I agree Lojo -
No matter how you look at it, it matters not how much negative feedback a casino gets. Anytime they get a whim to pay a few players, it's going to get posted and that will generate some players willing to go back. That essentially means that every single person owed money by a casino is a potential involuntary shill and spokesperson for that casino. No matter if your post is filled with 10 thousand negative things and you swear you will never do business there again, it still says "I got paid" in there. Someone will read it and go deposit.
Some of you folks have gotten really personal with the OP, and maybe there's some history behind some of it. Most of it, however, seems to just be based on this boycott theory.. so I ask, do any of you truly believe a botcott adhered to by all CM members would result in a casino going out of business? That's a stretch for me... I mean, honestly, I would think that the amount of players at such a casino being CM members (especially a listed Rogue group) would be infinitely small. The rest would be people who probably have no idea a place like this exists. People get screwed over every day with no recourse, but I digress... my point here is that at best, CM serves as a force for change. I don't believe the absence of players from CM will put a casino out of business. I believe that once a casino would like to attract the consumer force within CM, they will make the appropriate changes.
I have been in the position of the aggressor towards someone I believed was doing real damage. The difference between this situation and my tiff with AllAmericans dotcom is that in this situation, we have an individual player. In the AllAmericans dotcom situation, we had a business entity. Not only did we have a business entity, we had an individual aggressively trying to move his business forward utilizing false information directed at the uniformed and desperate. I found that to be 100 times more potent for doing harm.
Although I risk be labeled hypocritical, it is my wish that anymore personal jabs at this individual end. Was his depositing at a Rogue casino selfish? Maybe.. but it is his money and he is not (so it appears) trying to convince anyone else to deposit there. He keeps repeating that he just wanted to share the original issue causing him anxiety. He believed he was posting within a peer group speaking a similar language, but he didn't bargain for how the thread ended up. I don't like what he did, but I can't hate him for it either.
I always thought the various lists of dodgy establishments were recommendations for you to avoid, not that they were actual boycott and pickett demands. Nonetheless, people cross pickett lines all the time, and even though they do, the two parties in the dispute usually sort it out anyways. The pickett crosser becomes insignificant.
Anyone with any level of intelligence will read all of your responses and avoid this casino/group. You have done your job by providing the opposite point of view; in spades. Now let this man go get piss drunk and celebrate...
With the respect due to all of you,
- Keith