- Joined
- Apr 4, 2008
- Location
- Texas
I hope you proofed your zone better than you proofed your post.
Casinos
Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
Games
All Games
Bonuses
Popular Bonus Filters
Forums
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Complaints
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Gambling News
Popular News Sections
How to win at Roulette
- Thread starter Sentinel
- Start date
- Status
I hope you proofed your zone better than you proofed your post.
As the months roll by slowly but surely a few of you will start to realize the ZONE really. Has the strike rate and loss limit to turn consistent profits,that over time ammount to a formiddable bankroll that even a 5LOSS cannot destroy...
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2006
- Location
- uk
Gene - is that you?
www.timecube.com
The similarities are striking, both make equal sense.
Once more, please define the word "random" which you are so keen on using, simple request, often ignored. Please.
www.timecube.com
The similarities are striking, both make equal sense.
Once more, please define the word "random" which you are so keen on using, simple request, often ignored. Please.
Da_Gambla
Dormant account
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2007
- Location
- Los Angeles
Look, no one is trying to convince you to stop using : ominous music IN : THE ZONE : ominous music OUT :
As fellow gamblers, we applaud anyone who is successful. As community members, we feel the need to provide ACCURATE information to counter whatever exaggerations or over-exuberance that tend to leak into forum posts. There's a lot of new people trolling through the posts here who need balanced information.
You're speaking to someone who has been playing roulette for well over 10 years. I live 3 hours from Laughlin and 4 hrs from Vegas (with a good tail wind). I am also a computer programmer, so I've played live for real money, and I've developed testing platforms for various strategies. I have an entire system ready to go live in a few months. The difference is, I freely tell people that predicting numbers, or groups of numbers is a worthless endeavor unless you wish to use such `systems` for pure entertainment, and/or a lack of any good numbers or groups on your own.
What I'm trying to say is, if we just analyze your selection process, it's no better than.. say... lining a cat box with a roulette board graphic and playing whatever number your cat craps on. Just being honest here. Probability includes the chance that you WILL WIN. If probability smiles on you, and you walk away before you dump that profit back, you're a smart gambler. That doesn't mean your system worked, or my cat's droppings are the holy grail either.
I didn't come here to disrespect you. It's just that after a few people started adding information to keep things in perspective, you grew louder with your 'ZONE' chant. It got a little weird. That's when we worry you might actually believe your selection process is actually working, versus the reality that your money management is doing the real work. We get concerned with people who start showing delusional signs. Like saying mathematicians have it all wrong... lol.. that was a good one.
Ok, well, you'll be fine. Just walk slow and drink plenty of fluids. Good luck with : ominous music IN : THE ZONE : ominous music OUT :
- Keith
As fellow gamblers, we applaud anyone who is successful. As community members, we feel the need to provide ACCURATE information to counter whatever exaggerations or over-exuberance that tend to leak into forum posts. There's a lot of new people trolling through the posts here who need balanced information.
You're speaking to someone who has been playing roulette for well over 10 years. I live 3 hours from Laughlin and 4 hrs from Vegas (with a good tail wind). I am also a computer programmer, so I've played live for real money, and I've developed testing platforms for various strategies. I have an entire system ready to go live in a few months. The difference is, I freely tell people that predicting numbers, or groups of numbers is a worthless endeavor unless you wish to use such `systems` for pure entertainment, and/or a lack of any good numbers or groups on your own.
What I'm trying to say is, if we just analyze your selection process, it's no better than.. say... lining a cat box with a roulette board graphic and playing whatever number your cat craps on. Just being honest here. Probability includes the chance that you WILL WIN. If probability smiles on you, and you walk away before you dump that profit back, you're a smart gambler. That doesn't mean your system worked, or my cat's droppings are the holy grail either.
I didn't come here to disrespect you. It's just that after a few people started adding information to keep things in perspective, you grew louder with your 'ZONE' chant. It got a little weird. That's when we worry you might actually believe your selection process is actually working, versus the reality that your money management is doing the real work. We get concerned with people who start showing delusional signs. Like saying mathematicians have it all wrong... lol.. that was a good one.
Ok, well, you'll be fine. Just walk slow and drink plenty of fluids. Good luck with : ominous music IN : THE ZONE : ominous music OUT :
- Keith
Da_Gambla
Dormant account
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2007
- Location
- Los Angeles
Please do not put words into my posts that never existed - that's bad.
