How to win at Roulette

[Sentinel]

And no Keith I'm not selling anything,don't want a cent from anyone,I am here to throw a spanner in the works of the way people think and respond to anyone who dare challenge the almighty mathematicians. Something was overlooked,and I'm no fool Keith,I know its going to be a battle to get even one person to take what I'm saying seriously.

But in the words of one of your greatest presidents. We choose to do these things not because they're easy, but because. They ARE HARD...

 

[Sentinel]

@Sentinel


TY so very much. It's been awhile since I peed myself bc I was laughing so hard. Do you take narcotics? BC, much like roulette, u may experience short term improvements and success, but long term, ur mos.def. gonna lose...

And no one wants you out of here... You are hysterical, stick around.

Show me how im going to lose when I win hundreds of times to every 5 loss or in laymans terms for every 1000plus points I win I. Lose 101

 

[Sentinel]

Why the concern for my thought process? Shouldn't YOU be making tons of cash with your system rather than sitting here camping/posting on a Forum? You're not only delusional, your frankly a bit priority-challenged. I've never met a person who was so willing to sacrifice their time making money to reprogram my way of thinking about the laws of probability. You are such a nice guy... I really don't deserve this... :: actual thought: where the $#^& did I sign up for this?? ::



:: yawn ::

No.. actually, the real question is, why do you insist on shoving something down our throats that we have pondered and already dismissed as not worth our time? You were given a suggestion to go seek out Forums dedicated to roulette systems. You ignored that.

And I have to wonder why...?

It might possibly be that you are afraid of people who dedicate their time to these things, and maybe we at CM aren't quite as sophisticated as they are?

Hmm?

Can you politely piss off now, and just go make money already? Every roulette 'holy grail' system author (and really.. since your system isn't new at all, I use that term in the most loose sense possible) gets 15 seconds of fame on a professional gambling site. You've exceeded that. If you need further responses to your nonsense, please PM me for my Paypal account. I charge by the hour.

Take care now...

- Keith

Priority challenged,Keith it takes me less than an hour a day to make my living from the zone. Yes,I have plenty of time,and remember whose thread you are on before you start politely telling anyone to pee off.

 

[Sentinel]

Results update

Okay here is the state of play for Thursday Jan 27th

Session 1 QUALIFYING GAME DOZ 3=19

GAME 1=1,1,2=2 POINTS PROFIT SESSION ENDED

Session 2 QUALIFYING GAME DOZ 1=10

GAME 1=1,1,2,3=7 POINTS LOST Eventual hit DOZ 2=16

GAME 2=1=4 POINTS PROFIT SESSION ENDED

Session 3 QUALIFYING GAME DOZ 2=12

GAME 1=1=4 POINTS PROFIT SESSION ENDED

CLOSING BANK =395 POINTS

Well it happened as expected today saw the end of my winning streak of 10 games. With a double loss in session two. When this occurs I take the stakes to level 2 (2,2,4,6) In the following session. To make back the loss. Its uncommon to suffer two double losses in one day. Incidentally a point is worth £20 English pounds to me. So today I made £60 English pounds.

When I started the strategy 11 years ago a point was worth £1. I could win more but I don't get greedy, another reason my bankroll will always remain unchallenged even if I had 5losses everyday for a fortnight. Which will never happen so rare is the sequence. That is why I advocate a bankroll of 15 to 20 times your level one stakes minumum. 30 times and forget about it. You are never going to go bust.

There is a saying talk quitely but walk with a big stick. And that is exactly what you do with your bankroll, you look for no more than a 2 or 3 percent increase on a daily basis...

 

[Da_Gambla]

remember whose thread you are on

I didn't know individuals 'owned' threads on this forum. I'd have to check with Bryan on that one.

I asked you to piss off, not pee off, and it was meant towards you trying to cajole everyone in this thread to prove you wrong over and over, when in reality, the burden of proof isn't on us at all. In addition, we have rejected the `proof` you have been posting, because it's unverified, and there's no way we can see your losses. I'd like to trust you, but frankly, you seem about as untrustworthy as I've seen in awhile.

You have failed as a salesmen. You cannot even GIVE something away. This forum has nearly 16k registered users. This thread has in excess of 760 views, and not ONE soul has been appreciative enough for your free system to even give you ONE thanks. Need I go on? Your performance so far speaks for itself...

But let's just go ahead and go on..

