Keith. You have just demonstrated you do not grasp the ZONE at all. Who said anything about SELECTION PROCESS. I told you just the other DAY, the POWER OF THE ZONE IS THE VIRTUAL LIMIT. Nothing else. It just happened that I discovered it for the Dozens. It works for the columns too, and may be applicable for even chances. Straights are plain fools gold, even you should know that.

BUT, No you turn it into an all out war simply because you can't grasp the concept of a VIRTUAL LIMIT. Thats the only reason I said do some testing. Then you wouldn't even dare come on here dis-respecting me like this. You would see for yourself, a losing sequence like this for the DOZENS AND YES THE COLUMNS TOO is a RARE THING. 11,10,14,12,16

But you want to single me out for a daily, have a go at session. I would spend more time checking the above out, who knows that day job you hate could be history in the near future. Now theres a THOUGHT...
 
Keith. You have just demonstrated you do not grasp the ZONE at all. Who said anything about SELECTION PROCESS. I told you just the other DAY, the POWER OF THE ZONE IS THE VIRTUAL LIMIT. Nothing else. It just happened that I discovered it for the Dozens. It works for the columns too, and may be applicable for even chances. Straights are plain fools gold, even you should know that.

BUT, No you turn it into an all out war simply because you can't grasp the concept of a VIRTUAL LIMIT. Thats the only reason I said do some testing. Then you wouldn't even dare come on here dis-respecting me like this. You would see for yourself, a losing sequence like this for the DOZENS AND YES THE COLUMNS TOO is a RARE THING. 11,10,14,12,16

But you want to single me out for a daily, have a go at session. I would spend more time checking the above out, who knows that day job you hate could be history in the near future. Now theres a THOUGHT...

: yawn:

Well, I guess if you're going to make suppositions about my day job... I mean.. lmao. I love my job. I'm aware not many people get to enjoy being paid for what started as a hobby. I used to install multi-line telephone systems (PBX's), and voice mail/IVR systems. I loved that job, too, except many years of crawling through attics and underneath crawl spaces left me suffering from Arthritic pain on a daily basis. I could have easily stuck with it for another 10, maybe even 20 years, but suddenly my hobby of writing software started generating clients. It took about 3 years for the whole transition to completely shift, but I eventually hung up my punch down tool.

I develop corporate website engines. It's different than a graphic artist. My code runs the behind-the-scenes stuff. Since I did it for years for free, I must have obviously loved it. That I get paid extremely good click for it nowadays is just icing on the cake.

So no... I don't need THE ZONE : echo echo echo : to save me. hahaha

I don't need to come on here and disrespect you. You do a fine job at that yourself, and I'd be no competition for your own self-mutilation.

First it was 6 years playing roulette and winning, then it was 11, and now:

[.. snip ..] in the 15 years I've studied the game[.. snip ..]

I mean, you seriously have an issue with facts AND numbers, and it generally appears that you believe numbers can be whatever you want them to be, perform any way that you need them to, and that makes it near impossible to believe anything you say.

From my first posts to these newest ones, my argument has never shifted from the flaw in your selection process. The archived postings are proof of that. I was the very first one to point out that this was a WAGERING strategy. You are the one having a war with the selection process, telling us that all mathematicians are wrong, and you CAN swing probability in your favor by past results. HOGWASH. I love when fools try to switch around what was originally being discussed. It has taken ALL OF THIS TIME, but you are finally starting to admit that selecting dozens isn't magical, and that the wagering strategy is the driver here. I said that 3 days ago, dippy.

I say, with all due respect, you're a bit dense. If you approached SELLING your system as a wagering strategy, and modify it as such, you'd not only have better success at audience attention and retention, you'd find MORE selection processes to attach it to, hence increasing your playable strikes (whilst also increasing your potential losses, which is the game of roulette, period). Wagering strategies are usually quite welcome in any gambling forum, and are about 1000% less controversial than number selection systems. You'll get that eventually, even though you're quite firm in the amount of pain you're willing to endure before you get there.

After 15 years (according to you), you have quite a ways to go before you'll actually understand the game. Every post you make, makes that louder and clearer.

- Keith
 
Whilst the casino offers less than the true odds, you CANNOT WIN over time.

Whilst each spin is random, you CANNOT WIN over time.

You can be disciplined with your bankroll, but unless you can predict the result of the next spin (which you can't),you CANNOT WIN over time.

If we lived closer I wougld buy a roulette table and take your action whenever you want.

I'm almost certain that, like most people who brag about how much they always 'WIN', that you only reveal the details about those winnings and conveniently forget to mention the times they LOSE.