What I said was, (and it's only one post above your misquote), your selection process is no better than [insert any other selection process here]. I also said that according to probability, any selection process will produce a winner, but it is based on luck. That's fact, and we're not going to argue it. A person's beliefs can ignore facts, and that's what you're choosing to do here for your argument's sake. You believe your selection process has some sort of relevance to the outcome, but it does not. You're arguing beliefs, and I'm siding with facts (as they are inarguable). Anyone who tries to argue with a zealot bent on their beliefs will end up as frustrated as we are at this point. Another fact is, zealot beliefs > facts, no matter how backwards and counter-productive that may be.
Every time you see your selection hit for a win, your belief system is reinforced further, and you become further deeply embedded into the "Gambler's Fallacy" of thinking a random event has become 'overdue', due to it not making an appearance over x number of events.
At some point, you simply will have to come back down to Earth and calm down. Dozens are not special. You can apply the same logic to any other groupings, just adjust the algorithm for the increase or decrease in number of numbers in the group, and you will have similar results.
On one hand, I consider you a bit over exuberant about random events being anything but random. You've gone one step further and suggested that a sub-set of random events is even less random than the other random sub-sets within the game. We're quickly leaving the realm of zealot and approaching bloody mad. There's nothing further to discuss here, lest we just end up repeating what's already been bantered.
Good day, sir
- Keith
Session 1 =QUALIFYING GAME DOZEN 3 SPIN 10
BET 1=WIN SPIN 5 =2 POINTS PROFIT SESSION OVER
CLOSING BANK= 388 POINTS
The value of waiting for a losing dozen before you start is that 80% of your wins will come on the first game. Again a statistic no detractor,sceptics whatever can challenge with a comparable strategy.
Add to that by waiting for that losing game I have already negated 25% of my virtual losing limit of 4 consecutive games.Them you start to understand why I enthuse over this strategy so much later I will go into depth about how we address the worst outcome the strategy can deliver.
I will also talk about superior money management and why less is more.
BET 1=WIN SPIN 5 =2 POINTS PROFIT SESSION OVER
CLOSING BANK= 388 POINTS
The value of waiting for a losing dozen before you start is that 80% of your wins will come on the first game. Again a statistic no detractor,sceptics whatever can challenge with a comparable strategy.
Add to that by waiting for that losing game I have already negated 25% of my virtual losing limit of 4 consecutive games.Them you start to understand why I enthuse over this strategy so much later I will go into depth about how we address the worst outcome the strategy can deliver.
I will also talk about superior money management and why less is more.
Session 1 =QUALIFYING GAME DOZEN 3 SPIN 10
BET 1=WIN SPIN 5 =2 POINTS PROFIT SESSION OVER
CLOSING BANK= 388 POINTS
The value of waiting for a losing dozen before you start is that 80% of your wins will come on the first game. Again a statistic no detractor,sceptics whatever can challenge with a comparable strategy.
Add to that by waiting for that losing game I have already negated 25% of my virtual losing limit of 4 consecutive games.Them you start to understand why I enthuse over this strategy so much later I will go into depth about how we address the worst outcome the strategy can deliver.
I will also talk about superior money management and why less is more. BTW Keith luck doesn't even enter the equation,PERCENTAGES/STRIKE-RATE For find something that consistently delivers a high enough strike rate and common losing limit, and you have the game of ROULETTE tamed. That is EXACTLY WHAT THE ZONE DOES.
BET 1=WIN SPIN 5 =2 POINTS PROFIT SESSION OVER
CLOSING BANK= 388 POINTS
The value of waiting for a losing dozen before you start is that 80% of your wins will come on the first game. Again a statistic no detractor,sceptics whatever can challenge with a comparable strategy.
Add to that by waiting for that losing game I have already negated 25% of my virtual losing limit of 4 consecutive games.Them you start to understand why I enthuse over this strategy so much later I will go into depth about how we address the worst outcome the strategy can deliver.
I will also talk about superior money management and why less is more. BTW Keith luck doesn't even enter the equation,PERCENTAGES/STRIKE-RATE For find something that consistently delivers a high enough strike rate and common losing limit, and you have the game of ROULETTE tamed. That is EXACTLY WHAT THE ZONE DOES.
The zone and money management...
