- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
Well the record of having the most possession ( 78.8% ) in a World Cup match without scoring a goal is coming home to England.
World Cup 2026 World Cup 2026 - USA/Mexico/Canada
- Thread starter Webzcas
- Start date
- Featured
-
- Tags
- world cup 2026
World Cup 2026
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2012
- Location
- UK
Scotland appear to be going home, yet again not cracking the group stages, after every result last night went against them, need a miracle from the remaining games to not be a bottom-4 3rd place finisher.
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
To be honest, Brazil or not, Scotland were shockingly awful against them and don't deserve to qualify for the last 32 - Which after the results played out last night, I doubt they will.
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
It really does not want to come home, does it?
England should get past Congo but have a hard match in the last 16 if Mexico get through. They have home advantage plus I was seeing a lot about the high altitude playing in Mexico.
That match will be at 1am on a Monday if it happens
Have to say that Congo could be much better than expected as they drew 1-1 with Portugal and only lost 1-0 to Colombia.
Argentina look to have an easy run to the semis on paper.
Little but suspicious if you ask me as there weren't really any shocks with the group winners except maybe USA topping their group as Turkey completely flopped
Shame Netherlands/Morocco is at 2am, will probably be a great game.
Edit: Just noticed that Canada don't get to play any more games in their own country. Their match tonight is in LA! Bit odd if they are a host. Mexico get last 32 and 16 in Mexico and USA stay home too however far they go.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
I am in London on Tuesday and staying up there for the night. Won't be home until just an hour before kick off on Wednesday, if that is my train is not delayed.
If it is, just hope the 5/4g signal is good as will have to watch it on my phone.
Yeah playing in Mexico City at altitude in the last 16 is a worrying prospect, even more so if it is indeed Mexico, who have good recent form of late.
But we cannot look past Congo, even though on paper it should be a dead cert win.
If it is, just hope the 5/4g signal is good as will have to watch it on my phone.
Yeah playing in Mexico City at altitude in the last 16 is a worrying prospect, even more so if it is indeed Mexico, who have good recent form of late.
But we cannot look past Congo, even though on paper it should be a dead cert win.
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
Another great game just gone. Japan so unlucky not to get to extra time. Well done Brazil though, have to say I don't rate this Brazilian side. They are ok, but no chance of winning the World Cup imo.
I'm convinced it's because they have too many premier league players in the lineup.
They just don't play how Brazil of the past played. More like a prem team trying to keep possession.
A Brazil team with only one flair player just seems wrong!
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
For me the best Brazil team in my lifetime was that of the Brazil team in the 1982 World Cup held in Spain. Granted, they did not win it, but the players they had were awesome. Zico, Socrates, Junior, Falcao. They also played how Brazil should play.
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2017
- Location
- United kingdom
I was born in 1982, so I wasn’t really able to watch football live back then... 
but I watched every game of the 2002 FIFA World Cup. I think Brazil's team with Ronaldo, Ronaldinho, Roberto Carlos, etc. was great. Similarly, I think England and Germany's teams that played against Brazil in 2002 were the best.
Here Brazil beat England 2-1 when David Seaman let it slip in:
but I watched every game of the 2002 FIFA World Cup. I think Brazil's team with Ronaldo, Ronaldinho, Roberto Carlos, etc. was great. Similarly, I think England and Germany's teams that played against Brazil in 2002 were the best.Here Brazil beat England 2-1 when David Seaman let it slip in:
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2017
- Location
- United kingdom
Paraguay just smoked Germany out of FIFA 2026...
well, that's one less strong team for England to worry about facing.
well, that's one less strong team for England to worry about facing.
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2017
- Location
- United kingdom
What's notable is that Paraguay beat both Argentina and Brazil during the qualifiers.
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
HAHAHA. I nearly spat out my morning coffee seeing this
First time Germany have lost in a penalty shoot out at the World Cup. Welcome to how that feels being an England fan and all
Also Morocco have done the exact same to Holland just now as well.
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2017
- Location
- Belgium
Morocco beating the Netherlands isn't really that big a surprise but it was a boring game. The Dutch adapted too much to the Moroccans playing a 5 man defense... I don't think I've seen that since Italy somewhere in the 90s!
Unlucky they conceded in the 91st minute even tho it was a deserved goal for Morocco. The keeper of Holland was definitely the man of the match for me, very unlucky on one of the penalties too.
Unlucky they conceded in the 91st minute even tho it was a deserved goal for Morocco. The keeper of Holland was definitely the man of the match for me, very unlucky on one of the penalties too.
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
Too early ( late ) for me to catch the Holland vs Morocco game. But enjoyed the Brazil game and also the penalty shoot out that saw Germany go home.
Watching Germany, was akin to watching England. Lots of good individual players, but woah, they were poor last night.
Watching Germany, was akin to watching England. Lots of good individual players, but woah, they were poor last night.
cof180
Newbie member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2026
- Location
- Maidenhead
Lovely couple of results to wake up to!
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2016
- Location
- barcelona
Wow, amazing match between the Netherlands and Morocco. I’ve just watched the replay... no way I could watch it live, and I really enjoyed it as a spectator.
Very emotional moment when Gakpo scored (an Angel saw his father scoring fr the first time), and then that 91st-minute goal from Diop… incredible. Penalties as usual a Lottery and its a "must" to suffer some round with Penalties for a Winner Candidate.