I see it around here quite a lot even from slot players who reckon they are ahead of the game, who think we're all stupid enough to swallow the 'data' they provide to convince us of their gaming superiority - you are no different.

I will admit you have provided me with significant entertainment over the past few days so I thank you for that.
 
Still coming to me aren't you Keith? A year from now you'll learn. Basic understanding isn't your strong point. Even a child would know study and make a living are two different things.You claim to be intelligent but basic concepts pass over your head. Your loss,
 
Whilst the casino offers less than the true odds, you CANNOT WIN over time.

Whilst each spin is random, you CANNOT WIN over time.

You can be disciplined with your bankroll, but unless you can predict the result of the next spin (which you can't),you CANNOT WIN over time.

If we lived closer I wougld buy a roulette table and take your action whenever you want.

I'm almost certain that, like most people who brag about how much they always 'WIN', that you only reveal the details about those winnings and conveniently forget to mention the times they LOSE.

I see it around here quite a lot even from slot players who reckon they are ahead of the game, who think we're all stupid enough to swallow the 'data' they provide to convince us of their gaming superiority - you are no different.

I will admit you have provided me w ith significant entertainment over the past few days so I thank you for that.
Skippy don't even go there you're so stuck in outdated thinking I'm not even going to try to explain how far off you are stay down under.
 
"Skippy" is a derogatory name based solely on my country of origin.

It's an unacceptable racial slur.

I apologize Nifty. After 3 or 4 days of this guy being backed into a corner, he really doesn't have much of a choice but to start getting personal on any level he thinks will push our buttons.

You didn't deserve to be singled out for such a cheap slur that's not only meaningful in a negative way to him, but one he knew would have the same effect as a weapon on an Aussie. Certainly has nothing to do with roulette. Neither did my employment, or about 10 other smoke screens he's tossed out there. There's just some things that we're not going fix in our lifetime. May our children have better luck..

He's desperate, but apparently still has some game left. Let's all just sit back and watch him implode. Thanks for your participation, and even more so for your restraint after that ridiculously unwarranted attack.

- Keith
 
The sequence required to defeat the Zone is so infrequent,RARE I will win hundreds and hundreds of times to every time I Lose it. how much clearer do I have to make it? You Can Say I'm lying, but if you cannot understand that you are either avoiding it for reasons I àm well aware of or just plain stupid.
 
And skippy was the name
of a kangaroo from an Australian tv series racial slur? not hard to see why you are so touchy about realizing roulette can be beaten.

Keith at some point you will just have to admit you were wrong, I love watching you avoid that.There is always a forum bully on every forum about gambling, you just happen to be the one here.
 
The sequence required to defeat the Zone is so infrequent,RARE I will win hundreds and hundreds of times to every time I Lose it. how much clearer do I have to make it? You Can Say I'm lying, but if you cannot understand that you are either avoiding it for reasons I àm well aware of or just plain stupid.

You are saying you can consistently predict the result of a random event,and you are calling US stupid?

:rolleyes:
 
You are saying you can consistently predict the result of a random event,and you are calling US stupid?

:rolleyes:
No I AM. saying A random event rarely produces five losing streaks in. A row for the Zone. Big difference I àm not predicting anything.,I simply discovered a losing limit that Is breached so rarely, it. Can be used to formulate a winning strategy.
 
Can anyone answer these questions for me please?

What are the odds that a dozen will hit?

What odds does the casino offer for a dozen?

If a dozen hasn't hit in 3 spins what are the odds it will hit on the 4th spin?

What odds does the casino offer for hitting a dozen on this 4th spin?
 
Can anyone answer these questions for me please?

What are the odds that a dozen will hit?

What odds does the casino offer for a dozen?

If a dozen hasn't hit in 3 spins what are the odds it will hit on the 4th spin?
What odds does the casino offer for hitting a dozen on this 4th spin?
The. Odds are 2/1 but we are not dealing with the odds of the layout nifty thats where you go off course we are dealing with a rare losing limit of five games until you understand that you won't understand why I. Win...You think I. Mean 5 spins thats where your mis-understanding is. .
 
Keith at some point you will just have to admit you were wrong, I love watching you avoid that.There is always a forum bully on every forum about gambling, you just happen to be the one here.

Keith is in no way like a forum bully, he is very articulate and actually knows how to write intelligently. I also think he is very patient with idiots.

Sentinal, you seem to think it is fine and dandy to disrespect other forum members yet can't take the heat yourself.

This thread has been pretty entertaining for some of us, but let's face it, it is getting old.

Time to stick a fork in it, IMO.
 