Session 2=QUALIFYING GAME DOZEN 1=09
GAME 1=1,1,2,3=WIN TWO POINTS PROFIT SESSION ENDED
Session 3=QUALIFYING GAME DOZEN 3=14
GAME 1=1,1,2=WIN TWO POINTS PROFIT SESSION ENDED
CLOSING BANK =392 POINTS
Okay I am on a good run at the moment the last 3 days have been all winners in the first game. Experience tells me this won't go on for much longer which leads me to the subject of MONEY MANAGEMENT.
Although another member on here who stated his opinion will never see eye to eye with me on the solid consistency of this strategy. I do agree that MONEY MANAGEMENT plays a big part in its success.
But make no mistake about it, if the STRIKE-RATE didn't exist within the selection process no money management will make it a winning strategy. They go hand in hand. Even more important is my confidence in taking my staking to its highest level when that fourth losing game does eventually hit.
Far from cherry picking the strong points of the strategy to try and lure any win hungry people in. I will tell it to you EXACTLY as it is, and how it pans out week by week. You will see me have losing sessions (Yes I do have them) And you will see how I cope with them. I see them as minor set backs. I can have a losing day overall but I have yet to come out of a week without profit.
And tight money management is key to this fact. Without it even a WINNING STRATEGY can and will lose or at best under perform. I cannot stress that enough.
LEVEL 1 STAKING 1,1,2,3
LEVEL 2 STAKING 2,2,4,6
LEVEL 3 STAKING 4,4,8,12
LEVEL 4 STAKING 8,8,16,24--(Only required 5 times in eleven years)
Above is the staking system employed after each losing game. I seldom have to go beyond level 3 and haven't needed to for 3 weeks now.
The levels aren't designed to recover the whole loss just a percentage of it. The reason being winning far outnumbers losing with this strategy. I know over time all losses will be recovered. How good is the loss limit? It is a phenomenon in my opinion, if you consider that in the 11 years I have played this strategy I have only suffered ONE FIVE LOSS. And witnessed two others (one on an RNG incidentaly which I advise you to avoid at all costs, they certainly are not random in real money mode)
For every 5 or more loss you will have several 100 patterns like this. 11,13--------09,12,11-------10,11,09,18. Contrary to the belief that what happened before has no bearing on what will happen in the future, things in reality simply don't pan out like that. REMEMBER THE LONGER THE WAIT, THE SOONER THE CHANGE. If for example you were to wait for six reds in a row before betting on black And it took 14 spins in total to hit black. You are closer to winning than if you bet on black after another black. There are several virtual limits in roulette. The problem is most aren't usuable in a working everyday strategy. You simply wouldn't get enough play.
That in my opinion is what sets the virtual losing limit for the ZONE apart its only 4 games but very solid and consistent. I say to anyone studying any strategy to beat anything. Don't worry how often it wins be concerned how often it loses. That is what makes or breaks every strategy.
If anyone is curious or interested in knowing anything about this strategy I will be more than happy to ellaborate on it. It has worked for me for 11 years now. Thats why I don't accept it can be just luck or good money management. Its not that simple. All elements must perform to deliver one powerful compound. If you really want to beat the devils wheel. Just try it on paper or computer program. And you will know I am telling you the truth. And mathematicians have missed something in roulette. Its called a virtual limit. Even a game as ramdom as Roulette has a level which it simply cannot pass too often...
Session 2=QUALIFYING GAME DOZEN 1=09
GAME 1=1,1,2,3=WIN TWO POINTS PROFIT SESSION ENDED
Session 3=QUALIFYING GAME DOZEN 3=14
GAME 1=1,1,2=WIN TWO POINTS PROFIT SESSION ENDED
CLOSING BANK =392 POINTS
Okay I am on a good run at the moment the last 3 days have been all winners in the first game. Experience tells me this won't go on for much longer which leads me to the subject of MONEY MANAGEMENT.
Although another member on here who stated his opinion will never see eye to eye with me on the solid consistency of this strategy. I do agree that MONEY MANAGEMENT plays a big part in its success.
But make no mistake about it, if the STRIKE-RATE didn't exist within the selection process no money management will make it a winning strategy. They go hand in hand. Even more important is my confidence in taking my staking to its highest level when that fourth losing game does eventually hit.
