- Joined
- Jun 6, 2013
- Location
- RJVille UK
I've just had the email too and filled in the relevent information.
I'm still laughing at the option that said pocket money. I'm 29 not 9
I ticked that for the lolz
I've just had the email too and filled in the relevent information.
I'm still laughing at the option that said pocket money. I'm 29 not 9
I just got the dreaded source of wealth request as well. And I completed the form. But it hasn't asked me for any documents just yet. It basically just asked me some questions. I can not deposit atm it has blocked them.
Not happy what so ever!
Can I ask others how long it has taken for them to approve once you filled the form in and or if they ask for documents? to them unblock your account and you can then deposit and play again?
Thanks
Filled the form in about 10 pm last night no documents submitted. Got an email back at 11.30pm saying Thank you for concluding the security check at Videoslots.com
Your Source of Funds document has now been verified.
So took just over an hour on a Friday night if thats any help to you.
Filling in the source of wealth is easy, I was verified within 5 minutes.
When it comes to to the proof of declaration which is the next part, now thats up to you.
Go back to the beginning of this thread and look at what your going to get next.
Good luck
My account has always had the bit to verify bank account.i just checked my VS account they request to verify my bank account?
While i never use my bank account depositing only have used Neteller .... weird if you ask me...
It would be very useful to know what levels of deposits/withdrawals you guys are making which triggered the spanish inquesition ( no one expects them lol).
Seriously, I am not making any deposits until this situation is sorted out and we know where we stand as there is no way I will submit any proof and
would rather pack up gambling then worrying whether the next deposit/withdrawal will trigger the request
But deposit levels are irrelevant.
Surely it is the way that is being played that should be looked at when it comes to money laundering (the act that applies, not responsible gambling stuff). Do you only turn your deposit over one time and then withdraw? Do you cover most of the roulette table with a bet and then withdraw? Stuff such as that.
Me, I deposit and lose most of the time. My loss at VS since December is over £4k. Great way to launder money - not!!!
Exactly, low risk bets, fast withdrawals etc 'could' be an indication of money laundering, and would expect a SOW request if your playing style was like that, If you are playing high risk bets (slots for example) then I would suggest you are unlikely to be money laundering. Obviously there will be other trigger behaviours too though, but a loss of £4k in just over a month would suggest you aren't very good at your job if you are cleaning money (assuming your deposits haven't been £50k+)
People should question the validity of the requests, and don't accept the 'we can't talk about this it's against the law' excuses.
What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty? This whole exercise by Videoslots is the opposite. You are no longer welcome to play with us until you can prove you are not a criminal. Yeah cheers for that!
This is the same approach that was chosen in the GDPR. When it comes to data protection, the DP controller is kinda presumed guilty unless they can prove adequate measures to protect data (of data subjects) are in place, i.e. they must be able to demonstrate compliance. In the AML legal framework the same seems to apply to customers, they need to be able to prove their wealth/funds are not from illegal sources. Of course the operators have to demonstrate AML compliance as well, but the burden in this one has been placed heavily on the customer.
In case of VS, if UK customers are getting hammered with SOW request by default rather than applied on a case to case basis, I'd guess the UKGC has informed licensees of these requirements. And some casinos are taking these on face value rather than analysing what they actually mean. AMLD4 requirements are not meant to be used as a tool to issue blanket SOW requests.
Happily checked my emails this morning to see that I have now received the SoW request
Average deposit of £25, 3-4 times per week (may change slightly if luck has been in as VS or elsewhere but not by much)
Now the form isn't a problem, Completed it with 100% honesty and if that's it then all good.
I just hope, as I've numerously (in general) suggested that this 4th directive is not misinterpreted by operators.
Sure, If I suddenly start chucking in multiple deposits of £250 daily then ask for proof but if my 'pattern' doesn't change drastically then I think that should be the end of it for me and all the low rollers out there.
I mean seriously, who would launder 'pennies' at a time, I'd be dead and buried and long forgotten by the time my dosh was 'clean'.
As I say no problem with the form.