The. Odds are 2/1 but we are not dealing with the odds of the layout nifty thats where you go off course we are dealing with a rare losing limit of five games until you understand that you won't understand why I. Win...You think I. Mean 5 spins thats where your mis-understanding is. .

I'm not interested in your theory at this point, hence why I said can "anyone" answer these questions and not "can Sentinel answer these questions and relate them to his theory". :rolleyes:

I just wanted simple answers to my questions, as I don't play a lot of roulette.

The only reasons you don't want to answer are:

1. You don't know

2. You don't want to talk about facts

If someone else could chime in and answer I would be grateful.

Although Sentinel there is one or two questions you could answer - Why are you telling everyone about your personally-discovered 'huge exploit' of a hitherto unbeatable game of chance, and why are you spending so much time here when there is all this money to be made????

C'mon - it's time to flog the website or the book now - you have kept us waiting long enough.....
 
Can anyone answer these questions for me please?

What are the odds that a dozen will hit?

What odds does the casino offer for a dozen?

If a dozen hasn't hit in 3 spins what are the odds it will hit on the 4th spin?

What odds does the casino offer for hitting a dozen on this 4th spin?

On an American wheel, with 0 and 00, the odds are 31.58%. Excluding the 0's, there's 36 numbers, so each number has a 1/36 chance. A group of a dozen is exactly 1/3 of the board, so your chance of hitting a number in a dozen is 33.33%. Adding one or two zeros in the game then changes the game from even to a house edge, hence the lower than 33.33% on any dozen. Although you can play the house's zero(s) in a few combinations, dozens are not one of them. Any zero will immediately cause any dozen wager to lose.

In this game, however, it's not quite that simple, since has been repeated numerous times, no matter how many times an event has happened or not happened, the next spin does not carry this information forward. A roulette Tote Board was an ingenious idea to trick people into playing on past performances. This fallacy lines the house's pockets more than any other 'suggested' number or sequence selection.

If you're asking payout, Dozens pay 2:1, plus the return of your wager. You put $5 down, and if you win, you are given back $15 for a $10 profit.

If a dozen has not hit in 4 spins, or 400 spins, it still has the same 31.58% chance on the next spin.

The payouts do not change depending on how many times a certain sequence has not hit.

Hope those answer some questions...

As to wagering, there's many strategies, but the most popular is a progression based on intended profit. This depends on odds. For outside bets that pay 1:1, you typically will double your bet each time. Here's an example. You place $5 on red, and lose. You expected to profit exactly $5, but you're $5 down now. You bet $10 on the next spin, and lose again. If you had won, you would have made $10, but you were 5 down, so your actual profit would still have been $5, or .5:1. Now you bet $20, and lose again (not at all unrealistic). If you had won, you would have collected $20 profit, but after factoring in the original $5 loss, and then the $10 loss, you still only truly made $5 profit, or .25:1.

As this gets worse, you can realistically be wagering $320 on red (after 6 successive losses, which is STILL very realistic), and if you won, you would have only made $5 total profit. This is a VERY dangerous undertaking, and the risk to reward plummets with each loss and the next wager.

To counter the possibility that the gambler has unlimited funds to keep doubling, all roulette tables have MAXIMUM limits, both for any individual wager, and all wagers combined. Table maximums for physical tables in Vegas are quite generous, but most online software tables have a limit somewhere around 300-500. Once you've hit the limit, you're really done. On a $500 limit evens table, that 320 wager would be your last double up attempt, because your next wager would be $640 (to win $5). If you lost that $320 wager, your total losses for that sequence would be 5 + 10 + 20 + 40 + 80 + 160 + 320, or $635, all gone after 7 losses.

As we move up the odds chart, you don't have to double EACH spin to stay in. For dozens, which pay 2:1 to begin with, you would wager $5. If you won that wager, you'd profit $10. If you lost, you can now wager $10, which is a double. A win would profit $20, minus your last bet, and your profit would be $15, which is better than if you won the first wager. If you lost, we'd move to $15, not a double of $10. You profit would be $30, minus the 5 and 10, for again, a $15 profit. If lost, we move to $20, not a double. Profit would be $40 minus 5, 10 and 15, which would end up back to $10 profit.

You can use a spreadsheet to figure out all of these profit/risk scenarios for the various odds on different wagers. The bottom line remains, as you continue to lose, 2 things happen. You start tickling the table maximum, and you gain very little for such huge risks. This is why people who use ANY type of system are welcome with open arms to any roulette table.

Hope that helps.. and this post was just general in nature, and has NOTHING to do with this Zone crap. I'll let him explain that.

