- Joined
- Jan 30, 2006
- Location
- Los Angeles
Doesn't work that way. When you hit the stop button the reel changes anyway.
I like the stop buttons. I mash the eff out of 'em. I think they can make a big difference.
Doesn't work that way. When you hit the stop button the reel changes anyway.
I like the stop buttons. I mash the eff out of 'em. I think they can make a big difference.
I use the stop button sometimes just to speed up the reels - that way my money goes even faster!
Is anyone playing at All Star Slots now who used to play when they were Wizard? They transferred my account when they switched software but gave me some funky username and password that I can't remember. I thought I had the email with the un/pass around but can't find it whenever I want to play there so I end up going somewhere where I know who I am.
I watched to see how many times the colosseum scrolled by on the last reel and it always scrolls by right when you get a ceasar and then not again, so you don't even have a chance of hitting the stop button to try to catch it.
So what I am thinking is there have been some colosseums removed from this last reel to decrease the chances of hitting a bonus round.
Hogwash....I say this because I get tired of so many saying "nothing has changed".....when we KNOW it has...the last reel HAS been adjusted...I have been playing that game since day one...Nifty29: In my experience, there has only every been one colosseum symbol on the last reel. Ive been playing it for years and never known it to be any different.
Remember, although you may have a 25% return session, someone else may have just had a 170% session on another game, so IMO it isnt reasonable to diss a casino based on one or two losing sessions. Ive had some nice wins lately at RTG, and also some nasty sessions. As far as I can tell, it depends on the variance of the slot as to whether you are likely to have a really low % session. Someone mentioned having 62 spins @$2 on a slot for a $24 return - this is not unusual and its quite likely that you will bust out quickly betting $2 from a $100 bankroll. My advice is always have a minimum of 100 bets to start with, but again its a personal thing....however 62 bad spins is very much within the norm and can (and does) happen at any other casino.
QUOTE]
I agree with what your saying however in my opinion I think some casinos like Casino Titan changed their payouts in recent months based on over 30 losing sessions. You can have a bad luck streak I know but that usually does not last over every single deposit for several months following one cashout. One night I decided to experiment to see if my odds would improve and deposited over 6 times at $100 a pop using 100% deposit match bonuses and there was no change. People are not stupid and will notice changes over time. At other times I have deposited and did not use any bonus but had no change at all in the game play. A few really bad sessions are normal in my opnion but every one over a period of months is not. Its to a point where I feel I have no hope of ever getting to the cashout stage with Casino Titan. However to be fair I will give them one more chance this weekend and see if I can get some decent play with my money. If I dont then I will not be playing at this particular casino again for a while.
I was the one who said this...and I say bologne...on this...Someone mentioned having 62 spins @$2 on a slot for a $24 return - this is not unusual and its quite likely that you will bust out quickly betting $2 from a $100 bankroll
I cannot believe you can sit there and say how good these casinos are (RTG"s) when anyone who isn't blind can see something is different about them...this is not unusual
Another BS line.....geez...it depends on the variance of the slot
Insofar as on RTG paying our better than another, it is well known that operators can alter the payouts to 3 different setting within the 90% range. However, it is impossible to decipher which casino is set to which % based on one of even a few sessions - losing sessions can happen even at high % RTP casinos and the few % difference between settings will only be seen over a large amount of spins.
Remember, although you may have a 25% return session, someone else may have just had a 170% session on another game, so IMO it isnt reasonable to diss a casino based on one or two losing sessions. Ive had some nice wins lately at RTG, and also some nasty sessions. As far as I can tell, it depends on the variance of the slot as to whether you are likely to have a really low % session. Someone mentioned having 62 spins @$2 on a slot for a $24 return - this is not unusual and its quite likely that you will bust out quickly betting $2 from a $100 bankroll. My advice is always have a minimum of 100 bets to start with, but again its a personal thing....however 62 bad spins is very much within the norm and can (and does) happen at any other casino.
.
I cannot believe you can sit there and say how good these casinos are (RTG"s)
There was a time a $100 lasted for quite a long time even at $2 a spin...and for you to sit there and keep saying all is good...and keep having players think they can still have a decent time at any RTG...I say shame on you for giving that impression when almost everyone here KNOWS something is off with them...
Are you by any chance promoting them in any way? Just curious..Another BS line.....geez...
I mean no offense...but it seems you are very alone in these thoughts about how all is the same with these casinos...
I still pop into an RTG every once in a while and play a few spins....but these visits have gotten to be shorter and shorter and are going to be nil soon...because RTG casinos really have gotten so tight that it is absolutely ridiculous to even consider playing them anymore...until something changes or until they go broke...and my money is they are going to go broke if they continue down this path they have chosen these last 2 years..by literally stealing players money...and that has gotten old to many savvy players..who have moved on and beyond RTG's...
Just FYI for everybody reading this thread:
TOC OPERATES AN RTG CASINO
Im not saying anything else, just making sure everyone is aware.
@bern - yep bankroll management is what turned things around for me many years ago.
Oh please I was supporting your actions but you want to slander my name here at CM. Isn't that wrong around here. Bla Bla TOC is an RTC Casino, guess what I'm not a casino operator but merely an affiliate just like several posters on this site and BTW I don't advertise my URL like many do! Don't try and stir up crap with me and if you'd do your homework you'd see my affiliate site is highly respected here at CM. Max - warning this poster is out of line, I will behave around here but won't accept insults about my website just as CM and yourself! Chill out people...
RTG is probably the top U.S. player software, as history shows when you're on top people complain..
OK well you were the one who listed a particular RTG casino in your profile for which you were the webmaster....and this is the first time you have disputed being an RTG operator...you may technically be an affiliate but, from what you have said, you run a 'white label' operation which is a little different.
As for the slander.....where do you get that from?? What did I say that was slanderous?? All I did was state a well-known fact. I didnt insult you or degrade you in any way, and how can I slander or insult your website when I didnt even name it???
The point I was trying to make to other readers is that when you post:
,
..it is with bias. You have many times before taken the opportunity to spruik how wonderful RTG is, which just happens to be the software that 'your' casino operates on.
You have stated here at CM before that you have your 'own' casino which runs on RTG, so you are hardly going to come out and say anything negative about RTG are you?
I think the reason you have gone off the deep end here is that you dont like people drawing attention to your close relationship with RTG, and, as a result, taking your 'RTG is da bomb' statements with a grain of salt.
OK well you were the one who listed a particular RTG casino in your profile for which you were the webmaster....and this is the first time you have disputed being an RTG operator...you may technically be an affiliate but, from what you have said, you run a 'white label' operation which is a little different.
As for the slander.....where do you get that from?? What did I say that was slanderous?? All I did was state a well-known fact. I didnt insult you or degrade you in any way, and how can I slander or insult your website when I didnt even name it???
The point I was trying to make to other readers is that when you post:
,
..it is with bias. You have many times before taken the opportunity to spruik how wonderful RTG is, which just happens to be the software that 'your' casino operates on.
You have stated here at CM before that you have your 'own' casino which runs on RTG, so you are hardly going to come out and say anything negative about RTG are you?
I think the reason you have gone off the deep end here is that you dont like people drawing attention to your close relationship with RTG, and, as a result, taking your 'RTG is da bomb' statements with a grain of salt.
Why don't you slam CM for being a RTG supporter with all the RTG links around here.
As for the slander.....where do you get that from?? What did I say that was slanderous?? All I did was state a well-known fact. I didnt insult you or degrade you in any way, and how can I slander or insult your website when I didnt even name it???.