...loyalty is not created if the casino constantly will do whatever they can to delay or prevent withdrawals...
Indeed. Loyalty is created in any market by meeting - or exceeding - a customer's expectations. If the "majority" prefer to have their money held for 2 days after withdrawing in an accessible state, then let the "majority" have that. But if the "minority" would prefer not to have their wad sitting their waving at them, then I feel they should respect that too.
Sending an email saying the customers want it (which I've had several times before) just assumes I am a bit stupid but there you go. Like I'm gonna sit there and go "
Oh right. It must be me then. Sorry, I'll change my outlook totally and stop being so unreasonable in future". You don't expect them to admit they do it wrong after all and it's no great shakes: there is so much choice out there now, I just closed the account. To be fair I was only testing them but still, if that's how they treat customers then it doesn't bode well (and in case they were wondering, no they won't be appearing on my websites LOL).
The point about saving money on processing has to be a consideration for a casino - after all, it is a business. Some businesses will choose to - may even need to - put financial considerations ahead of the customer but I can't help but feel it's a false economy based on a short-term outlook. A casino who argues they make more money with longer reverse times will ultimately not be attractive to a lot of players.
Judging from the poll so far, it seems that having a reverse time and offering a flush option strikes a happy medium, although I've still come across casinos that take 12 hours to respond to a flush request LOL, which kind of makes it a pointless service. Personally I like my Virgins(!), Bet365's and 32Reds where when I cash out, that's it - it's done.
Like
Skiny says: that's what a real casino should do.
@
Tirilej. It wasn't Jackpot Capital or an RTG - it was an MG.