You registered here on May 22nd of LAST YEAR, and made a ZONE thread at that time:
https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/threads/how-to-win-at-roulette-the-zone.38048/

You were laughed out of that thread in one day, Mr. Persistence. You did not come back until Jan 21st, at which point you joined another roulette thread, then started this thread a few days ago.

What's interesting, is this from your first post in May:

Hello to all I am Sentinel, I have been making a living from the game known as roulette for 6 years.

Then you come back here 8 months later, post the SAME thing, but it has magically increased from 6 years to 11 years.

I am starting this thread to illustrate how I have been beating the game of Roulette for 11 years now.

Now, I repeat, please kindly piss off. Your 15 secs has been up for a few days now.

Thanks...

- Keith

 

[Sentinel]

I'm not here to make friends or get a pat on the back,going against the grain doesn't win any popularity contests.The only reason you can't leave this alone is your fragile ego.If I am right which I am it means you have been believing in flawed theories all these years.And thats going to be a bitter pill to swallow So again I didn't come here to be your or anyone elses pal.I came here to let it be known roulette isn't unbeatable as all the maths-heads would have the gullible believe.

And when someone who really wants to learn something about gambling,opens their mind.They will come to realize this too,not because I say it,but because they will prove it to themselves on paper first and then with a modest starting bankroll.When the proof is irrefutable to them.This might take years but I'm in no hurry. AND I have indeed been making a living from the strategy for now going on 7 years, I. Started playing it for real 11 years ago and reached a level where I. Could. Sustain myself from the. Strategy in. 2004.

So don't think your lame attempts to bully me off this forum are going to Work. Continue to believe in flawed maths theories by all means, but have the decency to allow me to have my say.

 

[rouletteguy]

As I said in a previous page on this thread your "ZONE" roulette system has been tested by countless roulette professionals ( yeah yeah I know no such thing but playing for years needs recognition) It totally went bust didn't even really get much of a "may just need tweaking" response.

SO if you wish you may continue to reject my reality and substitute your own
whatever turns your crank.

Now we had a respected member post his roulette system awhile back which I gave a whirl and would vouch for as having potential ( Isn't that right Stacey Lee) (wink wink nudge nudge) but this one is like a nag horse who can't get out of the starting gate, possibly the rails are holding it up.
best to put her down so she doesn't suffer.

So again.........been tested by many...........went bust............try somthing new if 66 % had of had success I would make that public knowledge but buddy...........nope hardly any said it held very long.

 

[Sentinel]

Rouletteguy nobody has tested the strategy as I Play it,get your facts straight Some people put it into a million spin simulator where they just flat bet every qualifying dozen without waiting for. A losing trigger.That is no good. I bet you or they don't even know what the virtual limit refers too.Nice try but,until someone mirrors my play method ON A LIVE WHEEL no one has tested anything..

 

[Nifty29]

Sentinel - there is NO point having a doctor prescribe you meds if you aren't going to TAKE them.

 

[Sentinel]

How's the cricket going skippy lol

 

[Sentinel]

At last we have peace in the valley. Today I'm going to illustrate where the skill lies in roulette by drawing. A comparison with. A. Game no one will argue involves some degree of. Skill. In the game of poker a player Can lose several hands and still beat everyone at. The table. HE/SHE achieves this by either having a. Royal. Flush at the right time or being àn extremely good. Bluffer, raising the stakes at. The perfect time.

On roulette there is no bluffing, but a virtual limit is as close to a perfect hand as you will get.When I have been pushed to the limit,I will risk up to ten times my normal stakes.Little my version of an all in, and its taken me years to build up this confidence.

When you see something behave the same way over and over again that confidence comes.Once you can divorce yourself fron the layout which isn't beatable.And approach the game from a fresh angle you begin to see other possibilities.

99.9% of people who play roulette try to. Beat the layout.And of course they fail.What they don't think about is what makes them. Lose in the first. Place. THE LONG LOSING STREAK.That is what a gambler must overcome. With the zone a long losing streak is virtually non-existent, so rare is a sequence of even 5 losing games, it. Is the reason for my success with the strategy. Show your strategy has nothing until you are in control of the losing streaks it. Can potentially deliver.

 

[swampwitch]

Small, ever-so-slight derail...And the following is in no way a slight against you personally, but...

Are you aware that the way you punctuate, with the periods in odd places, makes your writings come across as the written equivalent of a William Shatner as Captain Kirk impression?

 

[Nifty29]

Small, ever-so-slight derail...And the following is in no way a slight against you personally, but...

Are you aware that the way you punctuate, with the periods in odd places, makes your writings come across as the written equivalent of a William Shatner as Captain Kirk impression?