Please visit
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
for more info, and then that site in general is a VERY thorough and FREE education on odds and probabilities. Any gambler should have read that website forwards and backwards several times.

- Keith
 
Last edited:
You guys, there is no way in this wide world that the OP'ster is anything more than a trolling button pusher. My dog understands the math u are explaining and she is a particularly inbred and stupid breed. The OP is just going on and on out of megalomania and the steam our indignant responses have been providing him...

Here this will sooth you...
mukti.jpg
 
Here is an example of the sequence required for me to lose with the zone method. Master the losing streak and you will win far more often than you lose.

DOZEN 1=11--DOZEN 3=14--DOZEN 1=09--DOZEN 2=12--DOZEN 3=21

Now that's hardly rocket science. Maybe if I repeat it everyday for the next five years someone will get it...
 
Last edited:
If you want to reap far bigger returns for a double the last stake until you win bet, do this.......

1). Accumulate an unhealthy amount of cash (kinda defeats the object a bit, but we`re not here to win, just to have fun yes:thumbsup:).

2). Select a race meeting that has an average field of 8-12 horses per race.

3). Bet one = 1 unit on the favourite.

4). If it loses bet two becomes 2 units on the favourite.

5). Bet three becomes 4 units.

Stick to the same race meeting ie:- Newmarket, this will always yield a profit, 100% guaranteed, but like I say, you will need copious amounts of cash, and will have to ride a favourite winning at odds of 10/1 on with a good few hundred k of your cash on it, if you get bored, check a few race meeting cards over a week, some of the results will make your jaw drop ;).
 
If you want to reap far bigger returns for a double the last stake until you win bet, do this.......

1). Accumulate an unhealthy amount of cash (kinda defeats the object a bit, but we`re not here to win, just to have fun yes:thumbsup:).

2). Select a race meeting that has an average field of 8-12 horses per race.

3). Bet one = 1 unit on the favourite.

4). If it loses bet two becomes 2 units on the favourite.

5). Bet three becomes 4 units.

Stick to the same race meeting ie:- Newmarket, this will always yield a profit, 100% guaranteed, but like I say, you will need copious amounts of cash, and will have to ride a favourite winning at odds of 10/1 on with a good few hundred k of your cash on it, if you get bored, check a few race meeting cards over a week, some of the results will make your jaw drop ;).
I don't know horses but if it works for you I'm happy,I will never. Bet on something until I know it works.

I proofed the ZONE on paper for a whole year before I risked a penny on it. When you see a. Losing streak so Rare you really have something. Its not going to be easy changing brainwashed minds, but I'm in no hurry.

A few years down the line people will get That. And if I even Open one players mind I'm. Happy. Patience, I have it in abundance after lunch I'm going to update my state of play...
 
If you want to reap far bigger returns for a double the last stake until you win bet, do this.......

1). Accumulate an unhealthy amount of cash (kinda defeats the object a bit, but we`re not here to win, just to have fun yes:thumbsup:).

2). Select a race meeting that has an average field of 8-12 horses per race.

3). Bet one = 1 unit on the favourite.

4). If it loses bet two becomes 2 units on the favourite.

5). Bet three becomes 4 units.

Stick to the same race meeting ie:- Newmarket, this will always yield a profit, 100% guaranteed, but like I say, you will need copious amounts of cash, and will have to ride a favourite winning at odds of 10/1 on with a good few hundred k of your cash on it, if you get bored, check a few race meeting cards over a week, some of the results will make your jaw drop ;).

Yeah horseracing now we're talking, and I can follow :thumbsup:

Lets see, I can choose races with a certain starting method (harness racing/trotting that's why) and a certain distance, and choose number 5which I know has outstanding results in this type of race.
Then I'll just follow your advice and EVEN BETTER winners with number 5 are more likely to win at odds 10/1 or higher, with exception for them being favorites of course. Nice...:) now all I need is the unhealthy amount of cash, but I could start on a smaller scale. Thanks ;)
 
I don't know horses but if it works for you I'm happy,I will never. Bet on something until I know it works.

I proofed the ZONE on paper for a whole year before I risked a penny on it. When you see a. Losing streak so Rare you really have something. Its not going to be easy changing brainwashed minds, but I'm in no hurry.

A few years down the line people will get That. And if I even Open one players mind I'm. Happy. Patience, I have it in abundance after lunch I'm going to update my state of play...

Hopefully sometime within the week the mods will get to theirs cpus and this thread will close and ur incredibly insightful views will be the stuff of last week...

If I might make a suggestion, U should read this book,

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


Not that it will help ur logic, but one must start somewhere!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top