Far from cherry picking the strong points of the strategy to try and lure any win hungry people in. I will tell it to you EXACTLY as it is, and how it pans out week by week. You will see me have losing sessions (Yes I do have them) And you will see how I cope with them. I see them as minor set backs. I can have a losing day overall but I have yet to come out of a week without profit.
And tight money management is key to this fact. Without it even a WINNING STRATEGY can and will lose or at best under perform. I cannot stress that enough.
LEVEL 1 STAKING 1,1,2,3
LEVEL 2 STAKING 2,2,4,6
LEVEL 3 STAKING 4,4,8,12
LEVEL 4 STAKING 8,8,16,24--(Only required 5 times in eleven years)
Above is the staking system employed after each losing game. I seldom have to go beyond level 3 and haven't needed to for 3 weeks now.
The levels aren't designed to recover the whole loss just a percentage of it. The reason being winning far outnumbers losing with this strategy. I know over time all losses will be recovered. How good is the loss limit? It is a phenomenon in my opinion, if you consider that in the 11 years I have played this strategy I have only suffered ONE FIVE LOSS. And witnessed two others (one on an RNG incidentaly which I advise you to avoid at all costs, they certainly are not random in real money mode)
For every 5 or more loss you will have several 100 patterns like this. 11,13--------09,12,11-------10,11,09,18. Contrary to the belief that what happened before has no bearing on what will happen in the future, things in reality simply don't pan out like that. REMEMBER THE LONGER THE WAIT, THE SOONER THE CHANGE. If for example you were to wait for six reds in a row before betting on black And it took 14 spins in total to hit black. You are closer to winning than if you bet on black after another black. There are several virtual limits in roulette. The problem is most aren't usuable in a working everyday strategy. You simply wouldn't get enough play.
That in my opinion is what sets the virtual losing limit for the ZONE apart its only 4 games but very solid and consistent. I say to anyone studying any strategy to beat anything. Don't worry how often it wins be concerned how often it loses. That is what makes or breaks every strategy.
If anyone is curious or interested in knowing anything about this strategy I will be more than happy to ellaborate on it. It has worked for me for 11 years now. Thats why I don't accept it can be just luck or good money management. Its not that simple. All elements must perform to deliver one powerful compound. If you really want to beat the devils wheel. Just try it on paper or computer program. And you will know I am telling you the truth. And mathematicians have missed something in roulette. Its called a virtual limit. Even a game as ramdom as Roulette has a level which it simply cannot pass too often...
Last edited:
Nifty29
Dormant account
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2001
The only ZONE this joker is an expert in is The TWILIGHT ZONE.
Time to get back on the meds buddy.
Time to get back on the meds buddy.
all4greed
Now we can do business.
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2004
- Location
- Pacific NW
The Zone, the Zone, oh yeah I remember now...
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2008
- Location
- East and West
This is getting kinda old......
jod5413
Is That Better?
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Location
- somewhere on the planet
I think his Mom might have called him in for lunch and a nap. 
Da_Gambla
Dormant account
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2007
- Location
- Los Angeles
You have perfected this over 11 years... the was even before 9-11. 11 years is a REALLY long time. But you are just now putting together 'test runs' and analyzing 3 weeks of data. Oh, and you want others to start testing it, too...
Some things are just a higher level of LOL than others...
I do not understand your persistence on this boring web forum. You should be partying with Charley Sheen and his porn chicks in Vegas. You are indeed, the Magic Man. Nostradamus! :notworthy A true Rock Star.
To everyone else, please waste no time in getting in as much roulette as humanly possible, as soon as possible. The game will have to be retired due to this flaw that says it's the only random number game that is ultimately predictable.
- Keith
rouletteguy
Dormant Account
- Joined
- May 28, 2010
- Location
- Ontario
A;right I'll step in here (with a name like rouletteguy I must know somthing right)
Sentinel your over selling it your strike rate isnt' 66% it's 33%, 66% would be if you covered 2 dozens and it would only be 66% over a long term situation short term it could be 0% or 100% because of random variance. It's really a simple system as far as systems go. I'm glad your excited and winning, I love it when people win.
Where my problem lies is with the newbie who comes on here with a saved up 200 dollars and a dream to make it grow by gambling and going bust on your " close to the holy grail" system. I've lost a fair bit of cash playing single dozens and wouldn't do it ever again but go for it as long as your luck holds.
That being said I employ strategies myself and a well designed one does IMO help to win more frequently. There is nothing wrong with designing them and putting them into practice to see how well they perform.