Yes, but at least Kirk was on this planet occasionally .....

 

[StaceyLee]

Sentinal, I'm one of the newbies so I still wear a gullible cap and will always look at something that is new to me. Roulette Guy is right though when saying a good strategy was posted on this site a while back. I happened to be in the right place at the right time for this and I have consistently used betting strategies based on the 111 spin theory and I comfortably result in profit over loss. It's when I deviate and through sheer stupidity try something new in real play before fully testing it, or I get impatient and greedy, that I come unstuck and occasionally fall into the pit of doom.

My problem is curiosity as sometimes the 111 spin strategy can be a tad "boring" to play and lets face it, we all have days where boring just isn't on the menu. So I pop in from time to time to see what else has landed on the shelf.

I do actually "get" what you are trying to say and after having had a look at the zone and tweaking it, I have been number crunching. A long way to go yet, but I have to say that by waiting for 5 # to not hit a dz, then betting the 1,1,2,3 for 4 spins does result in enough hits vs loss to set a target, achieve it and get out of that set, even when 4 wins are needed to recoup the loss and add to the kitty. When a loss does occur on a dz no more bets are made until the dz strikes again to avoid the possible 20+ streak.

I know this sounds like a newbie having a look at the classics - martingale, labouchere, etc but I have crunched enough to get past the stage where the strategy usually fails and gets to live happily ever after in the bin.

So I will continue to crunch this one and either end up being the one in a million that it works for, besides yourself, or it will be dumped. Best of luck to you mate and I hope it continues to provide you with a comfortable living. Always great to have a roulette thread pop up.

P.S. Don't get too comfortable with your wins on the cricket pitch and start betting there coz ya will do ya dough!

Cheers
StaceyLee

 

[Sentinel]

Stacey lee start waiting for A losing game to. Trigger your bet and watch how much more you win.You will average 8 - 9 winning games out of 10, and Can enjoy streaks of more than 12 before you hit 2 losing games in. Patterns like this DOZEN ONE 12__DOZEN TWO 14.Tighten up and you will see how I win...

 

[Sentinel]

Small, ever-so-slight derail...And the following is in no way a slight against you personally, but...

Are you aware that the way you punctuate, with the periods in odd places, makes your writings come across as the written equivalent of a William Shatner as Captain Kirk impression?

Amazing I'm showing you how to beat roulette hands down and you're concerned about my punctuation.Little wonder why I will always have the game available to profit from.

Yes haven't quite got the hang of this Android keyboard. But I've got plenty of time to suss it out ROLLS EYES...

 

[Sentinel]

Small, ever-so-slight derail...And the following is in no way a slight against you personally, but...

Are you aware that the way you punctuate, with the periods in odd places, makes your writings come across as the written equivalent of a William Shatner as Captain Kirk impression?

Amazing I'm showing you how to beat roulette hands down and you're concerned about my punctuation.Little wonder why I will always have the game available to profit from.

Yes haven't quite got the hang of this Android keyboard. But I've got plenty of time to suss it out ROLLS EYES...

 

[StaceyLee]

After a quick think and look at sims I get how you wait for the 1st trigger in your strategy. I have been recording 111 spins in 20 spin rows for 7 months and although the dz's can come out close there are many, many occasions where only 1-2 #'s hit a dz in 20 spins. Never have I seen, to this day a dz have no hit in 20 spins - but it will appear for the records one day!

In one batch of sims I did on the Zone I was only placing a bet in the beginning of each 20 spins to avoid being caught in the trap of landing a 20 spin with only 1 hit in a dz i.e. 19 spins without a dz hitting resulting in a quick 2,3 or 4 losses in a row, resulting in loss target reached and Zone sucks!

Your theory of waiting for a dz to not hit for 9+ before commencing stage 2, and then engaging the stage 3 betting sequence, certainly takes care of the burn out of bankroll and/or target loss for the day.

I like it! Back to the sims with this one!

Cheers
StaceyLee

 

[Sentinel]

Its the best way STACYLEE one you have removed 25% 0f your virtual losing limit of four in a row and two the strike rate is superb.Follow this method religiously and you'll understand why I consider the mindset of the masses WRONG...

 

[swampwitch]

Amazing I'm showing you how to beat roulette hands down and you're concerned about my punctuation.Little wonder why I will always have the game available to profit from.

Yes haven't quite got the hang of this Android keyboard. But I've got plenty of time to suss it out ROLLS EYES...

