A newbie...one of the criteria for winning the randoms...
Nice to know I am not so off base on this. I posted a long while back about newbies and randoms...within the first six months , newbies will win a multiple amount of randoms due to the casinos settings of "stars".
Wow I didn't know about that. Amazing.
Can you please share the data you have collected as I know others would be interested too.
Yep, cleaned out all the Inetbet jackpots. 5 in a week at the same casino by the same person. I have asked about the odds of that.....and never got an answer...some must have felt that , that thread needed to die IMO...
She started with $30 as I remember....
I believe Inetbet and RTG pressured Bryan into making that thread die. I'm sure he was paid a healthy commission.
I always felt that was very unkosher and stunk to high heaven....she must have had a BIG star next to her name...or the machine malfunctioned and forgot to remove her star when she hit the first one....I still feel the randoms and mini/major jackpots are not random at all...that they are given out in a systematic way, some criteria that needs to be met, otherwise, everyone would have hit one of those at least once in any given time...because that would be random...
First you say that it should be random, and next you say that everyone should hit one in a given timeframe.
Looks like the exact opposite of 'random' to me.
You are also overlooking that the only 'random' part of the Random Jackpots is the amount at which they go off -
the chances of you being the person who hits it is influenced by bet size.
I would bet if you could get the stats for RJ's for the past 6 months from some RTG casinos, with the amount and bet size indicated, it would show that the majority are won with large bets ($5+). Players who hit them with .20c bets are just very lucky, and possibly were the only ones playing that slot at that time. Could someone do it 5 times in a week? Well if they played pretty much non-stop and made large bets then yes - remember that lady started with $30 but from memory hit the other randoms on big bets.
Put 1000 people in a room, spin the bottle 5 times and tell me the odds of the bottle stopping on the same person all 5 times by itself with out any help. It would NEVER happen because the bottle would RANDOMLY stop on the same person maybe , if they are lucky that ONE time.
This example is not even close to reality.
Something a bit closer (but still not correct) would be if there were 5000 spots around the circle, and the bottle was idle....then, at any time, day or night, the bottle will spin and only those who are still in the circle can win (considering people will leave to eat, sleep, poop, work, etc etc)...but added to that, some people will occupy 500 spots in the circle (big bettors) and some will only get 10. Jeez I'm confuzzled now...anyway you get the picture.
Winning a RJ involves a LOT of luck. You need to be at the right place at the right time to begin with, then you have to be lucky enough to win the 'lucky ticket draw' to get the actual RJ when others may have 10 times the amount of tickets that you have in the 'barrel'. You have to be there at the
exact second it goes off. When you imagine how long (in seconds) an Rj takes to build up on average, you can see just how unlikely it is for a small bettor to win it.
I have won ONE RJ since they were introduced, and I play RTG a lot. I am fortunate enough to be ahead more than I am behind without any more of them, but I don't feel 'cheated' or that there is any 'special system' in place to allow the operator to choose who can win them.
I went from a mid four figure depositor a month to maybe a low 2 figure ($70-80) a month.
See, this is where you are kinda arguing against yourself.
You were a big depositor, but you say that the casino has a system to avoid paying RJs to big depositors like yourself in favor of newbies who might not even hang around and who play .20c spins? Any casino that had that system they would be out of business in a month.
Why would the casino be happy to forego your $xxxx a month, when they could 'throw' you the odd RJ to keep you happy? The answer is they
don't because they
can't.
If you really
seriously believe the stuff you post, then the fact that you keep depositing there just makes your arguments and theories less and less credible. The other result is that it makes you look stupid, but I don't believe that to be the case as you do make intelligent arguments on other occasions - just not this one.