the OP burned his chances with us because of his repeated Forum Rules violations regarding multiple accounts AND because he was previously found to be a fraudster
He defrauded a previous casino? Why was he not banned at the time?
the OP burned his chances with us because of his repeated Forum Rules violations regarding multiple accounts AND because he was previously found to be a fraudster
I am not assuming anything, I have based what I have said here on the OP's original first post. ... It just does not stack up.
If the OP has submitted false identity documents, bogus bank details & tried to use casinomeister in order to get a payout previously through such practice & this was a clear repeated attempt then it is quite damning ....
He defrauded a previous casino? Why was he not banned at the time?
KYC documents failed
The player failed to supply in due time the notary certified identification documents, the documents he delivered have failed the internal fraud scrutinity. The subject has also been discussed with Max and Bryan. Therefore we have decided to close the account of the player and refund his initial deposit.
Grand Duke Casino
@topoor and VWMAgain with "OP said" stuff. THE OP IS A FRAUDSTER!!! WTF cares what he says why would anyone believe it anyway? Besides which -- as previously mentioned -- there's more to this than you can or will know. There were multiple depositing accounts involved, etc etc. If you want to have access to such details so you can speak from an informed position as opposed to guesses and fraudster info that you've been using so far then either send your resume to Bryan and suggest he fire me and hire you OR start your own complaints service and fill your boots. The point is that there is lots of PAB info that has not nor will it ever be shared, it's not the function of the PAB process to gather your opinions, and it's not a committee process.
Bryan has the case details, he looked at the case and dropped the axe on the OP (as would have I), and if you want to question his decisions then I suggest you PM him with same. BS speculations here on the forums regarding a case which you have no real information on is just that, BS. Enough already
All of it Nifty. Has the notary been contacted?
This has cleared things up.
Until now, the impression has been that the PAB went in favour of the casino. The OP has also been making this claim elsewhere (that Max found in favour of the casino), whereas it now seems that the PAB was halted due to serious violations of forum rules, and was not decided in favour of either party, meaning the casino wins by default. The OP is also claiming that it was the discovery of a couple of previous forum accounts that he had "hardly used" that had made all the difference.
The other problem is that the casino itself looks like a rogue that has managed to pull the wool over the eyes of both Max and CM.
This wasn't helped when the rep for "Grand Duke" butted in with this:-
This made me wonder why Grand Duke (a known rogue pit resident) had this level of detail for an issue involving Casinoseiger, a totally different casino based in a completely different jurisdiction.
If the two are related, then Casinoseiger is likely to be pulling the same stunts as Grand Duke. The rep never came back to answer the question as to why he was making the "official statement" on the issue of the OP failing KYC. It also places a question mark over the integrity of the evidence coming from the casino during the PAB.
This will be something to remember should a forum member not previously busted for fraud encounter the need to PAB against Casinoseiger.
As for the industry, it seems the notary system they rely on has been compromised in some way, even though this didn't get past casinoseiger. The OP has named the notary they used, and with this incident has demonstrated that at best notaries can be fooled, and this isn't just an issue for casinos, it's one of grave importance for many other industries where notaries are relied upon to verify documents related to very high value transactions. At worst, he has revealed a "bent" notary that other fraudsters may also be using.
The current weakness is that casinos tell players to find a notary, which could be anyone legally able to perform the task. Instead, the industry should consider drawing up a list of notaries that they have vetted, and are prepared to trust with regard to player KYC issues, and get players to select on from this list with the guarantee that the casino industry already has a working relationship with them, and that they know what is wanted by the industry when notarising a players' documents.
I have also discovered that in the UK, major branches of the post office can notarise documents, a service actually classed as "making a certified true copy" of an original document such as a passport or driving license. This is what most casinos are really after when they say "get it notarised", and the fee at the post office is a mere £7.15, not the £75 or £100+ that others are encountering when going to the legal firms for the service.
Since your comprehension skills are, by your own admission, poor....here is a clue:
I couldn't care less whether or not this player was done wrong by the casino, or if the casino is in the right - whether or not he has provided faked ID docs, or if he is as legit as the Queen of England. I don't give a toss. What I know for a fact is that he lied to me - and that he violated the forum rules, and he has committed fraud against this forum.
A quote from CM himself.
The OP might be totally innocent. Judging by his past, I would say he most like is NOT....but hey I don't have ALL the facts.
Bottom line...the OP gave up his right to a PAB when it was discovered he is a FRAUDSTER. What he does now....well I don't give a rat's arse and I'm sure a lot of others don't either.
If you want to contact him and take up his cause...go for it Perry Mason. NO evidence gathered during the PAB process is going to be shared with YOU or anyone else, so get over it.
Why don't YOU contact the notary Oh, and BTW, if the OP had multiple accounts etc or other information that didn't match, or matched other accounts, all the notaries in the World won't help him. If you have 5 accounts, and can prove one of them, it doesn't mean you get paid LOL.
Please don't insult me again. There is no admission that my skills are poor. Are you gay? Your forum name means fag which is another word for homosexual. Not nice to play on names is it.
The notary is registered with The Law Society and register of notaries if they are fake it is a very serious issue. This issue has gone beyond the PAB.
It is also important to ascertain the validity of the casinos claims for all players. Cm does not like tolerate fraud from players or casino.
Which parts of this paragraph...in particular the bolded parts...are you having trouble reading and comprehending?
All of it Nifty.
Please don't insult me again. There is no admission that my skills are poor. Are you gay? Your forum name means fag which is another word for homosexual. Not nice to play on names is it..
Having trouble comprehending doesn't mean I can't read. It means I find it difficult to understand what I'm reading because it doesn't make sense. A bit like your posts.
So I'm a child and a homophobe now? Well done.
I didn't say being gay was an insult. Seems like your comprehension could do with some help if anyone's could.
What is fraud to the reasonable man? Is it:
A) Having two chat forum accounts
B) a casino refusing to pay out to a winning punter
Pretty obvious surely.