Oooooooo, Android! Fancy schmancy. Well, anyone who consistantly conquers over all mathematic principles, and quite possibly time and space itself, deserves to compose posts in the style of any over the top hammy actor they want.

 

[Sentinel]

Stacylee don't concern yourself too much about the length of a losing streak for a dozen. I. have seen many 20 plus streaks in the 15 years I've studied the game and even some 30 plus streaks.Once it passes the Zone its just another losing game whether it hits on spin 9 or spin 29...

 

[Sentinel]

Don't look NOW swampwitch made a funny...

 

[Da_Gambla]

At last we have peace in the valley. Today I'm going to illustrate where the skill lies in roulette by drawing. A comparison with. A. Game no one will argue involves some degree of. Skill. In the game of poker a player Can lose several hands and still beat everyone at. The table. HE/SHE achieves this by either having a. Royal. Flush at the right time or being àn extremely good. Bluffer, raising the stakes at. The perfect time.

On roulette there is no bluffing, but a virtual limit is as close to a perfect hand as you will get.When I have been pushed to the limit,I will risk up to ten times my normal stakes.Little my version of an all in, and its taken me years to build up this confidence.

When you see something behave the same way over and over again that confidence comes.Once you can divorce yourself fron the layout which isn't beatable.And approach the game from a fresh angle you begin to see other possibilities.

99.9% of people who play roulette try to. Beat the layout.And of course they fail.What they don't think about is what makes them. Lose in the first. Place. THE LONG LOSING STREAK.That is what a gambler must overcome. With the zone a long losing streak is virtually non-existent, so rare is a sequence of even 5 losing games, it. Is the reason for my success with the strategy. Show your strategy has nothing until you are in control of the losing streaks it. Can potentially deliver.

Once again, this is boiling FURTHER down to how to play the selection. The `wagering method` here can be applied to any selection process with some tweaking. The flat out FACT, that you even admit, is that if you just played your selection each time, it would have losing streaks. It absolutely must be used in conjunction with the wagering/progression strategy.

At the end of the day, there is so much work waiting for all the `conditions` to be met for a strike, that you might as well go out and get a real job. You're not winning free money, you're -working- for it.

An actual roulette system doesn't need all these condition complications. Once exceeded, they aren't a system any longer, but work. This is EXACTLY why if someone was to test this and hit a losing pattern that made them wary, you'd start telling them they're 'playing it wrong', which then obviously means they need you to sit next to them and let them know exactly every decision you'd make with each wager once a strike was available.

Again, this isn't a system. Again, your sequence selection is no better than any others. It's all in the wagering once probability smiles on you, and when you walk away. It's much much more simple then you are making it out to be.

Roulette is one of my favorite pastimes, and I do very well at it. The technique is in the wagering combined with the luck of your selections. It will never be anything else.

I'm also now reading your drivel with Capt. Kirk's voice in my head. I almost pissed myself laughing... dammit Witchipoo... some things can't be unseen once you've seen them!!

- Keith

 

[Sentinel]

The NAME of the game is PROFIT keith, system, method ,strategy who cares? THE GAME OF ROULETTE IS BEING BEATEN. And there is little Work to be done once you understand the simple concept. Log on trace back the history bar and sit back chill, watch a Charley Sheen flick. And once your trigger game shows you commence. If you consider that too much to take on then I have to wonder what you call EASY??

Who was it that just the other day said LIFE IS SHORT? Couldn't agree more with you, which is why we need to have as much time for ourselves as possible. The Zone gives me the freedom to live as I please, not march to the beat of some greedy uncaring companies drum. As I DID for many years.

 

[Da_Gambla]

Log on trace back the history bar

This is the ONLY BASIS on any argument I have. PAST RESULTS do NOT dictate the future in a random game. Each spin is a NEW SPIN. A physical roulette wheel in a casino, and a RNG in software both DO NOT have a memory!

Every 'win' you get is based on the fact that probability smiled on you, you are not Nostradamus.

You have trotted out every usual 'roulette system' flaw possible, including now relating it to card games. This is again, ridiculous. Roulette has STATIC probabilities. They never change from one spin to the next. In card games, the probability is shifted every single time a card is used from the deck. They are TWO DIFFERENT animals. The only static probability in cards is selecting ONE card from a full deck. After that, the probabilities start changing. In roulette, numbers are NEVER expunged from the pool available, so the probabilities NEVER change, no matter how you wish they did.

As stated before, you are intoxicated with your luck. Every time you hit a winning spin, you are further convinced YOU predicted that.

And that's just :lolsign:

- Keith