Unless you want to risk a PAB being banned, best to let the dust settle before addressing any points that relate to your PABI wanted to reply to Eanske but I am not sure if I am allowed to discuss this matter while I have an ongoing PAB.
I think Eanske has been sent by Cbet or is a staff of Cbet. He sounds exactly like them.
... your settlement statement requires the player to have internet content removed AS A PREREQUISITE to him receiving the monies he is owed. That is blackmail because you are withholding his money until he does what you demand of him.
For instance, at Casinomeister we don't remove threads because a casino doesn't like them. We can update them, mark them "Resolved" and post in the thread that the player was paid if that was in fact the case. But deletions are not something we normally do.
In this particular case the player has asked us to delete the thread on the grounds that he won't get paid in full if he does not get threads deleted. As you may imagine we don't want to be the one reason the player isn't paid so as a one time courtesy to this player we would delete the thread.
However, I will then have no choice but to alert our readership as to the underhanded actions of your casino in a Casinomeister Warning (Casinomeister Warnings). And those are part of the permanent record.
So, either you require the original thread to be deleted in order for the player to receive his money or you do not. Which is it?