Also, an “interesting” stat from this Round of 32: 2 out of 4 games have gone to penalties so far, and Brazil did a miracle just last minute.
Overall I'm enjoying this WC, and we are still Live (La Roja). fr today 3 more but TBH I'm only able to watch Ivorie C. vs Norway, LEt see if Haaland could defeat vs th Elephants
Very emotional moment when Gakpo scored (an Angel saw his father scoring fr the first time), and then that 91st-minute goal from Diop… incredible. Penalties as usual a Lottery and its a "must" to suffer some round with Penalties for a Winner Candidate.
Also, an “interesting” stat from this Round of 32: 2 out of 4 games have gone to penalties so far, and Brazil did a miracle just last minute.
Overall I'm enjoying this WC, and we are still Live (La Roja). fr today 3 more but TBH I'm only able to watch Ivorie C. vs Norway, LEt see if Haaland could defeat vs th Elephants
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2012
- Location
- UK
Can anybody explain why this bet at Betano is so lopsided? It seems like it should be evens, but I don't think bookies make stupid mistakes, so there must be a reason.
Bookies odds aren't only based on event probability but also volume of money placed on each possibility so the odds change based on that.
The coin toss to decide ko is 50/50 but the bookie odds will reflect the amount of money that has been or could be placed on either outcome.
In your example it probably means that there has been more money placed on England to win the kick off or they expect more people to bet on England than Congo for that market.
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2012
- Location
- UK
That is absolutely not true. Bookies do not chase stupid odds down. If the punters bet irrationally they prepare for either taking a bath or getting a good payout, they can cope with any event due to their scale. I would also find it implausible that on a bet that is 50/50 punter money would go far one way. I think there has to be a reason it's not 50-50 but eff me if I know what it is.
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2012
- Location
- UK
The coin toss is definitely 50-50. What happens then is the winning captain gets to choose the starting end or whether to kick off first and the other captain chooses the other. I can't see any reason for any asymmetry in what the captains would desire in either case.
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2017
- Location
- UK / Switzerland
Eddie Howe was about 15 minutes from falling upwards there...
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
I think I have lost my voice, if you find it please let me know!
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2012
- Location
- UK
Never in doubt.
It seems you're confusing how sports betting works and how casino games work for the bookies/casinos.
What happens in the actual event is irrelevant to the bookie, they are only interested in balancing their book as best as possible to make a profit. You would never get both outcomes at evens as that would mean no margin for the bookies.
Either way you should do a bit of research yourself how bookmakers work if you don't believe what I've written. A google search should confirm it and probably has more information that I didn't include.
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2012
- Location
- UK
Obviously they wouldn't pay evens, they'd pay 1.83 or something. You need to learn how economies of scale work and how bookmakers don't go chasing down every piddling little market to try to "balance their book" just because that market is lopsided.
The fact they were paying 1.3 and 3.0 instead of 1.83 and 1.83 indicates that for some reason Betano's traders thought England were far more likely to kick off, not that more people bet on England to kick off
This is too much of a digression now, so I won't respond again in this thread, feel free to get the last word in if you wish, or if you want to create a new thread I'll be happy to discuss it there.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2017
- Location
- United kingdom
Claude AI says the following about those kickoff bets. Not sure whether it's true, but it makes sense.
The kick-off decision isn't purely random even though the coin toss is. Since 2019, the IFAB rules changed: the toss winner chooses either which goal to attack or whether to kick off, and the other captain gets the remaining choice. So there are two steps, a 50/50 coin toss, then a team decision that's often habitual rather than random.
The kick-off decision isn't purely random even though the coin toss is. Since 2019, the IFAB rules changed: the toss winner chooses either which goal to attack or whether to kick off, and the other captain gets the remaining choice. So there are two steps, a 50/50 coin toss, then a team decision that's often habitual rather than random.
You asked a question asking for an explanation in a way that came across like you didn't have any idea at all, I answered, you said I'm wrong but in a very confusing way so I replied again.
You just replied again like you know how bookies work but still don't put any reason why you think that market was like that but snidely want to argue against my answer again then do the patronising 'have the last word but I won't reply' bs.
What a weird interaction!
When Congo scored I straight away thought about the post I made about them. Kane to the rescue!
The thing is there's so many moments where England looks world class, if they can put it together more consistently like France do I can't see why they don't make it to the semis at least.
Test after test all the way now - Mexico then Brazil/Norway and probably Argentina/Colombia.
The squad has got players that can match every team I reckon. Apart from Messi and Vinius Jr everyone else is either pretty equal or much better compared to players in those 5 squads imo.
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
Mexico at the Azteca Stadium, 7000 feet above sea level, with a cauldron of support for the joint hosts. They have not lost a game or indeed conceded as of yet.
It is an incredibly tough ask, especially when you look at the frailties of the England defence, which is average at best.
This is our first proper test against the 9th best team in the world according to the last FIFA rankings. A tall tall ask.
Will I be up at 1am Sunday night / Monday morning to watch it? Absolutely!
It is an incredibly tough ask, especially when you look at the frailties of the England defence, which is average at best.
This is our first proper test against the 9th best team in the world according to the last FIFA rankings. A tall tall ask.
Will I be up at 1am Sunday night / Monday morning to watch it? Absolutely!
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
Oh I do have one thing to add
Similar threads
