I think you must have forgotten the post (which you liked) in this thread where i said:
The DOA stats, and the fact it's now allowed at some casinos, means they have probably (not definitely) turned down the volatility.
I have seen data, in this thread (and in others) which supports the fact that they have probably limited the max liability, or certainly made the stupidly high wins come out less often.
I have not, anywhere, pleaded ignorance for them changing the maths on DOA - i HAVE however said that i very much doubt Starburst has changed, and i'm told RR and MZ have not changed.
Starburst is a cash cow for NetEnt - there are very very few business reasons that make sense to change it. That doesn't mean it HASN'T changed, it just means on the balance of probability and based on my knowledge and experience i find it highly unlikely. But nothing is impossible. NetEnt have made some shockingly bad games in the last few years, so nothing would surprise me in all honesty.
If you're going to call me out, at least get what i've said correct