THe main problem is if you did (which you don't ) have a 66% success rate then 34 out of 100 people are gonna go bust if they use the zone. then they're gonna be pissed (at you) your gonna spend a tremendous amount of time blah blah blah ing about how they did somthing wrong they're gonna bash you and your crap system to no end and really............what did you accomplish?
Sure didn't convince alot of skeptics your system is awesome did you?
Which is what your trying to do now.
Go join a roulette forum I use the same name (rouletteguy) at a few of them.
There we test and re test many roulette strategies, with many players doing the exact same strategy on numerous wheels.
Yours has been tested.............. it went bust for many...........try somthing new.
Sentinel your over selling it your strike rate isnt' 66% it's 33%, 66% would be if you covered 2 dozens and it would only be 66% over a long term situation short term it could be 0% or 100% because of random variance. It's really a simple system as far as systems go. I'm glad your excited and winning, I love it when people win.
Where my problem lies is with the newbie who comes on here with a saved up 200 dollars and a dream to make it grow by gambling and going bust on your " close to the holy grail" system. I've lost a fair bit of cash playing single dozens and wouldn't do it ever again but go for it as long as your luck holds.
That being said I employ strategies myself and a well designed one does IMO help to win more frequently. There is nothing wrong with designing them and putting them into practice to see how well they perform.
THe main problem is if you did (which you don't ) have a 66% success rate then 34 out of 100 people are gonna go bust if they use the zone. then they're gonna be pissed (at you) your gonna spend a tremendous amount of time blah blah blah ing about how they did somthing wrong they're gonna bash you and your crap system to no end and really............what did you accomplish?
Sure didn't convince alot of skeptics your system is awesome did you?
Which is what your trying to do now.
Go join a roulette forum I use the same name (rouletteguy) at a few of them.
There we test and re test many roulette strategies, with many players doing the exact same strategy on numerous wheels.
Yours has been tested.............. it went bust for many...........try somthing new.
YKeith you say you're into number crunching,isn't it about time to find out if I'm telling you the truth about the virtual t
Keith do the test and then come back and tell me if I'm lying or not,there was a person like you on another forum I posted on when they actually quit ridiculling me went and did some testing,they had to admit I had something,Even though they wouldnt have the discipline to apply it themselves.Its not easy to follow day in day out Keith but,it can be done.You have perfected this over 11 years... the was even before 9-11. 11 years is a REALLY long time. But you are just now putting together 'test runs' and analyzing 3 weeks of data. Oh, and you want others to start testing it, too...
Some things are just a higher level of LOL than others...
I do not understand your persistence on this boring web forum. You should be partying with Charley Sheen and his porn chicks in Vegas. You are indeed, the Magic Man. Nostradamus! :notworthy A true Rock Star.
To everyone else, please waste no time in getting in as much roulette as humanly possible, as soon as possible. The game will have to be retired due to this flaw that says it's the only random number game that is ultimately predictable.
- Keith
3mptyseat
Non-Gambler
- Joined
- May 22, 2010
- Location
- California de Norte
@Sentinel
TY so very much. It's been awhile since I peed myself bc I was laughing so hard. Do you take narcotics? BC, much like roulette, u may experience short term improvements and success, but long term, ur mos.def. gonna lose...
And no one wants you out of here... You are hysterical, stick around.
TY so very much. It's been awhile since I peed myself bc I was laughing so hard. Do you take narcotics? BC, much like roulette, u may experience short term improvements and success, but long term, ur mos.def. gonna lose...
And no one wants you out of here... You are hysterical, stick around.
Da_Gambla
Dormant account
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2007
- Location
- Los Angeles
It's not my job to 'test' every Roulette theory brought to my attention by every delusional idgit on the planet. I have kids, a job, a life, and many other interests outside of gambling.
I never said your system doesn't work for you.
I test whatever I want to test when something INTERESTS me. This does not even qualify as interesting. It's boring. I'm not here to argue it's potential for entertainment. I argued facts as it relates to odds and probabilities. My number one argument remains: Dozens are NOT SPECIAL. They do not behave differently than any other combination of roulette numbers. Period.
You obviously have no idea how much time is involved in actually doing a thorough test of a touted system. To sit and heckle someone into testing your particular bullshite system is about as freaking rude as you could get.
