The issue here is a less than bright casino operator and the affirmation that lukewarm IQ's dominate the offshore gambling business. Other than confirming the game's fairness, RTG's liability is nil.
Perhaps things are a little different there in Amsterdam than they are here in the United States and particularly Atlanta, Georgia. But, here in the good old U.S.A. we have something called contingent liability. In this case, contingent liability works in rather well, why one might even say like a bug in a rug or so to speak. After all, it was Realtime Gaming that instituted the ban that got all of this rolling in the first place.
Quote: We are in the processing of lifting the bans associated with our fraud investigation. R. McMain, Director of Engineering Realtime Gaming
Now that "WE" clearly is speaking of R.T.G.
Now how many weeks (at the rate of $9,000.00 per week) that the player was out did RealTime Gaming drag their feet on this purported investigation?
Moreover, how is that $9,000.00 a week that the player is out going to be made up to him? Who (pray tell) is going to be CONTINGENTLY LIABLE for those SPECIFIC DAMAGES caused by the intentional loss of that income due the player over some hair-brained idea that a robot was used and the proof that there was a robot used is supported by mouse mappings that never even existed in the first place. No, LemmeSeeHere, RTG is on the line Big Time here.