Naw, bro... I think I'll pass on doing any testing at all on this. I have enough life experience to be able to predict the outcome in my head, and that suggests I don't waste any -actual- time going much further. A snipering system can win big, it can lose just as badly. It will do exactly what it's supposed to do: intoxicate those that believe, to the point of trying to force it down other's throats, and then bleeding them dry with a couple of surprise bad runs.
Enjoy your life, ok? It's short.
De Beuker
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2009
- Location
- Netherlands
I dont play roulette much, but this thread is hilarious!
Keith, I'm going to play your catbox system tonight, I'll let you know the outcome.
I feel my cat is going to make me rich!!
Thanks!
EXACTLY THE POINT, there are no surprise runs,you know the loss limit is nearly always that number 4.Again you are scared of finding out as number one you then have to admit you were wrong and mathematicians have overlooked something.I am persistent that's how I conqueered the game in the first place, I am not going anywhere until one decent person with some backbone actually does their homework.THEN, PASSES COMMENT.
Da_Gambla
Dormant account
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2007
- Location
- Los Angeles
Yes, shaking in my boots. Making money generally scares anyone.
The worst that could happen is, I'm wrong? I'd think the millions that are getting away from me would be the worst. I don't get to party with you and Charley in Vegas...
Mathematicians have had these basic concepts under control for hundreds of years, yet they overlooked the fact that Dozens in roulette behave differently than all other random events... hookay.. I'll have whatever you're smoking.
No, no, no... you're extremely annoying. There's a big difference. Every gambler who has gone bust was persistent. That's not necessarily a good trait in this hobby.
This is a respectable Forum full of extremely intelligent and experienced gamblers from all walks. You're not going to find anyone with that much idio... err.. backbone, to sit and test your little system that you have already tested for 11 years.
You still have refused to answer why it needs testing after 11 years. You refuse to answer lots of things. That's typical of a scammer. The only thing we're waiting for is the link to your website with more 'sure win' techniques, or the multiple alt Forum logins you've probably created to come start responding to your own posts.
You really came here thinking we are all this gullible? REALLY??
- Keith
It needs testing Keith because until someone independant of me sees the phenomenon for themselves you will never be able to divorce your thoughts from the layout and the usual maths thinking.You keep highlighting the dozens, I never said the virtual limit was unique to the dozens.That is just the section it was discovered on it may work in other areas too.
I don't think many of you are even grasping what I'm saying here judging by the responses.I was warned I would get this kind of response.Anytime you challenge peoples comfort zone its going to happen.You need to think outside the box or in this case the layout.All the usual arguments about house edge,randomness,laws of probability have no bearing on this phenomenon.The question is who is openminded. Enough to see it.
I don't think many of you are even grasping what I'm saying here judging by the responses.I was warned I would get this kind of response.Anytime you challenge peoples comfort zone its going to happen.You need to think outside the box or in this case the layout.All the usual arguments about house edge,randomness,laws of probability have no bearing on this phenomenon.The question is who is openminded. Enough to see it.
Last edited:
Da_Gambla
Dormant account
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2007
- Location
- Los Angeles
Why the concern for my thought process? Shouldn't YOU be making tons of cash with your system rather than sitting here camping/posting on a Forum? You're not only delusional, your frankly a bit priority-challenged. I've never met a person who was so willing to sacrifice their time making money to reprogram my way of thinking about the laws of probability. You are such a nice guy...
I really don't deserve this... :: actual thought: where the $#^& did I sign up for this?? 
:::: yawn ::
No.. actually, the real question is, why do you insist on shoving something down our throats that we have pondered and already dismissed as not worth our time? You were given a suggestion to go seek out Forums dedicated to roulette systems. You ignored that.
And I have to wonder why...?
It might possibly be that you are afraid of people who dedicate their time to these things, and maybe we at CM aren't quite as sophisticated as they are?
Hmm?
Can you politely piss off now, and just go make money already? Every roulette 'holy grail' system author (and really.. since your system isn't new at all, I use that term in the most loose sense possible) gets 15 seconds of fame on a professional gambling site. You've exceeded that. If you need further responses to your nonsense, please PM me for my Paypal account. I charge by the hour.
Take care now...
- Keith
Nifty29
Dormant account
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2001
This guy is living proof that taking annual vacations at Los Alamos, Three Mile Island and Bikini Atoll are damaging to your health.
- Status
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
-
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!
At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!